1. |
- Senanayake, Indunil C., et al.
(författare)
-
Fungal diversity notes 1611–1716: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on fungal genera and species emphasis in south China
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Fungal Diversity. - 1560-2745 .- 1878-9129. ; 122, s. 161-403
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article is the 15th contribution in the Fungal Diversity Notes series, wherein 115 taxa from three phyla, nine classes, 28 orders, 48 families, and 64 genera are treated. Fungal taxa described and illustrated in the present study include a new family, five new genera, 61 new species, five new combinations, one synonym, one new variety and 31 records on new hosts or new geographical distributions. Ageratinicolaceae fam. nov. is introduced and accommodated in Pleosporales. The new genera introduced in this study are Ageratinicola, Kevinia, Pseudomultiseptospora (Parabambusicolaceae), Marasmiellomycena, and Vizzinia (Porotheleaceae). Newly described species are Abrothallus altoandinus, Ageratinicola kunmingensis, Allocryptovalsa aceris, Allophoma yuccae, Apiospora cannae, A. elliptica, A. pallidesporae, Boeremia wisteriae, Calycina papaeana, Clypeococcum lichenostigmoides, Coniochaeta riskali-shoyakubovii, Cryphonectria kunmingensis, Diaporthe angustiapiculata, D. campylandrae, D. longipapillata, Diatrypella guangdongense, Dothiorella franceschinii, Endocalyx phoenicis, Epicoccum terminosporum, Fulvifomes karaiensis, F. pannaensis, Ganoderma ghatensis, Hysterobrevium baoshanense, Inocybe avellaneorosea, I. lucida, Jahnula oblonga, Kevinia lignicola, Kirschsteiniothelia guangdongensis, Laboulbenia caprina, L. clavulata, L. cobiae, L. cosmodisci, L. nilotica, L. omalii, L. robusta, L. similis, L. stigmatophora, Laccaria rubriporus, Lasiodiplodia morindae, Lyophyllum agnijum, Marasmiellomycena pseudoomphaliiformis, Melomastia beihaiensis, Nemania guangdongensis, Nigrograna thailandica, Nigrospora ficuum, Oxydothis chinensis, O. yunnanensis, Petriella thailandica, Phaeoacremonium chinensis, Phialocephala chinensis, Phytophthora debattistii, Polyplosphaeria nigrospora, Pronectria loweniae, Seriascoma acutispora, Setoseptoria bambusae, Stictis anomianthi, Tarzetta tibetensis, Tarzetta urceolata, Tetraploa obpyriformis, Trichoglossum beninense, and Tricoderma pyrrosiae. We provide an emendation for Urnula ailaoshanensis Agaricus duplocingulatoides var. brevisporus introduced as a new variety based on morphology and phylogeny.
|
|
5. |
- Jafari, Sonia, et al.
(författare)
-
Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Glyoxalase I
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Inorganic Chemistry. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 1520-510X .- 0020-1669. ; 59, s. 2594-2603
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Glyoxalase I (GlxI) is a member of the glyoxalasesystem, which is important in cell detoxification and convertshemithioacetals of methylglyoxal (a cytotoxic byproduct of sugarmetabolism that may react with DNA or proteins and introducenucleic acid strand breaks, elevated mutation frequencies, andstructural or functional changes of the proteins) and glutathioneinto D-lactate. GlxI accepts both the S and R enantiomers ofhemithioacetal, but converts them to only the S-D enantiomer oflactoylglutathione. Interestingly, the enzyme shows this unusualspecificity with a rather symmetric active site (a Zn ioncoordinated to two glutamate residues; Glu-99 and Glu-172),making the investigation of its reaction mechanism challenging.Herein, we have performed a series of combined quantummechanics and molecular mechanics calculations to study the reaction mechanism of GlxI. The substrate can bind to the enzyme in two different modes, depending on the direction of its alcoholic proton (H2; toward Glu-99 or Glu-172). Our results show that the S substrate can react only if H2 is directed toward Glu-99 and the R substrate only if H2 is directed toward Glu-172. In both cases, the reactions lead to the experimentally observed S-D enantiomer of the product. In addition, the results do not show any low- energy paths to the wrong enantiomer of the product from neither the S nor the R substrate. Previous studies have presented several opposing mechanisms for the conversion of R and S enantiomers of the substrate to the correct enantiomer of the product. Our results confirm one of them for the S substrate, but propose a new one for the R substrate.
|
|