| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Axelsson Fisk, Sten, et al.
(författare)
-
Social inequalities in the risk of giving birth to a small for gestational age child in Sweden 2010–16 : a cross-sectional study adopting an intersectional approach
- 2024
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Public Health. - 1101-1262 .- 1464-360X. ; 34:1, s. 22-28
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Well-established associations exist between the risk of small for gestational age (SGA) and unidimensional sociodemographic factors. We investigated social inequalities in SGA risk and adopted an intersectional approach that simultaneously considers different social categories. By doing so, we could assess heterogeneities in SGA risk within unidimensional sociodemographic categories. Methods: We included all live 679 694 singleton births in Sweden between 2010 and 2016. The outcome was SGA, and the exposures were age, maternal educational level, dichotomous migration status and civil status. Thirty-six possible combinations of these factors constituted the exposure in an intersectional model. We present odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)—a measurement of discriminatory accuracy (i.e. the ability to discriminate the babies born SGA from those who are not). Results: Women with low education and women born outside Sweden had ORs of 1.46 (95% CI 1.38–1.54) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.43–1.56) in unidimensional analyses, respectively. Among women aged under 25 with low education who were born outside Sweden and unmarried, the highest OR was 3.06 (2.59–3.63). The discriminatory accuracy was low for both the unidimensional model that included all sociodemographic factors (AUC 0. 563) and the intersectional model (AUC 0.571). Conclusions: The intersectional approach revealed a complex sociodemographic pattern of SGA risk. Sociodemographic factors have a low accuracy in identifying SGA at the individual level, even when quantifying their multi-dimensional intersections. This cautions against interventions targeted to individuals belonging to socially defined groups to reduce social inequalities in SGA risk.
|
|
| 3. |
-
Dybdelæring - en flerfaglig, relasjonell og skapende tilnærming
- 2019
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Hva er dybdelæring? Hva er det dybde tilfører læring? Denne boka presenterer et grunnleggende annet syn på læring og dybdelæring enn en ensidig kognitiv forståelse. Forfatterne viser at læring skjer gjennom samskaping mellom ulike aktører, og de transformerer (dybde)læring til å være kroppslig, relasjonell, skapende, affektiv og kognitiv læring - på en og samme gang. Empirien er hentet fra det flerfaglige forsknings- og utviklingsprosjektet «200 milliarder og 1,» der naturfag, religionsfag og kunstfag møtes. I møtet mellom to ungdomsskoler, en lærerutdanning, et teaterhus og Den kulturelle skolesekken skapes sanselig didaktisk design. Forfatterne har gått inn i disse møtene og formet et svar på hva flerfaglig læring kan være, og hva som er verdien i slik læring. Målgruppene for boken er studenter i grunnskolelærerutdanningen, studenter i PPU, ulike lærerprofesjonsrettede masterløp og lærere under videreutdanning.
|
|
| 4. |
- Lundborg, Petter, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-Term Effects of Childhood Nutrition : Evidence from a School Lunch Reform
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The Review of Economic Studies. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0034-6527 .- 1467-937X. ; 89:2, s. 876-908
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We study the long-term impact of a policy-driven change in childhood nutrition. For this purpose, we evaluate a program that rolled out nutritious school lunches free of charge to all pupils in Swedish primary schools between 1959 and 1969. We estimate the impact of the program on children’s economic, educational, and health outcomes throughout life. Our results show that the school lunch program generated substantial long-term benefits, where pupils exposed to the program during their entire primary school period have 3% higher lifetime income. The effect was greater for pupils that were exposed at earlier ages and for pupils from poor households, suggesting that the program reduced socioeconomic inequalities in adulthood. Exposure to the program also had substantial effects on educational attainment and health, which can explain a large part of the effect of the program on lifetime income.
|
|
