| 1. |
- Akyol, Z, et al.
(författare)
-
A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Journal of distance education = Revue de l'enseignement à distance. - 1916-6818. ; 23:2, s. 123-136
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has become a prominent model of teaching and learning in online and blended learning environments. Considerable research has been conducted which employs the framework with promising results, resulting in wide use to inform the practice of online and blended teaching and learning. For the CoI model to continue to grow and evolve, constructive critiques and debates are extremely beneficial, in so much as they identify potential problems and weaknesses in the model or its application, as well as provide direction for further research. In this context, the CoI framework was recently reviewed and critiqued by Rourke and Kanuka in their JDE article entitled “Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature.” This paper is a response to this article and focuses on two main issues. The first issue is the focus of the review and critique on learning outcomes. The second issue concerns the representation, comprehensiveness, and methodology of the review.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Arbaugh, B, et al.
(författare)
-
Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry framework : An exploratory study
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The Internet and higher education. - : Elsevier BV. - 1096-7516 .- 1873-5525. ; 13:1-2, s. 37-44
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper integrates the emerging literatures of empirical research oil the Community of Inquiry (Col) framework and disciplinary effects in online teaching and learning by examining the disciplinary differences in perceptions of social, teaching, and cognitive presence of over 1500 students in seven disciplines at two U S institutions Our results found significant disciplinary differences, particularly regarding cognitive presence, in soft, applied disciplines relative to other disciplines. These initial results suggest the possibility that the Col framework play be more applicable to applied disciplines than pure disciplines Our findings suggest interesting opportunities for future researchers to consider how the individual elements of the Col framework may influence and be influenced by academic disciplines and how the framework play need to be refined or modified to explain effective course conduct in pure disciplines.
|
|
| 4. |
- Arbaugh, J.B, et al.
(författare)
-
Developing a community of inquiry instrument : testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The Internet and higher education. - : Elsevier BV. - 1096-7516 .- 1873-5525. ; 11:3-4, s. 133-136
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article reports on the multi-institutional development and validation of an instrument that attempts to operationalize Garrison, Anderson and Archer's Community of Inquiry (Col) framework (2000). The results of the study suggest that the instrument is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of the dimensions of social presence and cognitive presence, thereby providing additional support for the validity of the Col as a framework for constructing effective online learning environments. While factor analysis supported the idea of teaching presence as a construct, it also suggested that the construct consisted of two factors-one related to course design and organization and the other related to instructor behavior during the course. The article concludes with a discussion of potential implications of further refinement of the Col measures for researchers, designers, administrators, and instructors.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Richardson, J. C., et al.
(författare)
-
Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design
- 2012
-
Ingår i: The Next Generation of Distance Education. - Boston, MA : Springer US. - 9781461417859 - 1461417848 - 9781461417842 ; , s. 97-125
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Community of Inquiry (CoI) model views the online learning experience as a function of the relationship between three elements: social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence. The proposed panel and chapter will focus on how the CoI framework can be used to guide the design and implementation of online courses through the explication of measures verifying the CoI. In addition, factors external but influential to the model-technology, disciplinary differences, and the role of the online instructor-are reviewed.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Swan, Karen, et al.
(författare)
-
Researching online communities of inquiry : New CoI survey instrument.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008. ; , s. 5812-5820
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework developed by Garrison, Anderson and Archer (2000) provides a theoretical model of online learning processes that has been used by many scholars in the field of online education. However, research utilizing the CoI framework needs to move from investigating single components of the model to integrating all three components and from situated studies using unique measures to inter-institutional research using common measures. In this paper, we summarize the CoI model and research to date on its multiple components, and report on validation of a CoI survey instrument designed to support common, integrated Community of Inquiry research across institutions.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
- Swan, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry
- 2008
-
Ingår i: E-mentor. - 1731-6758 .- 1731-7428. ; 2:24
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article examines work related to the development and validation of a measurement tool for the Communityof Inquiry (CoI) framework in online settings. The framework consists of three elements: social presence,teaching presence and cognitive presence, each of which is integral to the instrument. The 34 item instrument,and thus framework, was tested after being administered at four institutions in the Summer of 2007. The articlealso includes a discussion of implications for the future use of the CoI survey and the CoI framework itself.
|
|
