| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Thelander, Joakim
(författare)
-
Glenn Gould - essensen av en gåta
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Sociologiska utblickar och insikter. - Kristianstad : Kristianstad University Press. ; , s. 91-127
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Basic, Goran, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Mödrars röster om samordnare i ungdomsvården
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella?. - Stockholm : Statens Institutionsstyrelse. ; Forskningsrapport 2009:5, s. 119-153
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study is to analyze how mothers with children placed in Swedish juvenile homes interpret, define and perceive, on the one hand, the project “Motverka Våld och Gäng” meaning “Counteract Violence and Gangs”, and on the other hand the role of the Coordinators employed in this project. The mothers who were interviewed spoke about some Coordinators that they appreciated. They then paint different pictures of appreciated Coordinators. These includes Coordinators who possess the power to, for example, “check out the Social Service” and Coordinators without power who never-the-less are appreciated. The Coordinators who are described in a positive way are also seen as actors that are dedicated. They often call the mothers, they fight for their children and succeed in making absent fathers more committed. The mothers whose stories contain criticism towards the Coordinators often criticize the other involved actors. The criticism itself isn’t only focused on the Coordinator but rather on the context in which the Coordinator is a part. When the Coordinator is criticized explicitly, the description partly projects the picture of the Coordinator as absent from the care-giving chain.
|
|
| 5. |
- Basic, Goran, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Projektet utifrån institutionspersonalens perspektiv
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella?. - Stockholm : Statens Institutionsstyrelse. ; Forskningsrapport 2009:5, s. 155-191
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study is to map out and describe the way employees in Swedish juvenile homes interpret, define and perceive, on the one hand, the project “Motverka Våld och Gäng” meaning “Counteract Violence and Gangs”, and on the other hand the role of the Coordinators employed in this project. The role of the Coordinator is formally clear and unproblematic. The project management directives state what the Coordinators should (and should not) do. In the interviews for this survey the starting point is in fact the ambiguousness. The staff at the juvenile homes do not know or feel unsure about the role of the Coordinator and the purpose of the project. For example, they contested the projects name and meant that it did not include the type of problems that many of the projects youths suffered from. When describing the Coordinator and his role he or she is portrayed as discoursively unclear (when it’s percieved as vaguely stated) and organizationally unclear (when they wonder who does what in the care-giving chain). The staff formulate (“draw”) a clearer role for the Coordinators when talking about their own “ordinary” pressing problems, for example the inertia of the Social Service.
|
|
| 6. |
- Basic, Goran, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Röster från socialtjänsten
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella?. - Stockholm : Statens Institutionsstyrelse. ; Forskningsrapport 2009:5, s. 193-223
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study is to analyze how the Social Services personnel interpret, define and perceive, on the one hand, the project “Motverka Våld och Gäng” meaning “Counteract Violence and Gangs”, and on the other hand the role of the Coordinators employed in this project. Heads of units and Social Secretarys were interviewed, as well as observed and recorded at meetings. The personnel of the Social Service often state that the project came “from above”, from the state, and they construct the project as pointing out the Social Service as incompetent of handling juvenile care. Both appreciative as well as criticizing voices were heard about the Coordinators and their role. The criticism deals with the Coordinator portrayed as a controller and competitor when representing the young ones. Positive comments deal with the mediating role of the Coordinator, in contacts with the young one and the parents, as well as their administrative contributions.
|
|
| 7. |
- Basic, Goran, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Ungdomarnas beskrivningar : Uppskattning, kritik och förväntningar
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella?. - Stockholm : Statens Institutionsstyrelse. ; Forskningsrapport 2009:5, s. 49-118
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The purpose of this study is to analyse the way young people who were institutionalised in so called special youth-homes experienced, defined and iterpreted on the one hand the project “Motverka Våld och Gäng” (meaning: “Counteract Violence and Gangs”), and on the other hand the Coordinators employed in this project. There is a big variation in the perception of the coordinators. One common denominator is that the commission of Coordinator and the context in wich the Coordinator acts seems to be flexible enough for one individual to play the role in many different ways. It is only when the specific Coordinator selects an activ, prompt, independent, personal and relatively strong characterization of the role that he or she obtain a chance to have an impact. The personal aspect of the relationship between the young and the Coordinator is depicted as important and it seems as if it plays an important role in the care-giving chain.
|
|
| 8. |
- Basic, Goran, et al.
(författare)
-
Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella? : en processutvärdering av projektet ”Motverka våld och gäng”
- 2009
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- På uppdrag av Socialdepartementet har SiS under perioden 1 juli 2006 till 31 december 2008 genomfört ett projekt som tog namnet Motverka Våld och Gäng (MVG). I projektet ingick 15 utvalda kommuner, i första hand storstäderna Stockholm, Göteborg och Malmö och deras grannkommuner. I uppdraget ingick att subventionera kommunernas vårdavgifter och att anställa kvalificerade samordnare. Tusentalet ungdomar skrevs in på SiS institutioner från de deltagande kommunerna under projektet som totalt kom att kosta 223 miljoner kronor. Målet med projektet var att de ungdomar som deltog, skulle uppnå positiva och bestående förändringar av sin livssituation, bryta umgänget med kriminella kamrater och förbättra sin skolgång. I uppdraget ingick också att förbättra familjens och nätverkets möjligheter att fungera. Projektet skulle dessutom bidra till att skapa fungerande modeller för samverkan mellan SiS och socialtjänsten. Projektet genomgår två utvärderingar, dels denna processutvärdering, dels en effektutvärdering vars resultat väntas år 2010. Den här redovisade processutvärderingen av MVG-projektet har genomförts av Goran Basic, Joakim Thelander och Malin Åkerström vid Lunds universitet. Materialet består av intervjuer med ungdomar, föräldrar, samordnare, socialtjänstpersonal, institutionspersonal och projektledning. Därutöver har möten observerats och en enkät distribuerats till socialtjänsten.
|
|
| 9. |
- Basic, Goran, et al.
(författare)
-
Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella? : en processutvärdering av projektet ”Motverka våld och gäng”
- 2009
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- På uppdrag av Socialdepartementet har SiS under perioden 1 juli 2006 till 31 december 2008 genomfört ett projekt som tog namnet Motverka Våld och Gäng (MVG). I projektet ingick 15 utvalda kommuner, i första hand storstäderna Stockholm, Göteborg och Malmö och deras grannkommuner. I uppdraget ingick att subventionera kommunernas vårdavgifter och att anställa kvalificerade samordnare. Tusentalet ungdomar skrevs in på SiS institutioner från de deltagande kommunerna under projektet som totalt kom att kosta 223 miljoner kronor. Målet med projektet var att de ungdomar som deltog, skulle uppnå positiva och bestående förändringar av sin livssituation, bryta umgänget med kriminella kamrater och förbättra sin skolgång. I uppdraget ingick också att förbättra familjens och nätverkets möjligheter att fungera. Projektet skulle dessutom bidra till att skapa fungerande modeller för samverkan mellan SiS och socialtjänsten. Projektet genomgår två utvärderingar, dels denna processutvärdering, dels en effektutvärdering vars resultat väntas år 2010. Den här redovisade processutvärderingen av MVG-projektet har genomförts av Goran Basic, Joakim Thelander och Malin Åkerström vid Lunds universitet. Materialet består av intervjuer med ungdomar, föräldrar, samordnare, socialtjänstpersonal, institutionspersonal och projektledning. Därutöver har möten observerats och en enkät distribuerats till socialtjänsten.
|
|
| 10. |
- Basic, Goran, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Vårdkedja för ungdomar eller professionella? En processutvärdering av projektet ”Motverka våld och gäng” : [ A “Treatment Chain” for Young People or the Professionals? A Process Evaluation of the “Counteract Violence and Gangs” – Project in Sweden ]
- 2009
-
Rapport (refereegranskat)abstract
- This report concerns a large evaluation of a project concerning Swedish juvenile care. We analyse how professionals, youngsters and parents perceived and interpreted the three-year project which involved different authorities whose representatives should form a care-giving chain. The project also employed a number of coordinators. Beyond accounting for the results from just over one houndred interviews and an intense field work our ambition was also to place our findings in a greater social and cultural context. The origin of our analysis is based upon the empirical material, not from a before hand constructed perspective; the example of the coordinators’ focus on administrative issues was therefore discovered through interviews and observations and not something that we were looking for or even expecting to find. At the same time no analysis can arise solely from an empirical material. When we, for example, use terms like ‘dispute props’, when talking about the involved actors discussions on different documents, it origins from reading the work of the classic sociologist Georg Simmel and modern social psychologist Ervin Goffman, both using dramaturgy as a metaphor for social interaction. The lasting impression from this project is the administrative position of the involved officials. They were strongly committed to meetings and documents, they reviewed and assessed each other using a bureaucratic language rather than discussing the individual youth with commitment. In fact the youths rather fell into a discursive shaddow when reading the interviews and field observations. In projects like this one, where officials should cooperate, the danger is that the meeting with its attached bureaucracy becomes the goal instead of the means. A more pragmatic stance regarding the meeting would rather see them being means through which distinct decisions and results carried the youth forth in a direction which the group, the parents and the youth had agreed on (the latter categories should, according to directives, be integrated). The meetings we attended rather displayed a startling inertia, issues that could have been resolved between meetings were not. The shortcomings in the measures were not followed up with attribution of responsibility.
|
|
