| 1. |
- Bjuremark, Anna, 1950-, et al.
(författare)
-
Kursutvärdering som incitament till förändring
- 2008
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- En kursutvärdering får inte bli ett självändamål. Syftet är istället att med hjälp av den feedback man som lärare får, återkoppla och förbättra en kurs/utbildning. Fry et al., (2000) anser att lärare ibland kan ha nytta av att få hjälp med analys av utvärderingarna, för att på ett nyanserat sätt kunna ta emot den kritik som annars lätt skulle kunna avfärdas och bortses ifrån. Det kan vara jobbigt att ta in negativ kritik.
|
|
| 2. |
- Charalampidis, Anastasios, et al.
(författare)
-
Nighttime Bracing or Exercise in Moderate-Grade Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JAMA Network Open. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2574-3805. ; 7:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE Moderate-grade adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may be treated with full-timebracing. For patients who reject full-time bracing, the effects of alternative, conservativeinterventions are unknown.OBJECTIVE To determine whether self-mediated physical activity combined with either nighttimebracing (NB) or scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE) is superior to a control of physical activity alone (PA)in preventing Cobb angle progression in moderate-grade AIS.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Conservative Treatment for Adolescent IdiopathicScoliosis (CONTRAIS) randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 10, 2013, throughOctober 23, 2018, in 6 public hospitals across Sweden. Male and female children and adolescentsaged 9 to 17 years with an AIS primary curve Cobb angle of 25° to 40°, apex T7 or caudal, and skeletalimmaturity based on estimated remaining growth of at least 1 year were included in the study. Datesof analysis were from October 25, 2021, to January 28, 2023.INTERVENTIONS Interventions included self-mediated physical activity in combination with eitherNB or SSE or PA (control). Patients with treatment failure were given the option to transition to afull-time brace until skeletal maturity.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was curve progression of 6° or less(treatment success) or curve progression of more than 6° (treatment failure) seen on 2 consecutiveposteroanterior standing radiographs compared with the inclusion radiograph before skeletalmaturity. A secondary outcome of curve progression was the number of patients undergoing surgeryup until 2 years after the primary outcome.RESULTS The CONTRAIS study included 135 patients (45 in each of the 3 groups) with a mean (SD)age of 12.7 (1.4) years; 111 (82%) were female. Treatment success was seen in 34 of 45 patients (76%)in the NB group and in 24 of 45 patients (53%) in the PA group (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6).The number needed to treat to prevent curve progression with NB was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.4-33.5).Treatment success occurred in 26 of 45 patients (58%) in the SSE group (OR for SE vs PA, 1.2; 95% CI,0.5-2.8). Up to 2 years after the primary outcome time point, 9 patients in each of the 3 groupsunderwent surgery.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with NB preventedcurve progression of more than 6° to a significantly higher extent than did PA, while SSE did not; inaddition, allowing transition to full-time bracing after treatment failure resulted in similar surgicalfrequencies independent of initial treatment. These results suggest that NB may be an effectivealternative intervention in patients rejecting full-time bracing.
|
|
| 3. |
- Dufvenberg, Marlene, 1961-
(författare)
-
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis : Postural Stability, Prognostic factors and Impact of Conservative Treatments on Radiologic, Clinical and Self-Reported Outcomes
- 2024
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional distortion of spinal curvature of unknown cause that develops during puberty. If the frontal plane curvature exceeds a Cobb angle of 24°, full-time bracing is recommended to prevent curve progression, negative health consequences or need for surgery. However, many patients decline full-time bracing, and limited evidence exists regarding alternative conservative treatments. Increasing knowledge of risk factors enables better identification of high-risk patients, thereby reducing the risk of over- or undertreatment. The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate evidence of association between scoliosis and postural stability to inform a potential treatment target, to investigate the effectiveness of three alternative conservative treatments for patients who declined full-time bracing, and to develop a prognostic model for future risk of increased curvature in AIS. Methods: Data collection is based on one systematic literature review and meta-analysis, and one randomised controlled trial (RCT) for patients with AIS. In Paper I, literature was reviewed, and utilized posturography data to assess static postural stability to identify potential differences between patients with AIS and the control group (CON). In Papers II and III, patients were randomly assigned to either physical activity combined with hypercorrective Boston scoliosis night brace (NB), scoliosis-specific exercises (SSE), or a control group with physical activity alone (PA). Effects on trunk rotation, Cobb angle, self-reported physical activity, spinal appearance, and health-related quality of life were evaluated. Likewise, adherence, capability, and motivation in performing self-managed treatment were assessed. Follow-up was conducted at 6 months intervals until endpoint. The endpoint was defined as non-progression if the curvature increased by 6° or less at skeletal maturity, i.e., less than 1cm of growth over 6 months, or progression if the curvature increased by more than 6° before skeletal maturity. In Paper IV, data from the RCT were used for a longitudinal cohort analysis, developing and validating a prognostic model using Cox Proportional Hazards survival analysis. Results: Paper I found reduced postural stability in AIS patients compared to CON with increased sway area, mediolateral and anteroposterior range, and a posterior shift in the sagittal plane. The RCT included 135 individuals, mean age of 12.7 years (SD1.4) and Cobb angle of 31° (SD5.3). At 6 months, patients reported high adherence (72-95%) and motivation (65-92%) to the treatment, particularly in the NB group. Both the SSE and PA groups increased physical activity levels compared to the NB group. At endpoint, adherence remained adequate, but better in the NB and PA groups compared with the SSE group (50-89%). Adherence increased with higher capability and motivation, which explained 53% of the variance in adherence at endpoint. The SSE group had higher proportion of moderate problems in mobility and usual activities than the NB and PA groups, with no other clinically relevant between-group differences. The prognostic model (n=127) for curve progression showed acceptable discriminative ability (0.791), with risk factors including skeletal immaturity, larger major curve, and worsening spinal appearance. The model was adjusted for treatment exposure, as NB reduced the risk of curve progression. Conclusions: Patients with AIS have decreased postural stability with a posterior positional shift. Treatment evaluation at endpoint showed few between-group differences. However, the SSE group had higher proportion of moderate problems in mobility and usual activities compared to the other groups. Treatment adherence was adequate, but better in the NB and PA groups. Higher capability and motivation increased long-term adherence to the treatment. The treatment alternatives could be considered as the first option following a clinical decision on treatment. Including self-reported spinal appearance as a risk factor in the prognostic model may be clinically important for predicting which patients are at risk of curve progression.
|
|
| 4. |
- Dufvenberg, Marlene, 1961-, et al.
(författare)
-
Does postural stability differ between adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and typically developed? : A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2397-1789. ; 13:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundPostural stability deficits have been proposed to influence the onset and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to systematically identify, critically evaluate and meta-analyse studies assessing postural stability during unperturbed stance with posturography in AIS compared to typically developed adolescents.MethodsStudies from four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro) were searched and case-control methodological quality assessed using a risk-of-bias assessment tool and a posturography methodological quality checklist. Pooled data regarding centre of pressure (COP) parameters such as sway area, Mediolateral (ML) and Anteroposterior (AP) position and range were compared for AIS and typically developed adolescents using Cohen’s d effect size (ES) and homogeneity estimates.ResultsEighteen studies for quality analysis and 9 of these for meta-analysis were identified from 971 records. Risk-of-bias assessment identified 6 high, 10 moderate and 2 low risk-of-bias studies. The posturography methodological quality checklist identified 4 low, 7 moderate and 7 high-quality studies. Meta-analysis was performed for sway area whereas ML and AP are presented in three different meta-analyses due to divergent measurement units used in the studies: ML position 1 (MLP1), ML position 2 (MLP2) and ML range (MLR); AP position 1 (APP1), AP position 2 (APP2) and AP range (APR). Cohen’s d showed a medium ES difference in sway area 0.65, 95% CI (0.49–0.63), whereas ML showed no (MLP1, MLP2) and large (MLR) ES differences; MLP1 0.15, 95% CI (0.08–0.22); MLP2 0.14, 95% CI (0.08–0.19); and MLR 0.94, 95% CI (0.83–1.04). Cohen’s d for AP showed small ES (APP1) and large ES difference (APP2 and APR); APP1 0.43, 95% CI (0.31–0.54); APP2 0.85, 95% CI (0.72–0.97); and APR 0.98, 95% CI (0.87–1.09). Cochran’s Q and Higgins I2 showed homogeneity between studies.ConclusionsThere is moderate quality evidence for decreased postural stability in AIS measured as COP parameters sway area, ML and AP range with a positional shift posteriorly in the sagittal plane. The findings support studying postural stability in early stage AIS and also prospectively identify cause and effect of the curvature as well as effectiveness of postural control interventions in the prevention of scoliosis progression.
|
|
| 5. |
- Dufvenberg, Marlene, 1961-, et al.
(författare)
-
Six-Month Results on Treatment Adherence, Physical Activity, Spinal Appearance, Spinal Deformity, and Quality of Life in an Ongoing Randomised Trial on Conservative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (CONTRAIS)
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Medicine. - Basel, Switzerland : MDPI. - 2077-0383. ; 10:21
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often receive conservative treatments aiming to prevent progression of the spinal deformity during puberty. This study aimed to explore patient adherence and secondary outcomes during the first 6 months in an ongoing randomised controlled trial of three treatment interventions. Interventions consisted of physical activity combined with either hypercorrective Boston scoliosis night brace (NB), scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE), or physical activity alone (PA). Measures at baseline and 6 months included angle of trunk rotation (ATR), Cobb angle, International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF), pictorial Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (pSAQ), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r), EuroQol 5-Dimensions Youth (EQ-5D-Y) and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Patient adherence, motivation, and capability in performing the intervention were reported at 6 months. The study included 135 patients (111 females) with AIS and >1-year estimated remaining growth, mean age 12.7 (1.4) years, and mean Cobb angle 31 (±5.3). At 6 months, the proportion of patients in the groups reporting high to very high adherence ranged between 72 and 95%, while motivation ranged between 65 and 92%, with the highest proportion seen in the NB group (p = 0.014, p= 0.002). IPAQ-SF displayed significant between group main effects regarding moderate activity (F = 5.7; p = 0.004; ηp2 = 0.10), with a medium-sized increase favouring the SSE group compared to NB. Walking showed significant between group main effects, as did metabolic equivalent (MET-min/week), with medium (F = 6.8, p = 0.002; ηp2 = 0.11, and large (F = 8.3, p = < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.14) increases, respectively, for the SSE and PA groups compared to NB. From baseline to 6 months, ATR showed significant between group medium-sized main effects (F = 1.2, p = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.007) favouring the NB group compared to PA, but not reaching a clinically relevant level. In conclusion, patients reported high adherence and motivation to treatment, especially in the NB group. Patients in the SSE and PA groups increased their physical activity levels without other clinically relevant differences between groups in other clinical measures or patient-reported outcomes. The results suggest that the prescribed treatments are viable first-step options during the first 6 months.
|
|
