| 1. |
- Gossec, L., et al.
(författare)
-
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies : 2015 update
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - London : BMJ Books. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 75:3, s. 499-510
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2012, new evidence and new therapeutic agents have emerged. The objective was to update these recommendations.METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed regarding pharmacological treatment in PsA. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and the expert opinion of the 34 Task Force members. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were allocated.RESULTS: The updated recommendations comprise 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations, covering pharmacological therapies for PsA from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), to conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, whatever their mode of action, taking articular and extra-articular manifestations of PsA into account, but focusing on musculoskeletal involvement. The overarching principles address the need for shared decision-making and treatment objectives. The recommendations address csDMARDs as an initial therapy after failure of NSAIDs and local therapy for active disease, followed, if necessary, by a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD). The first bDMARD would usually be a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. bDMARDs targeting interleukin (IL)12/23 (ustekinumab) or IL-17 pathways (secukinumab) may be used in patients for whom TNF inhibitors are inappropriate and a tsDMARD such as a phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitor (apremilast) if bDMARDs are inappropriate. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD may be used.CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological treatment of PsA and strategies to reach optimal outcomes in PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion. © 2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Smolen, JS, et al.
(författare)
-
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 76:6, s. 960-977
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recent insights in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) necessitated updating the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) RA management recommendations. A large international Task Force based decisions on evidence from 3 systematic literature reviews, developing 4 overarching principles and 12 recommendations (vs 3 and 14, respectively, in 2013). The recommendations address conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GC); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, clazakizumab, sarilumab and sirukumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib). Monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and the targets of sustained clinical remission (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology-(ACR)-EULAR Boolean or index criteria) or low disease activity are discussed. Cost aspects were taken into consideration. As first strategy, the Task Force recommends MTX (rapid escalation to 25 mg/week) plus short-term GC, aiming at >50% improvement within 3 and target attainment within 6 months. If this fails stratification is recommended. Without unfavourable prognostic markers, switching to—or adding—another csDMARDs (plus short-term GC) is suggested. In the presence of unfavourable prognostic markers (autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions, failure of 2 csDMARDs), any bDMARD (current practice) or Jak-inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD or tsDMARD is recommended. If a patient is in sustained remission, bDMARDs can be tapered. For each recommendation, levels of evidence and Task Force agreement are provided, both mostly very high. These recommendations intend informing rheumatologists, patients, national rheumatology societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about EULAR's most recent consensus on the management of RA, aimed at attaining best outcomes with current therapies.
|
|
| 7. |
- Smolen, JS, et al.
(författare)
-
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 79:6, s. 685-699
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To provide an update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations to account for the most recent developments in the field.MethodsAn international task force considered new evidence supporting or contradicting previous recommendations and novel therapies and strategic insights based on two systematic literature searches on efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the last update (2016) until 2019. A predefined voting process was applied, current levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned and participants ultimately voted independently on their level of agreement with each of the items.ResultsThe task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 12 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GCs); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib). Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering on sustained clinical remission is provided. Cost and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs are addressed. Initially, MTX plus GCs and upon insufficient response to this therapy within 3 to 6 months, stratification according to risk factors is recommended. With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD or JAK inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD is recommended. On sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered, but not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were mostly high.ConclusionsThese updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on the management of RA with respect to benefit, safety, preferences and cost.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Van Hoovels, L., et al.
(författare)
-
IgA rheumatoid factor in rheumatoid arthritis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 1434-6621 .- 1437-4331. ; 60:10, s. 1617-1626
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a well-established marker for the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most studies evaluated IgM RF or isotype-nonspecific total RF assays. We evaluated the added value of IgA RF in this context. Methods An international sample cohort consisting of samples from 398 RA patients and 1073 controls was tested for IgA RF with 3 commercial assays. For all RA patients and 100 controls essential clinical and serological data for ACR/EULAR classification were available. Results The sensitivity of IgA RF for diagnosing RA was lower than the sensitivity of IgM RF. Differences in numerical values between IgA RF assays were observed. With all assays, the highest IgA RF values were found in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. Double positivity for IgM RF and IgA RF had a higher specificity for RA than either IgM RF or IgA RF. The sensitivity of double positivity was lower than the sensitivity of either IgA RF or IgM RF. Single positivity for IgA RF was at least as prevalent in controls than in RA patients. Adding IgA RF to IgM RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) did not affect RA classification. However, combined positivity for IgA RF, IgM RF and IgG ACPA had a higher specificity and lower sensitivity for RA classification than positivity for either of the antibodies. Conclusions IgA RF showed a lower sensitivity than IgM RF. Combining IgA RF with IgM RF and ACPA did not improve sensitivity of RA classification. Combined positivity (IgA-RF/IgM-RF/ACPA) increased specificity.
|
|
| 10. |
- Van Hoovels, L., et al.
(författare)
-
Multicentre study to improve clinical interpretation of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies test results
- 2022
-
Ingår i: RMD Open. - : BMJ. - 2056-5933. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are important biomarkers for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is poor harmonisation of RF and ACPA assays. The aim of this study was to refine RF and ACPA interpretation across commercial assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six total RF isotype-non-specific assays, 3 RF IgM isotype-specific assays and 9 ACPA immunoglobulin G assays of 13 different companies were evaluated using 398 diagnostic samples from patients with RA and 1073 disease controls. RESULTS: Using cut-offs proposed by the manufacturer, there was a large variability in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between assays. Thresholds of antibody levels were determined based on predefined specificities and used to define test result intervals. Test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs) were concordant across the different RF and ACPA assays. For all assays, the LR for RA increased with increasing antibody level. Higher LRs were found for ACPA than for RF. ACPA levels associated with LRs >80 were found in a substantial fraction (>22%) of patients with RA. CONCLUSION: Defining thresholds for antibody levels and assigning test result interval-specific LRs allows alignment of clinical interpretation for all RF and ACPA assays. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
|
|
| 11. |
- Van Hoovels, L., et al.
(författare)
-
Standardisation of ACPA tests: evaluation of a new candidate reference preparation
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81:10, s. 1379-1384
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction Commercial assays measuring antibodies to citrullinated protein/peptide (ACPA) show poor quantitative agreement. The diagnostic industry has never adopted the International Union of Immunological Societies-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (IUIS-CDC) ACPA reference standard. Recently, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) prepared a new candidate ACPA standard (18/204). We evaluated both reference materials using different commercially available ACPA assays. Materials and methods This is an international study in which the NIBSC candidate ACPA standard and the IUIS-CDC ACPA reference material were analysed together with 398 diagnostic samples from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in 1073 individuals who did not have RA using nine commercial ACPA assays. Results For both reference materials and samples from individuals with RA and individuals who did not have RA, there were large differences in quantitative ACPA results between assays. For most assays, values for the IUIS-CDC standard were lower than values for NIBSC 18/204 and the IUIS-CDC/NIBSC ratio was comparable for several, but not all assays. When NIBSC 18/204 was used as a calibrator, an improvement in alignment of ACPA results across several of the evaluated assays was obtained. Moreover, NIBSC 18/204 could align clinical interpretation for some but not all assays. Conclusion Adoption of an international standard for ACPA determination is highly desirable. The candidate NIBSC 18/204 standard improved the standardisation and alignment of most ACPA assays and might therefore be recommended to be used as reference in commercial assays.
|
|
| 12. |
- Combe, B, et al.
(författare)
-
2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 76:6, s. 948-959
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Since the 2007 recommendations for the management of early arthritis have been presented, considerable research has been published in the field of early arthritis, mandating an update of the 2007 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for management of early arthritis.MethodsIn accordance with the 2014 EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures, the expert committee pursued an approach that was based on evidence in the literature and on expert opinion. The committee involved 20 rheumatologists, 2 patients and 1 healthcare professional representing 12 European countries. The group defined the focus of the expert committee and target population, formulated a definition of ‘management’ and selected the research questions. A systematic literature research (SLR) was performed by two fellows with the help of a skilled librarian. A set of draft recommendations was proposed on the basis of the research questions and the results of the SLR. For each recommendation, the categories of evidence were identified, the strength of recommendations was derived and the level of agreement was determined through a voting process.ResultsThe updated recommendations comprise 3 overarching principles and 12 recommendations for managing early arthritis. The selected statements involve the recognition of arthritis, referral, diagnosis, prognostication, treatment (information, education, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions), monitoring and strategy. Eighteen items were identified as relevant for future research.ConclusionsThese recommendations provide rheumatologists, general practitioners, healthcare professionals, patients and other stakeholders with an updated EULAR consensus on the entire management of early arthritis.
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
- Smolen, JS, et al.
(författare)
-
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 69:6, s. 964-975
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may differ among rheumatologists and currently, clear and consensual international recommendations on RA treatment are not available. In this paper recommendations for the treatment of RA with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs) that also account for strategic algorithms and deal with economic aspects, are described. The recommendations are based on evidence from five systematic literature reviews (SLRs) performed for synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs, GCs, treatment strategies and economic issues. The SLR-derived evidence was discussed and summarised as an expert opinion in the course of a Delphi-like process. Levels of evidence, strength of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. Fifteen recommendations were developed covering an area from general aspects such as remission/low disease activity as treatment aim via the preference for methotrexate monotherapy with or without GCs vis-à-vis combination of synthetic DMARDs to the use of biological agents mainly in patients for whom synthetic DMARDs and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors had failed. Cost effectiveness of the treatments was additionally examined. These recommendations are intended to inform rheumatologists, patients and other stakeholders about a European consensus on the management of RA with DMARDs and GCs as well as strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA, based on evidence and expert opinion.
|
|
| 19. |
- Smolen, JS, et al.
(författare)
-
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 82:1, s. 3-18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.MethodsAn international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.ResultsThe task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3–6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.ConclusionsThese updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
| 23. |
- Studenic, P, et al.
(författare)
-
American College of Rheumatology/EULAR remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 82:1, s. 74-80
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean-based and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the two sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.MethodsWe used data from four randomised trials comparing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0–10 cm) compared with the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analysed agreement between the Boolean-based and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score≤0.5) and radiographic non-progression.ResultsData from 2048 trial participants, 1101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared with Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8–4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.ConclusionUsing the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies, more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardising predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
|
|
| 26. |
- van der Togt, CJT, et al.
(författare)
-
Points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from an umbrella review and international Delphi study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: RMD open. - : BMJ. - 2056-5933. ; 9:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To develop evidence-based points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, specifically rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.MethodsFollowing EULAR procedures, an international task force was formed, consisting of 13 experts in rheumatology, epidemiology and pharmacology from seven European countries. Twelve strategies for cost-effective use of b/tsDMARDs were identified through individual and group discussion. For each strategy, PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for relevant English-language systematic reviews and, for six strategies, additionally for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirty systematic reviews and 21 RCTs were included. Based on the evidence, a set of overarching principles and points to consider was formulated by the task force using a Delphi procedure. Level of evidence (1a–5) and grade (A–D) were determined for each point to consider. Individual voting on the level of agreement (LoA; between 0 (completely disagree) and 10 (completely agree)) was performed anonymously.ResultsThe task force agreed on five overarching principles. For 10 of 12 strategies, the evidence was sufficient to formulate one or more points to consider, leading to 20 in total, regarding response prediction, drug formulary use, biosimilars, loading doses, low-dose initial therapy, concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use, route of administration, medication adherence, disease activity–guided dose optimisation and non-medical drug switching. Ten points to consider (50%) were supported by level 1 or 2 evidence. The mean LoA (SD) varied between 7.9 (1.2) and 9.8 (0.4).ConclusionThese points to consider can be used in rheumatology practices and complement inflammatory rheumatic disease treatment guidelines to incorporate cost-effectiveness in b/tsDMARD treatment.
|
|
| 27. |
|
|
| 28. |
|
|
| 29. |
|
|
| 30. |
|
|
| 31. |
- Gessl, I, et al.
(författare)
-
CLINICAL AND ULTRASOUND-BASED COMPOSITE DISEASE ACTIVITY INDICES AND RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- 2022
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 1219-1219
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) has been reported to predict radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).ObjectivesTo test the predictive value of composite disease activity indices (DAI) based on solely clinical as well as clinical and US (USDAI) information to predict radiographic progression in RA.MethodsData from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management (SCQM) database were extracted from patients with RA; USDAIs were created based on previous publications (1) (Table 1). In summary, the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) were modified by supplementing or replacing the clinical swollen JC with joints showing signs of power Doppler (PD) and/or grey scale (GS) synovitis. Series with two standard x-rays of the hands (difference ≥ 183 days) and ≥1 visit with clinical and US data in between were analyzed. Progression was defined as an increase of ≥6.27 points of the Ratingen-Rau x-ray score. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses were used to assess predictive ability of every DAI for radiographic progression. As a subanalysis, ROCs using the median DAIs of series with ≥2 DAIs between two x-rays were run. Clinical DAS28/SDAIs were compared to their respective USDAI counterpart with the highest area under the curves (AUC).Table 1.Area under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves for the predictive value of the composite disease activity indices for radiographic progression. DAI disease activity index; DAS28, disease activity score for 28 joints; GS, grey scale; PD, power Doppler; SDAI, simplified disease activity index; SJC: swollen joint count; + positiveDisease activity indexesAll seriesSeries with ≥ 2 DAIs95% CI95% CIAUCLowerUpperAUCLowerUpperDAS28.58.52.58.62.45.78DAS28_GSSJC replaced by GS+ joints.56.49.56.62.44.80DAS28_PDSJC replaced by PD+ joints.60.53.60.63.46.81DAS28_GSPDSJC replaced by GS AND PD+ joints.57.50.57.62.44.80DAS28_plus_GSSJC supplemented by GS+ joints.57.50.57.62.44.8ßDAS28_plus_PDSJC supplemented by PD+ joints.59.52.59.61.43.79DAS28_plus_GSPDSJC supplemented by GS AND PD+ joints.57.50.57.62.44.79SDAI.57.50.57.48.26.70SDAI_GSSJC replaced by GS+ joints.53.46.53.47.23.71SDAI_PDSJC replaced by PD+ joints.58.52.58.51.27.75SDAI_GSPDSJC replaced by GS AND PD+ joints.53.46.53.47.23.71SDAI_plus_GSSJC supplemented by GS+ joints.54.47.54.47.23.70SDAI_plus_PDSJC supplemented by PD+ joints.58.51.58.48.25.72SDAI_plus_GSPDSJC supplemented by GS AND PD+ joints.54.47.54.46.23.70ResultsWe included 649 series in 475 patients. Progression was observed in 84/649 (12.9%) series. Mean difference between the x-rays was 27.6±18.0 months. Mean age was 56.3±12.7 years, 474/649 (73%) series were from female patients. There was no significant difference between the AUC of the ROC of SDAI vs. SDAI_PD (p=0.19) nor between DAS28 vs. DAS28_PD: (p=0.17) (Figure 1A, Table 1). Similarly, when analyzing only series with ≥2 DAIs (143 series) we observed no difference between the AUC of the ROC of SDAI vs. SDAI-PD (p=0.28) nor between that of DAS28 vs. DAS28_PD (p=0.23) (Figure 1B, Table 1).Figure 1.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of clinical and ultrasound-based composite disease activity indices (A) overall and (B) for the subgroup with series with ≥ disease activity indices. DAS, disease activity score; GS, grey scale; PD, power Doppler; SDAI, simplified disease activity index;ConclusionThe predictability of radiographic progression by disease activity measures was generally limited. The composite USDAIs containing sonographic JC were not superior for predicting radiographic progression compared to their clinical counterparts although there was a trend for higher predictive value for indices containing PD.References[1]Mandl P, Balint P, Brault Y et al. Arthritis Care Res 2013;65:879-87.Disclosure of InterestsIrina Gessl: None declared, Thomas Deimel: None declared, Paul Studenic: None declared, Giorgio Tamborrini: None declared, Pascal Zufferey: None declared, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, Burkhard Moeller: None declared, Peter Mandl Speakers bureau: from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, Grant/research support from: from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB
|
|
| 32. |
- Gessl, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Role of joint damage, malalignment and inflammation in articular tenderness in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and osteoarthritis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 80:7, s. 884-890
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To determine whether clinical tenderness can be considered a sign of inflammatory joint activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to assess other possible factors associated with tenderness.MethodsPatients diagnosed with RA, PsA and OA underwent clinical and ultrasound examination of wrists and finger joints. Radiographs of the hands were scored for erosions, joint space narrowing (JSN), osteophytes and malalignment. A binary damage score (positive if ≥1 erosion, JSN and/or presence of malalignment) was calculated. Differences in grey scale signs of synovitis and power Doppler (PD) between tender non-swollen (TNS) versus non-tender non-swollen (NTNS) joints were calculated. Disease duration was assessed,<2 years was regarded as early and >5 years as long-standing arthritis.ResultsIn total, 34 patients (9 early and 14 long-standing) from patients with RA, 31 patients (7 early and 15 long-standing) with PsA and 30 with OA were included. We found equal frequencies of PD signal between TNS and NTNS joints in RA (p=0.18), PsA (p=0.59) or OA (p=0.96). However, PD had a significant association with tenderness in early arthritis both in RA (p=0.02) and in PsA (p=0.02). The radiographic damage score showed significant association with tenderness in RA (p<0.01), PsA (p<0.01) and OA (p=0.04).ConclusionTenderness might not always be a sign of active inflammation in RA, PsA and OA. While tenderness in early arthritis may be more related to inflammation, established disease is better explained by joint damage and malalignment.
|
|
| 33. |
- Gessl, I, et al.
(författare)
-
TENDERNESS AND RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS
- 2022
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 1231-1231
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In inflammatory arthritis swelling is regarded as a sign of synovitis and is associated with radiographic progression. However, the association of tenderness with radiographic progression is not clear.ObjectivesTo assess the predictive value of tenderness alone and with consideration of sonographic signs for synovitis, disease duration and baseline radiographic damage for subsequent radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsClinical and sonographic (grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD)) examination of 22 joints of the hand were performed cross-sectionally in consecutive patients with RA and PsA with at least one tender joint. Radiographs were scored for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN) at inclusion and radiographic progression of each joint was assessed after 2 years. The impact of tenderness on progression was analyzed in non-swollen joints for RA and PsA separately with logistic regression analyses. As a second step, the association of PD, GS, disease duration, C-reactive protein, baseline erosions and JSN and global joint counts with subsequent structural damage was assessed using univariate logistic regression in tender non-swollen joints again on the joint level.ResultsWe included 1207 joints in 54 RA patients and 396 joints in 18 PsA patients. Tenderness was associated with subsequent radiographic progression in non-swollen joints in PsA (OR 3.44, 95%CI 1.78-6.62, p<0.01) but not in RA (OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.99-2.48, p=0.55) (Figure 1). In tender non-swollen joints in RA patients, PD (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.10-13.30, p=0.04) and baseline erosions (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.22-15.95, p=0.02) had a significant impact on radiographic progression. In PsA patients, PD (OR 8.46, 95% CI 1.72-41.72, p<0.01), baseline erosions (OR 6.71, 95% CI 1.43-31.39, p=0.02), baseline JSN (OR 7.27, 95% CI 1.47-35.89, p=0.02) and SJC (OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.07-1.48, p<0.01) were associated with radiographic progression.Figure 1.The proportion of joints with progression in tender non-swollen and non-tender non-swollen joints in patients with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis; NTNS: non-tender non-swollen; TNS: tender non-swollenConclusionOur findings indicate that tenderness in non-swollen joints is associated with subsequent radiographic progression in PsA, while in RA it is a risk factor for radiographic progression only in the presence of additional factors, such as sonographic signs for synovitis.Disclosure of InterestsIrina Gessl: None declared, Mihaela Popescu: None declared, Gabriela Supp: None declared, Thomas Deimel: None declared, Paul Studenic: None declared, Martina Durechova: None declared, Michael Zauner: None declared, Josef S. Smolen Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis- Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Roche, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, Peter Mandl Speakers bureau: from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, Grant/research support from: from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB;
|
|
| 34. |
- Gessl, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Tenderness and radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 82:3, s. 344-350
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of tenderness in the absence of swelling with consideration of other potential risk factors for subsequent radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsClinical and sonographic (grey scale and power Doppler (PD)) examination of 22 joints of the hand were performed in patients with RA and PsA. The impact of tenderness on progression after 2 years was analysed in non-swollen joints for RA and PsA separately with multilevel mixed logistic regression analysis.ResultsWe included 1207 joints in 55 patients with RA and 352 joints in 18 patients with PsA. In RA, tenderness was associated with radiographic progression after 2 years (model 2: OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.27), p=0.047), although the association of PD (OR 2.92 (95% CI 1.71 to 5.00), p<0.001) and erosions (OR 4.74 (95% CI 2.44 to 9.23), p<0.001) with subsequent structural damage was stronger. In PsA, we found a positive but not significant association between tenderness and radiographic progression (OR 1.72 (95% CI 0.71 to 4.17), p=0.23). In contrast, similarly to RA, erosions (OR 4.62 (95% CI 1.29 to 16.54), p=0.019) and PD (OR 3.30 (95% CI 1.13 to 9.53), p=0.029) had a marked effect on subsequent structural damage.ConclusionOur findings imply that tenderness in non-swollen joints in RA is associated with subsequent damage. In both diseases, additional risk factors, such as sonographic signs for synovitis and baseline radiographic damage are associated with radiographic progression.
|
|
| 35. |
|
|
| 36. |
|
|
| 37. |
|
|
| 38. |
|
|
| 39. |
|
|
| 40. |
|
|
| 41. |
|
|
| 42. |
- Studenic, P, et al.
(författare)
-
SYMPTOMS CHARACTERISTICS OF SEROPOSITIVE INDIVIDUALS AT-RISK FOR DEVELOPING RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ARE VERSATILE AND COMPARABLE TO THOSE IN PEOPLE WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 80, s. 1005-1005
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The symptom burden of typical rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms in those at risk for developing RA - positive for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) and musculoskeletal complaints - has not been explored.Objectives:To evaluate patient-reported symptoms in individuals at-risk to develop RA in comparison to people with newly diagnosed, early seropositive RA.Methods:Two datasources from the region of Stockholm were used: The RISK RA cohort follows up ACPA positive individuals with arthralgia, but without signs of joint inflammation in a structured program over 3 years. The baseline visit of this cohort was used. Patients with early seropositive (ACPA and/or rheumatoid factor positive) RA (symptom duration of 12 months maximum) reported in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (SRQ) at their closest visit to their diagnosis date before receiving DMARD treatment have been identified. At-risk individuals were matched 1:3 by sex and age using the nearest neighbour method utilizing Mahalanobis distance, corrected for sample bias and exact matches on sex. Effect estimates of being at-risk compared to early RA for pain, patient global (GH), fatigue (all visual analogue scales), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), TJC28 and the EuroQol-5D (EQ5D; range: 0-1) have been derived. Propensity score matching was used as sensitivity analyses.Results:A total of 223 individuals at risk for developing RA were compared to 820 matched early RA patients. The summary of distribution of variables and effect estimates of differences between at-risk and early RA individuals are shown in the Figure 1. At-risk individuals show 24mm of lower pain scores than early RA. This difference is even less (-17mm, 95%CI: -24 to -11) when the estimate is additionally matched for the number of tender joints. The TJC28 was on average 5.4 joints lower than in early RA patients. People at-risk show 22mm lower GH scores (rate themselves better) and 17mm lower fatigue scores than early RA patients. Fatigue was scored highest (mean:35mm, 95%CI: 30 to 29) among the three VAS. HAQ was on average lower by 0.6 points in at-risk individuals and EQ5D showed 0.24 higher index-values, outlining a better health status. Still the mean EQ5D in at-risk individuals was only 0.74 (95%CI: 0.71 to 0.77), which is lower than average values of an age-matched general population (0.92 to 0.96). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results.Figure 1.Boxplots of pain, global health, fatigue, TJC28, EQ5D and HAQ, separately displayed for people with early seropositive RA and individuals at-risk. Population effect estimates (all p<0.001) comparing at-risk to early RA are provided for every pair, with 95% confidence interval in brackets.Conclusion:Not surprisingly, individuals at risk for RA report less symptom burden then early diagnosed RA patients. However, these differences only range around minimal clinically important differences and for fatigue even below, which stresses the need for medical attention and management strategies for symptomatic at-risk individuals.Acknowledgements:This study was supported through the New Horizon Fellowship and the FOREUM research fellowship grant and is part of the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no 777357 (RTCure).Hensvold AH and Catrina IA contributed equally.Disclosure of Interests:None declared
|
|
| 43. |
|
|
| 44. |
|
|
