| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Geyer, C. E., et al.
(författare)
-
Overall survival in the OlympiA phase Ill trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germime pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0923-7534. ; 33:12, s. 1250-1268
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods: One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results: With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Delta 3.4%, 95% CI -0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Delta 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Delta 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion: With 35 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDES and DDFS with no new safety signals.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Pashayan, N, et al.
(författare)
-
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nature reviews. Clinical oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1759-4782 .- 1759-4774. ; 17:11, s. 687-705
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The European Collaborative on Personalized Early Detection and Prevention of Breast Cancer (ENVISION) brings together several international research consortia working on different aspects of the personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer. In a consensus conference held in 2019, the members of this network identified research areas requiring development to enable evidence-based personalized interventions that might improve the benefits and reduce the harms of existing breast cancer screening and prevention programmes. The priority areas identified were: 1) breast cancer subtype-specific risk assessment tools applicable to women of all ancestries; 2) intermediate surrogate markers of response to preventive measures; 3) novel non-surgical preventive measures to reduce the incidence of breast cancer of poor prognosis; and 4) hybrid effectiveness–implementation research combined with modelling studies to evaluate the long-term population outcomes of risk-based early detection strategies. The implementation of such programmes would require health-care systems to be open to learning and adapting, the engagement of a diverse range of stakeholders and tailoring to societal norms and values, while also addressing the ethical and legal issues. In this Consensus Statement, we discuss the current state of breast cancer risk prediction, risk-stratified prevention and early detection strategies, and their implementation. Throughout, we highlight priorities for advancing each of these areas.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Derksen, J. W. G., et al.
(författare)
-
Real-world evidence contributions to European medicines agency's safety and efficacy evaluations of oncology targeted therapies between 2018-2022
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 34:Suppl. 2, s. S930-S930
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: While Real-world Evidence (RWE) has documented value for safety monitoring and disease epidemiology, its objective contribution to safety and efficacy evaluations for regulatory purposes is still unclear. Here, we aim to describe the prevalence and type of RWE considered by European Medicines Agency (EMA) as contribution to efficacy and safety-related evidence generation among approved oncology targeted therapies...Methods: On March 10, 2023, we screened the medicines listing of EMA to identify all anti-cancer targeted therapies for solid malignancies with a decision date (initial marketing authorizations and extension of indications) between 2018-2022. We screened the European public assessment reports (EPARs) using a standardized approach to collect data on RWE. When generated pre-authorization, the RWE contribution to the final regulatory decision was classified as definitive, supportive, or non-supportive. For...Results: Out of a total of 1976 medicines, we identified 55 oncology targeted therapies, corresponding to 75 EPARs (indications), which are described in the table. The use of RWE in regulatory deliberations occurred in 24/75 (32%) EPARs, increasing from 30% in 2018-2020, to 34% in 2021-2022. Pre-authorization RWE was described in 20/24 (83%) EPARs, among which none were definitive, 8 RWE studies (in 7 EPARs) non-supportive, and 20 RWE studies (in 15 EPARs) were supportive of the decision. Published RWE...Conclusions: Over the past 5 years, RWE involvement in the approval of oncology targeted therapies in Europe tends to increase, with the majority being supportive for EMA regulatory decision making complementary to traditional clinical trials...
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
- Pellat, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Comprehensive mapping review of real-world evidence publications focusing on targeted therapies in solid tumors : A collaborative work from ESMO real-world data and Digital Health Working Group
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 34:Suppl. 2, s. S925-S925
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: A growing body of real-world evidence (RWE) aims to better reflect outcomes of cancer patients treated in real-world settings. We aimed to conduct a first comprehensive mapping review of the RWE produced over the past 3 years in terms of tumor type, treatment strategies, setting, and data sources, focusing on targeted therapies (TT) in solid tumors.Methods: We conducted a systematic review in PubMed of RWE studies published between 01/2020 and 12/2022. We identified non-interventional studies using observational data, focusing on solid tumors exposure to targeted therapies, excluding immunotherapies. Abstract and full-text screening were performed by 11 independent reviewers.Results: A total of 7,774 publications were retrieved with 1,251 considered eligible and extracted. The number of publications per year progressively increased during this period (328 in 2020; 421 in 2021; 502 in 2022). Most studies (50%) were performed in Asia, followed by Europe (25%) and North America (17%). Only 8% of studies had patients treated in more than one country. Treatment effectiveness and safety were assessed in 71% and 42% of studies respectively. Main data sources were medical records.Conclusions: RWE publications on TT for solid tumors are heterogeneous and mostly rely on retrospective data such as medical records. Population-based and international studies are rare. Collaborative efforts towards international representativeness and the use of routinely collected and/or standardized data sources must be encouraged to increase the relevance and future quality of publications and their potential impact on oncology practice.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
