| 1. |
- Kontio, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Early neurophysiology and MRI in predicting neurological outcome at 9-10 years after birth asphyxia
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Clinical Neurophysiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1388-2457 .- 1872-8952. ; 124:6, s. 1089-1094
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To assess whether early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) predict long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in normothermic, full-term infants with mild to moderate neonatal encephalopathy (NE), and to compare their predictive value to already available amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Fifty-six infants with post-asphyxia NE were prospectively recruited, and their SEP, aEEG and MRI data were acquired during the first five days. Follow-up continued to 9-10 years for assessment of neuromotor and neurocognitive development. We analysed SEP latency (N1 component), normality of aEEG background pattern, as well as patterns of injury on the neonatal MRI. Neurological outcome measures at 9-10 years included conventional MRI, Movement-ABC and the WISC-III NL. Results: A SEP latency <50 ms during the first five days was associated with a normal neuromotor outcome (p < 0.03), and a prolonged day 3 latency was associated with lower childhood IQ (p = 0.02). The presence of multiple seizures in aEEG, as well as a moderate or severe injury on the neonatal MRI was associated with a poor neuromotor score (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). Combination of multiple techniques improved prediction of long-term outcome compared to single modality. Conclusion: Early SEPs provide information that is comparable to the already available aEEG and MRI paradigms in the prediction of long-term outcome of full-term infants with mild to moderate neonatal encephalopathy. Significance: The present results call for further studies using early SEP to aid early assessment of infants treated with hypothermia.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Vanhatalo, Sampsa, et al.
(författare)
-
Why monitor the neonatal brain-that is the important question
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Pediatric Research. - : Springer Nature. - 0031-3998 .- 1530-0447. ; 93:1, s. 19-21
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- A key goal of neonatal neurocritical care is improved outcomes, and brain monitoring plays an essential role. The recent NEST trial(1) reported no outcome benefits using aEEG monitoring compared to clinical seizure identification among neonates treated for seizures. However, the study failed to prove the effects of monitoring on seizure treatment in the first place.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- El-Dib, Mohamed, et al.
(författare)
-
Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part I : neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Pediatric Research. - : Springer Nature. - 0031-3998 .- 1530-0447. ; 94:1, s. 64-73
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The blooming of neonatal neurocritical care over the last decade reflects substantial advances in neuromonitoring and neuroprotection. The most commonly used brain monitoring tools in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG), full multichannel continuous EEG (cEEG), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). While some published guidelines address individual tools, there is no consensus on consistent, efficient, and beneficial use of these modalities in common NICU scenarios. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for best utilization of neuromonitoring modalities in neonates with encephalopathy or with possible seizures. Neuromonitoring approaches in extremely premature and critically ill neonates are discussed separately in the companion paper. Impact:center dot Neuromonitoring techniques hold promise for improving neonatal care. center dot For neonatal encephalopathy, aEEG can assist in screening for eligibility for therapeutic hypothermia, though should not be used to exclude otherwise eligible neonates. Continuous cEEG, aEEG and NIRS through rewarming can assist in prognostication. center dot For neonates with possible seizures, cEEG is the gold standard for detection and diagnosis. If not available, aEEG as a screening tool is superior to clinical assessment alone. The use of seizure detection algorithms can help with timely seizures detection at the bedside.
|
|
| 7. |
- El-Dib, Mohamed, et al.
(författare)
-
Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part II : extremely premature infants and critically ill neonates
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Pediatric Research. - : Springer Nature. - 0031-3998 .- 1530-0447. ; 94:1, s. 55-63
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neonatal intensive care has expanded from cardiorespiratory care to a holistic approach emphasizing brain health. To best understand and monitor brain function and physiology in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the most commonly used tools are amplitude-integrated EEG, full multichannel continuous EEG, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Each of these modalities has unique characteristics and functions. While some of these tools have been the subject of expert consensus statements or guidelines, there is no overarching agreement on the optimal approach to neuromonitoring in the NICU. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for the best utilization of these neuromonitoring tools to promote neuroprotective care in extremely premature infants and in critically ill neonates. Neuromonitoring approaches in neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures are discussed separately in the companion paper. Impact For extremely premature infants, NIRS monitoring has a potential role in individualized brain-oriented care, and selective use of aEEG and cEEG can assist in seizure detection and prognostication. For critically ill neonates, NIRS can monitor cerebral perfusion, oxygen delivery, and extraction associated with disease processes as well as respiratory and hypodynamic management. Selective use of aEEG and cEEG is important in those with a high risk of seizures and brain injury. Continuous multimodal monitoring as well as monitoring of sleep, sleep-wake cycling, and autonomic nervous system have a promising role in neonatal neurocritical care.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Pressler, Ronit M., et al.
(författare)
-
Bumetanide for the treatment of seizures in newborn babies with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (NEMO) : an open-label, dose finding, and feasibility phase 1/2 trial
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Lancet Neurology. - 1474-4422 .- 1474-4465. ; 14:5, s. 469-477
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Predinical data suggest that the loop-diuretic bumetanide might be an effective treatment for neonatal seizures. We aimed to assess dose and feasibility of intravenous bumetanide as an add-on to phenobarbital for treatment of neonatal seizures. Methods In this open-label, dose finding, and feasibility phase 1/2 trial, we recruited full-term infants younger than 48 h who had hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and electrographic seizures not responding to a loading-dose of phenobarbital from eight neonatal intensive care units across Europe. Newborn babies were allocated to receive an additional dose of phenobarbital and one of four bumetanide dose levels by use of a bivariate Bayesian sequential dose-escalation design to assess safety and efficacy. We assessed adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and seizure burden during 48 h continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. The primary efficacy endpoint was a reduction in electrographic seizure burden of more than 80% without the need for rescue antiepileptic drugs in more than 50% of infants. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01434225. Findings Between Sept 1, 2011, and Sept 28, 2013, we screened 30 infants who had electrographic seizures due to hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. 14 of these infants (10 boys) were included in the study (dose allocation: 0.05 mg/kg, n=4; 0.1 mg/kg, n=3; 0. 2 mg/kg, n=6; 0.3 mg/kg, n=1). All babies received at least one dose of bumetanide with the second dose of phenobarbital; three were withdrawn for reasons unrelated to bumetanide, and one because of dehydration. All but one infant also received aminoglycosides. Five infants met EEG criteria for seizure reduction (one on 0.05 mg/kg, one on 0.1 mg/kg and three on 0.2 mg/kg), and only two did not need rescue antiepileptic drugs (ie, met rescue criteria; one on 0.05 mg/kg and one on 0.3 mg/kg). We recorded no short-term dose-limiting toxic effects, but three of 11 surviving infants had hearing impairment confirmed on auditory testing between 17 and 108 days of age. The most common non-serious adverse reactions were moderate dehydration in one, mild hypotension in seven, and mild to moderate electrolyte disturbances in 12 infants. The trial was stopped early because of serious adverse reactions and limited evidence for seizure reduction. Interpretation Our findings suggest that bumetanide as an add-on to phenobarbital does not improve seizure control in newborn infants who have hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and might increase the risk of hearing loss, highlighting the risks associated with the off-label use of drugs in newborn infants before safety assessment in controlled trials.
|
|
