| 1. |
- De Bruyne, Bernard, et al.
(författare)
-
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
- 2014
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - : Massachussetts Medical Society. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 371:13, s. 1208-1217
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that in patients with stable coronary artery disease and stenosis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed on the basis of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) would be superior to medical therapy.METHODS: In 1220 patients with stable coronary artery disease, we assessed the FFR in all stenoses that were visible on angiography. Patients who had at least one stenosis with an FFR of 0.80 or less were randomly assigned to undergo FFR-guided PCI plus medical therapy or to receive medical therapy alone. Patients in whom all stenoses had an FFR of more than 0.80 received medical therapy alone and were included in a registry. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 2 years.RESULTS: The rate of the primary end point was significantly lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (8.1% vs. 19.5%; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.57; P<0.001). This reduction was driven by a lower rate of urgent revascularization in the PCI group (4.0% vs. 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38; P<0.001), with no significant between-group differences in the rates of death and myocardial infarction. Urgent revascularizations that were triggered by myocardial infarction or ischemic changes on electrocardiography were less frequent in the PCI group (3.4% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.01). In a landmark analysis, the rate of death or myocardial infarction from 8 days to 2 years was lower in the PCI group than in the medical-therapy group (4.6% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.04). Among registry patients, the rate of the primary end point was 9.0% at 2 years.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI, as compared with medical therapy alone, improved the outcome. Patients without ischemia had a favorable outcome with medical therapy alone.
|
|
| 2. |
- Matsumura, Mitsuaki, et al.
(författare)
-
Serial NIRS-IVUS Assessment of Changes in Coronary Lumen Area During 2-Year Follow-Up : Insights From the PROSPECT ABSORB Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 78:19 Suppl., s. B35-B36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: In PROSPECT II, 182 patients with plaque burden (PB) ≥ 65% were randomized to bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone. Protocol-directed 3-vessel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-IVUS was repeated at 25 months.Methods: Excluding lesions treated by BVS, paired (baseline and follow-up) NIRS-IVUS was available in 626 nonculprit lesions in 165 patients. Follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) and the corresponding baseline sites were measured: rapid lesion progression (RLP) was a ≥ 0.5 mm2 decrease of MLA, and rapid lesion regression (RLR) was a ≥ 0.5 mm2 increase of MLA.Results: RLP occurred in 34.5%, RLR occurred in 15.5%, and 49.8% had “no change.” The % change in vessel area correlated with the % change of plaque area (r = 0.81, P < 0.001), demonstrating vessel remodeling (Figure 1). At baseline, the RLP lesions had larger plaque areas, longer lesions, and higher prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7). During follow-up, 80.2% of RLP lesions had negative remodeling irrespective of the change in plaque area, whereas 76.3% of RLR lesions had a decrease in plaque area irrespective of negative or positive remodeling. In lesions without change in lumen area, there were compensatory changes in plaque and vessel areas.Conclusion: In stabilized patients post-MI treated with GDMT, half of untreated non–flow- limiting lesions had significant lumen changes at 25 months, with RLP twice as frequent as RLR. The predominant mechanism of RLP was negative vessel remodeling whereas the predominant mechanism of RLR was reduction in plaque area.
|
|
