1. |
- Güsten, R., et al.
(författare)
-
APEX - The Atacama Pathfinder Experiment
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. - : SPIE. - 0277-786X .- 1996-756X. ; 6267 I
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- APEX, the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment, has been successfully commissioned and is in operation now. This novel submillimeter telescope is located at 5107 m altitude on Llano de Chajnantor in the Chilean High Andes, on what is considered one of the world's outstanding sites for submillimeter astronomy. The primary reflector with 12 m diameter has been carefully adjusted by means of holography. Its surface smoothness of 17-18 μm makes APEX suitable for observations up to 200 μm, through all atmospheric submm windows accessible from the ground.
|
|
2. |
- Mendonca, Luciana De Michelis, et al.
(författare)
-
Sports injury prevention programmes from the sports physical therapists perspective: An international expert Delphi approach
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Physical Therapy in Sport. - Oxford, United Kingdom : Elsevier. - 1466-853X .- 1873-1600. ; 55, s. 146-154
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To provide consensus on how to plan, organize and implement exercise-based injury prevention program (IPP) in sports.Design: Delphi.Setting: LimeSurvey platform.Participants: Experienced sports physical therapists from the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy member countries.Main outcome measures: Factors related to sports IPP planning, organization and implementation.Results: We included 305 participants from 32 countries. IPP planning should be based on an athletes injury history, on pre-season screening results, and on injury rates (respectively, 98%, 92%, 89% agreement). In total 97% participants agreed that IPP organization should depend on the athletes age, 93% on the competition level, and 93% on the availability of low-cost materials. It was agreed that IPP should mainly be implemented in warm-up sessions delivered by the head or strength/conditioning coach, with physical training sessions and individual physical therapy sessions (respectively, 94%, 92%, 90% agreement).Conclusion: Strong consensus was reached on (1) IPP based on the athletes injury history, pre-season screening and evidence-based sports-specific injury rates; (2) IPP organization based on the athletes age, competition level, and the availability of low-cost materials and (3) IPP implementation focussing on warm-up sessions implemented by the strength/conditioning coach, and/or individual prevention sessions by the physical therapist.
|
|