| 1. |
- Wilkinson, Mark D., et al.
(författare)
-
Comment : The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Scientific Data. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2052-4463. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders-representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers-have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.
|
|
| 2. |
- Broeder, Daan, et al.
(författare)
-
A large metadata domain of Language Resources
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of LREC 2004.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The INTERA and ECHO projects were partly intended to create a critical mass of open and linked metadata descriptions of language resources, helping researchers to understand the benefits of an increased visibility of language resources in the Internet and motivating them to participate. The work was based on the new IMDI version 3.0.3 which is a result of experiences with the earlier versions and new requirements coming from the involved partners. While in INTERA major data centers in Europe are participating, the ECHO project focuses on resources that can be seen as part of cultural heritage. Currently, 27 institutions and projects are active with the goal of having a large browsable and searchable domain by the summer of 2004. Experience shows that the creation of high quality metadata is not trivial and asks for a considerable amount of effort and skills, since manual work alone is too time consumin
|
|
| 3. |
- Uneson, Marcus, et al.
(författare)
-
Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage
- 2004
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- As part of the UNESCO project "Establishment of a National Inventory and Electronic Database of Lithuanian Intangible Cultural Heritage" the authors, representing the EU-funded project "European Cultural Heritage Online" (ECHO) were invited to give a course in digital archiving called "Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage" in Vilnius, Lithuania, March 15 to 20, 2004. The present report summarizes very briefly the sessions given. Thereafter, the analyses of the state of the digitization work of the participating institutes and recommendations for the future are given in a dedicated, stand-alone section.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Wittenburg, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
State of fairness in esfri projects
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Data Intelligence. - : MIT Press - Journals. - 2096-7004 .- 2641-435X. ; 2:1-2, s. 230-237
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Since 2009 initiatives that were selected for the roadmap of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures started working to build research infrastructures for a wide range of research disciplines. An important result of the strategic discussions was that distributed infrastructure scenarios were now seen as “complex research facilities” in addition to, for example traditional centralised infrastructures such as CERN. In this paper we look at five typical examples of such distributed infrastructures where many researchers working in different centres are contributing data, tools/services and knowledge and where the major task of the research infrastructure initiative is to create a virtually integrated suite of resources allowing researchers to carry out state-of-the-art research. Careful analysis shows that most of these research infrastructures worked on the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability dimensions before the term “FAIR” was actually coined. The definition of the FAIR principles and their wide acceptance can be seen as a confirmation of what these initiatives were doing and it gives new impulse to close still existing gaps. These initiatives also seem to be ready to take up the next steps which will emerge from the definition of FAIR maturity indicators. Experts from these infrastructures should bring in their 10-years’ experience in this definition process.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
