| 1. |
- Jaarsma, T, et al.
(författare)
-
[Value of basic and intensive management of patients with heart failure; results of a randomised controlled clinical trial]
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. - 0028-2162 .- 1876-8784. ; 152:37, s. 2016-21
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of 2 nurse-directed programmes of different intensity for the counselling and follow-up of patients hospitalised for heart failure, compared with standard care by a cardiologist. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised clinical trial (www.trialregister.nl: NCT 98675639). METHOD: A total of 1023 patients were randomized after hospitalisation for heart failure to 1 of 3 treatment strategies: standard care provided by a cardiologist, follow-up care from a cardiologist with basic counselling and support by a nurse specialising in heart failure, or follow-up care from a cardiologist with intensive counselling and support by a nurse specialising in heart failure. Primary end points were the time to rehospitalisation due to heart failure or death and the number of days lost to rehospitalisation or death during the 18-month study period. Data were analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 71 years, 38% were women, 50% had mild heart failure and 50% had severe heart failure. During the study, 411 patients (40%) were rehospitalised due to heart failure or died from any cause: 42% in the control group, and 41% and 38% in the basic and intensive support groups, respectively (differences not significant). The time to rehospitalisation or death was similar in the 3 groups: hazard ratios for the basic and intensive support groups versus the control group were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.76-1.21; p = 0.73) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.73-1.17; p = 0.53), respectively. The number of days lost to rehospitalisation or death was 39,960 in the control group; this number was 15% less in the intervention groups, but the difference was not significant. However, there was a trend toward lower mortality in the intervention groups. In all 3 groups, more visits occurred than planned, which may have had a considerable effect on care, notably in the control group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated that the provision of additional counselling and support by a nurse specialising in heart failure as an adjuvant to intensive follow-up care provided by a cardiologist does not always lead to a reduction in rehospitalisation frequency.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sturm, H. B., et al.
(författare)
-
The relevance of comorbidities for heart failure treatment in primary care: A European survey
- 2006
-
Ingår i: European journal of heart failure. - 1388-9842. ; 8:1, s. 31-7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: To assess the impact of comorbidities on chronic heart failure (CHF) therapy. METHODS: The IMPROVEMENT-HF survey included 11,062 patients from 100 primary care practices in 14 European countries. The influence of patient characteristics on drug regimes was assessed with multinomial logistical regression. RESULTS: Combined drug regimes were given to 48% of CHF patients, consisting of 2.2 drugs on average. Patient characteristics accounted for 35%, 42% and 10% of the variance in one-, two- and three-drug regimes, respectively. Myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes, hypertension, and lung disease influenced prescribing most. AF made all combinations containing beta-blockers more likely. Thus for single drug regimes, MI increased the likelihood for non-recommended beta-blocker monotherapy (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4), while for combination therapy recommended regimes were most likely. For both hypertension and diabetes, ACE-inhibitors were the most likely single drug, while the most likely second drugs were beta-blockers in hypertension and digoxin in diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics have a clear impact on prescribing in European primary care. Up to 56% of drug regimes were rational taking patient characteristics into account. Situations of insufficient prescribing, such as patients post MI, need to be addressed specifically.
|
|
