| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Hellström Reimer, Maria, Professor, 1960-, et al.
(författare)
-
Landscape architecture criticism in the Anthropocene
- 2022
-
Ingår i: JoLA - Journal of Landscape Architecture. - : Routledge. - 1862-6033 .- 2164-604X. ; 17:3, s. 4-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Pries, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Om den relationella urbangeografins gränser : Fältanteckningar: Norra Sorgenfri, Malmö, 2019.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: KRITIK: Tidskrift för arkitektur. - 1654-7969. ; :42-43
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Samhällsplaneringen har i någon månalltid varit intresserad av relationellaflöden. Det bilsamhälle som cementeradesunder efterkrigstidens rekordår var ihögsta grad en fråga om att styra rörelsermellan olika platser med industrins behovav arbetskraft som ledstjärna. Men, omvi ser närmare var det inte bara regionplanenstrafiksystem som var relationellt.Bostadsgården skulle skapa platser förolika användare. Torg och stadsdelscentrumvar målpunkter för större områden.Parker var ofta formgivna som gröna stråkför att binda samman bostadsområden.Och större fritidsanläggningar var designadeför aktiviteter som kunde dra till sigbesökare från ett helt lokalsamhälle.Dagens dominerande stadsideal är imycket en reaktion på efterkrigstidens sättatt tillhandahålla plats för relationella rörelserav människor i, och mellan, bostadsområdetsom rumslig skala. Den nyurbanistiskaidén om en blandad och tät stadutgår från efterkrigstidens vision om att seoch styra människors rörelser genom attformge rum, men framhäver gatan iställetför området som en strategisk skala för attförstå och styra dessa rörelser och uppnåen vision av ett intensivt och sammanpressatstadsliv. Detta allt tydligare fokus påmänniskors rörelser i staden utifrån gatans”mänskliga skala” och de inramandehusen ”mjuka kanter” har vissa uppenbarafördelar. Inte minst finns det idag enmycket rik uppsättning designverktyg förarkitekter och planerare att använda föratt forma denna slags relationer.Men Sorgenfris omvandling i Malmöbelyser också några av denna modellsbrister. Den mänskliga skalans rasterframstår i detta fall snarast som endimensionell.Den gående människan bliralltings mått, och alla problems lösning.Det är de som ska skapa den Jane Jacobsinspireradetrottorar-balett som ger föredetta periferi en framtida innerstadsidentitet.Omgivande områdens socioekonomiskasegregation tas för givet, ochde kan på sin höjda kopplas ihop genommiljöer för fotgängare.Idén om den mänskliga skalan riskerarockså att göra att vi inte ser hur de alltmer raffinerade verktygen för att formgestadens offentlighet för fotgängare uttryckligenkan användas för att iscensättaväldigt olika slags relationella flödesgeografier.Norra Sorgenfris offentlighetär explicit formgiven för att boende ocharbetande ska kunna skapa täta bandtill dess platsbildningar, samtidigt somgaturummet tänks bära upp flyktigare rörelsergenom området för de som kommerutifrån. Denna hierarki mellan olika slagsanvändare med olika slags relationer i denmänskliga skalans stadsrum skulle intevara så utmanande om det inte vore föratt det lämnar ett problem olöst. Visionenom spontana möten människor emellantänkta att ske i gatuoffentligheten i områdensom Norra Sorgenfri saluförs som lösningenpå den omgivande stadens segregation.Inte mycket talar för att denna slagsplatser, sina många kvaliteter till trots,kan leva upp till dessa ambitioner.
|
|
| 5. |
- Yigit Turan, Burcu
(författare)
-
Copy and paste landscapes
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Landscape Architecture. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1862-6033 .- 2164-604X. ; 17, s. 4-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
- Yigit Turan, Burcu, et al.
(författare)
-
Cultural Landscapes as the Complex Meta-texts of Clashing Metaphors
- 2010
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- “Landscape”, the European Landscape Convention tells us, “an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors”, irrespective of whether “natural, rural, urban [or] peri-urban.” Yet, the vast major- ity of the areas referred to in the Convention are designed, organically evolved or asso- ciative cultural landscapes outside of an urban context. This induces us to ask how people may perceive and interact with the urban cultural landscape and how this may influence the Convention’s aim of promoting landscape protection, management and planning. As an important part of recent identity politics, cultural landscapes are often associated with more or less stable communicative contents, symbolisms and messages (Inglis, 1987; Lo- wenthal, 1991; Daniels, 1993). In popular discourse, they are often romanticized and consid- ered natural assets, affecting also the development of professional normative frameworks, whether in the field of cultural heritage, environmental planning or design. Even though there is a significant research on the complexity of meanings that landscapes involve (Daniels & Cosgrove, 1988; Schama, 1996), as well as a considerable critique associated with the social processes behind these complexities (Barthes,1957/1993; Mitchell, 2002); the active ‘read- ing’ of landscapes as a basis for landscape architectural operations remains an exception. Yet, landscapes, and especially urban landscapes, have continuously been encoded as eve- ryday as “meta-texts” to operate and govern multiple interacting layers of economic, politi- cal, ecological, cultural and psychological realities of life. Many phenomena and problems emerging through landscape as multilayered power structure are usually not comprehended and touched by landscape architecture. There is thus a necessity to read and expose these complexities in order to find original, critical and reflective planning and design interventions that answer to the problems and realities emerging in and as urban landscapes. To question and re-construct the role of landscape architecture is necessary, requiring a critique of its knowledge construction and the conditioning of its cognitive, critical and creative skills ulti- mately defining the profession. This study will attempt to present some critical viewpoints, highlighting the theoretical debates on the ‘reading’ of ‘cultural landscape’. It will elaborate the subject asking following questions: - What could be learned from the landscapes emerging outside of the frameworks of the normative values and codes of the environmental planning and design disciplines? - What could be derived from critical theories of landscape as for the development of a reflexive landscape architecture? - How could the role of landscape architecture in the larger context of geographical realities be analysed, criticized and re-envisioned? - How should landscape architectural education be reconstructed/deconstructed ac- cording to the arguments of this study? These questions form the core argumentation along with theoretical arguments and exempli- fications from different cases.
|
|
| 7. |
- Yigit Turan, Burcu, et al.
(författare)
-
Cultural Landscapes as the Complex Meta-texts of Clashing Metaphors : a critical perspective
- 2010
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- “Landscape”, the European Landscape Convention tells us, “an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors”, irrespective of whether “natural, rural, urban [or] peri-urban.” Yet, the vast majority of the areas referred to in the Convention are designed, organically evolved or associative cultural landscapes outside of an urban context. This induces us to ask how people may perceive and interact with the urban cultural landscape and how this may influence the Convention’s aim of promoting landscape protection, management and planning. As an important part of recent identity politics, cultural landscapes are often associated with more or less stable communicative contents, symbolisms and messages (Inglis, 1987; Lowenthal, 1991; Daniels, 1993). In popular discourse, they are often romanticized and considered natural assets, affecting also the development of professional normative frameworks, whether in the field of cultural heritage, environmental planning or design. Even though there is a significant research on the complexity of meanings that landscapes involve (Daniels & Cosgrove, 1988; Schama, 1996), as well as a considerable critique associated with the social processes behind these complexities (Barthes,1957/1993; Mitchell, 2002); the active ‘reading’ of landscapes as a basis for landscape architectural operations remains an exception. Yet, landscapes, and especially urban landscapes, have continuously been encoded as everyday as “meta-texts” to operate and govern multiple interacting layers of economic, political, ecological, cultural and psychological realities of life. Many phenomena and problems emerging through landscape as multilayered power structure are usually not comprehended and touched by landscape architecture. There is thus a necessity to read and expose these complexities in order to find original, critical and reflective planning and design interventions that answer to the problems and realities emerging in and as urban landscapes. To question and re-construct the role of landscape architecture is necessary, requiring a critique of its knowledge construction and the conditioning of its cognitive, critical and creative skills ultimately defining the profession. This study will attempt to present some critical viewpoints, highlighting the theoretical debates on the ‘reading’ of ‘cultural landscape’. It will elaborate the subject asking following questions: - What could be learned from the landscapes emerging outside of the frameworks of the normative values and codes of the environmental planning and design disciplines? - What could be derived from critical theories of landscape as for the development of a reflexive landscape architecture? - How could the role of landscape architecture in the larger context of geographical realities be analysed, criticized and re-envisioned? - How should landscape architectural education be reconstructed/deconstructed according to the arguments of this study? These questions form the core argumentation along with theoretical arguments and exemplifications from different cases
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Yigit Turan, Burcu
(författare)
-
Forests in the city, a new paradigm?
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Landscape Architecture. - 1862-6033 .- 2164-604X. ; 18, s. 4-7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 10. |
- Yigit Turan, Burcu
(författare)
-
Home ecologies
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Landscape Architecture. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1862-6033 .- 2164-604X. ; 17, s. 4-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the summer of 2021, JoLA issued a call for Thinking Eye articles on the theme of Home ecologies. The theme, referring to new conceptualizations of home ‘habitats’, biological and metaphorical, evoked multiple creative responses that explored how landscape researchers and practitioners were responding to prevailing recommendations of being at home in the midst of a global pandemic. As we walked through previously untrailed streets, made friends with unknown neighbours and noticed the varied microecologies that we share our environments with, we developed a curiosity for and kinship with the mundane and ordinary. This call sought to highlight creative explorations that could help us make sense of this imposed confinement and mundanity and speculate on alternative ways of inhabiting and designing cities. The selected Home ecologies articles invite us to reclaim our bodies and to slow down in design; an invitation extended by other articles featured in this issue.
|
|
