| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Mantripragada, K K, et al.
(författare)
-
Identification of novel deletion breakpoints bordered by segmental duplications in the NF1 locus using high resolution array-CGH.
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Journal of medical genetics. - : BMJ. - 1468-6244 .- 0022-2593. ; 43:1, s. 28-38
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Segmental duplications flanking the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene locus on 17q11 mediate most gene deletions in NF1 patients. However, the large size of the gene and the complexity of the locus architecture pose difficulties in deletion analysis. We report the construction and application of the first NF1 locus specific microarray, covering 2.24 Mb of 17q11, using a non-redundant approach for array design. The average resolution of analysis for the array is approximately 12 kb per measurement point with an increased average resolution of 6.4 kb for the NF1 gene. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive array-CGH analysis of 161 NF1 derived samples and identified heterozygous deletions of various sizes in 39 cases. The typical deletion was identified in 26 cases, whereas 13 samples showed atypical deletion profiles. RESULTS: The size of the atypical deletions, contained within the segment covered by the array, ranged from 6 kb to 1.6 Mb and their breakpoints could be accurately determined. Moreover, 10 atypical deletions were observed to share a common breakpoint either on the proximal or distal end of the deletion. The deletions identified by array-CGH were independently confirmed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Bioinformatic analysis of the entire locus identified 33 segmental duplications. CONCLUSIONS: We show that at least one of these segmental duplications, which borders the proximal breakpoint located within the NF1 intron 1 in five atypical deletions, might represent a novel hot spot for deletions. Our array constitutes a novel and reliable tool offering significantly improved diagnostics for this common disorder.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Pacios, Isabel E, et al.
(författare)
-
Fragmentation of the lamellae and fractionation of polymer coils upon mixing poly(dimethylacrylamide) with the lamellar phase of aerosol OT in water
- 2005
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Physical Chemistry Part B. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 1520-5207 .- 1520-6106. ; 109:50, s. 23896-23904
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The lamellar mesophase formed by surfactant 1,4-bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT) in deuterated water is mixed with poly(dimethylacrylamide) (PDMAA) polymers of low molecular weight ((M) over bar (n) = (2-20) x 10(3)). The mixtures separate into microphases (lamellar plus isotropic polymer solution). Their microstructures are studied by microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and deuterium NMR (2 H NMR). According to SAXS, the lamellar phase fractionates the molecular weight distribution of the polymer, by dissolving only chains with coil sizes smaller than the thickness of the water layers between lamellae, and keeping larger chains segregated from the lamellar phase. The fraction of polymer that is segregated from the lamellar phase grows with (M) over bar (n) of the polymer. In H-2 NMR, there are two signals, a quadrupolar doublet (water molecules hydrating the anisotropic lamellar phase contribute to this doublet) and a singlet (water molecules in the isotropic polymer solution contribute to this singlet). These two signals are deconvoluted to analyze the phases. Mixing with the polymer produces the partial dispersion of the lamellar phase into small fragments (microcrystallites). The structure of these microcrystallites is such that they conserve the regular long period spacing of the macrophase, and are thus identified in SAXS, but they are smaller than the minimum size required to produce quadrupolar splitting (about 4 mu m), and therefore, in H-2 NMR, they contribute to the singlet. H-2 NMR can thus not distinguish between small microcrystallites and an isotropic polymer solution segregated from the lamellar phase; instead small microcrystallites are detected as an apparent increase of the isotropic solution. The degree of dispersion produced by the polymer in the lamellar phase is correlated 4 with the degree of segregation that the polymer suffers. Thus, much greater dispersion into microcrystallites is produced by the higher (M) over bar (n) polymers than by the lower (M) over bar (n) polymers (in the range covered by the present samples, although with a much higher molecular weight sample (3 x 10(6)) that is totally segregated no such microcrystallites were detected).
|
|
