| 1. |
- Kluin-Nelemans, Hanneke C., et al.
(författare)
-
Cytogenetic and molecular aberrations and worse outcome for male patients in systemic mastocytosis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Theranostics. - : Ivyspring International Publisher. - 1838-7640. ; 11:1, s. 292-303
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In systemic mastocytosis (SM), the clinical features and survival vary greatly. Patient-related factors determining the outcome in SM are largely unknown. Methods: We examined the impact of sex on the clinical features, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in 3403 patients with mastocytosis collected in the registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM). The impact of cytogenetic and molecular genetic aberrations on sex differences was analyzed in a subset of patients. Results: Of all patients enrolled, 55.3% were females. However, a male predominance was found in a subset of advanced SM (AdvSM) patients, namely SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN, 70%; p < 0.001). Correspondingly, organomegaly (male: 23% vs. female: 13%, p = 0.007) was more, whereas skin involvement (male: 71% vs. female: 86%, p = 0.001) was less frequent in males. In all patients together, OS (p < 0.0001) was significantly inferior in males, and also within the WHO sub-categories indolent SM, aggressive SM (ASM) and SM-AHN. PFS was significantly (p = 0.0002) worse in males when all patients were grouped together; due to low numbers of events, this significance persisted only in the subcategory smoldering SM. Finally, prognostically relevant cytogenetic abnormalities (10% vs. 5%, p = 0.006) or molecular aberrations (SRSF2/ASXLI/RUNXI profile; 63% vs. 40%, p = 0.003) were more frequently present in males. Conclusions: Male sex has a major impact on clinical features, disease progression, and survival in mastocytosis. Male patients have an inferior survival, which seems related to the fact that they more frequently develop a multi-mutated AdvSM associated with a high-risk molecular background.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kluin-Nelemans, Hanneke C., et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic impact of eosinophils in mastocytosis : analysis of 2350 patients collected in the ECNM Registry
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Leukemia. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 0887-6924 .- 1476-5551. ; 34:4, s. 1090-1101
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is frequently associated with eosinophilia. To examine its prevalence and clinical impact in all WHO classification-based subcategories, we analyzed eosinophil counts in 2350 mastocytosis patients using the dataset of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis. Ninety percent of patients had normal eosinophil counts, 6.8% mild eosinophilia (0.5-1.5x10(9)/l), and 3.1% hypereosinophilia (HE; >1.5x10(9)/l). Eosinophilia/HE were mainly present in patients with advanced SM (17%/19%), and only rarely recorded in patients with indolent and smoldering SM (5%/1%), and some patients with cutaneous mastocytosis. The eosinophil count correlated with organomegaly, dysmyelopoiesis, and the WHO classification, but not with mediator-related symptoms or allergy. Eosinophilia at diagnosis had a strong prognostic impact (p<0.0001) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with a 10-year OS of 19% for patients with HE, 70% for those with mild eosinophilia, and 88% for patients with normal eosinophil counts. In 89% of patients with follow-up data (n=1430, censored at start of cytoreductive therapy), eosinophils remained stable. In those with changing eosinophil counts (increase/decrease or mixed pattern), OS and PFS were inferior compared with patients with stable eosinophil counts. In conclusion, eosinophilia and HE are more prevalent in advanced SM and are predictors of a worse outcome.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sperr, Wolfgang R., et al.
(författare)
-
International prognostic scoring system for mastocytosis (IPSM) : a retrospective cohort study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The Lancet Haematology. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2352-3026. ; 6:12, s. E638-E649
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The WHO classification separates mastocytosis into distinct variants, but prognostication remains a clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to improve prognostication for patients with mastocytosis. Methods We analysed data of the registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis including 1639 patients (age 17-90 years) diagnosed with mastocytosis according to WHO criteria between Jan 12, 1978, and March 16, 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox regression were applied to identify prognostic variables predicting survival outcomes and to establish a prognostic score. We validated this International Prognostic Scoring System in Mastocytosis (IPSM) with data of 462 patients (age 17-79 years) from the Spanish network Red Espanola de Mastocitosis diagnosed between Jan 22, 1998, and Nov 2, 2017. Findings The prognostic value of the WHO classification was confirmed in our study (p<0.0001). For patients with non-advanced mastocytosis (n=1380), we identified age 60 years or older (HR 10.75, 95% CI 5.68-20.32) and a concentration of alkaline phosphatase 100 U/L or higher (2.91, 1.60-5.30) as additional independent prognostic variables for overall survival. The resulting scoring system divided patients with non-advanced mastocytosis into three groups: low (no risk factors), intermediate 1 (one risk factor), and intermediate 2 (two risk factors). Overall survival and progression-free survival differed significantly among these groups (p<0.0001). In patients with advanced mastocytosis (n=259), age 60 years or older (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.42-3.22), a concentration of tryptase 125 ng/mL or higher (1.81, 1.20-2.75), a leukocyte count of 16 x 10(9) per L or higher (1.88, 1.27-2.79), haemoglobin of 11 g/dL or lower (1.71, 1.13-2.57), a platelet count of 100 x 10(9) per L or lower (1.63, 1.13-2.34), and skin involvement (0.46, 0.30-0.69) were prognostic variables. Based on these variables, a separate score for advanced mastocytosis with four risk categories was established, with significantly different outcomes for overall survival and progression-free survival (p<0.0001). The prognostic value of both scores was confirmed in 413 patients with non-advanced disease and 49 with advanced mastocytosis from the validation cohort. Interpretation The IPSM scores for patients with non-advanced and advanced mastocytosis can be used to predict survival outcomes and guide treatment decisions. However, the predictive value of the IPSM needs to be confirmed in forthcoming trials. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 4. |
- Trizuljak, Jakub, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical features and survival of patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis defined by the updated WHO classification
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Allergy. European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. - : Wiley. - 0105-4538 .- 1398-9995. ; 75:8, s. 1927-1938
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), several risk factors of disease progression have been identified. Previous studies, performed with limited patient numbers, have also shown that the clinical course in ISM is stable and comparable to that of cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). The aim of this project was to compare the prognosis of patients with ISM with that of patients with CM.Methods: We employed a dataset of 1993 patients from the registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) to compare outcomes of ISM and CM.Results: We found that overall survival (OS) is worse in ISM compared to CM. Moreover, in patients with typical ISM, bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM), and smoldering SM (SSM), 4.1% of disease progressions have been observed (4.9% of progressions in typical ISM group, 1.7% in BMM, and 9.4% in SSM). Progressions to advanced SM were observed in 2.9% of these patients. In contrast, six patients with CM (1.7%) converted to ISM and no definitive progression to advanced SM was found. No significant differences in OS and event-free survival (EFS) were found when comparing ISM, BMM, and SSM. Higher risk of both progression and death was significantly associated with male gender, worse performance status, and organomegaly.Conclusion: Our data confirm the clinical impact of the WHO classification that separates ISM from CM and from other SM variants.
|
|
| 5. |
- Valent, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
The Data Registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) : Set Up, Projects, and Perspectives
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV. - 2213-2198 .- 2213-2201. ; 7:1, s. 81-87
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Mastocytosis is a unique hematologic neoplasm with complex biology and pathology and a variable clinical course. The disease can essentially be divided into cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) and systemic mastocytosis (SM). In adults, SM is diagnosed in most cases and manifests as either indolent or advanced disease. Patients with advanced SM have an unfavorable prognosis with reduced survival. However, so far, little is known about the prevalence of various categories of SM and about prognostic factors. In an attempt to learn more about the behavior and evolution of various forms of CM and SM, the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) initiated a mastocytosis registry in 2012. In this article, the set up and start phase of this registry are described. Until 2018, more than 3000 patients from 12 countries and 25 centers have been enrolled. In a majority of all patients, robust follow-up data and relevant clinical end points are available. Using this data set, a series of registry projects have been launched, with the aim to validate previously identified diagnostic and prognostic variables and to identify new disease-related and patient-related parameters in various forms of mastocytosis. Moreover, the core data set of the registry will be useful to establish multiparametric scoring systems through which prognostication and individualized management of patients with mastocytosis should improve in the foreseeable future. (C) 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
|
|
