| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Belloni, Valeria, et al.
(författare)
-
Cosmo-skymed range measurements for displacement monitoring using amplitude persistent scatterers
- 2020
-
Ingår i: IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium. - : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). ; , s. 2495-2498
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite data are widely used to monitor deformation phenomena impacting the Earth's surface (e.g. landslides, glacier motions, subsidence, and volcano deformations) and infrastructures (e.g. bridges, dams, buildings). The analysis is generally performed using the Differential SAR Interferometry (DInSAR) technique that exploits the phase information of SAR data. However, this technique suffers for lack of coherence among the considered stack of images, and it can only be adopted to monitor slow deformation phenomena. In the field of geohazards monitoring and glacier melting, the Offset Tracking technique has been also widely investigated. This approach is based on the amplitude information only but it reaches worse accuracy compared to DInSAR. To overcome the limitations of DInSAR and Offset Tracking, in the last decade, a new technique called Imaging Geodesy has been investigated exploiting the amplitude information and the precise orbit of the modern SAR platforms (i.e. TerraSAR-X, COSMO-SkyMed). In this study, an investigation of using COSMO-SkyMed data for Earth surface monitoring was performed. The developed approach was applied to a set of imagery acquired over the Corvara (Northern Italy) area, which is affected by a fast landslide with yearly displacements up to meters. Specifically, two well identifiable and stable human-made Amplitude Persistent Scatterers (APSs) were considered to estimate the residual errors of COSMO-SkyMed sensor during the acquisition period between 2010 and 2015. Then, the same methodology was applied to estimate the displacement of a Corner Reflector (CR) located in the landslide area. Finally, the results were compared to the available GPS reference trend showing a good agreement.
|
|
| 3. |
- DeAngelis, Nicola, et al.
(författare)
-
2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy
- 2021
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Emergency Surgery. - : BMC. - 1749-7922. ; 16:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.
|
|
| 4. |
- Parma, Valentina, et al.
(författare)
-
More Than Smell—COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Chemical Senses. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0379-864X .- 1464-3553. ; 45:7, s. 609-622
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recent anecdotal and scientific reports have provided evidence of a link between COVID-19 and chemosensory impairments, such as anosmia. However, these reports have downplayed or failed to distinguish potential effects on taste, ignored chemesthesis, and generally lacked quantitative measurements. Here, we report the development, implementation, and initial results of a multilingual, international questionnaire to assess self-reported quantity and quality of perception in 3 distinct chemosensory modalities (smell, taste, and chemesthesis) before and during COVID-19. In the first 11 days after questionnaire launch, 4039 participants (2913 women, 1118 men, and 8 others, aged 19–79) reported a COVID-19 diagnosis either via laboratory tests or clinical assessment. Importantly, smell, taste, and chemesthetic function were each significantly reduced compared to their status before the disease. Difference scores (maximum possible change ±100) revealed a mean reduction of smell (−79.7 ± 28.7, mean ± standard deviation), taste (−69.0 ± 32.6), and chemesthetic (−37.3 ± 36.2) function during COVID-19. Qualitative changes in olfactory ability (parosmia and phantosmia) were relatively rare and correlated with smell loss. Importantly, perceived nasal obstruction did not account for smell loss. Furthermore, chemosensory impairments were similar between participants in the laboratory test and clinical assessment groups. These results show that COVID-19-associated chemosensory impairment is not limited to smell but also affects taste and chemesthesis. The multimodal impact of COVID-19 and the lack of perceived nasal obstruction suggest that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus strain 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may disrupt sensory-neural mechanisms.
|
|
