| 1. |
- Dobsicek Trefna, Hana, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials: I. Clinical requirements
- 2017
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Hyperthermia. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0265-6736 .- 1464-5157. ; 33:4, s. 471-482
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality assurance guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials and treatment in the application of hyperthermia. This document provides definitions for a good hyperthermia treatment and identifies the clinical conditions where a certain hyperthermia system can or cannot adequately heat the tumour volume. It also provides brief description of the characteristics and performance of the current electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound and infra-red heating techniques. This information helps to select the appropriate heating technique for the specific tumour location and size, and appropriate settings of the water bolus and thermometry. Finally, requirements of staff training and documentation are provided. The guidelines in this document focus on the clinical application and are complemented with a second, more technical quality assurance document providing instructions and procedure to determine essential parameters that describe heating properties of the applicator for superficial hyperthermia. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.
|
|
| 2. |
- Dobsicek Trefna, Hana, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality assurance guidelines for interstitial hyperthermia
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Hyperthermia. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0265-6736 .- 1464-5157. ; 36:1, s. 277-294
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality assurance (QA) guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical hyperthermia treatments and trials. This document outlines the clinical and technical consequences of the specific properties of interstitial heat delivery and specifies recommendations for hyperthermia administration with interstitial techniques. Interstitial hyperthermia aims at tumor temperatures in the 40–44 °C range as an adjunct to radiation or chemotherapy. The clinical part of this document imparts specific clinical experience of interstitial heat delivery to various tumor sites as well as recommended interstitial hyperthermia workflow and procedures. The second part describes technical requirements for quality assurance of current interstitial heating equipment including electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive) and ultrasound heating techniques. Detailed instructions are provided on characterization and documentation of the performance of interstitial hyperthermia applicators to achieve reproducible hyperthermia treatments of uniform high quality. Output power and consequent temperature rise are the key parameters for characterization of applicator performance in these QA guidelines. These characteristics determine the specific maximum tumor size and depth that can be heated adequately. The guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.
|
|
| 3. |
- Dobsicek Trefna, Hana, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials: II. Technical requirements for heating devices
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1439-099X .- 0179-7158. ; 193:5, s. 351-366
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality assurance (QA) guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials with uniform quality hyperthermia treatments. This document outlines the requirements for appropriate QA of all current superficial heating equipment including electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound, and infrared heating techniques. Detailed instructions are provided how to characterize and document the performance of these hyperthermia applicators in order to apply reproducible hyperthermia treatments of uniform high quality. Earlier documents used specific absorption rate (SAR) to define and characterize applicator performance. In these QA guidelines, temperature rise is the leading parameter for characterization of applicator performance. The intention of this approach is that characterization can be achieved with affordable equipment and easy-to-implement procedures. These characteristics are essential to establish for each individual applicator the specific maximum size and depth of tumors that can be heated adequately. The guidelines in this document are supplemented with a second set of guidelines focusing on the clinical application. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) Technical Committee with participation of senior Society of Thermal Medicine (STM) members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.
|
|
| 4. |
- Carrapiço-Seabra, Carolina, et al.
(författare)
-
Application of the ESHO-QA guidelines for determining the performance of the LCA superficial hyperthermia heating system
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Hyperthermia. - 0265-6736 .- 1464-5157. ; 40:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: This study aimed to assess the quality of the lucite cone applicator (LCA), the standard applicator for superficial hyperthermia at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, using the most recent quality assurance guidelines, thus verifying their feasibility. Materials and methods: The assessment was conducted on each of the six LCAs available for clinical treatments. The temperature distribution was evaluated using an infrared camera across different layers of a fat-muscle mimicking phantom. The maximum temperature increase, thermal effective penetration depth (TEPD), and thermal effective field size (TEFS) were used as quality metrics. The experimental results were validated through comparison with simulated results, using a canonical phantom model and a realistic phantom model segmented from CT imaging. Results: A maximum temperature increase above 6 °C at 2 cm depth in the fat-muscle phantom for all the experiments was found. A mean negative difference between simulated and experimental data was of 1.3 °C when using the canonical phantom model. This value decreased to a mean negative difference of 0.4 °C when using the realistic model. Simulated and measured TEPD showed good agreement for both in silico scenarios, while discrepancies were present for TEFS. Conclusions: The LCAs passed all QA guidelines requirements for superficial hyperthermia delivery when used singularly or in an array configuration. A further characterization of parameters such as antenna efficiency and heat transfer coefficients would be beneficial for translating experimental results to simulated values. Implementing the QA guidelines was time-consuming and demanding, requiring careful preparation and correct setup of antenna elements.
|
|
