1. |
|
|
2. |
- Mittendorfer, Margareta, et al.
(författare)
-
Restoring discarded porcine lungs by ex vivo removal of neutrophil extracellular traps
-
Ingår i: The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. - 1557-3117.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: By causing inflammation and tissue damage, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) constitute an underlying mechanism of aspiration-induced lung injury, a major factor of the low utilization of donor lungs in lung transplantation (LTx).METHOD: To determine whether NET removal during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) can restore lung function and morphology in aspiration-damaged lungs, gastric aspiration lung injury was induced in 12 pigs. After confirmation of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the lungs were explanted and assigned to NET removal connected to EVLP (treated) (n=6) or EVLP only (non-treated) (n=6). Hemodynamic measurements were taken, and blood and tissue samples were collected to assess lung function, morphology, levels of cell-free DNA, extracellular histones, and nucleosomes as markers of NETs as well as cytokine levels.RESULTS: After EVLP and NET removal in porcine lungs, PaO 2/FiO 2 ratios increased significantly compared to those undergoing EVLP alone (p=0.0411). Treated lungs had lower cell-free DNA (p=0.0260) and lower levels of extracellular histones in EVLP perfusate than non-treated lungs (p=0.0260). According to histopathology, treated lungs showed less immune cell infiltration and less oedema compared with non-treated lungs which was reflected in decreased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in EVLP perfusate and BALF. CONCLUSION: To conclude, removing NETs during EVLP improved lung function and morphology in aspiration-damaged donor lungs. The ability to remove NETs during EVLP could represent a new therapeutic approach for LTx and potentially expand the donor pool for transplantation.
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Pirmohamed, Munir, et al.
(författare)
-
A Randomized Trial of Genotype-Guided Dosing of Warfarin
- 2013
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 369:24, s. 2294-2303
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The level of anticoagulation in response to a fixed-dose regimen of warfarin is difficult to predict during the initiation of therapy. We prospectively compared the effect of genotype-guided dosing with that of standard dosing on anticoagulation control in patients starting warfarin therapy.Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Genotyping for CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and VKORC1 (-1639GA) was performed with the use of a point-of-care test. For patients assigned to the genotype-guided group, warfarin doses were prescribed according to pharmacogenetic-based algorithms for the first 5 days. Patients in the control (standard dosing) group received a 3-day loading-dose regimen. After the initiation period, the treatment of all patients was managed according to routine clinical practice. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of time in the therapeutic range of 2.0 to 3.0 for the international normalized ratio (INR) during the first 12 weeks after warfarin initiation.Results: A total of 455 patients were recruited, with 227 randomly assigned to the genotype-guided group and 228 assigned to the control group. The mean percentage of time in the therapeutic range was 67.4% in the genotype-guided group as compared with 60.3% in the control group (adjusted difference, 7.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 10.6; P<0.001). There were significantly fewer incidences of excessive anticoagulation (INR 4.0) in the genotype-guided group. The median time to reach a therapeutic INR was 21 days in the genotype-guided group as compared with 29 days in the control group (P<0.001).Conclusions: Pharmacogenetic-based dosing was associated with a higher percentage of time in the therapeutic INR range than was standard dosing during the initiation of warfarin therapy.
|
|