SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Ostaszkiewicz Joan) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Ostaszkiewicz Joan)

  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Hälleberg Nyman, Maria, 1968-, et al. (författare)
  • Promoting evidence-based urinary incontinence management in acute nursing and rehabilitation care : A process evaluation of an implementation intervention in the orthopaedic context
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 1356-1294 .- 1365-2753. ; 25:2, s. 282-289
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The risk of developing urinary incontinence (UI) is associated with older age and hip surgery. There has been limited focus on factors that promote evidence-based UI practice in the orthopaedic context. The aim of this study was to evaluate an implementation intervention to support evidence-based practice for UI in patients aged 65 or older undergoing hip surgery.METHODS: A 3-month intervention was delivered in 2014 to facilitate the implementation of UI knowledge in orthopaedic units in 2 hospitals in Sweden. Each unit appointed a multidisciplinary team of nurses and physiotherapists or occupational therapists to facilitate the implementation. The teams were supported by external facilitators who shared knowledge about UI and implementation science. Interviews, nonparticipant observations, and audits of patient records were performed.RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, there was no use of guidelines regarding UI. The intervention raised the internal facilitators' awareness of UI risks associated with hip surgery. As internal facilitators shared this information with their peers, staff awareness of UI increased. The teams of internal facilitators described needing additional time and support from managers to implement evidence-based UI care. A management initiative triggered by the intervention increased the documentation of UI and urinary problems in 1 unit.CONCLUSION: To promote evidence-based practice related to safe procedures for older people in hospital care, there is a need to better understand strategies that successfully facilitate knowledge implementation. This study suggests that a multiprofessional team approach is promising for instigating a process towards evidence-based management of UI.
  •  
2.
  • Hälleberg Nyman, Maria, 1968-, et al. (författare)
  • Urinary incontinence and its management in patients aged 65 and older in orthopaedic care : what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Nursing. - West Sussex, United Kingdom : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702. ; 26:21-22, s. 3345-3353
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Aims and objectives: To describe what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do with regards to urinary incontinence and risk of urinary incontinence in patients 65 years or older undergoing hip surgery.Background: Urinary incontinence is a common but often neglected issue for older people. Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines on how to assess, manage and prevent UI, there are indications that these guidelines are not applied in hospital care.Design: A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted in two orthopaedic units.Methods: 46 interviews and 36 observations of care were conducted from January to October 2014 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.Results: Enrolled nurses performed most of the care related to bladder function, with focus on urinary catheterisation and preventing urinary tract infection and urinary retention. Registered nurses' role in urinary matters mainly comprised documentation, while the rehabilitation staff focused on making it possible for the patient to be independent in toileting. The nursing staff considered urinary incontinence a common condition for older people and that it was convenient for the patients to have an indwelling catheter or incontinence pad/pant, although they acknowledged some of the risks associated with these procedures.Conclusions: Urinary incontinence is not a priority in orthopaedic care, and urinary incontinence guidelines are not applied. Further, attitudes and actions are mainly characterised by a lack of urinary incontinence knowledge and the nursing and rehabilitation staff do not take a team approach to preventing and managing UI.Relevance and clinical practive: An increased focus on knowledge on urinary incontinence and evidence-based guidelines is needed. To secure evidence-based practice, the team of nursing and rehabilitation staff and managers must be aligned and work actively together, also including the patient in the team.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-2 av 2

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy