| 1. |
- Rietdijk, Saskia, et al.
(författare)
-
Improving writing in primary schools through a comprehensive writing program
- 2017
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Writing Research. - : Universiteit Antwerpen. - 2030-1006 .- 2294-3307. ; 9:2, s. 173-225
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study examined the effects of an innovative comprehensive writing program in upper primary education on students' writing performance and on teachers' classroom practices, beliefs and skills. The program focused on the communicative nature of writing, on writing as a process, and on explicit teaching of five genre-specific writing strategies. It was implemented by 43 teachers in their regular classrooms (Grades 4 to 6, N = 1052), with three conditions: (1) a writing program condition, (2) the same program complemented by professional development sessions and coaching, and (3) a control condition in which teachers taught their usual writing lessons. Students' writing performance was measured three times with multiple writing tasks. Data on teachers' practices, beliefs and skills were collected through lesson observations, interviews, questionnaires, teacher logs, and a text assessment task. The comprehensive writing program had a beneficial effect on students' writing performance and the extent to which teachers taught writing strategies. The complementary professional development and coaching had a direct effect on the number of lessons implemented, and an indirect effect on students' performance. Overall, the innovation proved to be effective for improving students' writing performance in the upper grades of primary schools.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rietdijk, Saskia, et al.
(författare)
-
Teaching Writing in Primary Education : Classroom Practice, Time, Teachers' Beliefs and Skills
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Educational Psychology. - : American Psychological Association (APA). - 0022-0663 .- 1939-2176. ; 110:5, s. 640-663
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to provide insight into the current practice of writing instruction in Dutch primary education, as a stepping stone for designing and implementing sustainable innovations that could satisfy both practitioners and policymakers. We investigated the extent to which three domain-specific approaches-communicative writing, process writing, and writing strategy instruction-and general features of high-quality instruction were implemented in writing lessons in the upper grades of primary schools. We also examined the learning time for writing, teachers' views on writing and writing instruction, how efficacious they feel about teaching writing, and how skilled they are in the writing instruction domain. Lastly, we explored relations between classroom practices, learning time, and teachers' beliefs and skills through correlation analysis, to identify potential aids and constraints to guide innovations in writing education. Participants were 61 teachers of 45 primary schools in the Netherlands. Data were collected through questionnaires, stimulated recall interviews and over 100 lesson observations. Results indicated that the three domain-specific approaches for writing instruction were insufficiently implemented in Dutch classrooms, as were differentiating and the teaching of learning strategies. The allocated learning time was also insufficient, but the realized learning time and the extent to which teachers promoted active learning were satisfactory, providing a strong basis for curricular improvement. Several relations were found between teachers' classroom practices, learning time, and teachers' beliefs and skills in the domain of writing instruction. Finally, we discuss options for sustainable innovations of writing instruction in this national context.
|
|
| 3. |
- van Weijen, Daphne, et al.
(författare)
-
Source use and argumentation behavior in L1 and L2 writing : a within-writer comparison
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Reading and writing. - : Springer. - 0922-4777 .- 1573-0905. ; 32:6, s. 1635-1655
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to test whether Cummins' Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis (LIH) might also apply to writing, by determining to what extent writers' text quality, source use and argumentation behavior are related in L1 and L2, how effective writers' behavior is and whether their L2 proficiency influenced the relations between them. To answer these questions, twenty students wrote four short argumentative source based essays each in L1 (Dutch) and four in L2 (English). A within-writer cross-linguistic comparison of their texts revealed that their L1 and L2 writing competencies appear to be related. Furthermore, writers' source use behavior differed to some extent between languages, but the strong positive correlations found between source use features suggest that in most cases this was more a person than a language effect. Similarly, for argumentation behavior, results showed some learner specific features (e.g. inclusion of titles and reference lists), but differences between languages for others (e.g. the inclusion of both arguments and counter-arguments). Effects of the different source use and argumentation features studied on text quality were limited and no clear effect of L2 proficiency on writers' behavior or their influence on text quality were found. Overall, in line with earlier research, these findings provide some additional support for Cummins' LIH and the idea that writers might have a common underlying source for writing related knowledge and practices which they can apply in multiple languages.
|
|
