| 1. |
- Areljung, Sofie, 1983-, et al.
(författare)
-
Expanding the notion of 'ownership' in participatory research involving teachers and researchers
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Research and Method in Education. - : Routledge. - 1743-727X .- 1743-7288. ; 44:5, s. 463-473
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article provides a conceptual discussion of 'ownership' in various forms of participatory research. The discussion is grounded in our experiences from three research projects in science education. We seek to understand how and why ownership may be distributed between teachers and researchers at different stages in the research process. Looking at our projects in retrospect, we see that ownership was differently distributed at the initial stages. Then ownership distribution followed a similar pathway, as teachers gained ownership of implementation, whereas researchers reclaimed ownership of analyzing and disseminating the work. Our discussion departs from the idea that ownership relates to both 'risks' and 'benefits' as well as to both 'rights' and 'obligations'. Thereby, we can make visible some of the circumstances that steer ownership towards the teachers or researchers. For example, we highlight that ownership distribution may be influenced by guidelines for research ethics and inequalities in terms of administrative support structures available to researchers and teachers. Based on our discussion, we suggest a number of questions to initiate and support a continuous dialogue between teachers and researchers who plan to engage in participatory research.
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersson, Sebastian, et al.
(författare)
-
Establishing epistemic practices in students’ formulation of scientifically researchable questions in upper secondary science education
- 2019
-
Ingår i: NOFA7 ABSTRACTS Stockholm University, 13 - 15 May 2019. ; , s. 24-24
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The development of students' capability to engage in scientific inquiry is part of the science curricula across the educational system. However, previous research shows that laboratory and practical work in science education do not necessarily develop the capability to engage in scientific inquiry or contribute to developing an understanding of the nature of inquiry. The purpose of this study is to explore how teaching activities can be designed with a specific focus to develop students' capability to formulate questions for scientific inquiry. Some science education research points to that in order for students to develop an understanding of the nature of science inquiry, teaching has to include activities explicitly focusing aspects of inquiry such as asking questions, observing and making inferences. In this study we draw on the theoretical framework of epistemic practices to analyse and design teaching with the purpose of developing students' capabilities to formulate questions for scientific inquiry. Epistemic practices refer to the ways people in a specific community propose, justify, evaluate and legitimize knowledge claims within a disciplinary framework. From this perspective, formulating scientifically researchable questions makes sense only as part of epistemic practice in relation to a motive of knowledge production. The research question is: How can epistemic practices be established in upper-secondary school science where students are invited to participate in activities of formulating researchable questions?The study was carried out as a design-based research collaboration with a research team consisting of nine science teachers and four science education researchers. Data was collected in three cycles of design, intervention and analysis of research lessons with six classes in three different upper-secondary schools. The data consists of video-recordings of student interaction while engaging in tasks of formulating researchable scientific questions. The data is analysed using the didactical model of organizing purposes; distinguishing between overarching purposes and the student-orientated purposes emerging in interaction. The results indicate that the development of students’ capabilities to formulate researchable questions is situated in the processes of interaction with peers, and the conditions for situating the formulation of questions in a practice characterised by closeness to an epistemic object and gathering of observational data. Based on the results, we argue for a shift in science education from focusing students’ views of a generic nature of science or nature of science inquiry to focussing student participation in epistemic practices of various kinds.
|
|
| 3. |
- Andersson, Sebastian, et al.
(författare)
-
Students’ capabilities to formulate scientifically researchable questions in upper secondary science education
- 2019
-
Ingår i: NOFA7 ABSTRACTS Stockholm University, 13 - 15 May 2019. ; , s. 25-25
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- A goal for science education is to develop student capabilities to participate in scientific inquiry. This includes various aspects of inquiry; formulating scientifically researchable questions as well as planning, performing, analyzing and presenting science investigations. In science education practices, there is a tradition of using practical or laboratory work to illustrate science concepts; focussing correct answers and reproduction of ready-made scientific knowledge, rather than engaging students in inquiry. Previous research shows that inquiry teaching predominantly engage students in investigating science questions as formulated beforehand by the teacher or a textbook. Little attention has been paid to what might characterize the capability of formulating scientifically researchable questions in school. In this study we draw on a theoretical framework of epistemic practices. Epistemic practices refer to the ways people in a specific community propose, justify, evaluate and legitimize knowledge claims within a disciplinary framework. From this perspective, formulating and developing scientifically researchable questions makes sense only in relation to a motive of knowledge production. The aim of this study is to explore what might characterize students’ capabilities to formulate and develop scientifically researchable questions in upper secondary science education.The collected data consists of video-recordings of student interaction in group-work focussing formulating and developing scientifically researchable questions. Data was collected as part of a design-based study with six classes in three different schools. The video-recordings were transcribed in verbatim and analysed by the means of qualitative content analysis. The preliminary results suggest three themes: Formulation of scientifically researchable questions as:1) Working with the specification of the epistemic object. The theme illustrates how the students elaborated on the meaning of related scientific concepts and discussed cause and effect. 2) Specifying researchability by focussing on how to operationalize the epistemic object. The theme illustrates how the students reformulate their questions as part of a process of discussing e.g. measurability and variables.3) Making value-judgements of epistemic objects. The theme illustrates how the students distinguish between scientific and non-scientific questions and make value-judgements about relevance. The results contribute to an understanding of what the capability to engage in scientific inquiry as participation in collective epistemic work in an upper-secondary school science classroom might entail. The themes are related to the establishing of a specific scientific epistemic object. The results are discussed in relation to previous research in science education and the development of resources for teaching inquiry framing capabilities of inquiry as generic.
|
|
| 4. |
- Andrée, Maria, et al.
(författare)
-
Ethical Challenges of Symmetry in Participatory Science Education Research – Proposing a Heuristic for Ethical Reflection
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Examining Ethics in Contemporary Science Education Research. - Cham : Springer. - 9783030509200 - 9783030509217 ; , s. 123-141
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The advancement of participatory methodologies and educational action research has raised challenges of research ethics that concern the relations between different actors. Different forms of participatory research rest on cooperation between teachers, researchers, and students in different forms of relations. The ways in which these relations are enacted are often related to research objectives, epistemology, the people involved in the study, and the context in which the study is carried out. In this chapter we seek to disentangle some ethical challenges emerging from three different teacher-researcher collaborations in science education research. What values are at stake and what are the potential tensions in attempting to secure different values? This includes the ethical implications of requiring shared responsibility between teachers and researchers in development of educational practices and knowledge generation. We discuss how different forms of teacher-researcher collaboration transform ethics and epistemology and how the ethics and epistemology become intertwined. In addition to standard ethical reflection, an ethics of participatory research in science education has to include considerations of the ontological, epistemological, and methodological values at stake.
|
|
| 5. |
- Areljung, Sofie, et al.
(författare)
-
Troubling ownership in teacher-researcher collaborations
- 2017
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Teacher-researcher collaborations inevitably dissolve the border between who is teaching and who is researching, which in turn pushes discussions on research ethics as well as how to define, measure and ensure research validity. In an attempt to deepen the discussion on validity and ethical issues in teacher-research collaboration in science education research, this proposal seeks to disentangle how the notion of ‘ownership’ is transformed in various forms of teacher-researcher collaborations. The paper builds on data from three recent research projects in science education, representing different forms of teacher-researcher collaborations. The analysis focuses how the teachers’ and researchers’ ownership is played out in four stages of the research process; problem stating, design and implementation, analysis, and dissemination. The results indicate that ownership becomes actualised and altered in different ways, and at different stages, depending on the form of collaboration. A conclusion is that ownership needs to be accounted for in in all stages in the research process in order for science education research to accomplish deep relevance and justified implications. Since the question of ownership appears to be particularly troublesome in the last stages of the research process, a suggestion for future teacher-researcher collaboration is to plan for the project’s end, for example in terms of the participants’ anonymity and time to take part in analysis and dissemination of the results, already at the beginning.
|
|
| 6. |
- Areljung, Sofie, et al.
(författare)
-
Troubling ownership in teacher-researcher collaborations
- 2017
-
Konferensbidrag (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Teacher-researcher collaborations inevitably dissolve the border between who is teaching and who is researching, which in turn pushes discussions on research ethics as well as how to define, measure and ensure research validity. In an attempt to deepen the discussion on validity and ethical issues in teacher-research collaboration in science education research, this proposal seeks to disentangle how the notion of ‘ownership’ is transformed in various forms of teacher-researcher collaborations. The paper builds on data from three recent research projects in science education, representing different forms of teacher-researcher collaborations. The analysis focuses how the teachers’ and researchers’ ownership is played out in four stages of the research process; problem stating, design and implementation, analysis, and dissemination. The results indicate that ownership becomes actualised and altered in different ways, and at different stages, depending on the form of collaboration. A conclusion is that ownership needs to be accounted for in in all stages in the research process in order for science education research to accomplish deep relevance and justified implications. Since the question of ownership appears to be particularly troublesome in the last stages of the research process, a suggestion for future teacher-researcher collaboration is to plan for the project’s end, for example in terms of the participants’ anonymity and time to take part in analysis and dissemination of the results, already at the beginning.
|
|
| 7. |
- Björnhammer, Sebastian, et al.
(författare)
-
Att designa epistemiska praktiker i nv-undervisningen - en studie om hur gymnasieelever producerar naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor
- 2018
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- I läroplanen för gymnasiet betonas det i de naturvetenskapliga ämnena att undervisningen ska innefatta naturvetenskapliga arbetsmetoder som att formulera och söka svar på frågor. Holmström, Pendrill et al. (2018) beskriver dock hur besparingar och en minskad tid för gymnasiets laborationsundervisning resulterat i att reformer likt denna inte fått någon genomslagskraft i lärares planering av laborationsundervisning. Den naturvetenskapliga undervisningen öppnar sällan upp för elever att formulera och utforska egna frågor (Lunde, 2015). Stort fokus läggs istället på reproduktion av redan etablerad kunskap och “rätta svar” (Andrée, 2007). När väl ansatser görs för att utforma uppgifter som ger eleverna möjlighet att utveckla förmåga till systematiskt undersökande är det inte självklart att uppgifterna faktiskt möjliggör det. Utmaningen är att utforma uppgifter som inte bara fokuserar på att eleverna ska utveckla förmåga att använda vissa tekniker och redskap för systematiskt undersökande utan att involvera eleverna i arbete med utveckla naturvetenskaplig kunskap (Bergvall, Lavett Lagerström & Andrée, 2018). Eleverna behöver få delta i aktiviteter som syftar till att synliggöra vad som kännetecknar naturvetenskapliga praktiker (Lunde, 2015; Kelly & Licona, 2018). En förutsättning för att etablera naturvetenskaplig epistemisk undervisningspraktik är enligt Kelly (2008) att eleverna får vara med och producera nya frågor och ny kunskap. Studiens syfte är att undersöka hur epistemiska praktiker kan etableras i naturvetenskaplig undervisning på gymnasiet där elever ges möjlighet att utveckla förmågan att formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor. Vi har genomfört en designbaserad studie i tre iterativa cykler i ett nära samarbete mellan nio NV-lärare och sex forskare i NV-didaktik. Cyklerna har genomförts på tre gymnasieskolor i stockholmsregionen, med 60-90 deltagande elever i respektive cykel. Empiri består av videoinspelningar och ljudupptagningar från elevgruppers diskussioner under lektionerna, samt elevers skriftligt formulerade frågor. Vi har genomfört en kvalitativ innehållsanayls (Graneheim & Lundman, 2003;2017) vilket har resulterat i en variation av kvaliteter av förmågan att formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor. De preliminära resultaten visar att dessa kvaliteter, som exempelvis att förhålla sig till frågans undersökningsbarhet, och hur eleverna fick möjlighet att utveckla dessa spelade roll för huruvida kunskapsproduktion eller vanemässiga handlingar etablerades i undervisningen (jfr Eriksson & Lindberg, 2016; Knorr Cetina, 2001).
|
|
| 8. |
- Björnhammer, Sebastian, et al.
(författare)
-
Vad kan elever som kan formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor?
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Forskning om undervisning och lärande. - 2000-9674 .- 2001-6131. ; 8:1, s. 81-104
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Denna studie fokuserar på innebörder av att kunna formulera undersökningsbara frågor i naturvetenskap. Studien tar utgångspunkt i naturvetenskapligt undersökande som epistemiskt arbete. Den forskningsfråga som undersöks är: Vilka kvalitativa aspekter av kunnande kommer till uttryck i gymnasieelevers arbete med att formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor? Studien har genomförts som en designbaserad studie med sex interventioner på gymnasiet där eleverna i den genomförda undervisningen har fått i uppgift att, i olika sammanhang, formulera undersökningsbara frågor. Data innefattar film- och ljudinspelningar och har analyserats med hjälp av kvalitativ innehållsanalys. Resultaten synliggör tre kvalitativa aspekter av att formulera undersökningsbara frågor: Precisering av det epistemiska objektet, Operationalisering av det epistemiska objektet samt Värdering av frågeställningen i relation till det epistemiska objektet.
|
|
| 9. |
- Freerks, Per, et al.
(författare)
-
Att utveckla gymnasieelevers förmåga att formulera, värdera och precisera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor
- 2018
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Tidigare forskning visar att elevers deltagande i laborationer inte självklart utvecklar förmågan till systematiskt undersökande arbete. I studien som presenteras utforskas därför hur undervisning kan bidra till att utveckla elevers förmåga att formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor. Lärare från tre olika gymnasieskolor och fem ämnesdidaktiska forskare har i tre cykler tillsammans designat, implementerat och analyserat lektioner där elever engagerats i att formulera naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbara frågor. Det preliminära resultatet visar att gymnasieelever kan urskilja och diskutera flera aspekter av vad som kan känneteckna en naturvetenskapligt undersökningsbar fråga. Vidare synliggörs betydelsen av att sätta formuleringen av naturvetenskapliga frågor i relation till att också planera och genomföra en undersökning.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
