| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Eshghi, Arash, et al.
(författare)
-
Action coordination and learning in dialogue
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Probabilistic Approaches to Linguistic Theory / edited by Jean-Philippe Bernardy, Rasmus Blanck, Stergios Chatzikyriakidis, Shalom Lappin, Aleksandre Maskharashvili. - Stanford : Center for the Study of Language and Information. - 9781684000791 ; , s. 357-418
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Eshghi, Arash, et al.
(författare)
-
Feedback in Conversation as Incremental Semantic Update
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics, 15-17 April 2015, Queen Mary University of London, London UK. - 9781941643334 ; , s. 261-271
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In conversation, interlocutors routinely indicate whether something said or done has been processed and integrated. Such feedback includes backchannels such as ‘okay’ or ‘mhm’, the production of a next relevant turn, and repair initiation via clarification requests. Importantly, such feedback can be produced not only at sentence/turn boundaries, but also sub-sententially. In this paper, we extend an existing model of incremental semantic processing in dialogue, based around the Dynamic Syntax (DS) grammar framework, to provide a low-level, integrated account of backchannels, clarification requests and their responses; demonstrating that they can be accounted for as part of the core semantic structure-building mechanisms of the grammar, rather than via higher level pragmatic phenomena such as intention recognition, or treatment as an “unofficial” part of the conversation. The end result is an incremental model in which words, not turns, are seen as procedures for contextual update and backchannels serve to align participant semantic processing contexts and thus ease the production and interpretation of subsequent conversational actions. We also show how clarification requests and their following responses and repair can be modelled within the same DS framework, wherein the divergence and re-alignment effort in participants’ semantic processing drives conversations forward.
|
|
| 4. |
- Eshghi, Arash, et al.
(författare)
-
Incremental Turn Processing in Dialogue
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. - York, UK.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
- Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, et al.
(författare)
-
Affordance competition in dialogue: the case of syntactic universals
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of SemDial (WatchDial2020), Waltham, Massachusetts, July 18-19 2020 (Online) / Sophia Malamud, James Pustejovsky & Jonathan Ginzburg (eds.). - : SemDial. - 2308-2275.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
- Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, et al.
(författare)
-
Completability vs (In)completeness
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0374-0463 .- 1949-0763. ; 52:2, s. 260-284
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2020 The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen. In everyday conversation, no notion of “complete sentence” is required for syntactic licensing. However, so-called “fragmentary”, “incomplete”, and abandoned utterances are problematic for standard formalisms. When contextualised, such data show that (a) non-sentential utterances are adequate to underpin agent coordination, while (b) all linguistic dependencies can be systematically distributed across participants and turns. Standard models have problems accounting for such data because their notions of ‘constituency’ and ‘syntactic domain’ are independent of performance considerations. Concomitantly, we argue that no notion of “full proposition” or encoded speech act is necessary for successful interaction: strings, contents, and joint actions emerge in conversation without any single participant having envisaged in advance the outcome of their own or their interlocutors’ actions. Nonetheless, morphosyntactic and semantic licensing mechanisms need to apply incrementally and subsententially. We argue that, while a representational level of abstract syntax, divorced from conceptual structure and physical action, impedes natural accounts of subsentential coordination phenomena, a view of grammar as a “skill” employing domain-general mechanisms, rather than fixed form-meaning mappings, is needed instead. We provide a sketch of a predictive and incremental architecture (Dynamic Syntax) within which underspecification and time-relative update of meanings and utterances constitute the sole concept of “syntax”.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
- Howes, Christine, 1978, et al.
(författare)
-
Formalising backchannel relevance spaces
- 2017
-
Ingår i: The first Dynamic Syntax conference, 19 April -20 April 2017, London.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
- Maraev, Vladislav, 1986, et al.
(författare)
-
Laughter relevance spaces
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The 3rd Dynamic Syntax Conference, 16-17th May 2019, Valletta, Malta.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
