| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Balduini, Carlo, et al.
(författare)
-
The EHA research roadmap : Platelet disorders
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - 2572-9241. ; 5:7
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2016, the European Hematology Association (EHA) published the EHA Roadmap for European Hematology Research1 aiming to highlight achievements in the diagnostics and treatment of blood disorders, and to better inform European policy makers and other stakeholders about the urgent clinical and scientific needs and priorities in the field of hematology. Each section was coordinated by 1 to 2 section editors who were leading international experts in the field. In the 5 years that have followed, advances in the field of hematology have been plentiful. As such, EHA is pleased to present an updated Research Roadmap, now including 11 sections, each of which will be published separately. The updated EHA Research Roadmap identifies the most urgent priorities in hematology research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and ideally a more funded future for European hematology research. The 11 EHA Research Roadmap sections include Normal Hematopoiesis; Malignant Lymphoid Diseases; Malignant Myeloid Diseases; Anemias and Related Diseases; Platelet Disorders; Blood Coagulation and Hemostatic Disorders; Transfusion Medicine; Infections in Hematology; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; CAR-T and Other Cellbased Immune Therapies; and Gene Therapy.
|
|
| 4. |
- Baliakas, Panagiotis, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Cytogenetics in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia : ERIC Perspectives and Recommendations
- 2022
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 2572-9241. ; 6:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Mounting evidence underscores the clinical value of cytogenetic analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), particularly as it allows the identification of complex karyotype, that has recently emerged as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker. That said, explicit recommendations regarding the methodology and clinical interpretation of either chromosome banding analysis (CBA) or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are still lacking. We herein present the consensus of the Cytogenetic Steering Scientific Committee of ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, regarding methodological issues as well as clinical interpretation of CBA/CMA and discuss their relevance in CLL. ERIC considers CBA standardized and feasible for CLL on the condition that standards are met, extending from the use of novel mitogens to the accurate interpretation of the findings. On the other hand, CMA, is also standardized, however, robust data on its clinical utility are still scarce. In conclusion, cytogenetic analysis is not yet mature enough to guide treatment choices in CLL. That notwithstanding, ERIC encourages the wide application of CBA, and potentially also CMA, in clinical trials in order to obtain robust evidence regarding the predictive value of specific cytogenetic profiles towards refining risk stratification and improving the management of patients with CLL.
|
|
| 5. |
- Baliakas, Panagiotis, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Nordic Guidelines for Germline Predisposition to Myeloid Neoplasms in Adults: Recommendations for Genetic Diagnosis, Clinical Management and Follow-up
- 2019
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. - 2572-9241. ; 3:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with germline predisposition have recently been recognized as novel entities in the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification for MNs. Individuals with MNs due to germline predisposition exhibit increased risk for the development of MNs, mainly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Setting the diagnosis of MN with germline predisposition is of crucial clinical significance since it may tailor therapy, dictate the selection of donor for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), determine the conditioning regimen, enable relevant prophylactic measures and early intervention or contribute to avoid unnecessary or even harmful medication. Finally, it allows for genetic counseling and follow-up of at-risk family members. Identification of these patients in the clinical setting is challenging, as there is no consensus due to lack of evidence regarding the criteria defining the patients who should be tested for these conditions. In addition, even in cases with a strong suspicion of a MN with germline predisposition, no standard diagnostic algorithm is available. We present the first version of the Nordic recommendations for diagnostics, surveillance and management including considerations for allo-HSCT for patients and carriers of a germline mutation predisposing to the development of MNs.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Christensen, Sarah, et al.
(författare)
-
Healthcare resource utilization in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a nationwide matched cohort study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 2572-9241. ; 5:S2, s. 529-530
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with severe complications and a substantial symptom burden – frequently emerging several years before diagnosis. Due to the chronic nature ofthe diseases, MPN patients have a lifelong need for treatment and care. However, only few studies have assessed MPN healthcare resource utilization (HRU) compared with matched cohorts, and no detailed assessments of HRU in the years preceding MPN diagnosis exist.Aims: To assess the pre- and post-diagnostic HRU of MPN patients compared with matched cohorts of nonMPN comparisons.Methods: We conducted this descriptive, register-based nationwide cohort study, utilizing data from the Danish National Chronic Myeloid Neoplasia Registry on all MPN patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2016, and data on HRU from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Health Service Registry. Populationbased cohorts of nonMPN comparisons were constructed by 1:10 matchingon age, sex, level of education, and region of residence. Data were linkedusing the unique civil registration number, which identifies all Danish citizens. HRU was summarized over each year for all cohorts from twoyears before date of MPN diagnosis and until emigration, death, or endof study (31 December 2017). HRU was calculated as annual number ofhealthcare contacts (inpatient days, outpatient consultations, treatmentsand examinations, and general practitioner [GP] visits) divided by person-years at risk and compared using rate ratios with 95% CI.Results: The study population included 3,342 MPN patients (1,140 essential thrombocythemia [ET]; 1,109 polycythemia vera [PV]; 533 primary myelofibrosis [PMF]; and 560 unspecified MPN [MPN-U]) and 32,737 nonMPN comparisons (11,181 nonET; 10,873 nonPV; 5,217 nonPMF; and 5,466 nonMPN-U). The median age was 67 (ET), 69 (PV), 73 (PMF), and 72 years (MPN-U), and the mean follow-up was 3.8 (ET), 3.8(PV), 3.1 (PMF), and 3.3 years (MPN-U). A total of 750 (22.4%) MPNpatients and 4,627 (14.1%) nonMPN comparisons died during follow-up.In nearly all years of follow-up, MPN patients had a higher HRU thannonMPN comparisons (Figure, rate ratio>1). Rate ratios for outpatientconsultations were largest at the time of diagnosis: ET, 2.7 (95%CI, 2.6-2.9); PV, 3.4 (95%CI, 3.2-3.6); PMF, 4.0 (95%CI, 3.7-4.4); and MPN-U,3.7 (95%CI, 3.4-4.0). For most MPN subtypes, rate ratios also peaked attime of diagnosis for treatment and examinations. In contrast, the largest rate ratio for PV was in the last year of follow-up: 3.5 (95%CI, 2.8-4.3). Across MPN subtypes, rate ratios for GP visits varied from 1.0 to1.5 during follow-up without any considerable fluctuations. Interestingly, increased rate ratios for inpatients days were evident 2 years before diagnosis: ET, 1.8 (95%CI, 1.7-1.9); PV, 1.3, (95%CI, 1.2-1.3); PMF, 1.4(95%CI, 1.2-1.5); and MPN-U, 1.7 (95%CI, 1.6-1.9). During follow-up,notable increases in rate ratios were observed, e.g., PMF 3.0 (95%CI 2.4-3.6) and PV 3.8 (95%CI 3.0-4.8) in year 5 and 7, respectively.Summary/Conclusion: Overall, compared with matched nonMPN comparisons, MPN patients had a higher HRU throughout the study period. This was consistent across MPN subtypes and HRU measures. Within the limitations of small numbers toward end of follow-up and lack ofmatching on comorbidity, our findings confirmed a consistent HRU burden after MPN diagnosis. Equally important, our study revealed substantial increases in HRU two years before MPN diagnosis, warrantingfurther exploration of the pre-diagnostic period, including the potentialbenefits of early detection.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
- Eskelund, Christian Winther, et al.
(författare)
-
Detailed Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Relapsed After the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Trials : MCL2 and MCL3
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 2572-9241. ; 5:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with a highly variable clinical course. The prognosis after relapse is generally poor, and no standard of care exists. We investigated the postrelapse outcomes of 149 patients who were initially treated in the Nordic Lymphoma Group trials, MCL2 or MCL3, both representing intensive cytarabine-containing frontline regimens including autologous stem cell transplant. Patients with progression of disease before 24 months (POD24, n = 51, 34%) displayed a median overall survival of 6.6 months compared with 46 months for patients with later POD (n = 98, 66%; P < 0.001). MCL international prognostic index, cell proliferation marker, blastoid morphology, and TP53 mutations showed independent prognostic value irrespective of POD24, and in a combined, exploratory risk score, patients with 0, 1, 2-3, or 4-5 high-risk markers, respectively, displayed a 5-year overall survival of 62%, 39%, 31%, and 0%. By a comparison of median progression-free survival of the different salvage therapies in the relapse setting, bendamustine-rituximab was superior to all other combination chemotherapy regimens; however, it was also associated with longer responses to last line of therapy. Collectively, we confirm the prognostic impact of POD24 and highlight the relevance of other biomarkers, and we emphasize the importance of novel therapies for patients with high-risk features at first POD.
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
- Jerkeman, Mats, et al.
(författare)
-
Nationwide Assessment of Patient Trajectories in Mantle Cell Lymphoma : The Swedish MCLcomplete Project
- 2023
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 2572-9241. ; 7:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell malignancy currently considered incurable. Although some patients obtain prolonged remission after first-line chemoimmunotherapy, many will need several treatment lines. Here, we present a nationwide assessment of treatment strategies, time to progression and survival in MCL. All patients diagnosed with MCL 2006-2018 were identified in the Swedish Lymphoma Register. Information on all lines of therapy was extracted from the medical records. Overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) were assessed through August 2021. In total, 1367 patients were included (median age, 71 years) and median follow-up was 6.8 years. Two hundred and one (15%) were managed initially with watch-and-wait, but 1235 (90%) eventually received treatment. The most frequently used first-line regimens were rituximab-bendamustine (BR) (n = 368; 30%) and Nordic MCL2 (n = 342; 28%). During follow-up, 630 patients (46%) experienced relapse/progression and 546 (40%) received second-line treatment. The most frequently used second-line regimen was BR (n = 185; 34%) but otherwise a wide variety of second-line treatments were used. Further, 382 and 228 patients experienced a second or third relapse/progression, respectively. Median PFS after first (PFS-1), second (PFS-2), third (PFS-3), and fourth (PFS-4) treatment lines was 29.4, 8.9, 4.3, and 2.7 months. Patients with early progression, defined as a PFS-1 <24 months, had an inferior median OS of 13 versus 37 months in patients with later relapse. For patients treated with frontline BR, however, time to relapse had no impact on later outcome. By use of nationwide population-based data, we provide important benchmarks for future studies of all treatment lines in MCL.
|
|
| 19. |
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
| 23. |
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
|
|
