| 1. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 2. |
- Long, Feiwu, et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation level on COVID-19 outcome: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Immunology. - : FRONTIERS MEDIA SA. - 1664-3224. ; 14
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exerted a profound influence on humans. Increasing evidence shows that immune response is crucial in influencing the risk of infection and disease severity. Observational studies suggest an association between COVID-19 and immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation traits, but the causal relevance of these traits in COVID-19 susceptibility and severity remains controversial.MethodsWe conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal association between 77 IgG N-glycosylation traits and COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and applying multiple methods including inverse-variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger, and weighted median. We also used Cochrans Q statistic and leave-one-out analysis to detect heterogeneity across each single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Additionally, we used the MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO global test, and PhenoScanner tool to detect and remove SNPs with horizontal pleiotropy and to ensure the reliability of our results.ResultsWe found significant causal associations between genetically predicted IgG N-glycosylation traits and COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, and severity. Specifically, we observed reduced risk of COVID-19 with the genetically predicted increased IgG N-glycan trait IGP45 (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98; FDR = 0.019). IGP22 and IGP30 were associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity. Two (IGP2 and IGP77) and five (IGP10, IGP14, IGP34, IGP36, and IGP50) IgG N-glycosylation traits were causally associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not identify any horizontal pleiotropy.ConclusionsOur study provides evidence that genetically elevated IgG N-glycosylation traits may have a causal effect on diverse COVID-19 outcomes. Our findings have potential implications for developing targeted interventions to improve COVID-19 outcomes by modulating IgG N-glycosylation levels.
|
|
