| 1. |
- DeVita, Michael A., et al.
(författare)
-
"Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis"-A consensus conference on the afferent limb of Rapid Response Systems
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Resuscitation. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-1570 .- 0300-9572. ; 81:4, s. 375-382
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Most reports of Rapid Response Systems (RRS) focus on the efferent, response component of the system, although evidence suggests that improved vital sign monitoring and recognition of a clinical crisis may have outcome benefits. There is no consensus regarding how best to detect patient deterioration or a clear description of what constitutes patient monitoring. Methods: A consensus conference of international experts in safety, RRS, healthcare technology, education, and risk prediction was convened to review current knowledge and opinion on clinical monitoring. Using established consensus procedures, four topic areas were addressed: (1) To what extent do physiologic abnormalities predict risk for patient deterioration? (2) Do workload changes and their potential stresses on the healthcare environment increase patient risk in a predictable manner? (3) What are the characteristics of an "ideal" monitoring system, and to what extent does currently available technology meet this need? and (4) How can monitoring be categorized to facilitate comparing systems? The major findings include: (1) vital sign aberrations predict risk, (2) monitoring patients more effectively may improve outcome, although some risk is random, (3) the workload implications of monitoring on the clinical workforce have not been explored, but are amenable to study and should be investigated, (4) the characteristics of an ideal monitoring system are identifiable, and it is possible to categorize monitoring modalities. It may also be possible to describe monitoring levels, and a system is proposed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Siegele, Bradford J., et al.
(författare)
-
N-terminus DUX4-immunohistochemistry is a reliable methodology for the diagnosis of DUX4-fused B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (N-terminus DUX4 IHC for DUX4-fused B-ALL)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. - : Wiley. - 1045-2257 .- 1098-2264. ; 61:8, s. 449-458
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy and the most commonly diagnosed adult lymphoblastic leukemia. Recent advances have broadened the spectrum of B-ALL, with DUX4 gene fusions implicated in a subclass occurring in adolescents and young adults and harboring a favorable prognosis. DUX4 fusions have been challenging to identify. We aimed to determine whether expression of the DUX4 oncoprotein, as detected by targeted immunohistochemistry, might serve as a surrogate for molecular detection of DUX4 fusions in B-ALL. A cohort of investigational B-ALLs was generated with enrichment for DUX4 fusions by the inclusion of cases with characteristic demographic features and immunophenotypic properties. B-ALLs with mutually exclusive cytogenetics were collected. Immunohistochemical staining by a monoclonal antibody raised against the N-terminus of the DUX4 protein was performed. N-DUX4 immunohistochemistry demonstrated strong, crisp nuclear staining in blasts of seven investigational cases, six of which had nucleic acid material available for molecular evaluation. Five of these cases demonstrated RNA-seq DUX4-fusion positivity. One N-DUX4 immunohistochemistry positive case lacked a definitive DUX4-fusion by RNA-seq, though demonstrated a gene expression profile characteristic of DUX4-rearranged B-ALLs, a CD2+ immunophenotype, and a lack of staining by C-terminus DUX4 antibody immunohistochemistry. At least 83.3% [5/6] positive predictive value. N-DUX4 immunohistochemistry was negative in blasts of three RNA-seq DUX4-fusion-negative cases (3/3; 100% negative predictive value). B-ALLs with mutually exclusive cytogenetic profiles were all N-DUX4 negative (0/10, specificity 100%). N-DUX4 immunohistochemistry is reliable for the distinction of DUX4-rearranged B-ALLs from other B-ALLs. We recommend its use for subclassification of B-ALLs in adolescents and young adults and in B-ALLs that remain “not otherwise specified.”.
|
|
