| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Abdelmoez, AM, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative profiling of skeletal muscle models reveals heterogeneity of transcriptome and metabolism
- 2020
-
Ingår i: American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. - : American Physiological Society. - 1522-1563 .- 0363-6143. ; 318:3, s. C615-C626
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Rat L6, mouse C2C12, and primary human skeletal muscle cells (HSMCs) are commonly used to study biological processes in skeletal muscle, and experimental data on these models are abundant. However, consistently matched experimental data are scarce, and comparisons between the different cell types and adult tissue are problematic. We hypothesized that metabolic differences between these cellular models may be reflected at the mRNA level. Publicly available data sets were used to profile mRNA levels in myotubes and skeletal muscle tissues. L6, C2C12, and HSMC myotubes were assessed for proliferation, glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis, mitochondrial activity, and substrate oxidation, as well as the response to in vitro contraction. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that mRNA of genes coding for actin and myosin was enriched in C2C12, whereas L6 myotubes had the highest levels of genes encoding glucose transporters and the five complexes of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Consistently, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and oxidative capacity were greatest in L6 myotubes. Insulin-induced glycogen synthesis was highest in HSMCs, but C2C12 myotubes had higher baseline glucose oxidation. All models responded to electrical pulse stimulation-induced glucose uptake and gene expression but in a slightly different manner. Our analysis reveals a great degree of heterogeneity in the transcriptomic and metabolic profiles of L6, C2C12, or primary human myotubes. Based on these distinct signatures, we provide recommendations for the appropriate use of these models depending on scientific hypotheses and biological relevance.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Al-Khalili, L, et al.
(författare)
-
MEF2 activation in differentiated primary human skeletal muscle cultures requires coordinated involvement of parallel pathways
- 2004
-
Ingår i: American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. - : American Physiological Society. - 0363-6143 .- 1522-1563. ; 286:6, s. C1410-C1416
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The myocyte enhancer factor (MEF)2 transcription factor is important for development of differentiated skeletal muscle. We investigated the regulation of MEF2 DNA binding in differentiated primary human skeletal muscle cells and isolated rat skeletal muscle after exposure to various stimuli. MEF2 DNA binding activity in nonstimulated (basal) muscle cultures was almost undetectable. Exposure of cells for 20 min to 120 nM insulin, 0.1 and 1.0 mM hydrogen peroxide, osmotic stress (400 mM mannitol), or 1.0 mM 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β- d-ribofuranoside (AICAR) led to a profound increase in MEF2 DNA binding. To study signaling pathways mediating MEF2 activity, we preincubated human skeletal muscle cell cultures or isolated rat epitrochlearis muscles with inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (10 μM SB-203580), MEK1 (50 μM PD-98059), PKC (1 and 10 μM GF109203X), phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase (10 μM LY-294002), or AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK; 20 μM compound C). All stimuli resulted primarily in activation of MEF2D DNA binding. Exposure of cells to osmotic or oxidative stress increased MEF2 DNA binding via pathways that were completely blocked by MAPK inhibitors and partially blocked by inhibitors of PKC, PI 3-kinase, and AMPK. In epitrochlearis muscle, MAPK inhibitors blocked contraction but not AICAR-mediated MEF2 DNA binding. Thus activation of MEF2 in skeletal muscle is regulated via parallel intracellular signaling pathways in response to insulin, cellular stress, or activation of AMPK.
|
|
| 10. |
- Al-Khalili, L, et al.
(författare)
-
Prior serum- and AICAR-induced AMPK activation in primary human myocytes does not lead to subsequent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake
- 2004
-
Ingår i: American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. - : American Physiological Society. - 0193-1849 .- 1522-1555. ; 287:3, s. E553-E557
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Exposing isolated rat skeletal muscle to 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside [AICAR, a pharmacological activator of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)] plus serum leads to a subsequent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose transport (Fisher JS, Gao J, Han DH, Holloszy JO, and Nolte LA. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E18–E23, 2002). Our goal was to determine whether preincubation of primary human skeletal muscle cells with human serum and AICAR (Serum+AICAR) would also induce a subsequent elevation in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Cells were preincubated for 1 h under 4 conditions: 1) without AICAR or serum (Control), 2) with serum, 3) with AICAR, or 4) with Serum+AICAR. Some cells were then collected for immunoblot analysis to assess phosphorylation of AMPK (pAMPK) and its substrate acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). Other cells were incubated for an additional 4 h without AICAR or serum and then used to measure basal or insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake. Level of pAMPK was increased ( P < 0.01) for myotubes exposed to Serum+AICAR vs. all other groups. Phosphorylated ACC (pACC) levels were higher for both Serum+AICAR ( P < 0.05) and AICAR ( P < 0.05) vs. Control and Serum groups. Basal ( P < 0.05) and 1.2 nM insulin-stimulated ( P < 0.005) 2-DG uptake was higher for Serum vs. all other preincubation conditions at equal insulin concentration. Regardless of insulin concentration (0, 1.2, or 18 nM), 2-DG was unaltered in cells preincubated with Serum+AICAR vs. Control cells. In contrast to results with isolated rat skeletal muscle, increasing the pAMPK and pACC in human myocytes via preincubation with Serum+AICAR was insufficient to lead to a subsequent enhancement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake.
|
|
