| 1. |
- Granstrand, Ove, 1944
(författare)
-
Towards a Theory of Innovation Governance and the Role of IPRs
- 2020
-
Ingår i: GRUR International. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8550 .- 2632-8623. ; 69:4, s. 341-354
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper theorizes about innovation governance, especially about governance of open innovation and the nature and role of IPRs. A reinterpretation of open innovation is offered in terms of the emergence of various types of markets for inputs to and outputs from innovative activities. These open innovation markets are typically markets for ideas, technologies, knowledge and data such as licensing markets, equity markets, and matching markets for innovation collaborations and correspond to various types of open innovation strategies viewed from the inside out in a focal firm's perspective. Open innovation-seen as a set of quasi-integrated organizational forms for innovative activities in between market and hierarchical firm organizations-is then explainable in terms of determinants of supply and demand. Intellectual property rights (IPRs) then play a new role as tools for innovation governance, thereby economizing on governance costs in an extended transaction cost framework. Licensing of usage rights is key to using IPRs for innovation governance. The by now standard property rights approach to rights in intellectual resources has to be challenged, however, and referred to as 'intellectual rights' rather than IPRs. In addition, the governing role of IPRs can be improved by combining them with liabilities into a hybrid approach. Organizational responsibilities provide still another institutional arrangement for innovation governance, and integration of rights, liabilities and responsibilities provide a new theoretical perspective on innovation governance-a perspective that also can provide links between organization theory, transaction cost economics and property rights theory.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lundstedt, Lydia
(författare)
-
AMS Neve and Others (C-172/18) : Looking for a Greater ‘Degree of Consistency’ Between the Special Jurisdiction Rule for EU Trade Marks and National Trade Marks
- 2020
-
Ingår i: GRUR international. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8623 .- 2632-8550. ; 69:4, s. 355-364
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) judgment in AMS Neve and others (C-172/18) clarifies how to interpret the concept ‘the Member State in which the act of infringement has been committed or threatened’ in the rule on special jurisdiction in the European Union Trade Mark Regulation. The CJEU held that Art. 125(5) should be interpreted to mean that the right holder may bring an action before an EU trade mark court of the Member State within which the consumers or traders to whom advertising and offers for sale are directed are located, even if the defendant took decisions and steps in another Member State to bring about that electronic display.With this judgment the CJEU introduces a targeting approach, which is something it has declined to do for the corresponding rule in Art. 7(2) Brussels Recast that applies to infringements of national trade marks. While the targeting approach is encouraging, the CJEU will need to clarify it to fulfil the objective of legal certainty. In addition, the CJEU appears to have interpreted Art. 125(5) EUTMR to exclude the Member State of activation. This is in contrast to Art. 7(2) Brussels Recast, which gives a right holder a choice between the Member State of activation and the Member State where the trade mark is registered. The article concludes that there is no justification for these differences in the special rules on jurisdiction applicable to EU trade marks and national trades.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Marusic, Branka, 1983-
(författare)
-
New Changes in the Croatian Patent Act
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0435-8600. ; 70:4, s. 377-379
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- New legislative reform of Croatian patent system.
|
|
| 5. |
- Marušić, Branka, 1983-
(författare)
-
Parody Exceptions in Copyright Laws
- 2023
-
Ingår i: GRUR International. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8550 .- 2632-8623. ; 72:3, s. 284-292
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Translation and case note B 12315-20 (Swedish Tiger).
|
|
| 6. |
- Marusic, Branka, 1983-
(författare)
-
Price-Fixing in Regulated Professions
- 2022
-
Ingår i: GRUR International. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8623 .- 2632-8550. ; 71:6, s. 567-569
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Marušić, Branka, 1983-
(författare)
-
Repackaging Medicinal Products in Parallel Trades
- 2023
-
Ingår i: GRUR International. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8550 .- 2632-8623. ; 72:2, s. 167-173
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Translation and case note PMT 8284-20 (Abacus Medicine A/S v Novartis AG).
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Marušić, Branka, 1983-
(författare)
-
The New Croatian Copyright Act – A Mixed Bag of Novelties and Quandaries
- 2022
-
Ingår i: GRUR International. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2632-8623 .- 2632-8550. ; 71:11, s. 1056-1061
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Croatia’s accession to the EU in 2013 left a mark on the Croatian Copyright Act. This mark was in the form of several amendments which aimed to implement the EU copyright harmonising measures. This implementation led to an uneven approach to copyright and related rights protection by prioritising implementation of the acquis communautaire over internal coherence and balance of rights. The new Croatian Copyright Act, adopted in October 2021, restores the internal coherence by substantially improving the layout of the act. Nevertheless, the formulation of some of the provisions it contains are inconsistent with international law, EU law and the Croatian Constitution. This paper focuses on three problematic legislative choices in the new Croatian Copyright Act – the gold-plating provision of the press publishers’ right, the automatic transfer of copyright made within public or state-owned institutions, and the nationalisation of audio-visual works.
|
|
