| 1. |
- Ayello, Elizabeth A.
(författare)
-
Predicting pressure ulcer risk
- 2007
-
Ingår i: The American Journal of Nursing. - 0002-936X .- 1538-7488. ; 107:11, s. 45-48
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Rajhathy, Erin, 1983-, et al.
(författare)
-
Debridement options for the interprofessional team
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Nursing. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0360-4039. ; 54:3, s. 30-38
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Debridement is a core component of chronic wound management. Although various debridement methods exist, each carries a unique patient risk level. This article discusses the different normal tissue components that are critical to safe debridement practice, various methods of wound debridement for nurses, and the importance of an interprofessional team and consulting a wound specialist.
|
|
| 3. |
- Tran, David L., et al.
(författare)
-
Debridement : Technical Considerations and Treatment Options for the Interprofessional Team
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Advances in Skin & Wound Care. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1527-7941 .- 1538-8654. ; 36:4, s. 180-187
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Debridement is a critical component in the management of both acute and chronic wounds. Six reviewed methods of debridement exist, and specific techniques are more appropriate to match patient needs with available clinical resources. Accurate differentiation between healable, maintenance, and nonhealable wounds is paramount when determining whether a wound would benefit from debridement.Clinical assessment includes review of the patient's underlying medical conditions/previous surgeries along with the history and progression of the wound. Awareness of the physiologic wound bed preparation components that contribute to the current wound status will direct treatment of the abnormal components. Optimal wound status includes complete healing or reduced abnormal wound-related symptoms or signs.Debridement competency requires an awareness of the six types of debridement, their clinical utility, and appropriate patient selection. Providers need to assess patients' wounds, triage them, and refer them as necessary to an interprofessional setting. For stalled but healable wounds, specialized testing may be necessary when managing patients who would benefit from more invasive or advanced forms of wound care. This article informs providers on the training and experience required for specific debridement techniques depending on the wound etiology.
|
|
| 4. |
- Van Tiggelen, Hanne, et al.
(författare)
-
Development and psychometric property testing of a skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES) in 37 countries
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648. ; 77:3, s. 1609-1623
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim To develop and psychometrically evaluate a skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES). Design Prospective psychometric instrument validation study. Method The skin tear knowledge assessment instrument was developed based on a literature review and expert input (N = 19). Face and content validity were assessed in a two-round Delphi procedure by 10 international experts affiliated with the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP). The instrument was psychometrically tested in a convenience sample of 387 nurses in 37 countries (April-May 2020). Validity of the multiple-choice test items (item difficulty, discriminating index, quality of the response alternatives), construct validity, and test-retest reliability (stability) were analysed and evaluated in light of international reference standards. Results A 20-item instrument, covering six knowledge domains most relevant to skin tears, was designed. Content validity was established (CVI = 0.90-1.00). Item difficulty varied between 0.24 and 0.94 and the quality of the response alternatives between 0.01-0.52. The discriminating index was acceptable (0.19-0.77). Participants with a theoretically expected higher knowledge level had a significantly higher total score than participants with theoretically expected lower knowledge (p < .001). The 1-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.78-0.86) for the full instrument and varied between 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.79) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81-0.89) for the domains. Cohen's Kappa coefficients of the individual items ranged between 0.21 and 0.74. Conclusion The skin tear knowledge assessment instrument is supported by acceptable psychometric properties and can be applied in nursing education, research, and practice to assess knowledge of healthcare professionals about skin tears. Impact Prevention and treatment of skin tears are a challenge for healthcare professionals. The provision of adequate care is based on profound and up-to-date knowledge. None of the existing instruments to assess skin tear knowledge is psychometrically tested, nor up-to-date. OASES can be used worldwide to identify education, practice, and research needs and priorities related to skin tears in clinical practice.
|
|
