| 1. |
- Delcoigne, B., et al.
(författare)
-
SHORT- AND LONGER-TERM RISKS FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS STARTING TREATMENT WITH DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS : A COLLABORATIVE OBSERVATIONAL HEAD-TO-HEAD STUDY ACROSS FIVE NORDIC RHEUMATOLOGY REGISTERS
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 80, s. 63-64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is associated with increased cardiovascular co-morbidity including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), partly due to effects of systemic inflammation. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may reduce RA disease activity, but act through several pathways and may themselves have an impact on cardiovascular risks. Whether the risks of ACS associated with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs differ is still unknown.Objectives:To assess and compare incidences of ACS during treatment of RA with etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (INF), certolizumab pegol (CTZ), golimumab (GOL), rituximab (RIT), abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ), baricitinib (BAR) or tofacitinib (TOF).Methods:We defined and pooled treatment cohorts of patients starting any of the above treatments between 2008 and 2017 from clinical rheumatology registers in Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE). One patient could contribute several treatment episodes. Age, sex, co-medication (methotrexate, prednisolone), number of previous b/tsDMARDs, CRP, comorbidities (cardiovascular (including ACS (defined as ICD-10: I20.0, I21.0-4, I21.9) and cerebrovascular disease, thromboembolic events, diabetes, hospitalized infection, cancer, kidney failure, COPD) and associated drugs were extracted and used as adjustment in Cox regression analyses comparing the incidence of ACS between treatments. We used several follow-up lengths (1, 2, and up to 5 years) and two different risk windows (ACS on drug [ending follow-up on treatment discontinuation] and ACS ever since treatment start [disregarding any treatment discontinuation]). We also stratified by age and number of previous b/tsDMARDs.Results:We included 40850 treatment courses in 24083 patients (DK 7271, FI 3732, NO 1540, and SE 11540; around 75% women). ETA was the most common treatment (27%) whereas BAR and TOF comprised <1%, and the other DMARDs 6-14% each. The proportions with a history of ACS at treatment start ranged from 1.2% (NO) to 1.8% (DK).We found 780 incident ACS events during 141 326 person-years (pyrs) in the 5-year follow-up time and “ACS ever since treatment start” risk window, resulting in a crude incidence rate of 5.5 events per 1000 pyrs. No event was recorded for BAR nor TOF, which also had the shortest follow-up. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) increased slightly with longer follow-up times, but the two risk windows provided similar HRs. For the 5-year follow-up, RIT was associated with an increased risk of ACS compared to ETA (Table), while no association was observed for shorter follow-up times. Stratifying on age did not modify the associations. Separate analyses by number of previous b/tsDMARDs suggested that ABA (HR=1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3), INF (HR=2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.6) and RIT (HR=1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4) were associated with increased risks of ACS compared to ETA in the subgroup of patients with two or more previous bDMARDs (Figure), whereas no differences were found among patients starting either drug as 1st/2nd bDMARD.Table 1.Comparisons of risks for ACS during a 5-year follow-up since start of bDMARD treatment.DrugN eventspyrsCrude incidence rate/ 1000 pyrsHR (95% CI)1ETA175359174.9ref.ADA115240934.81.0 (0.8-1.3)CTZ54141583.80.9 (0.6-1.2)GOL4090064.41.1 (0.8-1.5)INF106178036.01.2 (0.9-1.5)ABA70107956.51.1 (0.8-1.4)RIT158166229.51.3 (1.0-1.6)TCZ62128664.80.9 (0.5-1.2)BAR036TOF030Pyrs: person-years; HR: hazards ratio1 adjustment: see text.Conclusion:In this cohort including ≥ 24,000 patients followed for up to 5 years, the ACS incidence rate was 5.5/1000 pyrs, with RIT showing an increased risk compared to ETA. In clinical practice, the choice of bDMARD does not seem to influence ACS risk in the short term. In the longer term, differences in ACS risk between bDMARDs may reflect channeling to these, or truly differential effects in subpopulations of patients.Acknowledgements:Partly funded by Nordforsk and ForeumDisclosure of Interests:Bénédicte Delcoigne: None declared, Lotta Ljung: None declared, Sella Aa. Provan Speakers bureau: Novartis, Consultant of: Novartis, Grant/research support from: Boehringer- Ingelheim, Bente Glintborg Grant/research support from: Pfizer, BMS, AbbVie, Kathrine Lederballe Gron Grant/research support from: BMS, Merete L. Hetland Consultant of: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics B.V, Lundbeck Fonden, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Biopies, Sandoz, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics B.V, Lundbeck Fonden, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Biopies, Sandoz, Novartis, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Nina Trokovic: None declared, Heikki Relas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Celgene, Pfizer, Carl Turesson Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medac, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: Roche, Brigitte Michelsen Consultant of: Novartis (paid to employer), Grant/research support from: Novartis (paid to employer), Johan Askling Consultant of: Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB. These entities have entered into agreements with Karolinska Institutet with JA as principal investigator, mainly in the context of safety monitoring of biologics via the ARTIS national safety monitoring system.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindström, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of treatment retention and response to secukinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Rheumatology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1462-0324 .- 1462-0332. ; 60:8, s. 3635-3645
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. To compare treatment retention and response to secukinumab vs adalimumab, including the other four TNF inhibitors (TNFi) as comparators, in PsA. Methods. All patients with PsA starting secukinumab or a TNFi in 2015-2018 were identified in the biologic registers of the Nordic countries. Data on comorbidities were linked from national registers. One-year treatment retention and hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment discontinuation were calculated. The proportion achieving a 6 month 28-joint Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) remission was determined together with odds ratios (ORs) for remission (logistic regression). Both HRs and ORs were calculated with adalimumab as the reference and adjusted for baseline characteristics and concurrent comorbidities. All analyses were stratified by the line of biologic treatment (first, second, third+). Results. We identified 6143 patients contributing 8307 treatment courses (secukinumab, 1227; adalimumab, 1367). Secukinumab was rarely used as the first biologic, otherwise baseline characteristics were similar. No clinically significant differences in treatment retention or response rates were observed for secukinumab vs adalimumab. The adjusted HRs for discontinuation per the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.98 (95% CI 0.68, 1.41), 0.94 (0.70, 1.26) and 1.07 (0.84, 1.36), respectively. The ORs for DAPSA28 remission in the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.62 (95% CI 0.30, 1.28), 0.85 (0.41, 1.78) and 0.74 (0.36, 1.51), respectively. In the subset of patients previously failing a TNFi due to ineffectiveness, the results were similar. Conclusion. No significant differences in treatment retention or response were observed between secukinumab and adalimumab, regardless of the line of treatment. This suggests that even in patients who have failed a TNFi, choosing either another TNFi or secukinumab may be equally effective.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Chatzidionysiou, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of a Second Biologic After Failure of a Non-tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor As First Biologic in Rheumatoid Arthritis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rheumatology. - : The Journal of Rheumatology. - 0315-162X .- 1499-2752. ; 48:10, s. 1512-1518
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), evidence regarding the effectiveness of a second biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) in patients whose first-ever bDMARD was a non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) bDMARD is limited. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the outcome of a second bDMARD (non-TNFi: rituximab [RTX], abatacept [ABA], or tocilizumab [TCZ], separately; and TNFi) after failure of a non-TNFi bDMARD as first bDMARD. Methods. We identified patients with RA from the 5 Nordic biologics registers who started treatment with a non-TNFi as first-ever bDMARD but switched to a second bDMARD. For the second bDMARD, we assessed drug survival (at 6 and 12 months) and primary response (at 6 months). Results. We included 620 patients starting a second bDMARD (ABA 86, RTX 40, TCZ 67, and TNFi 427) following failure of a first non-TNFi bDMARD. At 6 and 12 months after start of their second bDMARD, approximately 70% and 60%, respectively, remained on treatment, and at 6 months, less than one-third of patients were still on their second bDMARD and had reached low disease activity or remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints. For those patients whose second bMDARD was a TNFi, the corresponding proportion was slightly higher (40%). Conclusion. The drug survival and primary response of a second bDMARD in patients with RA switching due to failure of a non-TNFi bDMARD as first bDMARD is modest. Some patients may benefit from TNFi when used after failure of a non-TNFi as first bDMARD.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Delcoigne, B, et al.
(författare)
-
EXPOSURE TO SPECIFIC TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITORS AND RISK OF DEMYELINATING AND INFLAMMATORY NEUROPATHY IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS. A COLLABORATIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ACROSS FIVE NORDIC RHEUMATOLOGY REGISTERS
- 2022
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 41-41
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Though rare, studies have reported increased risk of neurological events including demyelinating disease of CNS (DML), multiple sclerosis (MS), and inflammatory neuropathy (INP) in patients with inflammatory joint disease treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).1,2 More in-depth investigations are required to elucidate the association between TNFi and neurological events in these patients, especially whether rates differ across type of TNFi mode of action.ObjectivesTo estimate the incidence of neurological events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA, including axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis) starting treatment with TNFi across five Nordic countries. To compare the incidence of neurological events in etanercept (ETN)-treated patients to patients treated with other TNFi (oTNFi).MethodsWe defined treatment cohorts of patients initiating TNFi between 2001 through 2018 from clinical rheumatology registers in Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Iceland (IS), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE). One patient could contribute to more than one treatment episode. Demographic data (sex, age), co-medication (methotrexate) and clinical variables (CRP, disease duration (<1 year, 1 to 5 years, >5 years) were extracted and used as covariates. We estimated crude incidence rates (IR) for neurological events and subtypes (ICD-10 codes: MS: G35, DML: G35, G36.0, G36.8-9, G37.1, G37.3, G37.5, G37.8-9, H46, H48.1, G04.8-9, INP: G61.0, G61.8-9), all countries pooled. We compared risk of neurological events between patients treated with ETN and oTNFi using Cox regression with time since treatment start, adjusted for the above covariates, robust standard errors, and stratified by country.ResultsWe included 52,682 treatment starts, in 33,885 RA patients (DK 8,259, FI 3,765, IS 723, NO 1353, SE 19,785; 75% women, mean age 56 years) and 46,549 treatment starts in 28,772 SpA patients (DK 7,000, FI 2,885, IS 962, NO 2,684, SE 15,241; 47% women, mean age 45 years).Numbers of DML, MS, INP and all neurological events, person-years (pyrs), and IRs in RA and SpA patients, for the two treatment groups are displayed in Figure 1. IRs for these neurological events showed some variation by diagnosis (RA vs. SpA), with rates of DML (and MS) in SpA patients around two (and three, respectively) times higher than the corresponding rates in RA (p<0.01), but similar rates for INP in RA and SpA patients. Comparing oTNFi to ETN, all Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) were statistically non-significant and close to one, whatever the outcome and the group of patients (Figure 1), with the adjusted HR (95%CI) for developing any neurological event in oTNFi compared to ETN being 1.08 (0.91-1.28) in RA patients and 0.96 (0.78-1.19) in SpA patients.Figure 1.Number of events, pyrs and IRs of DML, MS, INP and all neurological events (NE) in RA and SpA patients, treated with ETN or oTNFi. HRs (95%CI) comparing oTNFi to ETN.ConclusionThe incidences of DML and MS were lower in RA compared to SpA patients, while rates of INP were similar in both patients’ groups. There was no evidence of differences in these rates between ETN and oTNFi. The findings are of importance from a safety perspective for patients starting TNFi.References[1]Kopp T ARD 2020;79(5):566[2]Kunchok A JAMA Neurol 2020;77(8):937AcknowledgementsNordForsk and Foreum partially funded this research project.Disclosure of InterestsBénédicte Delcoigne: None declared, Tine Iskov Kopp Paid instructor for: T. I. Kopp has served on scientific advisory board from Novartis, Consultant of: T. I. Kopp has received support to congress participation from Biogen, Grant/research support from: T. I. Kopp has received support to congress participation from Biogen, Elizabeth Arkema: None declared, Karin Hellgren: None declared, Sella Aarrestad Provan: None declared, Heikki Relas Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Pfizer, Kalle Aaltonen: None declared, Nina Trokovic: None declared, Björn Gudbjornsson Speakers bureau: Novartis _ not related to this work, Consultant of: Novartis _ not related to this work, Gerdur Gröndal: None declared, Eirik kristianslund: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Galderma and Janssen, Grant/research support from: Grant from BMS outside the present work, Johan Askling Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Delcoigne, B, et al.
(författare)
-
Exposure to specific tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and risk of demyelinating and inflammatory neuropathy in cohorts of patients with inflammatory arthritis: a collaborative observational study across five Nordic rheumatology registers
- 2023
-
Ingår i: RMD open. - : BMJ. - 2056-5933. ; 9:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To compare incidences of neuroinflammatory events, including demyelinating disease (DML), inflammatory polyneuropathies (IPN) and multiple sclerosis (MS), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA; including psoriatic arthritis) starting a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), investigating whether monoclonal TNFi antibodies (other TNFis (oTNFis)) confer higher risk than etanercept.MethodsThis is an observational cohort study including patients from the five Nordic countries starting a TNFi in 2001–2020. Time to first neuroinflammatory event was identified through register linkages. We calculated crude incidence rates (cIR) per 1000 person-years and used multivariable-adjusted Cox regression to compare incidences of neuroinflammatory events overall and for DML, IPN and MS with oTNFi versus etanercept. We further examined individual TNFis and indications.Results33 883 patients with RA and 28 772 patients with SpA were included, initiating 52 704 and 46 572 treatment courses, respectively. In RA, we observed 135 neuroinflammatory events (65% DML) with cIR of 0.38 with oTNFi and 0.34 with etanercept. The HR of oTNFi versus etanercept was 1.07 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.54) for any neuroinflammatory event, 0.79 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.22) for DML, 2.20 (95% CI 1.05 to 4.63) for IPN and 0.73 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.56) for MS. In SpA, we observed 179 events (78% DML) with cIR of 0.68 with oTNFi and 0.65 with etanercept. The HR for any neuroinflammatory event, DML, IPN and MS was 1.06 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.50), 1.01 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.50), 1.28 (95% CI 0.61 to 2.69) and 0.94 (95% CI0.53 to 1.69), respectively.ConclusionThe cIRs of neuroinflammatory events are higher in SpA than in RA, but the choice of specific TNFi does not seem to play an important role in the risk of neuroinflammatory events.
|
|
| 10. |
- Gonda, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Predation- and competition-mediated brain plasticity in Rana temporaria tadpoles
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Journal of Evolutionary Biology. - : Wiley. - 1010-061X .- 1420-9101. ; 23:11, s. 2300-2308
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- An increasing number of studies have demonstrated phenotypic plasticity in brain size and architecture in response to environmental variation. However, our knowledge on how brain architecture is affected by commonplace ecological interactions is rudimentary. For example, while intraspecific competition and risk of predation are known to induce adaptive plastic modifications in morphology and behaviour in a wide variety of organisms, their effects on brain development have not been studied. We studied experimentally the influence of density and predation risk on brain development in common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles. Tadpoles grown at low density and under predation risk developed smaller brains than tadpoles at the other treatment combinations. Further, at high densities, tadpoles developed larger optic tecta and smaller medulla oblongata than those grown at low densities. These results demonstrate that ecological interactions - like intraspecific competition and predation risk - can have strong effects on brain development in lower vertebrates.
|
|
