| 1. |
- Bueno, Hector, et al.
(författare)
-
Report of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table regulatory workshop update of the evaluation of new agents for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome : Executive summary
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. - 2048-8726 .- 2048-8734. ; 8:8, s. 745-754
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Regulatory authorities interpret the results of randomized controlled trials according to published principles. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is planning a revision of the 2000 and 2003 guidance documents on clinical investigation of new medicinal products for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to achieve consistency with current knowledge in the field. This manuscript summarizes the key output from a collaborative workshop, organized by the Cardiovascular Round Table and the European Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology, involving clinicians, academic researchers, trialists, European and US regulators, and pharmaceutical industry researchers. Specific questions in four key areas were selected as priorities for changes in regulatory guidance: patient selection, endpoints, methodologic issues and issues related to the research for novel agents. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) should be studied separately for therapies aimed at the specific pathophysiology of either condition, particularly for treatment of the acute phase, but can be studied together for other treatments, especially long-term therapy. Unstable angina patients should be excluded from acute phase ACS trials. In general, cardiovascular death and reinfarction are recommended for primary efficacy endpoints; other endpoints may be considered if specifically relevant for the therapy under study. New agents or interventions should be tested against a background of evidence-based therapy with expanded follow-up for safety assessment. In conclusion, new guidance documents for randomized controlled trials in ACS should consider changes regarding patient and endpoint selection and definitions, and trial designs. Specific requirements for the evaluation of novel pharmacological therapies need further clarification.
|
|
| 2. |
- Graham, Ian, et al.
(författare)
-
New strategies for the development of lipid-lowering therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2055-6845 .- 2055-6837. ; 4:2, s. 119-127
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The very high occurrence of cardiovascular events presents a major public health issue, because treatment remains suboptimal. Lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins or ezetimibe in combination with a statin reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular risk reduction in relation to the absolute LDL-C reduction is linear for most interventions without evidence of attenuation or increase in risk at low LDL-C levels. Opportunities for innovation in dyslipidaemia treatment should address the substantial risk of lipid-associated cardiovascular events among patients optimally treated per guidelines but who cannot achieve LDL-C goals and who could benefit from additional LDL-C-lowering therapy or experience side effects of statins. Fresh approaches are needed to identify promising drug targets early and develop them efficiently. The Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) convened a workshop to discuss new lipid-lowering strategies for cardiovascular risk reduction. Opportunities to improve treatment approaches and the efficient study of new therapies were explored. Circulating biomarkers may not be fully reliable proxy indicators of the relationship between treatment effect and clinical outcome. Mendelian randomization studies may better inform development strategies and refine treatment targets before Phase 3. Trials should match the drug to appropriate lipid and patient profile, and guidelines may move towards a precision-based approach to individual patient management. Stakeholder collaboration is needed to ensure continued innovation and better international coordination of both regulatory aspects and guidelines. It should be noted that risk may also be addressed through increased attention to other risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, overweight, and inactivity.
|
|
| 3. |
- Olivier, Cecille, et al.
(författare)
-
New strategies for the conduct of clinical trials in paediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH): Outcome of a multi-stakeholder meeting with patients, academia, industry and regulators held at EMA on Monday 12th June 2017
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - 2047-9980. ; 8:10, s. 1-10
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: Drug development for paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) ispressingly needed. Experts from the US Food and Drug Administration, EuropeanMedicines Agency, Health Canada, key opinion leaders, academia, patients, and industry representatives held a workshop on 12th June 2017 dedicated to addressing challenges and unmet needs. This report summarises the approaches proposed during the meeting to address key issues in extrapolation, trial design, and study endpoints in pediatric drug development.Methods and Results: A pre-workshop stakeholder survey was conducted and showed that most respondents believe the pathophysiology of heritable PAH and some forms of idiopathic PAH is thought to be sufficiently similar in adult and paediatric patients, although the clinical manifestations may differ. In this situation, placebo-controlled trials might not be required to confirm clinical benefit in paediatrics. The study endpoints used to support drug approvals in adults were reviewed to determine if these existing study endpoints can be applied in paediatric PAH efficacy trials. It showed that non-invasive study endpoints, such as the time to clinical worsening, WHO functionalclass, and 6-Minute-Walk-Test could be applicable in paediatric PAH trials, although each presents some limitations in paediatrics.Conclusion: Extrapolation of efficacy from informative adult studies may be appropriate in some forms of PAH. Initial dose-finding studies and exposure-response modelling are warranted in paediatric PAH, followed by an efficacy and safety study to explore the response to treatment and exposure-response relationship. A novel, non-invasive, developmentally-appropriate, and reliable study endpoint needs to be developed.
|
|
