| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Ernstsson, O., et al.
(författare)
-
Health-related quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation - an assessment of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L using data from the Swedish Amputation and Prosthetics Registry
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Disability and Rehabilitation. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0963-8288 .- 1464-5165. ; 44:26, s. 8471-8479
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose To assess the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in patients with a major lower limb amputation (LLA). Methods This was a retrospective register-based study using data from the Swedish Amputation and Prosthetics Registry (SwedeAmp). Patients with a six-months follow-up (including either EQ-5D-3L or EQ-5D-5L) after a major unilateral LLA were included. The measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L were compared in terms of feasibility, response patterns, informativity, and convergent and known-group validity. Results The sample included 700 patients with below-knee amputation (76%), above-knee amputation (18%), or knee disarticulation (7%). Responses to EQ-5D-3L and -5L were similar regarding feasibility (98% completion rate) and the proportion reporting no problems (7% and 6%). Compared to EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L showed higher absolute and relative informativity in all dimensions, with the largest improvement in the mobility dimension. In the analyses of convergent validity, the EQ-5D-5L generally showed stronger correlations with disease-specific measures. Only EQ-5D-5L was able to discriminate between subgroups with different amputation levels. Conclusion The findings support the use of EQ-5D-5L over EQ-5D-3L in patients with an LLA, mainly due to improved informativity and improved convergent and known-group validity.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Gedin, F, et al.
(författare)
-
Productivity losses among people with back pain and among population-based references: a register-based study in Sweden
- 2020
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 10:8, s. e036638-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Back pain is the leading cause for years lived with disability globally and among the main reasons for sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP). The objective of this study was to explore the occurrence of SA and DP and to estimate productivity losses among individuals with back pain compared with among matched population-based references.DesignExplorative prospective cohort study using register microdata.Participants and settingA total of 23 176 people, aged 19–60 years, with a first visit to inpatient or specialised outpatient healthcare for back pain (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems code M54) in 2010 in Sweden and a matched population-based reference group (n=115 880).OutcomesLong-term SA (in SA spells >14 days) and DP and productivity losses, measured in € (2018 prices) by multiplying the SA and DP net days by the societal cost of each such day.ResultsIn the back-pain group, 42% had SA or DP days; in the reference group, the corresponding proportion was 15%. Productivity loss per patient with back pain was €8928 during the 12-month follow-up period; in the reference group, it was €3499 (p<0.0001).ConclusionsSA and DP, leading to excess productivity losses among people with back pain, reflect the challenges these patients are facing to maintain their work capacity. Interventions to promote that individuals with back pain remain in paid work should be a priority in order to address the high costs.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
