| 1. |
- Chesnut, Randall, et al.
(författare)
-
A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring : the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Intensive Care Medicine. - : Springer. - 0342-4642 .- 1432-1238. ; 46:5, s. 919-929
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Current guidelines for the treatment of adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) consist of high-quality evidence reports, but they are no longer accompanied by management protocols, as these require expert opinion to bridge the gap between published evidence and patient care. We aimed to establish a modern sTBI protocol for adult patients with both intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen monitors in place.Methods: Our consensus working group consisted of 42 experienced and actively practicing sTBI opinion leaders from six continents. Having previously established a protocol for the treatment of patients with ICP monitoring alone, we addressed patients who have a brain oxygen monitor in addition to an ICP monitor. The management protocols were developed through a Delphi-method-based consensus approach and were finalized at an in-person meeting.Results: We established three distinct treatment protocols, each with three tiers whereby higher tiers involve therapies with higher risk. One protocol addresses the management of ICP elevation when brain oxygenation is normal. A second addresses management of brain hypoxia with normal ICP. The third protocol addresses the situation when both intracranial hypertension and brain hypoxia are present. The panel considered issues pertaining to blood transfusion and ventilator management when designing the different algorithms.Conclusions: These protocols are intended to assist clinicians in the management of patients with both ICP and brain oxygen monitors but they do not reflect either a standard-of-care or a substitute for thoughtful individualized management. These protocols should be used in conjunction with recommendations for basic care, management of critical neuroworsening and weaning treatment recently published in conjunction with the Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference.
|
|
| 2. |
- Chesnut, Randall M., et al.
(författare)
-
Perceived Utility of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury : A Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference Consensus-Based Analysis and Recommendations
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Neurosurgery. - : Oxford University Press. - 0148-396X .- 1524-4040. ; 93:2, s. 399-408
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is widely practiced, but the indications are incompletely developed, and guidelines are poorly followed. OBJECTIVE: To study the monitoring practices of an established expert panel (the clinical working group from the Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference effort) to examine the match between monitoring guidelines and their clinical decision-making and offer guidance for clinicians considering monitor insertion.METHODS: We polled the 42 Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Conference panel members' ICP monitoring decisions for virtual patients, using matrices of presenting signs (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] total or GCS motor, pupillary examination, and computed tomography diagnosis). Monitor insertion decisions were yes, no, or unsure (traffic light approach). We analyzed their responses for weighting of the presenting signs in decision-making using univariate regression.RESULTS: Heatmaps constructed from the choices of 41 panel members revealed wider ICP monitor use than predicted by guidelines. Clinical examination (GCS) was by far the most important characteristic and differed from guidelines in being nonlinear. The modified Marshall computed tomography classification was second and pupils third. We constructed a heatmap and listed the main clinical determinants representing 80% ICP monitor insertion consensus for our recommendations.CONCLUSION: Candidacy for ICP monitoring exceeds published indicators for monitor insertion, suggesting the clinical perception that the value of ICP data is greater than simply detecting and monitoring severe intracranial hypertension. Monitor insertion heatmaps are offered as potential guidance for ICP monitor insertion and to stimulate research into what actually drives monitor insertion in unconstrained, real-world conditions.
|
|
| 3. |
- Figaji, Anthony A., et al.
(författare)
-
Pressure autoregulation, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation in children with severe traumatic brain injury
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. - 1933-0715. ; 4:5, s. 420-428
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Object. Cerebral pressure autoregulation is an important neuroprotective mechanism that stabilizes cerebral blood flow when blood pressure (BP) changes In this study the authors examined the association between autoregulation and clinical factors. BR. intracranial pressure (ICP), brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO(2)), and outcome after pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). In particular we examined how the Status 01: autoregulation influenced the effect of BP changes on ICP and PbtO(2) Methods In this prospective observational study. 52 autoregulation tests were performed in 24 patients with severe. TBI. The patients had a mean age of 6.3 +/- 3.2 years. and a postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 6 (range 3-8). All patients underwent continuous ICP and MID, monitoring. and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was, used to examine the autoregulatory index (ARI) based on blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery after increasing mean arterial pressure by 20% of the baseline value Impaired autoregulation was defined as an ARI < 0 4 and intact autoregulation as an ART >= 0 4 The relationships between autoregulation (measured as both a Continuous and dichotomous variable), outcome, and clinical and physiological variables were examined using Multiple logistic regression analysis Results. Autoregulation was impaired (ART < 0 4) in 29% of patients (7 patients). The initial Glasgow Coma Scale score was significantly associated with the ARI (p = 0.02, r = 0.32) but no other clinical factors were associated with autoregulation Status. Baseline values at the time of testing for ICP, PbtO(2), the ratio PbtO(2)/PaO2, mean arterial pressure, and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity were similar in the patients with impaired or intact autoregulation. There was an inverse relationship between ART (continuous and dichotomous) with a chancle in ICP (continuous ARI, p 0.005, dichotomous ARI, p = 0 02): that is. ICP increased with the BP increase when ARI was low (weak autoregulation) The ART (continuous and dichotomous) was also inversely associated with a change in PbtO(2). (continuous ART. p 0.002. dichotomous ARI, p = 0 02). The PbtO(2) increased when BP was increased in most patients, even when the ARI was relatively high (stronger autoregulation). but the magnitude of this response was still associated with the ART. There was no relationship between the ART and Outcome Conclusion. These data demonstrate the influence of the strength of autoregulation on the response of ICP and MO. to BP changes and the variability of this response between individuals The findings suggest that autoregulation testing may assist clinical decision-making in pediatric severe TBI and help better define optimal BP or cerebral perfusion pressure targets for individual patients. (DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.PEDS096)
|
|
| 4. |
- Figaji, Anthony A., et al.
(författare)
-
Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index is not a reliable indicator of intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Surgical Neurology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0090-3019. ; 72:4, s. 389-394
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The TCD-derived PI has been associated with ICP in adult studies but has not been well investigated in children. We examined the relationship between PI and ICP and CPP in children with severe TBI. Methods: Data were prospectively collected from consecutive TCD studies in children with severe TBI undergoing ICP monitoring. Ipsilateral ICP and CPP values were examined with Spearman correlation coefficient (mean values and raw observations), with a GEE, and as binary values (1 and 20 mm Hg, respectively). Results: Thirty-four children underwent 275 TCD studies. There was a weak relationship between mean values of ICP and PI (P = .04, r = 0.36), but not when raw observations (P = .54) or GEE (P = .23) were used. Pulsatility index was 0.76 when ICP was lower than 20 mm Hg and 0.86 when ICP was 20 mm Hg or higher. When PI was 1 or higher, ICP was lower than 20 mm Hg in 62.5% (25 of 40 studies), and when ICP was 20 mm Hg or higher, PI was lower than 1 in 75% (46 of 61 studies). The sensitivity and specificity of a PI threshold of 1 for examining the ICP threshold of 20 mm Hg were 25% and 88%, respectively. The relationship between CPP and PI was stronger (P = .001, r -0.41), but there were too few observations below 50 mm Hg to examine PI at this threshold. Conclusion: The absolute value of the PI is not a reliable noninvasive indicator of ICP in children with severe TBI. Further study is required to examine the relationship between PI and a CPP threshold of 50 mm Hg. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hawryluk, Gregory W. J., et al.
(författare)
-
A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring : the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC)
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Intensive Care Medicine. - : Springer. - 0342-4642 .- 1432-1238. ; 45:12, s. 1783-1794
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Management algorithms for adult severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) were omitted in later editions of the Brain Trauma Foundation's sTBI Management Guidelines, as they were not evidence-based.Methods: We used a Delphi-method-based consensus approach to address management of sTBI patients undergoing intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Forty-two experienced, clinically active sTBI specialists from six continents comprised the panel. Eight surveys iterated queries and comments. An in-person meeting included whole- and small-group discussions and blinded voting. Consensus required 80% agreement. We developed heatmaps based on a traffic-light model where panelists' decision tendencies were the focus of recommendations.Results: We provide comprehensive algorithms for ICP-monitor-based adult sTBI management. Consensus established 18 interventions as fundamental and ten treatments not to be used. We provide a three-tier algorithm for treating elevated ICP. Treatments within a tier are considered empirically equivalent. Higher tiers involve higher risk therapies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 include 10, 4, and 3 interventions, respectively. We include inter-tier considerations, and recommendations for critical neuroworsening to assist the recognition and treatment of declining patients. Novel elements include guidance for autoregulation-based ICP treatment based on MAP Challenge results, and two heatmaps to guide (1) ICP-monitor removal and (2) consideration of sedation holidays for neurological examination.Conclusions: Our modern and comprehensive sTBI-management protocol is designed to assist clinicians managing sTBI patients monitored with ICP-monitors alone. Consensus-based (class III evidence), it provides management recommendations based on combined expert opinion. It reflects neither a standard-of-care nor a substitute for thoughtful individualized management.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Sarigul, Buse, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostication and Goals of Care Decisions in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury : A Survey of The Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference Working Group
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurotrauma. - : Mary Ann Liebert. - 0897-7151 .- 1557-9042. ; 40:15-16, s. 1707-1717
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Best practice guidelines have advanced severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) care; however, there is little that currently informs goals of care decisions and processes despite their importance and frequency. Panelists from the Seattle International severe traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC) participated in a survey consisting of 24 questions. Questions queried use of prognostic calculators, variability in and responsibility for goals of care decisions, and acceptability of neurological outcomes, as well as putative means of improving decisions that might limit care. A total of 97.6% of the 42 SIBICC panelists completed the survey. Responses to most questions were highly variable. Overall, panelists reported infrequent use of prognostic calculators, and observed variability in patient prognostication and goals of care decisions. They felt that it would be beneficial for physicians to improve consensus on what constitutes an acceptable neurological outcome as well as what chance of achieving that outcome is acceptable. Panelists felt that the public should help to define what constitutes a good outcome and expressed some support for a "nihilism guard." More than 50% of panelists felt that if it was certain to be permanent, a vegetative state or lower severe disability would justify a withdrawal of care decision, whereas 15% felt that upper severe disability justified such a decision. Whether conceptualizing an ideal or existing prognostic calculator to predict death or an unacceptable outcome, on average a 64-69% chance of a poor outcome was felt to justify treatment withdrawal. These results demonstrate important variability in goals of care decision making and a desire to reduce this variability. Our panel of recognized TBI experts opined on the neurological outcomes and chances of those outcomes that might prompt consideration of care withdrawal; however, imprecision of prognostication and existing prognostication tools is a significant impediment to standardizing the approach to care-limiting decisions.
|
|
