| 1. |
- Angenete, Eva, 1972, et al.
(författare)
-
Ostomy function after abdominoperineal resection-a clinical and patient evaluation.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International journal of colorectal disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-1262 .- 0179-1958. ; 27:10, s. 1267-74
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer results in a permanent colostomy. As a consequence of a recent change in operative technique from standard (S-APR) to extralevator resection (E-APR), the perineal part of the procedure is now performed with the patient in a prone jackknife position. The impact of this change on stoma function is unknown. The aim was to determine stoma-related complications and the individual patient experience of a stoma. METHODS: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer operated on with APR in one institution in 2004 to 2009 were included. Recurrent cancer, palliative procedures, pre-existing stoma and patients not alive at the start of the study were excluded. Data were collected from hospital records and the national colorectal cancer registry. A questionnaire was sent out to patients. The median follow-up was 44months (13-84) after primary surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were alive in February 2011. Seventy seven agreed to participate. Sixty-nine patients (90%) returned the questionnaire. Stoma necrosis was more common for E-APR, 34% vs. 10%, but bandaging problems and low stoma height were more common for S-APR. There were no differences in the patients' experience of stoma function. In all, 35% of the patients felt dirty and unclean, but 90% felt that they had a full life and could engage in leisure activities of their choice. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study indicates no difference in stoma function after 1year between S-APR and E-APR. Over 90% of the patients accept their stoma, but our study indicates that more information and support for patients are warranted.
|
|
| 2. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela
(författare)
-
Aspects on colostomy construction, complications and stoma function
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Aim: The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the importance of surgical technique for stoma complications as well as stoma function in patients operated with colostomy. Methods: Five papers are included: Three observational studies (three papers), one randomized control trial (two papers). Clinical data has been collected from medical records, operative notes, the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, prospectively registered clinical records forms and patient reported data through questionnaires. Results: The incidence of stoma related complications is high and may be affected by surgical technique but not stoma function (paper I). Most patients seem to live a full life with their stoma (paper II). A loop colostomy does not seem to reduce the risk for postoperative complications after surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer but it does affect the stoma related complications (paper III). The incidence of parastomal hernia was not affected by the surgical technique used under colostomy construction (paper IV-V). Conclusion: Surgical technique when colostomies are performed influences the occurrence of short-term complications in patients operated with abdominoperineal excision. Parastomal hernia incidence is not affected by the surgical technique used for colostomy construction. Stoma type does not affect the risk for postoperative complications.
|
|
| 3. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate: Results From Stoma-const-A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: National Center of Biotechnology Information. - 0027-8874. ; 273:4, s. 640-647
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The primary objective of this trial was to compare the parastomal hernia rates 1 year after the construction of an end colostomy by 3 surgical techniques: cruciate incision, circular incision in the fascia and using prophylactic mesh. Secondary objectives were evaluation of postoperative complications, readmissions/reoperations, and risk factors for parastomal hernia. Summary of background data: Colostomy construction techniques have been explored with the aim to improve function and reduce stoma complications, but parastomal herniation is frequent with an incidence of approximately 50%. Methods: A randomized, multicenter trial was performed in 3 hospitals in Sweden and Denmark; all patients scheduled to receive an end colostomy were asked to participate. Parastomal hernia within 12 months was determined by computed tomography of the abdomen in prone position and by clinical assessment. Complications, readmissions, reoperations, and risk factors were also assessed. Results: Two hundred nine patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 arms of the study. Patient demographics were similar in all 3 groups. Assessment of parastomal hernia was possible in 185 patients. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for parastomal hernia was 1.25 (0.83; 1.88), and 1.22 (0.81; 1.84) between cruciate versus circular and cruciate versus mesh groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to parastomal hernia rate. Age and body mass index were found to be associated with development of a parastomal hernia. Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the rates of parastomal hernia within 12 months of index surgery between the 3 surgical techniques of colostomy construction.
|
|
| 4. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
Stoma-Const - the technical aspects of stoma construction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Trials. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1745-6215. ; 15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The construction of a colostomy is a common procedure, but the evidence for the different parts of the construction of the colostomy is lacking. Parastomal hernia is a common complication of colostomy formation. The aim of this study is to standardise the colostomy formation and to compare three types of colostomy formation (one including a mesh) regarding the development of parastomal hernia.
|
|
| 5. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
Stoma-related complications: a report from the Stoma-Const randomized controlled trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Colorectal Disease. - : Wiley. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 23:5, s. 1091-1101
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The impact of construction techniques on the development of stoma complications is partly undiscovered. The aim of this paper was to report and analyse the impact of the three surgical techniques in a randomized controlled trial Stoma-Const on stoma-related complications as well as identifying risk factors and patient-reported stoma function as a planned secondary analysis. Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter trial where all patients scheduled to receive an end colostomy were invited to participate. Patients were randomized to one of three techniques for stoma construction; cruciate fascial incision, circular incision or prophylactic mesh. Stoma complications were assessed by a surgeon and stoma care nurses within 1 year postoperatively. Results: Two hundred and nine patients were randomized. Patient demographics were similar in all three groups. Data on stoma-related complications were available for analysis in 201 patients. A total of 127 patients (63%) developed some type of stoma complication within 1 year after surgery. The risk ratio (95% CI) for stoma complications was 0.93 (0.73; 1.2) between cruciate vs. circular incision groups and 1.02 (0.78; 1.34) between cruciate vs. mesh groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding parastomal hernia rate and no risk factors could be identified. Conclusion: This randomized trial confirmed a high prevalence of stoma-related complications but could not identify an impact of surgical technique or identify modifiable risk factors for stoma-related complications.
|
|
| 6. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
Stoma-related symptoms in patients operated for rectal cancer with abdominoperineal excision.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International journal of colorectal disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-1262 .- 0179-1958. ; 31:3, s. 635-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The primary aim of this study was to characterize the frequency, severity, and distress of symptoms from the colostomy and colostomy acceptance in rectal cancer patients. The secondary aims were to study the symptomatic parastomal herniation, its relationship to stoma-related symptoms, and potential risk factors for the development of symptomatic parastomal herniation.
|
|
| 7. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
The type of stoma mattersmorbidity in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer
- 2018
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Colorectal Disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0179-1958 .- 1432-1262. ; 33:12, s. 1773-1780
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PurposeA loop colostomy may reduce the risk of severe intraabdominal complications in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer compared to an end colostomy. The aim of this study was to relate complications to the type of stoma, and a secondary aim was to evaluate whether the type of colostomy had an impact on time until oncological/surgical treatment.MethodsAll patients who underwent surgery and received a deviating colostomy due to obstructing colorectal cancer between January 2011 and December 2015 in five Swedish hospitals in Region Vastra Gotaland were included (n=289). Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Patients alive in the end of 2016 were contacted and were sent a questionnaire including questions about stoma function and health-related quality of life.ResultsSome 289 patients were included; 147 received an end colostomy and 140 a loop colostomy. Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to missing data. There was no difference in complications at 90days between the two groups, 44% (end colostomy) and 54% (loop colostomy) (odds ratio: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.49; 1.41). Time to start of treatment was similar in both groups. Patients with a loop colostomy had significantly higher stoma-related morbidity with retraction, prolapse, leakage and bandaging problems. No differences in quality of life were found.ConclusionThe hypothesis that a loop colostomy reduced complications could not be confirmed. An end colostomy should be the first choice in these patients particularly in patients who will have their colostomy for the remainder of their life to reduce stoma-related symptoms.
|
|
| 8. |
- Park, Jennifer, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial).
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Surgical endoscopy. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-2218 .- 0930-2794. ; 34:1, s. 69-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Hospital costs associated with the treatment of rectal cancer are considerable and the formation of a temporary stoma accounts for additional costs. Results from the EASY trial showed that early closure of a temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications but no difference in health-related quality of life up to 12months after rectal resection. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis within the framework of the EASY trial.Early closure (8-13days) of a temporary stoma was compared to late closure (>12weeks) in the randomized controlled trial EASY (NCT01287637). The study period and follow-up was 12months after rectal resection. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, signs of postoperative complications or anastomotic leakage. Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the trial and unit costs from Swedish sources. Costs were calculated for the year 2016 and analysed from the perspective of the healthcare sector.Fifty-five patients underwent early closure, and 57 late closure in eight Swedish and Danish hospitals between 2011 and 2014. The difference in mean cost per patient was 4060 US dollar (95% confidence interval 1121; 6999, p value<0.01) in favour of early closure. A sensitivity analysis, taking protocol-driven examinations into account, resulted in an overall difference in mean cost per patient of $3608, in favour of early closure (95% confidence interval 668; 6549, p value 0.02). The predominant cost factors were reoperations, readmissions and endoscopic examinations.The significant cost reduction in this study, together with results of safety and efficacy from the randomized controlled trial, supports the routine use of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer in selected patients without signs of anastomotic leakage.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov, clinical trials identifier NCT01287637.
|
|
| 9. |
- Park, Jennifer, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 105:3, s. 244-251
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A temporary ileostomy may reduce symptoms from anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Earlier results of the EASY trial showed that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following early versus late closure of a temporary ileostomy. Methods: Early closure of a temporary ileostomy (at 8-13 days) was compared with late closure (at more than 12 weeks) in a multicentre RCT (EASY) that included patients who underwent rectal resection for cancer. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were signs of anastomotic leakage, diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, and signs of postoperative complications at clinical evaluation 1-4 days after rectal resection. HRQOL was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after resection using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 and Short Form 36 (SF-36 (R)). Results: There were 112 patients available for analysis. Response rates of the questionnaires were 82-95 per cent, except for EORTC QLQ-C30 at 12 months, to which only 54-55 per cent of the patients responded owing to an error in questionnaire distribution. There were no clinically significant differences in any questionnaire scores between the groups at 3, 6 or 12 months. Conclusion: Although the randomized study found that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer complications, this clinical advantage had no effect on the patients' HRQOL.
|
|
