| 1. |
- Clausen, Niels, et al.
(författare)
-
Similar bleeding phenotype in young children with haemophilia A or B : A cohort study
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 20:6, s. 747-755
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The bleeding phenotype has been suggested to differ between haemophilia A and B. More knowledge on the bleeding phenotype at initiation of treatment is important to optimize patient care. The aim of this study was to investigate the severity of the bleeding phenotype and the variation in bleeding in children with severe or moderate haemophilia A and B. Consecutive, previously untreated patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A and B (factor VIII or IX activity <0.01 or 0.01-0.05 IU mL-1 respectively) born between January 1st 2000 and January 1st 2010 were included. Primary outcome was severity of bleeding tendency. Secondary outcome was variation in bleeding pattern. A total of 582 patients with severe haemophilia A and 76 with severe haemophilia B did not differ in age at first exposure to clotting factor (0.81 vs. 0.88 years, P = 0.20), age at first bleed (0.82 vs. 0.88 years, P = 0.36), and age at first joint bleed (1.18 vs. 1.20 years, P = 0.59). Patients with moderate haemophilia were older compared to patients with severe haemophilia. In patients with moderate haemophilia there were no clear differences between haemophilia A and B. Severity and variation in bleeding phenotype are similar during the early stage of treatment in patients with severe and moderate haemophilia A and B respectively. The findings imply that children with haemophilia B should be observed and treated as vigilantly as those with haemophilia A.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Eckhardt, CL, et al.
(författare)
-
Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation and risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere hemophilia A
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 1528-0020 .- 0006-4971. ; 122:11, s. 1954-1962
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The inhibitor incidence in nonsevere hemophilia A patients with certain F8 mutations approaches the inhibitor incidence in severe patients. These findings are highly relevant for clinical practice, as they facilitate identification of high-risk patients based on F8 genotype.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Fischer, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Prospective observational cohort studies for studying rare diseases: the European PedNet Haemophilia Registry
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 20:4, s. 280-286
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Haemophilia is a rare disease. To improve knowledge, prospective studies of large numbers of subjects are needed. To establish a large well-documented birth cohort of patients with haemophilia enabling studies on early presentation, side effects and outcome of treatment. Twenty-one haemophilia treatment centres have been collecting data on all children with haemophilia with FVIII/IX levels up to 25% born from 2000 onwards. Another eight centres collected data on severe haemophilia A only. At baseline, details on delivery and diagnosis, gene mutation, family history of haemophilia and inhibitors are collected. For the first 75 exposure days, date, reason, dose and product are recorded for each infusion. Clinically relevant inhibitors are defined as follows: at least two positive inhibitor titres and a FVIII/IX recovery <66% of expected. For inhibitor patients, results of all inhibitor- and recovery tests are collected. For continued treatment, data on bleeding, surgery, prophylaxis and clotting factor consumption are collected annually. Data are downloaded for analysis annually. In May 2013, a total of 1094 patients were included: 701 with severe, 146 with moderate and 247 with mild haemophilia. Gene defect data were available for 87.6% of patients with severe haemophilia A. The first analysis, performed in May 2011, lead to two landmark publications. The outcome of this large collaborative research confirms its value for the improvement of haemophilia care. High-quality prospective observational cohorts form an ideal source to study natural history and treatment in rare diseases such as haemophilia.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Nijdam, A., et al.
(författare)
-
How to achieve full prophylaxis in young boys with severe haemophilia A: different regimens and their effect on early bleeding and venous access
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 21:4, s. 444-450
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To facilitate early prophylaxis, step-up regimens starting prophylaxis with infusions 1xweek(-1) were introduced. Choice of initial regimen may affect outcome. This study aims to classify initial prophylactic regimens and compare them on short-term outcome. From the European Paediatric Network for Haemophilia Management' (PedNet) registry, patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors, born 2000-2012, receiving prophylaxis were included. Treatment centres were classified according to the initial frequency of prophylactic infusions and the age at reaching infusions >= 3 x week(-1). Bleeding, and central venous access device (CVAD) use were compared at age 4 years. In 21 centres with 363 patients, three regimens were identified: (i) start prophylaxis with >= 3 x week(-1) infusions before age three (full: 19% of centres, 18% of patients); (ii) start 1-2 x week(-1), increasing frequency as soon as possible (asap), reaching >= 3 x week(-1) before age three (43% of centres, 36% of patients); (iii) start 1-2 x week(-1), increasing frequency according to bleeding (phenotype), reaching >= 3 x week(-1) after age three (38% of centres, 46% of patients). Prophylaxis was started at median 1.2 years on the full and asap regimen vs 1.8 years on the phenotype regimen. Complete prevention of joint bleeds was most effective on the full regimen (32% full vs. 27% asap and 8% phenotype), though at the cost of using most CVADs (88% full vs. 34% asap and 22% phenotype). The three prophylaxis regimens identified had different effects on early bleeding and CVAD use. This classification provides the first step towards establishing the optimum prophylactic regimen.
|
|
