| 1. |
- Andersson, Sofia, et al.
(author)
-
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Palliative Care. - : Sage Publications. - 0825-8597. ; 39:1, s. 21-28
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: To translate and adapt the Serious Illness Conversation Guide for use within the Swedish healthcare setting and examine the validity and acceptability of the Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide. Methods: Three rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted (T1-3); patients (T1 n = 11; T2 n = 10; T3 n = 8), family members (T1 n = 5; T2 n = 2; T3 n = 2), and healthcare professionals (T1 n = 6; T2 n = 6; T3 n = 5). The guide was iteratively adapted based on interview feedback, clinical experience, and the literature. The guide was tested on training days with physicians and nurses. Results: The Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide was found to be useful in supporting serious illness conversations. Clinicians reported that some questions were emotionally challenging. Explicit questions about prognosis and timing were excluded. Instead, the dual approach of "hoping for the best and preparing for the worst" was used to explore patients' thoughts about the future. Conclusions: Patients, family members, and healthcare professionals found the Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide to be appropriate, sensitive, and responsive to their needs. The Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide may facilitate a more health-promoting approach to serious illness conversations. Further research is needed to understand the impact of these conversations on person-centered and goal-concordant care.
|
|
| 2. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Core elements of serious illness conversations : an integrative systematic review
- 2023
-
In: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2045-435X .- 2045-4368.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Ariadne Labs' Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), inclusive of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG), has been adapted for use in a variety of settings and among diverse population groups. Explicating the core elements of serious illness conversations could support the inclusion or exclusion of certain components in future iterations of the programme and the guide.Aim: This integrative systematic review aimed to identify and describe core elements of serious illness conversations in relation to the SICP and/or SICG.Design: Literature published between 1 January 2014 and 20 March 2023 was searched in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and PubMed. All articles were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines. Data were analysed with thematic synthesis.Results: A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria. Three themes were revealed: (1) serious illness conversations serve different functions that are reflected in how they are conveyed; (2) serious illness conversations endeavour to discover what matters to patients and (3) serious illness conversations seek to align what patients want in their life and care.Conclusions: Core elements of serious illness conversations included explicating the intention, framing, expectations and directions for the conversation. This encompassed discussing current and possible trajectories with a view towards uncovering matters of importance to the patient as a person. Preferences and priorities could be used to inform future preparation and recommendations. Serious illness conversation elements could be adapted and altered depending on the intended purpose of the conversation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-
(author)
-
“Life is for living” : exploring thriving for older people living in nursing homes
- 2021
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Background: Demand for formal care in nursing homes has steadily increased in recent decades, prompting calls for exploration of health-promoting and salutogenic concepts that support people not only to survive in older age, but to thrive. The concept of thriving has been described as a holistic experience of place-related well-being resulting from interactions between the person and their lived-environment. However, detailed understandings of thriving among nursing home residents and staff are lacking, and little is known about the variables that influence thriving, how thriving is regarded outside of Scandinavia, or the extent to which thriving may change over time.Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to explore meanings, expressions, measurements, and associations for thriving in nursing homes. Study I aimed to illuminate the meanings of thriving as narrated by persons living in an Australian nursing home. Study II aimed to explore how Australian nursing home staff recognise expressions of thriving among persons living in nursing homes. Study III aimed to further test and describe the psychometric properties and performance of the 32-item Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale (TOPAS) and to develop a short-form TOPAS. Study IV aimed to describe longitudinal changes in Swedish nursing home thriving over a five-year period and describe changes in associated factors. Methods: For studies I and II data were collected in the form of qualitative interviews with Australian nursing home residents (N=21; study I) and staff (N=14; study II). Qualitative data were analysed using phenomenological hermeneutical analysis and qualitative content analysis respectively. For studies III and IV cross-sectional baseline (i.e., 2013/2014) and follow-up (i.e., 2018/2019) data were collected from a nationally representative sample of Swedish nursing homes for the Swedish National Inventory of Care and Health in Residential Aged Care (SWENIS) study. The baseline SWENIS I sample consisted of 4,831 proxy-rated resident surveys from 35 municipalities (study III) and the follow-up SWENIS II sample consisted of 3,894 proxy-rated resident surveys from 43 municipalities (study IV). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, validity testing, item response theory-based analysis, and simple linear regression.Results: The meanings of thriving for nursing home residents were understood as encompassing elements of acceptance, balance, and contentment in relation to the person’s living situation, as well as their social and physical environment (study I). These meanings were interpreted as having options and choices, and the agency to make decisions where possible, in relation to the care and living environment. Nursing home staff were found to recognise expressions of thriving through a combination of understanding, observing, and sensing (study II). Staff described recognising thriving through reflective assessment processes that involved comparing and contrasting their personal and professional interpretations of thriving with their overall sense of the resident. Psychometric testing of the 32-item and short-form versions of the TOPAS showed good validity and reliability to measure thriving among nursing home residents (study III). Population characteristics were relatively consistent between the SWENIS I baseline and SWENIS II follow-up samples (study IV). A sub-sample of nursing homes that participated in both baseline and follow-up data collections reported a statistically significant increase for thriving and a decrease in the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Higher and lower thriving was associated with several neuropsychiatric symptoms.Conclusions: Thriving appeared to be a relevant and meaningful phenomenon with shared understandings among nursing home residents and staff, providing valuable support for the ongoing assessment and application of thriving in international and cross-cultural nursing home settings. The TOPAS appeared valid and reliable to facilitate proxy-rated measurement of thriving among nursing home residents, and the short-form TOPAS could have enhanced use for assessment of thriving in research and practice. Changes to the overall thriving scores between baseline and follow-up provides important information that may be used as a reference point for future measurements and comparisons of thriving and its associated variables over time. This thesis highlights the importance of considering the various experiences, perceptions, and interpretations of thriving if such a concept is to be effectively embedded in person-centred care, policy, and practice.
|
|
| 4. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Patient identification for serious illness conversations : A scoping review
- 2022
-
In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 19:7
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Serious illness conversations aim to align medical care and treatment with patients' values, goals, priorities, and preferences. Timely and accurate identification of patients for serious illness conversations is essential; however, existent methods for patient identification in different settings and population groups have not been compared and contrasted. This study aimed to examine the current literature regarding patient identification for serious illness conversations within the context of the Serious Illness Care Program and/or the Serious Illness Conversation Guide. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A comprehensive search was undertaken in four databases for literature published between January 2014 and September 2021. In total, 39 articles met the criteria for inclusion. This review found that patients were primarily identified for serious illness conversations using clinical/diagnostic triggers, the 'surprise question', or a combination of methods. A diverse assortment of clinicians and non-clinical resources were described in the identification process, including physicians, nurses, allied health staff, administrative staff, and automated algorithms. Facilitators and barriers to patient identification are elucidated. Future research should test the efficacy of adapted identification methods and explore how clinicians inform judgements surrounding patient identification.
|
|
| 5. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Perils and payoffs for patients in serious illness conversations as described by physicians : a qualitative study
- 2024
-
In: BMJ Open Quality. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2399-6641. ; 13:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The Serious Illness Care Programme was developed to promote more, better and earlier serious illness conversations. Conversations about goals and values are associated with improved experiences and outcomes for seriously ill patients. Clinicians’ attitudes and beliefs are thought to influence the uptake and performance of serious illness conversations, yet little is known about how clinicians perceive the impact of these conversations on patients. This study aimed to explore physicians’ perceptions regarding the impact of serious illness conversations for patients.Methods: The Serious Illness Care Programme was implemented as a quality improvement project in two hospitals in Southern Sweden. Focus group evaluation discussions were conducted with 14 physicians and inductive thematic analysis was undertaken.Results: The results revealed that physicians considered potential perils and optimised potential payoffs for patients when engaging in serious illness conversations. Potential perils encompassed inappropriate timing, damaging emotions and shattering hopes. Potential payoffs included reflection time, secure space, and united understandings.Conclusions: Physicians depicted a balance in evaluating the perils and payoffs of serious illness conversations for patients and recognised the interrelation of these possibilities through continual assessment and adjustment.
|
|
| 6. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Perils and payoffs for patients in serious illness conversations as described by physicians : a qualitative study
- 2024
-
In: BMJ Open Quality. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2399-6641. ; 13:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background The Serious Illness Care Programme was developed to promote more, better and earlier serious illness conversations. Conversations about goals and values are associated with improved experiences and outcomes for seriously ill patients. Clinicians' attitudes and beliefs are thought to influence the uptake and performance of serious illness conversations, yet little is known about how clinicians perceive the impact of these conversations on patients. This study aimed to explore physicians' perceptions regarding the impact of serious illness conversations for patients.Methods The Serious Illness Care Programme was implemented as a quality improvement project in two hospitals in Southern Sweden. Focus group evaluation discussions were conducted with 14 physicians and inductive thematic analysis was undertaken.Results The results revealed that physicians considered potential perils and optimised potential payoffs for patients when engaging in serious illness conversations. Potential perils encompassed inappropriate timing, damaging emotions and shattering hopes. Potential payoffs included reflection time, secure space, and united understandings.Conclusions Physicians depicted a balance in evaluating the perils and payoffs of serious illness conversations for patients and recognised the interrelation of these possibilities through continual assessment and adjustment.
|
|
| 7. |
- Baxter, Rebecca, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Promoting resident thriving in nursing homes : a qualitative study
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: To explore how staff promote resident thriving in an Australian nursing home.Design: Qualitative research design using content analysis.Methods: Interviews were held with 14 nursing staff working in an Australian nursing home in March/April 2018. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.Results: Four themes were revealed: promoting personalized care; promoting opportunities for autonomy; promoting connection and meaning; and promoting a curated environment.Conclusions: Staff promoted resident thriving in relation to everyday care, activities, capabilities, relationships and the lived environment. Interventions that were perceived to promote thriving were described relative to the nurse, the resident, the care team and the wider nursing home context.
|
|
| 8. |
- Maric, Dora, et al.
(author)
-
Effects of resistance training on sleep quality and disorders among individuals diagnosed with cancer : a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
- 2024
-
In: Cancer Medicine. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2045-7634. ; 13:8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Sleep disorders are often complained by cancer patients and can last years after the end of therapies, leading to different negative consequences. Non-pharmacological strategies such as exercise interventions may be considered to counteract this phenomenon. The literature supports the beneficial effects of aerobic training (AT), while evidence on resistance training (RT) is scarce. Accordingly, our systematic review aims to investigate the potential novel effect of RT on sleep outcomes in cancer survivors.Methods: The literature search was conducted on MEDLINE (Pubmed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The screening procedure was conducted using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Sleep outcomes assessed through self-reported questionnaires or objective sleep measurements were extracted from RCTs recruiting cancer survivors of any age and gender, on or off treatment. The risk of bias (RoB) for each study was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Meta-analytic syntheses were performed on sleep quality and insomnia.Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the review. Considering the mean percentage differences of all studies combined, promising positive results were found after combined aerobic and resistance exercise program (COMB) for sleep quality (−19%) and sleep disturbance (−17.3%). The meta-analysis results showed significant improvement for both sleep quality and insomnia (d = 0.28, SE: 0.11, Z = 2.51, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.07–0.49 and d = 0.43, SE: 0.20, Z = 2.18, p = 0.029, 95% CI: 0.07–0.49, respectively).Conclusion: RT interventions of 60 minutes per session, performed 2–3 times a week for 12 weeks, with exercise intensity ranging from 60% to 80% of one-repetition maximum can be administered to cancer survivors, aiming to improve sleep outcomes.
|
|
| 9. |
- Pusa, Susanna, 1982-, et al.
(author)
-
Core competencies for serious illness conversations : an integrative systematic review
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Palliative Care. - : Sage Publications. - 0825-8597.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: The Serious Illness Care Program was developed to support goals and values discussions between seriously ill patients and their clinicians. The core competencies, that is, the essential clinical conversation skills that are described as requisite for effective serious illness conversations (SICs) in practice, have not yet been explicated. This integrative systematic review aimed to identify core competencies for SICs in the context of the Serious Illness Care Program. Methods: Articles published between January 2014 and March 2023 were identified in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases. In total, 313 records underwent title and abstract screening, and 96 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines, and data were analyzed using thematic synthesis.Results: In total, 53 articles were included. Clinicians' core competencies for SICs were described in 3 themes: conversation resources, intrapersonal capabilities, and interpersonal capabilities. Conversation resources included using the conversation guide as a tool, together with applying appropriate communication skills to support better communication. Intrapersonal capabilities included calibrating one's own attitudes and mindset as well as confidence and self-assurance to engage in SICs. Interpersonal capabilities focused on the clinician's ability to interact with patients and family members to foster a mutually trusting relationship, including empathetic communication with attention and adherence to patient and family members views, goals, needs, and preferences.Conclusions: Clinicians need to efficiently combine conversation resources with intrapersonal and interpersonal skills to successfully conduct and interact in SICs.
|
|
| 10. |
- Pusa, Susanna, et al.
(author)
-
Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations : An Integrative Systematic Review
- 2024
-
In: Journal of Palliative Care. - : Sage Publications. - 0825-8597.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: The Serious Illness Care Program was developed to support goals and values discussions between seriously ill patients and their clinicians. The core competencies, that is, the essential clinical conversation skills that are described as requisite for effective serious illness conversations (SICs) in practice, have not yet been explicated. This integrative systematic review aimed to identify core competencies for SICs in the context of the Serious Illness Care Program. Methods: Articles published between January 2014 and March 2023 were identified in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed databases. In total, 313 records underwent title and abstract screening, and 96 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Guidelines, and data were analyzed using thematic synthesis. Results: In total, 53 articles were included. Clinicians' core competencies for SICs were described in 3 themes: conversation resources, intrapersonal capabilities, and interpersonal capabilities. Conversation resources included using the conversation guide as a tool, together with applying appropriate communication skills to support better communication. Intrapersonal capabilities included calibrating one's own attitudes and mindset as well as confidence and self-assurance to engage in SICs. Interpersonal capabilities focused on the clinician's ability to interact with patients and family members to foster a mutually trusting relationship, including empathetic communication with attention and adherence to patient and family members views, goals, needs, and preferences. Conclusions: Clinicians need to efficiently combine conversation resources with intrapersonal and interpersonal skills to successfully conduct and interact in SICs.
|
|
| 11. |
- Pusa, Susanna, et al.
(author)
-
Physicians' perceptions of the implementation of the serious illness care program : a qualitative study
- 2023
-
In: BMC Health Services Research. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1472-6963. ; 23:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundConversations about goals, values and priorities with patients that are seriously ill are associated with improved palliative healthcare. The Serious Illness Care Program is a multi-component program that can facilitate more, better, and earlier conversations between clinicians and seriously ill patients. For successful and sustainable implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program, it is important to consider how stakeholders perceive it. The aim of our study was to explore physicians' perceptions and experiences of implementing the Serious Illness Care Program.MethodsData were collected through four focus group discussions with physicians (n = 14) working at a hospital where the Serious Illness Care program was in the process of being implemented. Data were analyzed with inductive thematic analysis.ResultsPhysicians' perceptions of the implementation encompassed three thematic areas: hovering between preparedness and unpreparedness, being impacted and being impactful, and picking pieces or embracing it at all.ConclusionsThis study identified key aspects related to the individual physician, the care team, the impact on the patient, and the organizational support that were perceived to influence the implementation and sustainable integration of the Serious Illness Care Program. Describing these aspects provides insight into how the Serious Illness Care Program is implemented in practice and indicates areas for future training and development.Trial registrationNot applicable.
|
|
| 12. |
- Weni, Woro Mustika, et al.
(author)
-
Psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool
- 2023
-
In: International Journal of Older People Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1748-3735 .- 1748-3743. ; 18:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The number of Indonesian care staff working in hospitals and long-term care facilities caring for persons with dementia in Japan is increasing; however, there is no instrument available in the Indonesian language to assess their dementia care practice.Objectives: This study aimed to translate the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of Indonesian care staff working in dementia care and long-term care facilities in Japan.Methods: This is a descriptive, methodological, and cross-sectional study. The P-CAT was translated into the Indonesian language. The draft was administered to Indonesian care staff (n = 218) working at long-term care facilities in Japan. Data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), known-group validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.Results: EFA showed three-factor and CFA of the three-factor indicated that the model had an acceptable fit (chi-squared statistics/degree of freedom = 1.78, comparative fit index = 0.94, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06) with a slightly different structure compared to the original P-CAT. Regarding known-group validity, the P-CAT total score was significantly higher for those who had training in dementia, who knew about person-centred care, and who showed satisfaction in the job. Internal consistency (Cronbach's a) of the total scale was 0.68 which is considered acceptable, and the test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.61 which is considered moderate.Conclusion: The Indonesian P-CAT indicated sound validity and reliability to measure person-centred care among Indonesian care staff working in dementia care and long-term care facilities in Japan.Implication for Practice: The development of Indonesian P-CAT allows the evaluation of dementia care, promotes and further improves person-centred care for persons with dementia provided by Indonesian care staff working in long-term care facilities in Japan.
|
|
