| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Mätzsch, Thomas, et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of standard heparin or low molecular weight heparin on healing of abdominal wounds and colonic anastomoses in rats
- 1987
-
Ingår i: Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica. - 0001-5482. ; 153:10, s. 593-598
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The influence of standard heparin or low molecular weight (LMW) heparin on healing of abdominal wounds and colonic anastomoses was studied in rats. Subcutaneous injection of 1 XaI U/g b.w. of standard or LMW-heparin or 0.5 ml physiologic saline was given 12 hours preoperatively and daily for 3 or 7 days postoperatively. Breaking strength of the abdominal wound and the anastomosis was measured, as were haemoglobin and albumin in serum. Hydroxyproline as a measure of collagen and tissue dry weight was determined in standardized segments of colonic wall adjacent to the anastomosis. Except for significant increase in breaking strength of the anastomosis after 7-day injection of LMW heparin, no differences in the parameters of wound healing were found after 3 or 7 days. In rats receiving standard heparin there was increased bleeding tendency (reduced haemoglobin) compared with the LMW-heparin group and the controls. The administered heparin thus did not negatively influence healing, and standard and LMW-heparin did not differ in this respect.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Secin, Fernando P., et al.
(författare)
-
The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: An International Multicenter Study
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Journal of Urology. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1527-3792 .- 0022-5347. ; 184:6, s. 2291-2296
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: It is not yet possible to estimate the number of cases required for a beginner to become expert in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We estimated the learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for positive surgical margins compared to a published learning curve for open radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed records from 8,544 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated laparoscopically by 51 surgeons at 14 academic institutions in Europe and the United States. The probability of a positive surgical margin was calculated as a function of surgeon experience with adjustment for pathological stage, Gleason score and prostate specific antigen. A second model incorporated prior experience with open radical prostatectomy and surgeon generation. Results: Positive surgical margins occurred in 1,862 patients (22%). There was an apparent improvement in surgical margin rates up to a plateau at 200 to 250 surgeries. Changes in margin rates once this plateau was reached were relatively minimal relative to the CIs. The absolute risk difference for 10 vs 250 prior surgeries was 4.8% (95% CI 1.5, 8.5). Neither surgeon generation nor prior open radical prostatectomy experience was statistically significant when added to the model. The rate of decrease in positive surgical margins was more rapid in the open vs laparoscopic learning curve. Conclusions: The learning curve for surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy plateaus at approximately 200 to 250 cases. Prior open experience and surgeon generation do not improve the margin rate, suggesting that the rate is primarily a function of specifically laparoscopic training and experience.
|
|
