| 1. |
- Almqvist, Hakan, et al.
(författare)
-
Radiological evaluation in patients with clinical suspicion of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis presenting with nontraumatic headache-a retrospective observational study with a validation cohort
- 2020
-
Ingår i: BMC Medical Imaging. - : BMC. - 1471-2342. ; 20:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Clinical suspicion of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is imprecise due to non-specific symptoms such as headache. The aim was to retrospectively assess the diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT (neCT) in patients with nontraumatic headache and clinically suspected CVST. Methods A retrospective consecutive series of patients referred 2013-2015 for radiology were evaluated. Eligible patients had nontraumatic headache and suspicion of CVST stated in the referral, investigated with CT venography (CTV) and nonenhanced CT (neCT). neCT scans were re-evaluated for the presence of CVST or other pathology. All CTVs were checked for the presence of CVST. The validation cohort consisted of 10 patients with nontraumatic CVT (2017-2019). Results Less than 1% (1/104) had a suspected thrombus on neCT, confirmed by subsequent CTV. The remaining 99% had a CTV excluding CVST. Eleven percent had other imaging findings explaining their symptoms. In the patient with CVST, the thrombosed dural sinus was high attenuating (maximum HU 89) leading to the suspicion of CVST confirmed by CTV. The validation cohort (n = 10) confirmed the presence of a high attenuating (HU > 65) venous structure in the presence of a confirmed thrombus in all patients presenting within 10 days (suspicion written in referral, 10%). Conclusions Despite clinical suspicion, imaging findings of CVST in nontraumatic headache are uncommon. Evaluating neCT for high attenuation in dural sinuses, followed by CTV for confirmation in selected cases seems reasonable. CVST should be recognized by all radiologists and requires a high level of awareness when reading neCT for other indications.
|
|
| 2. |
- Delgado, Anna Falk, et al.
(författare)
-
Discrimination between primary low-grade and high-grade glioma with 11C-methionine PET : a bivariate diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
- 2018
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Radiology. - : British Institute of Radiology. - 0007-1285 .- 1748-880X. ; 91:1082
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET) to discriminate between primary low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG).Methods: A systematic database search was performed by a librarian in relevant databases with the latest search on 07 November 2016. Hits were assessed for inclusion independently by two authors. Individual patient data on relative MET uptake was extracted on patients examined pre-operatively with MET PET and subsequent neuropathological diagnosis of astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma. Individual patient data were analysed for diagnostic accuracy using a bivariate diagnostic random-effects meta-analysis model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation method. Bivariate meta-regression and subgroup analyses assessed study heterogeneity and validity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016050747.Results: Out of 1828 hits, 13 studies comprising of 241 individuals were included in the quantitative and qualitative analysis. MET PET had an area under the bivariate summary receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78 to discriminate between LGG and HGG and a summary sensitivity of 0.80 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.66–0.88) and a summary false positive rate of 0.28, 95% CI (0.19–0.38). Heterogeneity was described by; bias in patient inclusion, study quality, and ratio method. Optimal cutoff for relative MET uptake was 2.21.Conclusion: MET PET had a moderately high diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination between primary LGG and HGG.Advances in knowledge: MET PET can be used as a clinical tool for the non-invasive discrimination between LGG and HGG with a moderately high accuracy at cut-off 2.21.
|
|
| 3. |
- Delgado, Anna Falk, et al.
(författare)
-
Glioma Grade Discrimination with MR Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging : A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Radiology. - : RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA. - 0033-8419 .- 1527-1315. ; 287:1, s. 119-127
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: To assess the diagnostic test accuracy and sources of heterogeneity for the discriminative potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) to differentiate low-grade glioma (LGG) (World Health Organization [WHO] grade II) from high-grade glioma (HGG) (WHO grade III or IV).Materials and Methods: The Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and the Web of Science Core Collection were systematically searched by two librarians. Retrieved hits were screened for inclusion and were evaluated with the revised tool for quality assessment for diagnostic accuracy studies (commonly known as QUADAS-2) by two researchers. Statistical analysis comprised a random-effects model with associated heterogeneity analysis for mean differences in mean kurtosis (MK) in patients with LGG or HGG. A bivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation method was used to describe the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and bivariate meta-regression.Results: Ten studies involving 430 patients were included. The mean difference in MK between LGG and HGG was 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11, 0.22) with a z score equal to 5.86 (P<.001). The statistical heterogeneity was explained by glioma subtype, echo time, and the proportion of recurrent glioma versus primary glioma. The pooled area under the curve was 0.94 for discrimination of HGG from LGG, with 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.92) sensitivity and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) specificity. Heterogeneity was driven by neuropathologic subtype and DKI technique.Conclusion: MK shows high diagnostic accuracy in the discrimination of LGG from HGG.
|
|
| 4. |
- Delgado, Anna Falk, et al.
(författare)
-
Neuroimaging lesion assessment by pseudo-subtraction of overlaid semi-transparent volumes : A technical description and feasibility series
- 2021
-
Ingår i: The Neuroradiology Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1971-4009 .- 2385-1996. ; 34:2, s. 128-130
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Assessing and reporting clinical images constitutes the mainstay of clinical neuroradiology. Continually increasing numbers of neuroradiology referrals and follow-up examinations call for reproducible, accurate, and rapid workflows. Readily available and easy to use, advanced workstation tools such as co-registration of volume series can be used to overlay volume series from two different time points as semi-transparent images, with an inverse color scale. By overlaying semi-transparent inverse color maps, stationary findings will be shaded out in grey, whereas progressing or regressing lesions will be highlighted as white or black in the resulting pseudo-subtraction map. Pseudosubtraction in longitudinal neuroradiology imaging might enhance workflow and imaging assessment.
|
|
| 5. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Arterial spin labeling MR imaging for differentiation between high- and low-grade glioma - A meta-analysis
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Neuro-Oncology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1522-8517 .- 1523-5866. ; 20:11, s. 1450-1461
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. Arterial spin labeling is an MR imaging technique that measures cerebral blood flow (CBF) noninvasively. The aim of the study is to assess the diagnostic performance of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MR imaging for differentiation between high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. Methods. Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched. Study selection ended November 2017. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017080885). Two authors screened all titles and abstracts for possible inclusion. Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to describe summary receiver operating characteristics. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. Results. In total, 15 studies with 505 patients were included. The diagnostic performance of ASL CBF for glioma grading was 0.90 with summary sensitivity 0.89 (0.79-0.90) and specificity 0.80 (0.72-0.89). The diagnostic performance was similar between pulsed ASL (AUC 0.90) with a sensitivity 0.85 (0.71-0.91) and specificity 0.83 (0.69- 0.92) and pseudocontinuous ASL (AUC 0.88) with a sensitivity 0.86 (0.79-0.91) and specificity 0.80 (0.65-0.87). In astrocytomas, the diagnostic performance was 0.89 with sensitivity 0.86 (0.79 to 0.91) and specificity 0.79 (0.63 to 0.89). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. TSA revealed that the meta-analysis was adequately powered. Conclusion. Arterial spin labeling MR imaging had an excellent diagnostic accuracy for differentiation between high-grade and low-grade glioma. Given its low cost, non-invasiveness, and efficacy, ASL MR imaging should be considered for implementation in the routine workup of patients with glioma.
|
|
| 6. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms : a pragmatic meta- analysis of randomized and non- randomized trials with short- and long- term follow- up
- 2017
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY. - : BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. - 1759-8478 .- 1759-8486. ; 9:3, s. 264-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Two randomized trials have evaluated clipping and coiling in patients with ruptured aneurysms. Aggregated evidence for management of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms is missing. Objective To conduct a meta- analysis evaluating clinical outcome after aneurysm treatment. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials. gov were searched for studies evaluating aneurysm treatment. The primary outcome measure was an independent clinical outcome ( modified Rankin scale 0- 2, Glasgow Outcome Scale 4- 5, or equivalent). Secondary outcomes were poor outcome and mortality. ORs were calculated on an intention- to- treat basis with 95% Cls. Outcome heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochrane's Q test ( significance level cut- off value at < 0.10) and l(2) ( significance cut- off value > 50%) with the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes. A p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results Searches yielded 18 802 articles. All titles were assessed, 403 abstracts were evaluated, and 183 full-text articles were read. One- hundred and fifty articles were qualitatively assessed and 85 articles were included in the meta- analysis. Patients treated with coiling ( randomized controlled trials ( RCTs)) had higher independent outcome at short- term follow- up ( OR= 0.67, 95% Cl 0.57 to 0.79). Independent outcome was favored for coiling at intermediate and long- term follow-up ( RCTs and observational studies combined-OR= 0.80, 0.68 to 0.94 and OR= 0.81, 0.71 to 0.93, respectively). Independent outcome and lower mortality was favored after coiling in unruptured aneurysms ( database registry studies) at short- term follow- up ( OR= 0.34, 0.29 to 0.41 and OR= 1.74, 1.52 to 1.98, respectively). Conclusions This meta- analysis evaluating clinical outcome after coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysms, indicates a higher independent outcome and lower mortality after coiling.
|
|
| 7. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Complete Lymph Node Dissection in Melanoma : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Anticancer Research. - : Anticancer Research USA Inc.. - 0250-7005 .- 1791-7530. ; 37:12, s. 6825-6829
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the survival after immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND) compared to observation only (OO) or delayed CLND in patients with melanoma and lymph node metastasis.Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Clinical trials and Embase. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing: CLND with OO, or immediate CLND with delayed CLND.Results: Four RCTs were included. There was no difference in melanoma-specific survival (MSS) (HR=0.91, 95% CI=0.77-1.08, p=0.29). In a sensitivity analysis, MSS was higher after immediate CLND compared to delayed CLND in patients with nodal metastasis (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.35-0.74, p=0.0004) without evidence of heterogeneity.Conclusion: CLND appears to have no additional survival benefit after SNB compared to OO. However, subgroup analysis suggests a time-dependent benefit for early surgical lymph node removal compared to delayed or none.
|
|
| 8. |
- Falk Delgado, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging : a comprehensive overview
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Insights into Imaging. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1869-4101. ; 10:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) increase lesion detection and improve disease characterization for many cerebral pathologies investigated with MRI. These agents, introduced in the late 1980s, are in wide use today. However, some non-ionic linear GBCAs have been associated with the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with kidney failure. Gadolinium deposition has also been found in deep brain structures, although it is of unclear clinical relevance. Hence, new guidelines from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine advocate cautious use of GBCA in clinical and research practice. Some linear GBCAs were restricted from use by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2017.This review focuses on non-contrast-enhanced MRI techniques that can serve as alternatives for the use of GBCAs. Clinical studies on the diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced as well as contrast-enhanced MRI methods, both well established and newly proposed, were included. Advantages and disadvantages together with the diagnostic performance of each method are detailed. Non-contrast-enhanced MRIs discussed in this review are arterial spin labeling (ASL), time of flight (TOF), phase contrast (PC), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging.Ten common diseases were identified for which studies reported comparisons of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. These specific diseases include primary brain tumors, metastases, abscess, multiple sclerosis, and vascular conditions such as aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, arteriovenous fistula, intracranial carotid artery occlusive disease, hemorrhagic, and ischemic stroke.In general, non-contrast-enhanced techniques showed comparable diagnostic performance to contrast-enhanced MRI for specific diagnostic questions. However, some diagnoses still require contrast-enhanced imaging for a complete examination.
|
|
| 9. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Home institution bias in the New England Journal of Medicine? : A noninferiority study on citation rates
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Scientometrics. - : SPRINGER. - 0138-9130 .- 1588-2861. ; 115:1, s. 607-611
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recently, in the four top journals of humanities, an institutional bias towards publication of authors from Harvard and Yale was shown. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is today the highest ranked general medical journal. It is unknown if there exists institutional bias favoring publication of articles originating from Harvard University, since the NEJM is produced by the Massachusetts Medical Society with close connections to the Harvard University. We examined if studies originating from the Harvard University published in the NEJM were noninferior in terms of citation rates compared to articles with an origin outside Harvard University. We evaluated original research articles published in the NEJM in 2000 up until June 2001. A two-sample noninferiority test based on the primary endpoint of citations was performed. Twenty-two studies were affiliated to the Harvard University and 280 studies were not affiliated to the Harvard University. The mean number of citations for Harvard affiliated studies was 625 (95% CI 358-952, median 354) and for non-Harvard affiliated studies 493 (95% CI 421-569, median 303). The mean difference was not statistically different between affiliations, but fulfilled the requirements for noninferiority [132 (95% CI - 138-402, P = 0.343), Delta 200]. In summary, citation rates were comparable between studies origination from the Harvard University compared to non-Harvard Institutions. Based on these results there appears to be low risk of institutional bias in the publishing process of original studies in the NEJM.
|
|
| 10. |
- Falk-Delgado, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Improved clinical outcome 3 months after endovascular treatment, including thrombectomy, in patients with acute ischemic stroke : a meta-analysis
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. - : BMJ. - 1759-8486 .- 1759-8478. ; 8:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator is standard treatment in acute stroke today. The benefit of endovascular treatment has been questioned. Recently, studies evaluating endovascular treatment and intravenous thrombolysis compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone, have reported improved outcome for the intervention group. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular treatment in addition to intravenous thrombolysis with intravenous thrombolysis alone.METHODS: Databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was a functional neurological outcome after 90 days. A secondary outcome was severe disability and death. Data were pooled in the control and intervention groups, and OR was calculated on an intention to treat basis with 95% CIs. Outcome heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochrane's Q test (significance level cut-off value at <0.10) and I(2) (significance cut-off value >50%) with the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes. A p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.RESULTS: Six studies met the eligibility criteria, and data from 1569 patients were analyzed. A higher probability of a functional neurological outcome after 90 days was found for the intervention group (OR 2, 95% CI 2 to 3). There was a significantly higher probability of death and severe disability in the control group compared with the intervention group.CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment in addition to intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke leads to an improved clinical outcome after 3 months, compared with patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis alone.
|
|
| 11. |
- Falk Delgado, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
[In Process Citation].
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 112
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Systemic thrombolysis is an established treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatment to reperfuse occluded vessels has been in clinical practice the last decade. The role of neurointervention in acute ischemic stroke has been questioned. Within the last year, several randomized controlled trials have been published, comparing endovascular treatment and systemic thrombolysis with systemic thrombolysis alone. A meta-analysis, using data from six trials treating 1569 patients, was recently published. In this meta-analysis, patients treated with endovascular therapy in addition to IV thrombolysis had a more favourable clinical outcome compared to patients receiving IV thrombolysis alone, after 3 months. Compared to the individ-ual studies, a decreased mortality in the intervention group was shown. Assessing the safety of endovascular treatment, there was no increased risk of intracranial bleed-ing, compared to IV thrombolysis alone. This meta-analysis highlights and summar-izes the scientific evidence for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.
|
|
| 12. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Inconsistent Reporting Between Meta-analysis Protocol and Publication – A Cross-Sectional Study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Anticancer Research. - : Anticancer Research USA Inc.. - 0250-7005 .- 1791-7530. ; 37:9, s. 5101-5107
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Inconsistent reporting in published meta-analyses compared to registered protocol are poorly understood. The aim of the study was to assess inconsistencies between registered protocols and published reports among oncology drug meta-analyses.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including oncology drug meta-analyses published between January 1st and November 14th 2016 with a published protocol. Two investigators extracted data on: selection criteria, outcome(s) and statistical plan in protocol and manuscript, plus self-acknowledgement of inconsistent reporting between protocol and publication.Results: Protocol registration was present in 19% (23/119) of all oncology drug meta-analyses. In meta-analyses with protocol (n= 23), 70% (16/23) had issues with inconsistent reporting between protocol and published report concerning; inclusion criteria, comparator group, intervention, outcome (PICO) or statistical analysis. Self-acknowledgement of changes between protocol and publication was found in 50% (8/16).Conclusion: In meta-analyses with protocol, discrepancies between registered protocols and publications are frequent.
|
|
| 13. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Melanoma Sentinel-Node Metastasis.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 377:9, s. 891-892
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 14. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm treatment : a non-inferiority meta-analysis comparing endovascular coiling and surgical clipping
- 2017
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Neurosurgery. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0268-8697 .- 1360-046X. ; 31:3, s. 345-349
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Aneurysms of the carotid-ophthalmic segment are relatively rare, comprising only five percent of all intracranial aneurysms. There is no consensus regarding the optimal management for ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms, whether endovascular coiling or surgical clipping provide the most favourable patient outcome. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyse these two treatment modalities for ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms with respect to independent clinical outcome.Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov for treatment of ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms, comparing endovascular coiling and surgical clipping. Primary outcome in the study was independent clinical patient outcome at follow up (defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale four–five). Secondary outcomes were poor clinical patient outcome, mortality and total angiographic occlusion. The meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenszel method for dichotomous outcome.Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 152 patients were included. Sixty-seven of these patients were treated with endovascular coiling and 85 patients were treated with microsurgical clipping. The proportion of patients with an independent clinical outcome after coiling and clipping was comparable, OR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.40, 2.71). The proportion of patients with an independent outcome in the endovascular group was 76% and in the surgical group 71%. Mortality between the two treatment arms was equal.Conclusion: Clinical outcome after endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms was comparable between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling. There was no proven difference in clinical outcome after endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms but the evidence was based on few studies of moderate to low quality and we cannot rule out the possibility of a difference in clinical outcome between the two treatment modalities.
|
|
| 15. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Self-declared stock ownership and association with positive trial outcome in randomized controlled trials with binary outcomes published in general medical journals : a cross-sectional study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Trials. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1745-6215. ; 18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Describe the prevalence and types of conflicts of interest (COI) in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in general medical journals with a binary primary outcome and assess the association between conflicts of interest and favorable outcome. Methods: Parallel-group RCTs with a binary primary outcome published in three general medical journals during 2013-2015 were identified. COI type, funding source, and outcome were extracted. Binomial logistic regression model was performed to assess association between COI and funding source with outcome. Results: A total of 509 consecutive parallel-group RCTs were included in the study. COI was reported in 74% in mixed funded RCTs and in 99% in for-profit funded RCTs. Stock ownership was reported in none of the non-profit RCTs, in 7% of mixed funded RCTs, and in 50% of for-profit funded RCTs. Mixed-funded RCTs had employees from the funding company in 11% and for-profit RCTs in 76%. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that stock ownership in the funding company among any of the authors was associated with a favorable outcome (odds ratio = 3.53; 95% confidence interval = 1.59-7.86; p < 0.01). Conclusion: COI in for-profit funded RCTs is extensive, because the factors related to COI are not fully independent, a multivariable analysis should be cautiously interpreted. However, after multivariable adjustment only stock ownership from the funding company among authors is associated with a favorable outcome.
|
|
| 16. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Current Oncology Reports. - : SPRINGER. - 1523-3790 .- 1534-6269. ; 21:6
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose of Review: The main surgical treatment for invasive malignant melanoma consists of wide surgical and examination of the sentinel node and in selected cases complete lymph node dissection. The aim of this review is to present data for the optimal surgical management of patients with malignant melanoma.Recent Findings: A surgical excision margin of 1-2cm is recommended for invasive melanoma depending on the thickness of the melanoma. Sentinel node biopsy may be considered for patients with at least T1b melanomas thickness 0.8 to 1.0mm or less than 0.8mm Breslow thickness with ulceration, classified as T1b lesion, per recent AJCC guidelines. Two randomized controlled trials have been publishedDeCOG (German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy) and MSLT-2 (Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial) comparing the complete lymph node dissection (CLND) with observation after positive sentinel node biopsy. In the MSLT-2 study, the disease control rate was improved in the immediate CLND group compared with observation but there was no difference in 3-year melanoma specific survival (86%1.3% and 86%+/- 1.2%, respectively; p=0.42). Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) or isolated limb infusion (ILI) with melphalan and actinomycin D is recommended for large and multiple in-transit metastases and satellite metastases in the extremities when local excision is considered ineffective or too extensive.Summary: In light of new adjuvant treatment options and new indications for checkpoint inhibitors, and the lack of survival benefit after CLND, we can expect open surgery to decrease in melanoma disease.
|
|
| 17. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
The association of funding source on effect size in randomized controlled trials : 2013-2015-a cross-sectional survey and metaanalysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Trials. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1745-6215. ; 18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Trials financed by for-profit organizations have been associated with favorable outcomes of new treatments, although the effect size of funding source impact on outcome is unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect size for a favorable outcome in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), stratified by funding source, that have been published in general medical journals. Methods: Parallel-group RCTs published in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, and JAMA between 2013 and 2015 were identified. RCTs with binary primary endpoints were included. The primary outcome was the OR of patients' having a favorable outcome in the intervention group compared with the control group. The OR of a favorable outcome in each trial was calculated by the number of positive events that occurred in the intervention and control groups. A meta-analytic technique with random effects model was used to calculate summary OR. Data were stratified by funding source as for-profit, mixed, and nonprofit. Prespecified sensitivity, subgroup, and metaregression analyses were performed. Results: Five hundred nine trials were included. The OR for a favorable outcome in for-profit-funded RCTs was 1.92 (95% CI 1.72-2.14), which was higher than mixed source-funded RCTs (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.43) and nonprofit-funded RCTs (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39). The OR for a favorable outcome was higher for both clinical and surrogate endpoints in for-profit-funded trials than in RCTs with other funding sources. Excluding drug trials lowered the OR for a favorable outcome in for-profit-funded RCTs. The OR for a favorable surrogate outcome in drug trials was higher in for-profit-funded trials than in nonprofit-funded trials. Conclusions: For-profit-funded RCTs have a higher OR for a favorable outcome than nonprofit-and mixed source-funded RCTs. This difference is associated mainly with the use of surrogate endpoints in for-profit-financed drug trials.
|
|
| 18. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
The language of peer review reports on articles published in the BMJ, 2014-2017 : an observational study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scientometrics. - : SPRINGER. - 0138-9130 .- 1588-2861. ; 120:3, s. 1225-1235
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To analyse the words and expressions used in peer reviews of manuscripts that were later published as original research in the BMJ. Secondary aims were to estimate the differences in net sentiment between peer review reports on manuscripts subject to one or more rounds of peer review and and review reports on initially rejected manuscripts that were accepted after appeal. This observational study included all peer review reports published in the BMJ from September 2014 until the end of 2017. The study analysed the frequency of specific words in peer review reports for accepted manuscripts, identifying the most commonly occurring positive and negative words and their context, as well as the most common expressions. It also quantified differences in net sentiment in peer review reports between manuscripts accepted after appeal and manuscript accepted without appeal. The dataset consisting of 1716 peer review reports contained 908,932 word tokens. Among the most frequent positive words were "well", "important", "clear", "while the negative words included "risk", "bias", and "confounding". The areas where the reviewer makes the most positive and negative comments included: "well-written paper", "well-written manuscript", "this is an important topic", "answers an important question", "high risk of bias" and "selection bias". The sentiment analysis revealed that manuscripts accepted after appeal had lower scores on review reports for joy and positive sentiment, in addition to having higher scores for negative words expressing sadness, fear, disgust and anger compared with manuscripts that were not initially rejected. Peer review comments were mainly related to methodology rather than the actual results. Peer review reports on initially rejected manuscripts were more negative and more often included expressions related to a high risk of bias.
|
|
| 19. |
- Delgado, A. F., et al.
(författare)
-
Arterial Spin-Labeling in Children with Brain Tumor : A Meta-Analysis
- 2018
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Neuroradiology. - : AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY. - 0195-6108 .- 1936-959X. ; 39:8, s. 1536-1542
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:The value of arterial spin-labeling in a pediatric population has not been assessed in a meta-analysis. PURPOSE:Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin-labeling-derived cerebral blood flow to discriminate low- and high-grade tumors. DATA SOURCES:MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were used. STUDY SELECTION:Pediatric patients with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging with verified neuropathologic diagnoses were included. DATA ANALYSIS:Relative CBF and absolute CBF and tumor grade were extracted, including sequence-specific information. Mean differences in CBF between low- and high-grade tumors were calculated. Study quality was assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS:Data were aggregated using the bivariate summary receiver operating characteristic curve model. Heterogeneity was explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses. The study protocol was published at PROSPERO (CRD42017075055). Eight studies encompassing 286 pediatric patients were included. The mean differences in absolute CBF were 29.62 mL/min/100 g (95% CI, 10.43-48.82 mL/min/100 g), I-2 = 74, P = .002, and 1.34 mL/min/100 g (95% CI, 0.95-1.74 mL/min/100 g), P < .001, I-2 = 38 for relative CBF. Pooled sensitivity for relative CBF ranged from 0.75 to 0.90, and specificity, from 0.77 to 0.92 with an area under curve = 0.92. Meta-regression showed no moderating effect of sequence parameters TE, TR, acquisition time, or ROI method. LIMITATIONS:Included tumor types, analysis method, and original data varied among included studies. CONCLUSIONS:Arterial spin-labeling-derived CBF measures showed high diagnostic accuracy for discriminating low- and high-grade tumors in pediatric patients with brain tumors. The relative CBF showed less variation among studies than the absolute CBF.
|
|
| 20. |
- Delgado, Anna F., et al.
(författare)
-
Discrimination between Glioma Grades II and III Using Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion MRI : A Meta-Analysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Neuroradiology. - 0195-6108 .- 1936-959X. ; 38:7, s. 1348-1355
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: DSC perfusion has been evaluated in the discrimination between low-grade and high-grade glioma but the diagnostic potential to discriminate beween glioma grades II and III remains unclear.PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of relative maximal CBV from DSC perfusion MR imaging to discriminate glioma grades II and III.DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov.STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies reported on patients evaluated with relative maximal CBV derived from DSC with a confirmed neuropathologic diagnosis of glioma World Health Organization grades II and III. Studies reporting on mean or individual patient data were considered for inclusion.DATA ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed by using inverse variance with the random-effects model and receiver operating characteristic curves describing optimal cutoffs and areas under the curve. Bivariate diagnostic random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate diagnostic accuracy.DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies evaluating 727 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. Individual data were available from 10 studies comprising 190 individuals. The mean difference of relative maximal CBV between glioma grades II and III (n = 727) was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.27-2.24; P < .001). Individual patient data (n = 190) had an area under the curve of 0.77 for discriminating glioma grades II and III at an optimal cutoff of 2.02. When we analyzed astrocytomas separately, the area under the curve increased to 0.86 but decreased to 0.61 when we analyzed oligodendrogliomas.LIMITATIONS: A substantial heterogeneity was found among included studies.CONCLUSIONS: Glioma grade III had higher relative maximal CBV compared with glioma grade II. A high diagnostic accuracy was found for all patients and astrocytomas; however, the diagnostic accuracy was substantially reduced when discriminating oligodendroglioma grades II and III.
|
|
| 21. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome switching in randomized controlled oncology trials reporting on surrogate endpoints: a cross-sectional analysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scientific reports. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2045-2322. ; 7:1, s. 9206-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Inconsistent reporting of clinical trials is well-known in the literature. Despite this, factors associated with poor practice such as outcome switching in clinical trials are poorly understood. We performed a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the prevalence of, and the factors associated with outcome switching. PubMed and Embase were searched for pharmaceutical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in oncology reporting on a surrogate primary outcome published in 2015. Outcome switching was present in 18% (39/216). First-author male sex was significantly more likely associated with outcome switching compared to female sex with an OR of 3.05 (95% CI 1.07–8.64, p = 0.04) after multivariable adjustment. For-profit funded RCTs were less likely associated with outcome switching compared to non-profit funded research with an OR of 0.22 (95% CI 0.07–0.74, p = 0.01). First author male sex was more likely associated with outcome switching compared to female sex in drug oncology RCTs reporting on a primary surrogate endpoint. For-profit funded research was less likely associated with outcome switching compared to research funded by non-profit organizations. Furthermore, 18 percent of drug oncology trials reporting on a surrogate endpoint could have a higher risk of false positive results due to primary outcome switching.
|
|
| 22. |
- Backman, Samuel, et al.
(författare)
-
Global DNA Methylation Analysis Identifies Two Discrete clusters of Pheochromocytoma with Distinct Genomic and Genetic Alterations
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2045-2322. ; 7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare and frequently heritable neural-crest derived tumours arising from the adrenal medulla or extra-adrenal chromaffin cells respectively. The majority of PPGL tumours are benign and do not recur with distant metastases. However, a sizeable fraction of these tumours secrete vasoactive catecholamines into the circulation causing a variety of symptoms including hypertension, palpitations and diaphoresis. The genetic landscape of PPGL has been well characterized and more than a dozen genes have been described as recurrently mutated. Recent studies of DNA-methylation have revealed distinct clusters of PPGL that share DNA methylation patterns and driver mutations, as well as identified potential biomarkers for malignancy. However, these findings have not been adequately validated in independent cohorts. In this study we use an array-based genome-wide approach to study the methylome of 39 PPGL and 4 normal adrenal medullae. We identified two distinct clusters of tumours characterized by different methylation patterns and different driver mutations. Moreover, we identify genes that are differentially methylated between tumour subcategories, and between tumours and normal tissue.
|
|
| 23. |
- Blanton, Michael R., et al.
(författare)
-
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV : Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Astronomical Journal. - : IOP Publishing Ltd. - 0004-6256 .- 1538-3881. ; 154:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We describe the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV), a project encompassing three major spectroscopic programs. The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2) is observing hundreds of thousands of Milky Way stars at high resolution and. high signal-to-noise ratios in the near-infrared. The Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey is obtaining spatially resolved spectroscopy for thousands of nearby galaxies (median z similar to 0.03). The extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) is mapping the galaxy, quasar, and neutral gas distributions between z similar to 0.6 and 3.5 to constrain cosmology using baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, and the shape of the power spectrum. Within eBOSS, we are conducting two major subprograms: the SPectroscopic IDentification of eROSITA Sources (SPIDERS), investigating X-ray AGNs. and galaxies in X-ray clusters, and the Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey (TDSS), obtaining spectra of variable sources. All programs use the 2.5 m Sloan Foundation Telescope at the. Apache Point Observatory; observations there began in Summer 2014. APOGEE-2 also operates a second near-infrared spectrograph at the 2.5 m du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, with observations beginning in early 2017. Observations at both facilities are scheduled to continue through 2020. In keeping with previous SDSS policy, SDSS-IV provides regularly scheduled public data releases; the first one, Data Release 13, was made available in 2016 July.
|
|
| 24. |
- Falk Delgado, Alberto, et al.
(författare)
-
The Skoog Lip Repair for Unilateral Cleft Lip Deformity : The Uppsala Experience
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963). - 0032-1052 .- 1529-4242. ; 141:5, s. 1226-1233
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The Uppsala Craniofacial Center has been treating patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity using the lip repair technique described by Tord Skoog. The aim of this study was to determine complications after lip surgery and the incidence and indications for lip revisions in all patients born with unilateral cleft lip from 1960 to 2004.Methods: All patients who were born from 1960 to 2004 with unilateral cleft lip, cleft lip and alveolus, or cleft lip and palate and underwent lip repair were studied retrospectively. The timing, indication, complications of the primary procedure, and type of secondary surgery were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests were used, with Bonferroni correction.Results: The study included 443 patients. The total rate of early surgical complications was 6 percent (n = 26). Secondary surgery for short upper lip was performed in 3.8 percent (n = 17), 8.4 percent (n = 37) underwent reduction of excess vermillion, 8.6 percent (n = 38) underwent scar revision, 11 percent (n = 51) underwent revision for incongruent vermillion-cutaneous border, and 10 percent (n = 45) underwent revision for other indications. Altogether, 45 percent had no secondary revisions.Conclusion: In conclusion, the Skoog lip repair is associated with a low total revision rate, and a short-lip deformity is rare.CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
|
|
| 25. |
- Hedström, Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Complications after breast augmentation with dermal fillers containing copolyamide : A systematic review
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JPRAS Open. - : Elsevier. - 2352-5878. ; 40, s. 19-31
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundDermal fillers containing copolyamide are used for breast augmentation and are marketed under different labels, such as Aquafilling, Los Deline, Aqualift, and Activegel. In recent years, the number of publications reporting complications after use of these fillers has increased.MethodsThrough a computerized search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of published studies on complications, treatment options, and radiological findings related to breast augmentation with dermal fillers containing copolyamide was performed. Publications between January 1, 2007, and January 23, 2023, were included. Retrieved studies were screened for inclusion and quality assessment. The Joanna Briggs checklist for case reports and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for cross-sectional studies were used.ResultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria: 14 case reports and 2 retrospective cohort studies, including 196 women and 333 complications. Long-term complications (≥30 days after surgery) were described in 15 studies. The most commonly reported complications were nodules in the breast (130 patients), pain (92 patients), inflammation and/or infection (43 patients), breast deformities (35 patients), and migration of the filler to the pectoralis muscle, abdominal wall, thoracic wall, pubic area, back, or upper extremity (27 patients). The median time between injection of the dermal filler and any complication was 18 months, and the majority of patients with complications required surgical intervention.ConclusionGiven the reports of severe complications months to years after injection of dermal fillers containing copolyamide and the lack of studies evaluating long-term safety, our interpretation is that dermal fillers containing copolyamide should not be used for breast augmentation.
|
|
