| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Prins, H. A. B., et al.
(författare)
-
Exposure and virologic outcomes of dolutegravir combined with ritonavir boosted darunavir in treatment-naive individuals enrolled in the Netherlands Cohort Study on Acute HIV infection (NOVA)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. - : Elsevier. - 0924-8579 .- 1872-7913. ; 61:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To the authors' knowledge, there is currently no literature or guidance recommendation regard-ing whether the dose of dolutegravir (DTG) should be increased when co-administered with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in patients with acute human immunodeficiency virus infection (AHI). This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of twice-daily (BID) DTG and once-daily (QD) DRV/r, and com-pared this with DTG QD without DRV/r in patients with AHI. Forty-six participants initiated antiretro-viral therapy within < 24 h of enrolment: DTG 50 mg BID, DRV/r 80 0/10 0 mg QD, and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 4 weeks (Phase I); and DTG 50 mg QD with two NRTIs there-after (Phase II: reference). Total DTG trough concentration (Ctrough) and area under the concentration-time profile of 0-24 h (AUC0-24h) were predicted using a population PK model. DTG glucuronidation metabolic ratio (MR) and DTG free fraction were determined and compared per treatment phase using geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI). Participants had a predicted geometric mean steady-state DTG Ctrough of 2.83 [coefficient of variation (CV%) 30.3%] mg/L (Phase I) and 1.28 (CV% 52.4%) mg/L (Phase II), with GMR of 2.20 (90% CI 1.90-2.55). Total exposure during DTG BID increased but did not double [AUC0-24h GMR 1.65 (90% CI 1.50-1.81) h.mg/L]. DTG glucuronidation MR increased by approxi-mately 29% during Phase I. DTG Ctrough was above in-vivo EC90 (0.32 mg/L) during both phases, except in one participant during Phase I. At Week 8, 84% of participants had viral loads <= 40 copies/mL. The drug-drug interaction between DTG (BID) and DRV/r (QD) was due to induced glucuronidation, and is not clinically relevant in patients with AHI.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Helou, R. I., et al.
(författare)
-
Use of stewardship smartphone applications by physicians and prescribing of antimicrobials in hospitals : A systematic review
- 2020
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 15:9
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs promote appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce antimicrobial resistance. Technological developments have resulted in smartphone applications (apps) facilitating AMS. Yet, their impact is unclear.ObjectivesSystematically review AMS apps and their impact on prescribing by physicians treating in-hospital patients.Data sourcesEMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar.Study eligibility criteriaStudies focusing on smartphone or tablet apps and antimicrobial therapy published from January 2008 until February 28th 2019 were included.ParticipantsPhysicians treating in-hospital patients.InterventionsAMS appsMethodsSystematic review.ResultsThirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. None was a randomized controlled trial. Methodological study quality was considered low to moderate in all but three qualitative studies. The primary outcomes were process indicators, adherence to guidelines and user experience. Guidelines were more frequently accessed by app (53.0% - 89.6%) than by desktop in three studies. Adherence to guidelines increased (6.5% - 74.0%) significantly for several indications after app implementation in four studies. Most users considered app use easy (77.4%—>90.0%) and useful (71.0%—>90%) in three studies and preferred it over guideline access by web viewer or booklet in two studies. However, some physicians regarded app use adjacent to colleagues or patients unprofessional in three qualitative studies. Susceptibility to several antimicrobials changed significantly post-intervention (from 5% decrease to 10% - 14% increase) in one study.ConclusionsUse of AMS apps seems to promote access to and knowledge of antimicrobial prescribing policy, and increase adherence to guidelines in hospitals. However, this has been assessed in a limited number of studies and for specific indications. Good quality studies are necessary to properly assess the impact of AMS apps on antimicrobial prescribing. To improve adherence to antimicrobial guidelines, use of AMS apps could be considered.
|
|
