| 1. |
- Augustsson, Hanna, et al.
(författare)
-
Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care : a scoping review.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2662-2211. ; 2:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of interventions provided to patients lack evidence of their effectiveness. This implies that patients may receive ineffective, unnecessary or even harmful care. However, despite some empirical studies in the field, there has been no synthesis of determinants impacting the use of low-value care (LVC) and the process of de-implementing LVC.AIM: The aim was to identify determinants influencing the use of LVC, as well as determinants for de-implementation of LVC practices in health care.METHODS: A scoping review was performed based on the framework by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched four scientific databases, conducted snowball searches of relevant articles and hand searched the journal Implementation Science for peer-reviewed journal articles in English. Articles were included if they were empirical studies reporting on determinants for the use of LVC or de-implementation of LVC. The abstract review and the full-text review were conducted in duplicate and conflicting decisions were discussed until consensus was reached. Data were charted using a piloted data charting form and the determinants were inductively coded and categorised in an iterative process conducted by the project group.RESULTS: In total, 101 citations were included in the review. Of these, 92 reported on determinants for the use of LVC and nine on determinants for de-implementation. The studies were conducted in a range of health care settings and investigated a variety of LVC practices with LVC medication prescriptions, imaging and screening procedures being the most common. The identified determinants for the use of LVC as well as for de-implementation of LVC practices broadly concerned: patients, professionals, outer context, inner context, process and evidence and LVC practice. The results were discussed in relation to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.CONCLUSION: The identified determinants largely overlap with existing implementation frameworks, although patient expectations and professionals' fear of malpractice appear to be more prominent determinants for the use and de-implementation of LVC. Thus, existing implementation determinant frameworks may require adaptation to be transferable to de-implementation. Strategies to reduce the use of LVC should specifically consider determinants for the use and de-implementation of LVC.REGISTRATION: The review has not been registered.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergström, Anna, 1983-, et al.
(författare)
-
A facilitated social innovation : stakeholder groups using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for perinatal health across levels of the health system in Cao Bang province, Vietnam
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 4:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundUniversal coverage of evidence-based interventions for perinatal health, often part of evidence-based guidelines, could prevent most perinatal deaths, particularly if entire communities were engaged in the implementation. Social innovations may provide creative solutions to the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, but successful use of social innovations relies on the engagement of communities and health system actors. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess whether an earlier successful social innovation for improved neonatal survival that employed regular facilitated Plan-Do-Study-Act meetings on the commune level was feasible and acceptable when implemented on multiple levels of the health system (52 health units) and resulted in actions with plausibly favourable effects on perinatal health and survival in Cao Bang province, northern Vietnam.MethodsThe Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework guided the implementation and evaluation of the Perinatal Knowledge-Into-Practice (PeriKIP) project. Data collection included facilitators’ diaries, health workers’ knowledge on perinatal care, structured observations of antenatal care, focus group discussions with facilitators, their mentors and representatives of different actors of the initiated stakeholder groups and an individual interview with the Reproductive Health Centre director. Clinical experts assessed the relevance of the identified problems and actions taken based on facilitators’ diaries. Descriptive statistics included proportions, means, and t-tests for the knowledge assessment and observations. Qualitative data were analysed by content analysis.ResultsThe social innovation resulted in the identification of about 500 relevant problems. Also, 75% of planned actions to overcome prioritised problems were undertaken, results presented and a plan for new actions to achieve the group’s goals to enhance perinatal health. The facilitators had significant roles, ensuring that the stakeholder groups were established based on principles of mutual respect. Overall, the knowledge of perinatal health and performance of antenatal care improved over the intervention period.ConclusionsThe establishment of facilitated local stakeholder groups can remedy the need for tailored interventions and grassroots involvement in perinatal health and provide a scalable structure for focused efforts to reduce preventable deaths and promote health and well-being.
|
|
| 3. |
- Chan, Paul Shing-fong, et al.
(författare)
-
Applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to investigate factors of implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention among primary care physicians and nurses in Hong Kong, China: an exploratory sequential mixed-method study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : SPRINGERNATURE. - 2662-2211. ; 5:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) is an evidence-based intervention recommended by the World Health Organization. This study applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand facilitators and barriers of SBI implementation in primary care settings in Hong Kong, China.Methods This was a sequential mixed-method study. In-depth interviews of 21 physicians and 20 nurses working in the primary care settings from the public and private sectors were first conducted to identify CFIR constructs that were relevant to SBI implementation in the Chinese context and potential factors not covered by the CFIR. A questionnaire was then developed based on the qualitative findings to investigate factors associated with SBI implementation among 282 physicians and 295 nurses.Results The in-depth interviews identified 22 CFIR constructs that were facilitators or barriers of SBI implementation in Hong Kong. In addition, the stigmatization of alcohol dependence was a barrier and the belief that it was important for people to control the amount of alcohol intake in any situation was mentioned as a facilitator to implement SBI. In the survey, 22% of the participants implemented SBI in the past year. Factors associated with the SBI implementation echoed most of the qualitative findings. Among physicians and nurses in both sectors, they were more likely to implement SBI when perceiving stronger evidence supporting SBI, better knowledge and self-efficacy to implement SBI, more available resources, and clearer planning for SBI implementation in the clinics but less likely to do so when perceiving SBI implementation to be complicated and of higher cost, and drinking approved by the Chinese culture. Participants were more likely to implement SBI when perceiving SBI fit better with the existing practice and better leadership engagement in the public sector, but not in the private sector. Perceiving a stronger need and greater importance to implement SBI were associated with higher likelihood of SBI implementation among physicians, but not among nurses. Perceiving better organizational culture supporting SBI was positively associated with SBI implementation among nurses, but not among physicians.Conclusions There was a significant gap between SBI evidence and its implementation. Some strategies to improve SBI implementation may be different between physicians and nurses and between those in the public and private sectors. The CFIR is a useful framework for understanding facilitators and barriers of SBI implementation in primary care settings.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hasson, Henna, et al.
(författare)
-
How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations : a study protocol
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 1:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a basic premise of contemporary social services (e.g., child and family social services). However, EBIs seldom fit seamlessly into a specific setting but often need to be adapted. Although some adaptions might be necessary, they can cause interventions to be less effective or even unsafe. The challenge of balancing adherence and adaptations when using EBIs is often referred to as the adherence and adaptation dilemma. Although the current literature identifies professionals’ management of this dilemma as problematic, it offers little practical guidance for professionals. This research aims to investigate how the adherence and adaptation dilemma is handled in social services and to explore how structured decision support can impact the management of the dilemma.Methods: The design is a prospective, longitudinal intervention with a focus on the feasibility and usefulness of the structured decision support. The project is a collaboration between academic researchers, embedded researchers at three research and development units, and social service organizations. A multi-method data collection will be employed. Initially, a scoping review will be performed, and the results will be used in the development of a structured decision support. The decision support will be further developed and tested during a series of workshops with social service professionals. Different forms of data—focus group interviews, questionnaires, and documentation—will be used on several occasions to evaluate the impact of the structured decision support. Qualitative and quantitative analysis will be performed and usefulness for practice prioritized throughout the study.Discussion: The study will contribute with knowledge on how the adherence and adaption dilemma is handled and experienced by social service professionals. Most importantly, the study will generate rich empirical data on how a structured decision support impacts professionals’ management of adherence and adaptions. The goal is to produce more strategic and context-sensitive implementation of EBIs in social service, which will increase value for service users.
|
|
| 5. |
- Ingvarsson, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Management strategies to de-implement low-value care-an applied behavior analysis.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 3:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: There is a lack of knowledge about management strategies being used to de-implement low-value care (LVC). Furthermore, it is not clear from the current literature what mechanisms are involved in such strategies and how they can change physicians' behaviors. Understanding the mechanisms is important for determining a strategy's potential impact. Applied behavior analysis focuses on processes involved in increasing and decreasing behaviors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to understand what management strategies are being used to de-implement LVC and the possible mechanisms involved in those strategies, using concepts from applied behavior analysis.METHOD: We applied a qualitative study design using an inductive approach to understand what management strategies are in use and then employed applied behavior analysis concepts to deductively analyze the mechanisms involved in them.RESULTS: We identified eight different management strategies intended to influence LVC. Five of the strategies were developed at a regional level and had the potential to influence physicians' LVC-related behaviors either by functioning as rules on which LVC to de-implement or by initiating local strategies in each health care center that in turn could influence LVC practices. The local strategies had a stronger potential for influencing de-implementation.CONCLUSION: Both strategies at a systemic level (regional) and on a local level (health care centers) must be considered to influence LVC-related behaviors. Strategies at the center level have a specific opportunity to impact LVC-related behaviors because they can be tailored to specific circumstances, even though some of them probably were initiated as an effect of strategies on a regional level. Using applied behavior analysis to understand these circumstances can be helpful for tailoring strategies to reduce LVC use.
|
|
| 6. |
- Jackson, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Closing the know-do gap for child health: UNICEF's experiences from embedding implementation research in child health and nutrition programming
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Implementation science communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2662-2211. ; 2:1, s. 112-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- UNICEF operates in 190 countries and territories, where it advocates for the protection of children’s rights and helps meet children’s basic needs to reach their full potential. Embedded implementation research (IR) is an approach to health systems strengthening in which (a) generation and use of research is led by decision-makers and implementers; (b) local context, priorities, and system complexity are taken into account; and (c) research is an integrated and systematic part of decision-making and implementation. By addressing research questions of direct relevance to programs, embedded IR increases the likelihood of evidence-informed policies and programs, with the ultimate goal of improving child health and nutrition.This paper presents UNICEF’s embedded IR approach, describes its application to challenges and lessons learned, and considers implications for future work.From 2015, UNICEF has collaborated with global development partners (e.g. WHO, USAID), governments and research institutions to conduct embedded IR studies in over 25 high burden countries. These studies focused on a variety of programs, including immunization, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, birth registration, nutrition, and newborn and child health services in emergency settings. The studies also used a variety of methods, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods.UNICEF has found that this systematically embedding research in programs to identify implementation barriers can address concerns of implementers in country programs and support action to improve implementation. In addition, it can be used to test innovations, in particular applicability of approaches for introduction and scaling of programs across different contexts (e.g., geographic, political, physical environment, social, economic, etc.). UNICEF aims to generate evidence as to what implementation strategies will lead to more effective programs and better outcomes for children, accounting for local context and complexity, and as prioritized by local service providers. The adaptation of implementation research theory and practice within a large, multi-sectoral program has shown positive results in UNICEF-supported programs for children and taking them to scale.
|
|
| 7. |
- Lindholm, Lars H., et al.
(författare)
-
Importance of congruence between communicating and executing implementation programmes : a qualitative study of focus group interviews
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 1:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The Ostrobothnia Depression Programme (ODP) in Finland was intended to implement two evidence-based brief psychotherapy interventions, namely motivational interview and behavioural activation, in several regional psychiatric teams. A simultaneous effectiveness study was conducted. Considerable tension was encountered between these two arms, causing resistance to change. We conducted a qualitative case study to better understand this tension and to discuss how managerial and executive practices may ensure the successful running of a hybrid design programme.Methods: We conducted focus group interviews to evaluate the phases of preparation and practical execution of the ODP from the perspectives of management and the programme executives. To gather the data, we applied the revised Socratic approach for health technology assessment and focus group interviews. We analysed the data deductively according to the Normalization Process Theory.Results: We identified two main critical issues: (1) The ODP programme plan ignored the team leaders' crucial role in influencing the implementation climate and mobilizing organizational strategies. The ODP had a simplistic top-down design with minimal and delayed collaboration with its target groups in the preparation phase. (2) Incongruence occurred between what the project group had explicitly communicated about being the spearhead of the ODP and what they then actually enacted. These two issues caused tension between the implementation efforts and the effectiveness study as well as resistance to change among the staff.Conclusion: Early, open collaboration with all prospective stakeholders towards a shared understanding about the programme is the first action the programme administrators should take. Agreement on goals and the means to achieve them would lower tension between the two arms of a hybrid design programme, thereby reducing resistance to change. Congruence between the goals communicated and the actual managerial and executive actions is of paramount importance in getting the programme recipients on board.
|
|
| 8. |
- Moullin, Joanna C., et al.
(författare)
-
Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central. - 2662-2211. ; 1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Recent reviews of the use and application of implementation frameworks in implementation efforts highlight the limited use of frameworks, despite the value in doing so. As such, this article aims to provide recommendations to enhance the application of implementation frameworks, for implementation researchers, intermediaries, and practitioners.
|
|
| 9. |
- Neher, Margit, 1959-, et al.
(författare)
-
Innovation in healthcare : leadership perceptions about the innovation characteristics of artificial intelligence—a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - London : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Despite the extensive hopes and expectations for value creation resulting from the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare, research has predominantly been technology-centric rather than focused on the many changes that are required in clinical practice for the technology to be successfully implemented. The importance of leaders in the successful implementation of innovations in healthcare is well recognised, yet their perspectives on the specific innovation characteristics of AI are still unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the perceptions of leaders in healthcare concerning the innovation characteristics of AI intended to be implemented into their organisation.Methods: The study had a deductive qualitative design, using constructs from the innovation domain in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were conducted with 26 leaders in healthcare.Results: Participants perceived that AI could provide relative advantages when it came to care management, supporting clinical decisions, and the early detection of disease and risk of disease. The development of AI in the organisation itself was perceived as the main current innovation source. The evidence base behind AI technology was questioned, in relation to its transparency, potential quality improvement, and safety risks. Although the participants acknowledged AI to be superior to human action in terms of effectiveness and precision in some situations, they also expressed uncertainty about the adaptability and trialability of AI. Complexities such as the characteristics of the technology, the lack of conceptual consensus about AI, and the need for a variety of implementation strategies to accomplish transformative change in practice were identified, as were uncertainties about the costs involved in AI implementation.Conclusion: Healthcare leaders not only saw potential in the technology and its use in practice, but also felt that AI’s opacity limits its evidence strength and that complexities in relation to AI itself and its implementation influence its current use in healthcare practice. More research is needed based on actual experiences using AI applications in real-world situations and their impact on clinical practice. New theories, models, and frameworks may need to be developed to meet challenges related to the implementation of AI in healthcare. © 2023, The Author(s).
|
|
| 10. |
- Nilsen, Per, 1960-, et al.
(författare)
-
Implementing social distancing policy measures in the battle against the coronavirus : protocol of a comparative study of Denmark and Sweden
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : Springer Nature. - 2662-2211. ; 1:77
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Social distancing policies to ensure physical distance between people have become a crucial strategy in the battle against the spread of the coronavirus. The aim of this project is to analyze and compare social distancing policies implemented in Denmark and Sweden in 2020. Despite many similarities between the two countries, their response to the coronavirus pandemic differed markedly. Whereas authorities in Denmark initiated mandatory regulations and many severe restrictions, Swedish authorities predominantly promoted voluntary recommendations.
|
|
| 11. |
- Pettersson, Kristoffer, et al.
(författare)
-
Fidelity-consistency and deliberateness of modifications in parenting programs
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central Ltd. - 2662-2211. ; 5:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are frequently modified in practice. It is recommended that decisions to modify EBIs should be made deliberately to ensure fidelity-consistency, yet the relationship between fidelity-consistency and deliberateness is not well understood. This study aims to explore modifications in a sample of practitioners delivering evidence-based parenting programs (i.e., interventions to strengthen parent–child relationships, reduce harmful interactions, and improve child health and well-being). The study investigated three research questions: (1) What kind of modifications are made during the delivery of parenting programs? (2) To what degree are the identified modifications consistent with the core functions of each program? and (3) Is deliberateness associated with the fidelity-consistency of the identified modifications? Methods: In total, 28 group leaders of five widely disseminated parenting programs in Sweden participated in five focus groups, and two participants from each group also participated in individual interviews (n = 10). A content analysis approach was used where the identification of modifications was directed by the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) and then assessed for fidelity-consistency and four levels of deliberateness (universal, situational, conditional, and unintentional). Chi-square tests were performed to compare consistent and inconsistent modifications, and logistic regression was performed to explore whether deliberateness predicted consistency. Results: A total of 137 content modifications were identified, covering most of the content modification categories in FRAME. The most common were tailoring/tweaking/refining, adding elements, shortening/condensing, lengthening/extending, and integrating another treatment. Modifications were mostly fidelity-consistent but consistency varied greatly among categories. Furthermore, modifications made unintentionally or situationally were more likely to be fidelity-inconsistent. Conclusions: These results indicate that explicit consideration of modifications and their impact could be essential for sustaining the fidelity-consistent use of EBIs, even as such interventions are continuously modified.
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
- Roczniewska, Marta, et al.
(författare)
-
How do healthcare professionals make decisions concerning low-value care practices? Study protocol of a factorial survey experiment on de-implementation
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 2:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A large number of practices used in health care lack evidence of effectiveness and may be unnecessary or even cause harm. As such, they should be de-implemented. While there are multiple actors involved in de-implementation of such low-value care (LVC) practices, ultimately, the decision to abandon a practice is often made by each health care professional. A recent scoping review identified 6 types of factors affecting the utilization vs. abandonment of LVC practices. These factors concern health care professionals, patients, outer context, inner context, processes, and the characteristics of LVC practice itself. However, it is unclear how professionals weigh these different factors in and how these determinants influence their decisions about abandoning LVC practices. This project aims to investigate how health care professionals account for various factors as they make decisions regarding de-implementation of LVC practices.Methods: This project will be carried out in two main steps. First, a factorial survey experiment (a vignette study) will be applied to empirically test the relevance of factors previously identified in the literature for health care professionals’ decision-making about de-implementation. Second, interactive workshops with relevant stakeholders will be carried out to develop a framework for professionals’ decision-making and to offer suggestions for interventions to support de-implementation of LVC practices.Discussion: The project has the potential to contribute to improved understanding of the decision-making involved in de-implementation of LVC practices. We will identify which factors are more important when they make judgments about utilizing versus abandoning LVC practices. The results will provide the basis for recommendations concerning appropriate interventions to support de-implementation decision-making processes.
|
|
| 14. |
- Simooya, Constance, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploring communication and implementation challenges of the HIV/AIDS policy change to test-and-treat-all in selected public health facilities in Lusaka District, Zambia
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2662-2211. ; 4:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The World Health Organization has promoted a shift towards the test-and-treat-all strategy to accelerate the elimination of HIV/AIDS. Zambia was one of the early African countries to adopt this strategy as the policy change was officially announced on national television by the republican president on 15th August 2017. This study explored the communication and implementation challenges of the HIV/AIDS policy change to test-and-treat-all in selected public health facilities in Lusaka District, Zambia.Methods: A qualitative case study design was employed with a purposeful sample of policy makers, international partners, National AIDS Council representatives, health facility managers, and frontline health providers in selected tertiary, secondary and primary health facilities in the Lusaka District, Zambia. Thematic data analysis was performed using NVivo 12 Pro software.Results: In total, 22 key informant interviews and 3 focus group discussions were conducted. The government relied on formal and informal channels to communicate the test-and-treat-all policy change to health providers. Whilst HIV policy changes were reflected in the National HIV/AIDS Strategic Framework, there was little awareness of this policy by the frontline providers. The use of informal communication channels such as verbal and text instructions affected health providers’ implementation of the test-and-treat-all. Electronic and print media were ineffective in communicating the test-and-treat-all policy change to some sections of the public. Top-down stakeholder engagement, limited health worker training, and poor financing negatively affected the implementation of the test-and-treat-all policy change. Acceptability of the test-and-treat-all policy change was shaped by positive provider perceptions of its benefits, limited sense of policy ownership, and resistance by the non-treatment-ready patients. Furthermore, unintended consequences of the test-and-treat-all policy change on human resources for health and facility infrastructure were reported.Conclusion: Effective test-and-treat-all policy change communication is vital for successful policy implementation as it enhances interpretation and adoption among health providers and patients. There is a need to enhance collaboration among policy makers, implementers and the public to develop and apply communication strategies that facilitate the adoption of the test-and-treat-all policy changes to sustain gains in the fight against HIV/AIDS.
|
|
| 15. |
- von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Professionals’ management of the fidelity–adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions—an intervention study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2662-2211. ; 2:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) can be effective tools for the prevention of disease and healthpromotion. However, their implementation often requires a delicate balance between the need to adjust theintervention to the context in which it is implemented and the need to keep the core components that make theintervention effective. This so-called dilemma between fidelity and adaptation is often handled by healthprofessionals in the sustainment phase of an implementation (i.e., once the intervention has been adopted andinstitutionalized in an organization), but not much is known about how and to what extent health professionals areaffected by this dilemma. Focusing on the sustainment phase, this project aims to study (1) how fidelity andadaptation are managed by professionals using an EBI, (2) how the fidelity–adaptation dilemma affectsprofessionals’ psychosocial working conditions, and (3) how a structured decision support influences professionals’management of the dilemma and their psychosocial working conditions.Methods: The study is set in Sweden, and the EBI in focus is a parental program (All Children in Focus). Alongitudinal within-person intervention design is used, combined with a cross-sectional survey design. Data sourcesinclude web-based questionnaires, brief interviews, fidelity ratings, paper-and-pen questionnaires, and writtendocumentation, collected at multiple time points with both group leaders and parents as respondents.Discussion: This project approaches fidelity and adaptation from the perspective of the professionals that manageEBIs during the sustainment phase of implementation. Although it is well known that EBIs continue to change overtime, it remains to be understood how the fidelity–adaptation dilemma can be managed so that the effectivenessof interventions is retained or improved, not diluted. Moreover, the project adds to the literature by presenting anoccupational health perspective on the fidelity–adaptation dilemma. It is acknowledged that fidelity and adaptationmay have consequences for not only clients but also the occupational wellbeing of the professionals managing thedilemma, and subsequently, their willingness and ability to deliver EBIs in a sustainable way.
|
|
| 16. |
- von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Understanding the value of adhering to or adapting evidence-based interventions : a study protocol of a discrete choice experiment
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Implementation Science Communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2662-2211. ; 2:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Whereas the value of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) is often determined by its effect on clinicaloutcomes, the value of implementing and using EBIs in practice is broader, reflecting qualities such asappropriateness, equity, costs, and impact. Reconciling these value conflicts involves a complicated decision processthat has received very limited scholarly attention. Inspired by studies on decision-making, the objective of thisproject is to explore how practitioners appraise the values of different outcomes and to test how this appraisalinfluences their decisions surrounding the so-called fidelity–adaptation dilemma. This dilemma is related to thebalance between using an EBI as it was designed (to ensure its effectiveness) and making appropriate adaptations(to ensure alignment with constraints and possibilities in the local context).Methods: This project consists of three sub-studies. The participants will be professionals leading evidence-basedparental programs in Sweden and, in Sub-study 1, parents and decision-makers. Sub-study 1 will use sequentialfocus groups and individual interviews to explore parameters that influence fidelity and adaptation decisions—thedilemmas encountered, available options, how outcomes are valued by practitioners as well as other stakeholders,and value trade-offs. Sub-study 2 is a discrete choice experiment that will test how value appraisals influencedecision-making using data from Sub-study 1 as input. Sub-study 3 uses a mixed-method design, with findingsfrom the two preceding sub-studies as input in focus group interviews to investigate how practitioners make senseof findings from optimal decision situations (experiment) and constrained, real-world decision situations.Discussion: The project will offer unique insights into decision-making processes that influence how EBIs are usedin practice. Such knowledge is needed for a more granular understanding of how practitioners manage thefidelity–adaptation dilemma and thus, ultimately, how the value of EBI implementation can be optimized. Thisstudy contributes to our knowledge of what happens once EBIs are adopted—that is, the gap between the way inwhich EBIs are intended to be used and the way in which they are used in practice.
|
|
