| 1. |
- Balkenhol, Maschenka C. A., et al.
(författare)
-
Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Laboratory Investigation. - : NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP. - 0023-6837 .- 1530-0307. ; 99:11, s. 1596-1606
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- As part of routine histological grading, for every invasive breast cancer the mitotic count is assessed by counting mitoses in the (visually selected) region with the highest proliferative activity. Because this procedure is prone to subjectivity, the present study compares visual mitotic counting with deep learning based automated mitotic counting and fully automated hotspot selection. Two cohorts were used in this study. Cohort A comprised 90 prospectively included tumors which were selected based on the mitotic frequency scores given during routine glass slide diagnostics. This pathologist additionally assessed the mitotic count in these tumors in whole slide images (WSI) within a preselected hotspot. A second observer performed the same procedures on this cohort. The preselected hotspot was generated by a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained to detect all mitotic figures in digitized hematoxylin and eosin (Hamp;E) sections. The second cohort comprised a multicenter, retrospective TNBC cohort (n = 298), of which the mitotic count was assessed by three independent observers on glass slides. The same CNN was applied on this cohort and the absolute number of mitotic figures in the hotspot was compared to the averaged mitotic count of the observers. Baseline interobserver agreement for glass slide assessment in cohort A was good (kappa 0.689; 95% CI 0.580-0.799). Using the CNN generated hotspot in WSI, the agreement score increased to 0.814 (95% CI 0.719-0.909). Automated counting by the CNN in comparison with observers counting in the predefined hotspot region yielded an average kappa of 0.724. We conclude that manual mitotic counting is not affected by assessment modality (glass slides, WSI) and that counting mitotic figures in WSI is feasible. Using a predefined hotspot area considerably improves reproducibility. Also, fully automated assessment of mitotic score appears to be feasible without introducing additional bias or variability.
|
|
| 2. |
- Balkenhol, Maschenka C. A., et al.
(författare)
-
Histological subtypes in triple negative breast cancer are associated with specific information on survival
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1092-9134 .- 1532-8198. ; 46
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Much research has focused on finding novel prognostic biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), whereas only scattered information about the relation between histopathological features and survival in TNBC is available. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of histological subtypes in TNBC. A multicenter retrospective TNBC cohort was established from five Dutch hospitals. All non-neoadjuvantly treated, stage I-III patients with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 were included. Clinical and follow-up data (overall survival; OS, relapse free survival; RFS) were retrieved and a central histopathological review was performed. Of 597 patients included (median follow up 62.8 months, median age at diagnosis 56.0 years), 19.4% developed a recurrence. The most prevalent histological subtypes were carcinoma of no special type (NST) (88.4%), metaplastic carcinoma (4.4%) and lobular carcinoma (3.4%). Collectively, tumors of special type were associated with a worse RFS and OS compared to carcinoma NST (RFS HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.18-3.03; p = 0.008; OS HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.28-2.92; p = 0.002). Substantial differences in survival, however, were present between the different histological subtypes. In the presented TNBC cohort, special histological subtype was in general associated with less favorable survival. However, within the group of tumors of special type there were differences in survival between the different subtypes. Accurate histological examination can provide specific prognostic information that may potentially enable more personalized treatment and surveillance regimes for TNBC patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Mercan, Caner, et al.
(författare)
-
Deep learning for fully-automated nuclear pleomorphism scoring in breast cancer
- 2022
-
Ingår i: npj Breast Cancer. - : Nature Portfolio. - 2374-4677. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To guide the choice of treatment, every new breast cancer is assessed for aggressiveness (i.e., graded) by an experienced histopathologist. Typically, this tumor grade consists of three components, one of which is the nuclear pleomorphism score (the extent of abnormalities in the overall appearance of tumor nuclei). The degree of nuclear pleomorphism is subjectively classified from 1 to 3, where a score of 1 most closely resembles epithelial cells of normal breast epithelium and 3 shows the greatest abnormalities. Establishing numerical criteria for grading nuclear pleomorphism is challenging, and inter-observer agreement is poor. Therefore, we studied the use of deep learning to develop fully automated nuclear pleomorphism scoring in breast cancer. The reference standard used for training the algorithm consisted of the collective knowledge of an international panel of 10 pathologists on a curated set of regions of interest covering the entire spectrum of tumor morphology in breast cancer. To fully exploit the information provided by the pathologists, a first-of-its-kind deep regression model was trained to yield a continuous scoring rather than limiting the pleomorphism scoring to the standard three-tiered system. Our approach preserves the continuum of nuclear pleomorphism without necessitating a large data set with explicit annotations of tumor nuclei. Once translated to the traditional system, our approach achieves top pathologist-level performance in multiple experiments on regions of interest and whole-slide images, compared to a panel of 10 and 4 pathologists, respectively.
|
|
