| 1. |
- Atieh, M. A., et al.
(författare)
-
ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015. ; 3:3, s. 5-36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of various materials and techniques for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction compared with extraction alone or other methods of ARP in patients requiring dental implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of ARP techniques with at least six months of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool. Data were analysed using a statistical software program. RESULTS. A total of 16 RCTs with 524 extraction sockets in 426 participants were included. The meta-analysis showed a very low certainty evidence of a reduction in loss of alveolar ridge width (mean difference (MD)-1.18 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI)-1.82 to-0.54; P = 0.0003) and height (MD-1.35 mm, 95% CI-2.00 to-0.70; P < 0.0001) in favour of xenograft when compared to extraction alone. There are no significant differences in the need for additional augmentation or implant failure between xenograft and extraction alone. No serious adverse events were reported with most trials indicating that the procedure was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS. ARP techniques may minimise the overall changes in residual ridge height and width six months after extraction but the evidence is very uncertain. There is no evidence of any clinically significant difference between different grafting materials and barriers used for ARP.
|
|
| 2. |
- Azaripour, A., et al.
(författare)
-
SOFT TISSUE SUBSTITUTES AT IMMEDIATE POST-EXTRACTIVE IMPLANTS TO REDUCE TISSUE SHRINKAGE – 3-YEAR RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015. ; 3:3, s. 47-57
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. The aim of this parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate whether placement of a soft tissue graft substitute (STGS) could decrease peri-implant tissue shrinkage at immediate post-extractive implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty patients with one missing tooth between two adja-cent healthy teeth in aesthetic areas and at least 4 mm of bone apically to the tooth apex were randomly allocated after tooth extraction to receive or not a subepithelial buccal STGS. Implants were inserted with a torque of at least 30 Ncm and sites were grafted with a cancellous particulate allograft. Ten patients received a buccal STGS and 10 patients did not (control group). All patients were restored with non-occluding immediate provisional screw-retained crowns, replaced after 6 months by definitive metal-ceramic crowns, and were followed to 3-year after grafting/loading. RESULTS. Three-year after loading, no drop-out, crown or implant failure or complication occurred. No statistically significant difference or trends in aesthetics (difference = 0.2, 95% CI:-0.81 to 1.21; P = 0.97), peri-implant marginal bone loss (difference = 0.14 mm; 95% CI:-0.27 to 0.57; P = 0.58) and keratinized mucosa heights (difference = 0.8 mm; 95% CI:-1.79 to 3.39; P = 0.57) between the two groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS. Acknowledging that the sample size was small, no clinical benefits could be observed using a soft tissue graft substitute at immediate post-extractive implants up to 3-year after grafting. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT. The manufacturer (BEGO Implant Systems, Bremen, Germany) of the implants used in this investigation, partially supported this trial, however data belonged to the authors and by no means the sponsor interfered with the conduct of the trial or the publication of its results.
|
|
| 3. |
- Barausse, Carlo, et al.
(författare)
-
POSTERIOR JAW REHABILITATION USING PARTIAL PROSTHESES SUPPORTED BY IMPLANTS 4.0 X 4.0 MM OR LONGER: THREE-YEAR POST-LOADING RESULTS OF A MULTICENTRE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015 .- 2785-3039. ; 1, s. 25-36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. To evaluate whether 4.0 x 4.0-mm dental implants could be viable alternatives to implants of length at least 8.5 mm when placed in posterior jaws with adequate bone volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and fifty patients with posterior (premolar and molar areas) jaws having at least 12.5 mm bone height above the mandibular canal or 11.5 mm below the maxillary sinus, as applicable, were randomised according to a paral-lel-group design and received one to three 4.0 mm-long implants or one to three implants which were at least 8.5 mm-long at three treatment centres. All implants had a diameter of 4.0 mm. Implants were loaded with permanent screw-retained prostheses after 4 months. Patients were followed-up until 3-year post-loading, and outcome measures considered were prosthesis and implant failure, any complications, and changes in pe-ri-implant marginal bone levels. RESULTS. Seventy-five patients were randomly allocated to each group. Drop-outs at 3-year post-loading assessment were five patients from the long implant group and three from the short implant group. Up to 3 years post-loadings, three patients lost one 4.0 mm-long implant each, in comparison to two patients who lost one long implant each (difference in proportion =-0.013; 95% CI:-0.079 to 0.054; P = 1). All failures occurred before loading; failed implants were replaced, delaying delivery of two prostheses in each group by several months (difference in proportion = 0; 95% CI:-0.061 to 0.062; P = 1). Five short-implant patients experienced six complications versus the three complications seen in three long implant patients (difference in proportion =-0.026; 95% CI:-0.103 to 0.053; P = 0.719). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in prosthesis failures, implant failures or complications. Patients with short implants lost on average 0.55 mm of peri-implant bone, and patients with longer implants lost 0.61 mm. There were no statistically significant differences between short and long implants in bone level changes up to 3 years (mean difference = 0.05 mm; 95% CI:-0.05 to 0.16; P = 0.221). CONCLUSIONS. Outcomes 3 years after loading were similar with 4.0 x 4.0 mm-long implants and 8.5 x 4.0 mm or longer implants in posterior jaws, in the presence of adequate bone volumes. However, 5 to 10-year post-loading data will be necessary before reliable recommendations can be made. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT. Global D (Brignais, France) partially supported this trial and donated the implants and prosthetic components. OsteoBiol (Tecnoss, Giaveno, Italy) donated the biomaterials used for bone augmentation. However, the data property belonged to the authors and neither Global D nor OsteoBiol interfered in any way with the conduct of the trial or the publication of the results.
|
|
| 4. |
- Esposito, Marco, 1965, et al.
(författare)
-
MACHINED VERSUS CAST ABUTMENTS FOR DENTAL IMPLANTS: A 1-YEAR WITHIN-PATIENT MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING MARGINAL SEAL CAPACITY AND OUTCOMES
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015. ; 3:2, s. 19-31
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE To compare clinical outcomes of machined titanium abutments (machined group) versus cast cobalt-chrome abutments (cast group) and to evaluate in vitro their implant fit. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study comprised two parts. In the in vitro part, the im-plant–abutment fit of 5 cast abutments and 5 machined abutments screwed on with a torque of 30 Ncm was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated using micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) and AgNO3 to reveal connection gaps. In the clinical part, 31 partially edentulous subjects received two single non-adjacent implant-supported crowns at three centres. At impression taking, three and a half months after implant placement, implants were randomized to receive a machined or cast abutment according to a wi-thin-patient study design. Unfortunately, four patients dropped out and one patient lost one implant before randomization, so only 26 patients had their implants randomized. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complications, and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes. Patients were followed up to 1 year after loading. RESULTS The fit of the implant–abutment connection was assessed in vitro using µ-CT scans. No gaps were revealed at any of the machined or cast abutments tested. In the clinical part, after randomization, three patients dropped out, no implant failed, but one crown on a cast abutment was replaced. The between-group difference in prosthesis failure was not statistically different (McNemar chi-square test P = 1.0; difference in proportions = 0.039). One complication occurred in each group, the difference not being statistically different (McNemar test P = 1.000; difference in proportions = 0; 95% CI 0.06 to 15.99). Both groups presented statistically significant peri-implant marginal bone loss from implant placement to 1 year after loading, respectively-0.76 ± 1.01 mm for machined and-0.69 ± 0.82 mm for cast abutments, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (mean difference 0.07 mm; 95% CI-0.54 to 0.67; P = 0.828). Both groups gradually lost marginal peri-implant bone from loading to 1 year after loading but this was not significantly different, respectively-0.06 ± 0.56 mm for machined and-0.10 ± 0.29 mm for cast abutments, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.739; mean difference 0.07 mm; 95% CI-0.12 to 0.16; P = 0.739). CONCLUSIONS Our clinical data suggests that implant prognosis up to 1 year after loading is not affected by using machined or cast abutments. In support of these findings, in vitro analysis proved that both types of abutments allow a tight fit with no gaps. The-refore, for the time being dentists should feel free to choose whichever type they prefer. However, these preliminary results need to be confirmed by larger trials with at least 10 years of follow-up.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Testori, T., et al.
(författare)
-
IMMEDIATE NON-OCCLUSAL VERSUS EARLY LOADING OF DENTAL IMPLANTS IN PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS - 15-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A MULTICENTRE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015. ; 3:1, s. 5-20
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. To compare peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels at immediately non-oc-clusally loaded versus non-submerged early-loaded implants in partially edentulous patients 15 years after loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-two patients from five Italian private practices were randomised, 25 to immediate loading and 27 to early loading. To be immediately loaded, single full Osseotite implants had to be inserted with a torque of at least 30 Ncm, and splinted implants with a torque of at least 20 Ncm. Immediately loaded implants were provided with non-occluding temporary restorations within 48 hours, which were brought into full occlusion after 2 months. In the early loading group, implants were loaded after 2 months. Definitive restorations were provided 8 months after implant placement in both groups. Outcome measures were prosthesis failures, implant failures and complica-tions, recorded by non-blinded assessors, and peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels, as evaluated by blinded assessors. RESULTS. Fifty implants were loaded immediately and 54 early. Twelve patients with 24 implants dropped out from the immediate group versus 11 patients with 22 implants from the early loaded group, but all remaining patients were followed up for at least 15 years after loading. One single implant with its provisional crowns and one definitive prothesis failed in the immediate loading group. Seven patients with immediately loaded and two with early loaded implants reported complications. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of implant failures (Fisher’s exact test P = 0.481; diff. =-0.04, 95% CI:-0.16 to 0.08), prosthesis failures (Fisher’s exact test P = 0.226; diff. =-0.08, 95% CI:-0.21 to 0.06), or complications (Fisher’s exact test P = 0.066; diff. =-0.22, 95% CI:-0.41 to 0.01). There were also no statistically significant differences in peri-implant bone (diff. = 0.28 mm, 95%CI:-0.35 to 0.91; P = 0.368) or soft-tissue level changes (diff. = 0.34 mm, 95%CI:-0.32 to 1.00; P = 0.292) between the two groups. Specifically, after 15 years immediately loaded patients had lost an average of 1.75 mm, and early loaded patients an average of 1.44 mm of peri-implant marginal bone. CONCLUSIONS. The long-term prognosis of prostheses supported by both immediately and early-loaded implants seems favourable.
|
|
| 7. |
- Xhanari, Erta, et al.
(författare)
-
MACHINED VERSUS CAST ABUTMENTS FOR SINGLE DENTAL IMPLANTS: A 3-YEAR WITHIN-PATIENT MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Trials in Dentistry. - 2784-9015 .- 2785-3039. ; 5:1, s. 5-16
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. To compare clinical outcomes of machined titanium abutments (machined group) versus cast cobalt-chrome abutments (cast group). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-one partially edentulous subjects received two single non-adjacent implant-supported crowns each at three centres. Three and a half months after implant placement, implants were randomized at impression taking to receive one machined and one cast abutment according to a within-patient study design. Four patients dropped out and one patient lost one implant before randomization, so only 26 patients had their implants randomized. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complications, and radiographic peri-implant marginal bone level changes. Patients were followed up for 3 years after loading. RESULTS. After randomization, three patients dropped out. One implant failed and two crowns on cast abutments were lost, but differences in implant and prosthesis failures were not statistically different (McNemar test P = 1.000; difference in proportions = 0.04 and P = 0.500; difference in proportions = 0.08, respectively). Two minor complications occurred in the cast group versus one in the machined group, the difference not being statistically different (McNemar test P = 1.000; difference in proportions = 0.04; 95% CI 0.18 to 22.06). Both groups presented statistically significant peri-implant marginal bone loss from implant placement to 3 years after loading, respectively-0.72 ± 0.90 mm (P = 0.001) for machined and-0.60 ± 0.61 mm (P <0.001) for cast abutments, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (mean difference-0.12 mm; 95% CI-0.57 to 0.34; P = 0.624). Both groups gradually lost marginal peri-implant bone from loading (baseline) to 3 years after loading, but this was not statistically significant; machined lost-0.05 ± 0.12 mm while cast lost-0.14 ± 0.11 mm, a difference that was not statistically significant (mean difference 0.06 mm; 95% CI-0.24 to 0.35; P = 0.708). CONCLUSIONS. The present clinical data suggest that implant prognosis up to 3 years after loading is not affected by the choice of machined or cast abutments.
|
|
