| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Dreno, B., et al.
(författare)
-
An expert view on the treatment of acne with systemic antibiotics and/or oral isotretinoin in the light of the new European recommendations
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Eur J Dermatol. ; 16:5, s. 565-71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2003 the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products amended the summary product characteristics for oral isotretinoin to standardise information provided from the different countries of the European Community. The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products recommended that among others, exclusively severe forms of acne (such as nodular or conglobate acne or acne at risk of permanent scarring) resistant to "adequate courses" of standard therapy with systemic antibacterials and local therapy should benefit from oral isotretinoin. However, no indication was provided on what were considered adequate courses or the possibility given to use oral isotretinoin as first line treatment. The aims of the present report were: 1) to provide a specialist view on when it is appropriate to introduce oral isotretinoin as a second line therapy for acne, taking into consideration optimum dosage and duration of systemic antibiotics prior to the start of the oral isotretinoin, and 2) to support the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy in specific cases for acne in clinical practice. The recommendations are based on an exhaustive literature review as well as on the personal experience of the members of an European panel of acne specialists. The EEP agreed with the decision made by the CPMP that oral isotretinoin should be administered as 2nd line therapy in those cases of severe acne, which were resistant to or which did not respond successfully to an initial combination regimen with systemic antibiotics and topical treatments (topical retinoids +/- benzoyl peroxide). However, the members emphasized that a number of prognostic factors, as well as psychosocial morbidity should be taken into account when choosing the regimen and that these factors may influence the use of oral isotretinoin as first line therapy.
|
|
| 11. |
- Dréno, B, et al.
(författare)
-
Combination therapy with adapalene-benzoyl peroxide and oral lymecycline in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris : a multicentre, randomized, double-blind controlled study
- 2011
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Dermatology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-0963 .- 1365-2133. ; 165:2, s. 383-390
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:Oral antibiotics in association with a topical retinoid with or without benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are the recommended first-line option in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lymecycline 300 mg with adapalene 0·1%-BPO 2·5% (A/BPO) fixed-dose gel in comparison with oral lymecycline 300 mg with a vehicle gel in subjects with moderate to severe acne vulgaris.METHODS:A total of 378 subjects were randomized in a double-blind, controlled trial to receive once-daily lymecycline with either A/BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks. Evaluations included percentage changes from baseline in lesion counts, success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), skin tolerability, adverse events and patients' satisfaction.RESULTS:The median percentage reduction from baseline in total lesion counts at week 12 was significantly higher (P < 0·001) in the lymecycline with A/BPO group (-74·1%) than in the lymecycline with vehicle group (-56·8%). The success rate was significantly higher (47·6% vs. 33·7%, P = 0·002) in subjects treated with lymecycline and A/BPO. Both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions were significantly reduced at week 12 (both P < 0·001) with a rapid onset of action from week 2 for noninflammatory lesions (P < 0·001) and week 4 for inflammatory lesions (P = 0·005). The A/BPO and lymecycline combination was well tolerated. The proportion of satisfied and very satisfied subjects was similar in both groups, but the number in the A/BPO group who were 'very satisfied' was significantly greater (P = 0·031).CONCLUSION:These results demonstrate the clinical benefit of combining A/BPO with lymecycline in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
- Knobler, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0926-9959 .- 1468-3083. ; 28:s1, s. 1-37
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundAfter the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease. Materials and methodsIn order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. Results and conclusionThese guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
