| 1. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
High-resolution computed tomography with 16-row MDCT: A comparison regarding visibility and motion artifacts of dose-modulated thin slices and "step and shoot" images
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 49:7, s. 755-760
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Dose modulation can be used to reduce the radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) examinations while still obtaining the necessary diagnostic image quality. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) provides the possibility of simultaneous reconstruction of thin and thick slices from the same raw data. Purpose: To compare thin slices reconstructed from a dose-modulated helical acquisition and conventional high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images taken with the “step and shoot” technique in terms of visibility and motion artifacts, in order to investigate the possibility of excluding “step and shoot” acquisition from the HRCT examination. Material and Methods: Twenty patients were examined by a dose-modulated helical acquisition, “MDCT smart mA,” and by a noncontiguous cross-sectional high-resolution 16-row MDCT examination, “MDCT step and shoot.” Images from four anatomical levels, made anonymous regarding identity and technical data, were analyzed in random order by four thoracic radiologists. Results: “MDCT smart mA” was worse than “MDCT step and shoot” in terms of visibility. Concerning motion artifacts, “MDCT smart mA” was better than “MDCT step and shoot.” Conclusion: Thin images reconstructed from a dose-modulated 16-row helical MDCT acquisition (“MDCT smart mA”), as performed in our study, do not provide sufficient image quality regarding visibility compared to the “MDCT step and shoot” technique for the latter technique to be excluded from the HRCT examination.
|
|
| 2. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
High-Resolution Computed Tomography with Single-Slice Computed Tomography and 16-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparison Regarding Visibility and Motion Artifacts
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 48:9, s. 956-961
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: High-resolution computed tomography is the image procedure of choice in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease. Multidetector-row computed tomography provides the possibility of simultaneous reconstruction of thin and thick slices from the same raw data, acquired from one single series. Thus, it may be tempting to exclude the step-and-shoot series. Purpose: To compare high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT step-and-shoot) from single-slice CT (SSCT) and 16-channel multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of visibility and motion artifacts, and to investigate whether thin images reconstructed from helical MDCT are equal to or better than conventional HRCT by SSCT in terms of visibility and motion artifacts. Material and Methods: 20 patients underwent HRCT step-and-shoot by SSCT (SSCT step-and-shoot) and MDCT (MDCT step-and-shoot), and a helical MDCT acquisition (MDCT helical). Images from four anatomical levels were analyzed in random order regarding visibility and motion artifacts. Results: Visibility using MDCT step-and-shoot was significantly better than or equal to SSCT step-and-shoot for segmental bronchi and fissures, but not for subsegmental bronchi. For MDCT helical, visibility was equal to or better than SSCT step-and-shoot for segmental bronchi, but not for fissures and subsegmental bronchi. Concerning motion artifacts, MDCT step-and-shoot and MDCT helical were significantly better than or equal to SSCT step-and-shoot. Conclusion: The image quality (accounting for motion artifacts and visibility) of SSCT step-and-shoot and MDCT step-and-shoot is comparable. The visibility of anatomic structures in images from MDCT helical is inferior to HRCT step-and-shoot.
|
|
| 3. |
- Vikgren, Jenny, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Ny CT – ny HRCT?
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Röntgenveckan 2005, 19-23 september 2005, Malmö.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Ásgeirsdóttir, Helga, et al.
(författare)
-
Depiction of anatomic structures of relevance for scoring of cystic fibrosis changes by chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 37th European Cystic Fibrosis Conference, 11-14 June 2014, Gothenburg, Sweden. ; 13:Suppl. 2
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: Chest radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used for imaging of patients with cystic fibrosis, and scoring is applied to assess disease severity. Chest tomosynthesis (CTS) is a new imaging modality providing better anatomic visualization than CR at radiation doses and costs lower than CT. Objective: To compare visibility and size of anatomic structures of relevance for scoring in CTS and CT images. Methods: 21 adult patients with cystic fibrosis were examined both with CTS (VolumeRAD; GE Healthcare) and volumetric CT (LightSpeed Pro 16, LightSpeed VCT, Discovery CT750HD; GE healthcare and Somatom Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions). The average effective dose for a standard patient was 0.13 and 4.5 mSv for CTS and CT, respectively. Comparison of visibility and manual measurements of diameters of the central and peripheral bronchi and their accompanying artery, as well as bronchial wall thickness (BWT), were performed in a non-blinded fashion. Results: All central structures could be evaluated. Mean difference in diameter of central bronchi, accompanying artery and BWT between CTS and CT was −0.6 (SD 0.6), −0.7 (SD 0.7) and −0.4 (SD 0.2) mm, respectively. Peripheral structures were more difficult to assess by CTS. Peripheral bronchial diameter, BWT and diameter of accompanying artery could be assessed by CTS in 20, 15 and 4 cases, respectively and mean difference between measurements was −0.5 (SD 0.5), −0.3 (SD 0.3) and −0.4 (SD 0.4) mm, respectively. Conclusion: This study indicates that peripheral structures are more difficult to evaluate by CTS and that CTS slightly underestimate size of structures in comparison to CT
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Asplund, Sara, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Extended analysis of the effect of learning with feedback on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. - : SPIE. - 1605-7422. ; 7966
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In chest tomosynthesis, low-dose projections collected over a limited angular range are used for reconstruction of section images of the chest, resulting in a reduction of disturbing anatomy at a moderate increase in radiation dose compared to chest radiography. In a previous study, we investigated the effects of learning with feedback on the detection of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis. Six observers with varying degrees of experience of chest tomosynthesis analyzed tomosynthesis cases for presence of pulmonary nodules. The cases were analyzed before and after learning with feedback. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as reference. The differences in performance between the two readings were calculated using the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC-2) as primary measure of detectability. Significant differences between the readings were found only for observers inexperienced in chest tomosynthesis. The purpose of the present study was to extend the statistical analysis of the results of the previous study, including JAFROC-1 analysis and FROC curves in the analysis. The results are consistent with the results of the previous study and, furthermore, JAFROC-1 gave lower p-values than JAFROC-2 for the observers who improved their performance after learning with feedback. © 2011 SPIE.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Asplund, Sara, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Learning aspects and potential pitfalls regarding detection of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis and proposed related quality criteria.
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Acta radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 1600-0455 .- 0284-1851. ; 52:5, s. 503-512
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background In chest tomosynthesis, low-dose projections collected over a limited angular range are used for reconstruction of an arbitrary number of section images of the chest, resulting in a moderately increased radiation dose compared to chest radiography. Purpose To investigate the effects of learning with feedback on the detection of pulmonary nodules for observers with varying experience of chest tomosynthesis, to identify pitfalls regarding detection of pulmonary nodules, and present suggestions for how to avoid them, and to adapt the European quality criteria for chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) to chest tomosynthesis. Material and Methods Six observers analyzed tomosynthesis cases for presence of nodules in a jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristics (JAFROC) study. CT was used as reference. The same tomosynthesis cases were analyzed before and after learning with feedback, which included a collective learning session. The difference in performance between the two readings was calculated using the JAFROC figure of merit as principal measure of detectability. Results Significant improvement in performance after learning with feedback was found only for observers inexperienced in tomosynthesis. At the collective learning session, localization of pleural and subpleural nodules or structures was identified as the main difficulty in analyzing tomosynthesis images. Conclusion The results indicate that inexperienced observers can reach a high level of performance regarding nodule detection in tomosynthesis after learning with feedback and that the main problem with chest tomosynthesis is related to the limited depth resolution.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
