| 1. |
- Ehrenstein, V., et al.
(författare)
-
Osteonecrosis of the jaw among patients with cancer treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid: Results of a regulator-mandated cohort postauthorization safety study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Cancer. - : Wiley. - 0008-543X .- 1097-0142. ; 127:21, s. 4050-4058
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is an adverse effect of antiresorptive treatment. This study estimated incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ in cancer patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in routine clinical practice. METHODS This cohort study in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden in 2011-2018 included 3 treatment cohorts: a denosumab inception cohort (DEIC), a zoledronic acid inception cohort (ZAIC), and a denosumab-switch cohort (DESC). The authors estimated 1- to 5-year incidence proportions and incidence rates of ONJ overall, by cancer site (breast, prostate, or other solid tumor), and by country. ONJ diagnoses were confirmed by adjudication. RESULTS There were 1340 patients in the DEIC, 1352 in the ZAIC, and 408 in the DESC. The median ages of the 3 cohorts were 70, 69, and 70 years, respectively; the proportions of men were 72.6%, 53.8%, and 48.3%, respectively; and the median follow-up was 19.8, 12.9, and 13.3 months, respectively. The 5-year incidence proportions of ONJ were 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-7.3%) in the DEIC, 1.4% (95% CI, 0.8%-2.3%) in the ZAIC, and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-10.0%) in the DESC. The corresponding ONJ incidence rates per 100 person-years were 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3-3.7), 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and 4.3 (95% CI, 2.8-6.3). Incidence proportions and incidence rates were highest in patients with prostate cancer and in Denmark. CONCLUSIONS This study provides estimates of the risk of medically confirmed ONJ among patients initiating denosumab or zoledronic acid in routine clinical practice in 3 Scandinavian countries. The results varied by cancer site and by country. LAY SUMMARY Denosumab and zoledronic acid reduce the risk of bone fractures, pain, and surgery in patients with advanced cancers involving bone. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)-death of a jawbone-is a known side effect of treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid. The authors examined almost 2900 denosumab- or zoledronic acid-treated patients with cancer in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Over the course of 5 years, ONJ developed in 5.7% of the patients whose initial treatment was denosumab, in 1.4% of the patients whose initial treatment was zoledronic acid, and in 6.6% of the patients who switched from zoledronic acid to denosumab.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Heimdal, K, et al.
(författare)
-
A segregation analysis of testicular cancer based on Norwegian and Swedish families
- 1997
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - 0007-0920. ; 75:7, s. 7-1084
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Clustering of testicular cancer cases in families is well known, although the aetiology is not. We present the results of a segregation analysis performed with the algorithm Pointer on familial data on 978 Scandinavian patients with testicular cancer. The segregation analysis favoured the involvement of major gene effects over models incorporating solely polygenic effects in testicular cancer aetiology. Overall, a recessive model best fits the family observations with an estimated gene frequency of 3.8% and a lifetime risk for homozygous men of developing the disease of 43%. This implies that 7.6% of men in the general population will be carriers of the mutant allele and that 0.1% would be homozygote and are, therefore, at high risk of developing the cancer. The testicular cancer incidence has changed greatly during the last generation. Also, the lethality of the disease has changed because of the introduction of new therapy. As failure to take account of such time trends might lead to inappropriate evidence for a recessive model, the analyses were repeated under different assumptions. The analyses favoured a recessive model of inheritance under all assumptions tested. However, the assumptions underlying the analyses are complex and, as this is the first segregation analysis of testicular cancer, the results must be interpreted cautiously.
|
|
| 6. |
- Heimdal, K, et al.
(författare)
-
Familial testicular cancer in Norway and southern Sweden
- 1996
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - 0007-0920. ; 73:7, s. 9-964
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Information about occurrence of testicular cancer (TC) in relatives of TC patients has been collected using questionnaires from 797 out of 922 consecutive Norwegian and 178 out of 237 Swedish patients with TC seen at the Norwegian Radium Hospital and the University Hospital Lund in Sweden during 1981-91. Fifty-one Norwegian and five Swedish patients had a relative with confirmed TC. Thus, 51/922 (5.5%) of the Norwegian and 5/237 (2.1%) of the Swedish patients treated during the time interval investigated were considered to have familial TC. Thirty-two of the patients had an affected first-degree relative. Expected numbers of cancers in the relatives were computed from data in the Norwegian and Swedish Cancer Registries. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were taken as observed numbers of TC/expected numbers of TC in the relatives. The SIR for brothers was 10.2 (95% confidence interval 6.22-15.77). SIR for fathers was 4.3 (1.6-9.3) and for sons 5.7 (0.7-23.2). The point estimate for the risk to brothers in the Norwegian part of the sample to develop TC by the age of 60 was 4.1% (95% CI 1.7-6.6%). This study indicates that genetic factors may be of greater importance in TC than previously assumed. Patients with familial testicular cancer had bilateral tumours more often than sporadic cases (9.8% bilaterality in familial vs 2.8% in sporadic cases, P=0.02). For patients with seminoma age of onset was lower in familial than in sporadic cases (32.9 vs 37.6 years, P=0.06). In father-son pairs, there was a statistically significant earlier age of diagnosis in the generation of sons (28.8 years vs 44.9 years, P=0.04). The prevalence of undescended testis (UDT) did not seem to be higher in familial than in sporadic TC (8.2% in familial TC and 13.3% in sporadic cases). This may indicate that different factors are of importance for the development of familial TC and UDT.
|
|
| 7. |
- Heimdal, K, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of cancer in relatives of testicular cancer patients
- 1996
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - 0007-0920. ; 73:7, s. 3-970
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The incidence of cancer at sites other than the testis has been investigated in the families of 797 Norwegian and 178 Swedish patients diagnosed with testicular cancer during 1981-91. In the families of the Norwegian patients, the total number of cancers in the relatives was significantly lower than the expected number derived from national incidence rates [observed number of cancers 250, expected number of cancers 281.92, standardised incidence ratio (SIR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.00]. This finding can be accounted for almost entirely by the finding of fewer than expected prostate and gastrointestinal cancers in the parents of cases. The other common cancers were found at slightly lower than or near the expected levels in the relatives. In the Swedish cohort, which accounts for less than 20% of cases, the observed number of cancers was very close to the expected number. Fourteen fathers of cases had prostate cancer compared with 27.57 prostate cancers expected, giving a SIR of 0.51 (P=0.006). Mothers had more lung cancers (ten cases observed, SIR=2.11, P=0.04) and cancers of the endometrium than expected (13 cases observed, SIR=1.73, P=0.09). These findings may be interpreted as support for theories proposing hormonal dysfunction as causing testicular cancer. Fifty-four gastrointestinal cancers were observed in the parents compared with 68.48 expected (SIR=0.78, P=0.082). Furthermore, testicular cancer was not found to be associated with the known dominantly inherited cancer syndromes [Familial breast (-ovarian) cancer, hereditary no-polyposis colon cancer]. However, one patient belonged to a Li-Fraumeni family, raising the possibility that testicular cancer may be an infrequent component of this rare cancer syndrome. This study supports the hypothesis that families of testicular cancer patients are not prone to cancer.
|
|
| 8. |
- Åberg, F., et al.
(författare)
-
Cancer After Liver Transplantation in Children and Young Adults: A Population-Based Study From 4 Nordic Countries
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Liver Transplantation. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1527-6465 .- 1527-6473. ; 24:9, s. 1252-1259
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cancer after liver transplantation (LT) constitutes a threat also for young recipients, but cancer risk factors are usually absent in children and large studies on the cancer risk profile in young LT recipients are scarce. Data of patients younger than 30 years who underwent LT during the period 1982‐2013 in the Nordic countries were linked with respective national cancer registries to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). A total of 37 cancer cases were observed in 923 patients with 7846 person‐years of follow‐up. The SIR for all cancer types, compared with the matched general population, was 9.8 (12.4 for males and 7.8 for females). Cumulative incidence of cancer adjusted for the competing risk of death was 2% at 10 years, 6% at 20 years, and 22% at 25 years after LT. Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma was the most common cancer type (n = 14) followed by colorectal (n = 4) and hepatocellular cancer (n = 4). Age was a significant risk factor for cancer, and the absolute risk of most cancers (except for lymphoma) increased considerably in young adults older than 20 years. The cancer risk pattern is different in pediatric and young LT patients compared with adult recipients. The striking increase in cancer incidence in young adulthood after the second decade of life deserves further consideration in transition programs.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
