| 1. |
- Simmons, D., et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0029-7828 .- 1533-9866. ; 78:11, s. 636-637
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- (Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2023;388(23):2132-2144) Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common pregnancy complication. It is associated with adverse outcomes, including preeclampsia, obstetrical intervention, large-for-gestational-age neonates, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Cohort studies have found that women with hyperglycemia before 20 weeks of gestation are more likely to experience accelerated fetal growth by 24 to 28 weeks than those diagnosed with GDM later in pregnancy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sweeting, Arianne, et al.
(författare)
-
Relationship Between Early-Pregnancy Glycemia and Adverse Outcomes : Findings From the TOBOGM Study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Diabetes Care. - : American Diabetes Association. - 0149-5992 .- 1935-5548.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: We evaluated associations between early-pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose and complications in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) cohort to inform prognostic OGTT thresholds. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Individuals with risk factors for hyperglycemia were recruited for an international, multicenter, randomized controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) treatment trial. A 2-h 75-g OGTT was performed at <20 weeks' gestation. Individuals with early treated hyperglycemia in pregnancy were excluded from the primary analysis. Early OGTT glucose concentrations were analyzed continuously and in glycemic categories (normal, low band, and high band).RESULTS: Overall, 3,645 individuals had an OGTT at (mean ± SD) 15.6 ± 2.5 weeks. For each 1-SD increase in fasting, 1-h, and 2-h glucose values, there were continuous positive associations with late GDM: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.04 (95% CI 1.82-2.27), 3.05 (2.72-3.43), and 2.21 (1.99-2.45), respectively. There were continuous positive associations between 1-h and 2-h glucose and the perinatal composite (birth <37 + 0 weeks, birth trauma, birth weight ≥4,500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy requirement, stillbirth/neonatal death, and shoulder dystocia), with aOR 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.26) and 1.14 (1.04-1.25), respectively, and with large-for-gestational-age offspring, with aOR 1.18 (1.06-1.31) and 1.26 (1.01-1.25), respectively. Significant associations were also observed between 1-h glucose and cesarean section and between fasting and 2-h glucose and neonatal hypoglycemia. In categorical analysis, only the high-band 1-h glucose (≥10.6 mmol/L [191 mg/dL]) predicted the perinatal composite.CONCLUSIONS: There is a continuous positive association between early-pregnancy OGTT glucose and complications. In individuals with hyperglycemia risk factors, only the high-glycemic-band 1-h glucose corresponded to increased risk of major perinatal complications.
|
|
| 3. |
- Haque, Mohammad M., et al.
(författare)
-
Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus : economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: eClinicalMedicine. - : Elsevier. - 2589-5370. ; 71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) "Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus" (TOBOGM: 2017-2022) found that the diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) improved pregnancy outcomes. Based on data from the trial, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early GDM (from <20 weeks') among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy compared with usual care (no treatment until 24-28 weeks') from a healthcare perspective.METHODS: Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).FINDINGS: Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [-7.8% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -14.6%, -0.9%), -$2795 (95% CI: -$6,638, -$533)]; the intervention was more effective and tended to be less costly [-8.9% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -15.1%, -2.6%), -$5548 (95% CI: -$16,740, $1547)] among women diagnosed before 14 weeks' gestation as well. INTERPRETATION: Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention.
|
|
| 4. |
- Simmons, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - : Massachusetts Medical Society. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 388:23, s. 2132-2144
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Whether treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation improves maternal and infant health is unclear.METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, women between 4 weeks' and 19 weeks 6 days' gestation who had a risk factor for hyperglycemia and a diagnosis of gestational diabetes (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) to receive immediate treatment for gestational diabetes or deferred or no treatment, depending on the results of a repeat oral glucose-tolerance test [OGTT] at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation (control). The trial included three primary outcomes: a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (birth at <37 weeks' gestation, birth trauma, birth weight of ≥4500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth or neonatal death, or shoulder dystocia), pregnancy-related hypertension (preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), and neonatal lean body mass.RESULTS: A total of 802 women underwent randomization; 406 were assigned to the immediate-treatment group and 396 to the control group; follow-up data were available for 793 women (98.9%). An initial OGTT was performed at a mean (±SD) gestation of 15.6±2.5 weeks. An adverse neonatal outcome event occurred in 94 of 378 women (24.9%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 113 of 370 women (30.5%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -5.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.1 to -1.2). Pregnancy-related hypertension occurred in 40 of 378 women (10.6%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 37 of 372 women (9.9%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 2.9). The mean neonatal lean body mass was 2.86 g in the immediate-treatment group and 2.91 g in the control group (adjusted mean difference, -0.04 g; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02). No between-group differences were observed with respect to serious adverse events associated with screening and treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Immediate treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation led to a modestly lower incidence of a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes than no immediate treatment; no material differences were observed for pregnancy-related hypertension or neonatal lean body mass. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; TOBOGM Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000924459.).
|
|
| 5. |
- Cooray, Shamil D., et al.
(författare)
-
Temporal validation and updating of a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. - : Elsevier. - 0895-4356 .- 1878-5921. ; 164, s. 54-64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The original Monash gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk prediction in early pregnancy model is internationally externally validated and clinically implemented. We temporally validate and update this model in a contemporary population with a universal screening context and revised diagnostic criteria and ethnicity categories, thereby improving model performance and generalizability.Study Design and Setting: The updating dataset comprised of routinely collected health data for singleton pregnancies delivered in Melbourne, Australia from 2016 to 2018. Model predictors included age, body mass index, ethnicity, diabetes family history, GDM history, and poor obstetric outcome history. Model updating methods were recalibration-in-the-large (Model A), intercept and slope re-estimation (Model B), and coefficient revision using logistic regression (Model C1, original ethnicity categories; Model C2, revised ethnicity categories). Analysis included 10-fold cross-validation, assessment of performance measures (c-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope, and expected-observed ratio), and a closed-loop testing procedure to compare models' log-likelihood and akaike information criterion scores.Results: In 26,474 singleton pregnancies (4,756, 18% with GDM), the original model demonstrated reasonable temporal validation (c-statistic = 0.698) but suboptimal calibration (expected-observed ratio = 0.485). Updated model C2 was preferred, with a high c-statistic (0.732) and significantly better performance in closed testing.Conclusion: We demonstrated updating methods to sustain predictive performance in a contemporary population, highlighting the value and versatility of prediction models for guiding risk-stratified GDM care.
|
|
