| 1. |
- Andersen, Mikkel Rathsach, et al.
(författare)
-
Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty : A randomized RSA study with 2-year follow-up of 53 patients
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Acta Orthopaedica. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1745-3674 .- 1745-3682. ; 87:6, s. 607-614
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose — Backside wear of the polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can produce clinically significant levels of polyethylene debris, which can lead to loosening of the tibial component. Loosening due to polyethylene debris could theoretically be reduced in tibial components of monoblock polyethylene design, as there is no backside wear. We investigated the effect of 2 different tibial component designs, monoblock and modular polyethylene, on migration of the tibial component in uncemented TKA. Patients and methods — In this randomized study, 53 patients (mean age 61 years), 32 in the monoblock group and 33 in the modular group, were followed for 2 years. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was done postoperatively after weight bearing and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint of the study was comparison of the tibial component migration (expressed as maximum total point motion (MTPM)) of the 2 different implant designs. Results — We did not find any statistically significant difference in MTPM between the groups at 3 months (p = 0.2) or at 6 months (p = 0.1), but at 12 and 24 months of follow-up there was a significant difference in MTPM of 0.36 mm (p = 0.02) and 0.42 mm (p = 0.02) between groups, with the highest amount of migration (1.0 mm) in the modular group. The difference in continuous migration (MTPM from 12 and 24 months) between the groups was 0.096 mm (p = 0.5), and when comparing MTPM from 3–24 months, the difference between the groups was 0.23 mm (p = 0.07). Interpretation — In both study groups, we found the early migration pattern expected, with a relatively high initial amount of migration from operation to 3 months of follow-up, followed by stabilization of the implant with little migration thereafter. However, the modular implants had a statistically significantly higher degree of migration compared to the monoblock. We believe that the greater stiffness of the modular implants was the main reason for the difference in migration, but an initial creep in the polyethylene metal-back locking mechanism of the modular group could also be a possible explanation for the observed difference in migration between the 2 study groups.
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersen, Mikkel Rathsach, et al.
(författare)
-
Tibial Component Undersizing Is Related to High Degrees of Implant Migration Following Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty : A Study of Radiostereometric Analysis Data for 111 Patients with 2-Year Follow-up
- 2023
-
Ingår i: JBJS Open Access. - 2472-7245. ; 8:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies have shown that the continuous migration of tibial components is predictive of aseptic loosening following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the present study, we investigated whether accurate sizing and placement of tibial components are related to the degree of implant migration as measured with use of RSA.Methods:A total of 111 patients who underwent TKA surgery with a cementless tibial component were followed for a period of 2 years postoperatively, during which implant migration was assessed with use of RSA. RSA was performed within 7 days postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for component size and placement in the tibia. The evaluations were performed by experienced knee surgeons who were blinded to the migration data and clinical outcomes. A multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted.Results:Continuous implant migration (i.e., migration occurring between 12 and 24 months postoperatively) had a negative association with tibial component size (coefficient [B], -0.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.33 to -0.08). Subsidence was associated with the absence of posterior cortical bone support (B, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.28), the absence of lateral cortical bone support (B, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.37), frontal-plane varus malalignment (B, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.16), and component undersizing (B, -0.4; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.68). Posterior tilt was associated only with undersizing (B, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.11).Conclusions:Undersized cementless tibial components are at a higher risk for poor fixation with continuous migration following TKA. Therefore, a higher risk of aseptic loosening should be expected.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
|
|
