| 1. |
- Costa, Nathalia, et al.
(författare)
-
A Definition of "Flare" in Low Back Pain: A Multiphase Process Involving Perspectives of Individuals With Low Back Pain and Expert Consensus
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pain. - : CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE. - 1526-5900 .- 1528-8447. ; 20:11, s. 1267-1275
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Low back pain (LBP) varies over time. Consumers, clinicians, and researchers use various terms to describe LBP fluctuations, such as episodes, recurrences and flares. Although "flare" is use commonly, there is no consensus on how it is defined. This study aimed to obtain consensus for a LBP flare definition using a mixed-method approach. Step 1 involved the derivation of a preliminary candidate flare definition based on thematic analysis of views of 130 consumers in consultation with an expert consumer writer. In step 2, a workshop was conducted to incorporate perspectives of 19 LBP experts into the preliminary flare definition, which resulted in 2 alternative LBP flare definitions. Step 3 refined the definition using a 2-round Delphi consensus with 50 experts in musculoskeletal conditions. The definition favored by experts was further tested with 16 individuals with LBP in step 4, using the definition in three scenarios. This multiphase study produced a definition of LBP flare that distinguishes it from other LBP fluctuations, represents consumers views, involves expert consensus, and is understandable by consumers in clinical and research contexts: "A flare-up is a worsening of your condition that lasts from hours to weeks that is difficult to tolerate and generally impacts your usual activities and/or emotions." Perspective: A multiphase process, incorporating consumers views and expert consensus, produced a definition of LBP flare that distinguishes it from other LBP fluctuations. (C) 2019 by the American Pain Society
|
|
| 2. |
- Eklund, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
A cost-utility analysis of multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary healthcare
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Pain. - : De Gruyter Open. - 1877-8860 .- 1877-8879. ; 1, s. 48-58
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Multimodal rehabilitation programs (MMRPs) have been shown to be both cost-effective and an effective method for managing chronic pain in specialist care. However, while the vast majority of patients are treated in primary healthcare, MMRPs are rarely practiced in these settings. Limited time and resources for everyday activities alongside the complexity of chronic pain makes the management of chronic pain challenging in primary healthcare and the focus is on unimodal treatment. In order to increase the use of MMRPs incentives such as cost savings and improved health status in the patient group are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MMRPs for patients with chronic pain in primary healthcare in two Swedish regions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MMRPs at one-year follow-up in comparison with care as usual for patients with chronic pain in primary healthcare in two Swedish regions.Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a prospective cohort study comparing the MMRP with the alternative of continuing with care as usual. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL), using EQ5D, and working situation of 234 participants were assessed at baseline and one-year follow-up. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained while the secondary outcome was sickness absence. An extrapolation of costs was performed based on previous long-term studies in order to evaluate the effects of the MMRP over a five-year time period.Results: The mean (SD) EQ5D index, which measures HRQoL, increased significantly (p<0.001) from 0.34 (0.32) to 0.44 (0.32) at one-year follow-up. Sickness absence decreased by 15%. The cost-utility analysis showed a cost per QALY gained of 18 704 € at one-year follow-up.Conclusions: The results indicate that the MMRP significantly improves the HRQoL of the participants and is a cost-effective treatment for patients with chronic pain in primary healthcare when a newly suggested cost-effectiveness threshold of 19 734 € is implemented. The extrapolation indicates that considerable cost savings in terms of reduced loss of production and gained QALYs may be generated if the effects of the MMRP are maintained beyond one-year follow-up. The study demonstrates potential benefits of MMRPs in primary healthcare for both the patient with chronic pain and the society as a whole. The cost-effectiveness of MMRPs in primary healthcare has scarcely been studied and further long-term studies are needed in these settings.
|
|
| 3. |
- Falkhamn, Lukasz Mateusz, et al.
(författare)
-
Interdisciplinary multimodal pain rehabilitation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care : a cohort study from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 20:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Chronic pain is a major public health issue. Mounting evidence suggests that interdisciplinary multimodal pain rehabilitation programs (IMMRPs) performed in specialist pain care are an effective treatment for patients with chronic pain, but the effects of such treatment if performed in primary care settings have been less studied. The aims of this pragmatic study were to (1) describe characteristics of patients participating in IMMRPs in primary care; (2) examine whether IMMRPs in primary care improve pain, disability, quality of life, and sick leave 1-year post discharge in patients with chronic pain; and (3) investigate if outcomes differ between women and men. Data from 744 (645 women and 99 men, age range 18-65 years) patients with non-malignant chronic pain included in the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation Primary Care were used to describe patient characteristics and changes in health and sick leave. At 1-year follow-up, the patients had improved significantly (p < 0.01) in all health outcome measures and had reduced sick leave except in men, where no significant change was shown in physical activity level. This study indicates that MMRPs in primary care improved pain and physical and emotional health and reduced sick leave, which was maintained at the 1-year follow-up.
|
|
| 4. |
- Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2397-7523. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Many studies have been performed to identify important prognostic factors for outcomes after rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain, and there is a need to synthesize them through systematic review. In this process, it is important to assess the study quality and risk of bias. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" (QUIPS) tool has been developed for this purpose and consists of several prompting items categorized into six domains, and each domain is judged on a three-grade scale (low, moderate or high risk of bias). The aim of the present study was to determine the interrater agreement of the risk of bias assessment in prognostic studies of patients with chronic pain using QUIPS and to elaborate on the use of this instrument.Methods: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of prognostic factors for long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic pain. Two researchers rated the risk of bias in 43 published papers in two rounds (15 and 28 papers, respectively). The interrater agreement and Cohen's quadratic weighted kappa coefficient (κ) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated in all domains and separately for the first and second rounds.Results: The raters agreed in 61% of the domains (157 out of 258), with similar interrater agreement in the first (59%, 53/90) and second rounds (62%, 104/168). The overall weighted kappa coefficient (kappa for all domains and all papers) was weak: κ = 0.475 (95%CI = 0.358-0.601). A "minimal agreement" between the raters was found in the first round, κ = 0.323 (95%CI = 0.129-0.517), but increased to "weak agreement" in the second round, κ = 0.536 (95%CI = 0.390-0.682).Conclusion: Despite a relatively low interrater agreement, QUIPS proved to be a useful tool in assessing the risk of bias when performing a meta-analysis of prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation, since it demands of raters to discuss and investigate important aspects of study quality. Some items were particularly hard to differentiate in-between, and a learning phase was required to increase the interrater agreement. This paper highlights several aspects of the tool that should be kept in mind when rating the risk of bias in prognostic studies, and provides some suggestions on common pitfalls to avoid during this process.Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016025339; registered 05 February 2016.
|
|
| 5. |
- Stenberg, Gunilla, 1968-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients selected to participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes in primary care : a multivariate cross-sectional study focusing on gender and sick leave
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Pain. - : Walter de Gruyter. - 1877-8860 .- 1877-8879. ; 20:3, s. 511-524
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and aims: A multimodal rehabilitation programme (MMRP) is an evidence-based treatment of chronic pain conditions. The complexity involved in chronic pain needs to be identified and evaluated in order to adapt the rehabilitation to patients' needs. The aim was to investigate the multivariate relationships between self-reported variables in patients with chronic pain before taking part in MMRP in primary care, with a special focus on gender and degree of sick leave.Methods: Prior to MMRP, 397 patients (339 women and 58 men) filled in a questionnaire about pain, healthcare aspects, health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, coping, physical function, and work-related variables e.g. sick leave. Data were analysed by principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square analysis.Results: The PCA identified four components that explained 47% of the variation in the investigated data set. The first component showed the largest variation and was primarily explained by anxiety and depression, quality of life, acceptance (activity engagement), and pain-related disability. Gender differences were only seen in one component with the pain variables having the highest loadings. Degree of sick leave was not well explained by the variables in the questionnaire.Conclusions: The questionnaire filled out by the patients prior to participation in MMRP in primary care identified much of the complexity of chronic pain conditions but there is room for improvement, e.g. regarding explanation of work-related factors. In the multivariate analysis, gender did not fall out as an important factor for how most patients answered the questions.
|
|
| 6. |
- Abbott, Allan, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context : an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMJ Open. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2044-6055. ; 8:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem commonly requiring healthcare. In Sweden, there is a call from healthcare practitioners (HCPs) for the development, implementation and evaluation of a best practice primary healthcare model for LBP.Aims (1) To improve and understand the mechanisms underlying changes in HCP confidence, attitudes and beliefs for providing best practice coherent primary healthcare for patients with LBP; (2) to improve and understand the mechanisms underlying illness beliefs, self-care enablement, pain, disability and quality of life in patients with LBP; and (3) to evaluate a multifaceted and sustained implementation strategy and the cost-effectiveness of the BetterBack☺ model of care (MOC) for LBP from the perspective of the Swedish primary healthcare context.Methods This study is an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial testing the hypothesised superiority of the BetterBack☺ MOC compared with current routine care. The trial involves simultaneous testing of MOC effects at the HCP, patient and implementation process levels. This involves a prospective cohort study investigating implementation at the HCP level and a patient-blinded, pragmatic, cluster, randomised controlled trial with longitudinal follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months post baseline for effectiveness at the patient level. A parallel process and economic analysis from a healthcare sector perspective will also be performed. Patients will be allocated to routine care (control group) or the BetterBack☺ MOC (intervention group) according to a stepped cluster dogleg structure with two assessments in routine care. Experimental conditions will be compared and causal mediation analysis investigated. Qualitative HCP and patient experiences of the BetterBack☺ MOC will also be investigated.Dissemination The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Further national dissemination and implementation in Sweden and associated national quality register data collection are potential future developments of the project.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-
(författare)
-
Back pain : long-term course and predictive factors
- 2005
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background. Better knowledge of the long-term course in patients treated in primary care for back pain (clinical course) and in patients that do not receive specific treatment after seeking care (clinical natural course) is needed to enable health professionals and their patients to understand the likely course of back pain and to make clinical decisions about treatment alternatives.Aims. To increase and deepen the knowledge of the course of back pain during 2½ and 5 years, and of predictive factors for health condition and sick-leave at 1-year and 5-year follow-ups for patients with low back pain. In addition specific emphasis was on assessing the influence of type of outcome measure, timepoint of assessment of the outcome measure, timepoint of assessment of the predictive factors (baseline, after treatment or after four weeks) and inclusion of different combinations of predictive factors. Furthermore to assess the ability of physiotherapists to predict which patients will return for additional care if they do not receive specific treatment.Material and Methods. The thesis is based on two cohorts of patients between 18 to 60 years of age seeking primary care for back pain. Exclusion criteria were having received active treatment for the current back pain within the previous month, other disease, recent accident, pregnancy, and inability to understand Swedish. In one cohort 254 patients previously treated in primary care filled out a 5-year follow-up questionnaire. Also in the other cohort almost the same questionnaire was used, including a package of well-known measures of pain, disability, recurrence rate, healthcare consumption, sick-leave, and questions regarding demographic data. The other cohort including 56 patients was used to describe the clinical natural course with 2½-year follow-up. Patients filled out questionnaires at baseline, after 4 weeks, at 6 months and at 1- and 2½ year follow-ups. Besides physical measures were assessed at baseline and after four weeks. The physiotherapist predicted whether the patient would or would not return for additional care. Main outcome measures for describing the course of back pain were pain and disability, and secondary measures were recurrence rate and health care consumption. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for disability and sick-leave. Prediction models for the two outcome variables at the I-year and 5-year follow-up were created to assess whether the models were influenced by difference in outcome measure, timepoint of measuring the outcome, timepoint of assessment of potential predictive factors (baseline or after treatment), and different combinations of potential predictive factors included in the models. Potential predictive factors included were "standard" factors age, gender, sick-leave, pain frequency, disability, well-being, expectations of treatment, similar problems the previous 5 years, duration of the current episode, more than one localization, and physical activity-related and work-related independent variables. Linear regression was used to assess the predictive value of physical measures, assessed at baseline and at 4-week follow-up, for health condition at 1-year follow-up.Results. About half the patients treated in primary care reported pain and disability at the land 5-year follow-up. Around two third of the patients reported recurrence or continuous pain, and approximately one third of the patients reported additional healthcare consumption during the previous 6 months at the 1-year and 5-year follow-up. These proportions were similar for the clinical natural course cohort at the 1-year and 2½-year follow-up. Predictive factors for disability and sick-leave were only partly the same. Disability appeared to be an important predictive factor for future disability. Sick-leave and dissatisfaction with the workplace appeared to be important predictive factors for future sick-leave. Predictive factors for outcome at 1-year and 5-year follow-up were only partly the same. Health state related variables and duration of the current episode seemed to be stronger predictive factors for outcome at 1-year follow-up than for outcome at 5-year follow-up, whereas being a woman, and physical activity-related and work-related factors were stronger predictive factors for outcome at 5-year follow-up. Health state related variables assessed after treatment appeared to be stronger predictive factors for future disability or sick-leave compared with corresponding variables at baseline. Several confidence intervals were wide and the results must be interpreted with caution. Three out of four physical measures assessed at 4-week follow-up seemed to be predictive factors for health condition after one year. None of these four measures assessed at baseline had predictive value. The physiotherapists showed ability to predict which patients would or would not return for additional care.Conclusions. A substantial proportion of patients seeking primary care for back pain continued to report back pain several years after seeking care. Future research should focus on prevention, as well as on management of patients with long-term back pain. Both selfreported measures related to health state, physical activity and work, as well as physical measures and prediction by health professionals seem helpful to identify patients at risk of worse future health condition and sick-leave. Further exploration of the predictive value of disability and sick-leave showed that future disability was predicted by disability only, and future sick-leave was predicted by both sick-leave and disability. In clinical practice, selfreported measures and physical measures can be assessed for various reasons. To improve the ability to predict future outcome, information obtained at a later timepoint than baseline should be used instead of information obtained at the first visit. Assessment of physical measures at baseline was useless for prediction purposes. Future studies should include other factors, such as psychosocial predictive factors found in other studies, to further improve the ability to predict future health condition and sick-leave. Another promising area of research is further exploration of the ability of health care professionals to predict outcomes, and on what grounds they base their predictions.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical course in patients seeking primary care for back or neck pain : a prospective 5-year follow-up of outcome and health care consumption with subgroup analysis
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 29:21, s. 2458-2465
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design. Prospective follow-up.Objective. To describe the 5-year clinical course in a cohort of patients treated for back or neck pain in primary care and compare results with the 1-year outcome both for the whole group and for subgroups.Summary of Background Data. A randomized study showed a decrease in perceived pain and disability after treatment by chiropractic or physiotherapy, but many reported recurrence or continual pain at the 1-year follow-up. Knowledge of the clinical course over longer follow-up periods is limited.Methods. A 5-year follow-up questionnaire was sent to 314 individuals. Main outcome measures were pain intensity, Oswestry score, and general health. Recurrence, health care consumption, and other measures were described.Results. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported pain (visual analog scale, >10 mm) and back-related disability (Oswestry, >10%) at the 5-year follow-up. This was similar to 1-year results, and 84% of these were the same individuals. Sixty-three percent reported recurrence or continual pain, and 32% reported health care consumption at the 5-year follow-up.Conclusions. In a cohort of individuals of working age seeking primary care for nonspecific back or neck pain, it can be expected that about half of the population will report pain and disability at the 5-year follow-up. A significant proportion will report recurrence or continual pain and health care consumption. Pain and disability were associated with recurrence or continual pain and health care consumption. Further analysis is needed to identify additional predictors for 5-year outcome, taking into account 1-year follow-up results. Since many patients will have recurrence or continual pain, health policies and clinical decision models for long-term outcome must allow for these aspects.
|
|
| 11. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Course of back pain in primary care : a prospective study of physical measures
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 35:4, s. 168-173
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To describe physical measures used in patients with back pain when no specific treatment is given, to examine associations between change over time in these measures and changes in pain and back-related disability, and to study the value of physical measures at baseline and at a 4-week follow-up to predict outcome at 12 months.DESIGN: A prospective consecutive study.SUBJECTS: Forty-four patients presenting with low back pain in primary care.METHODS: The patients underwent a physical examination at baseline and at 4 weeks. Follow-up was carried out using questionnaires until 12 months. Linear regression was used to identify predictors.RESULTS: Most measures had improved significantly at the 4-week follow-up. Thoracolumbar rotation, isometric endurance back extensors, and fingertip-to-floor distance at 4 weeks were significant predictors for pain intensity and back-related disability at the 12-month follow-up. Eighteen out of 44 patients reported an increase in pain after the assessment of the physical measures at baseline. This group of patients improved more in physical measures between baseline and the 4-week follow-up.CONCLUSION: Physical measures assessed at the 4-week follow-up, but not at baseline, could provide important additional information for identifying those patients at risk for worse outcome in pain or back-related disability at 12 months.
|
|
| 12. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care : a qualitative interview study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. - : Taylor & Francis. - 1748-2623 .- 1748-2631. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4-14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; "Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies-a matter of support systems", comprising the following categories: "Knowledge translation", "Interaction and dialogue", "The health care professional support" and "Form organization". Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.
|
|
| 13. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Predictive factors for 1-year and 5-year outcome for disability in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in primary care
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Pain. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0304-3959 .- 1872-6623. ; 122:1-2, s. 137-144
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Many patients seeking primary care for low back pain continue to report disability several years after their initial visit. The aims of this study were to assess the independent predictive value of a number of potential predictive factors for disability at the 1-year and 5-year follow-ups, and to examine whether prediction models were improved by replacing baseline health-state-related variables with corresponding variables after treatment. A further aim was to describe possible differences between those on sick leave, early retirement or disability pension, and those who were not. Baseline factors were age, gender, self-reported physical-activity-related and work-related factors, expectations of treatment, similar problems previously, duration of episode, more than one localization, sick leave, pain frequency, disability, and well-being. The study sample comprised 148 participants in a previous randomized trial who were eligible for sick-leave benefits. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors. At the 5-year follow-up, 37% (n = 19/52) of the patients with disability were on sick leave or were receiving early retirement or disability pension. For those without disability the corresponding figure was 9% (n = 8/92). Being a woman, duration of the current episode, similar problems during the previous 5 years, exercise level before the current episode, pain frequency at baseline, and disability after treatment emerged as predictive factors for disability at the 5-year follow-up. Replacing baseline health-state-related measures with corresponding measures after the treatment period, and adding physical-activity-related and possibly work-related factors might improve the likelihood of predicting future disability.
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
- Fors, Maria, 1987-
(författare)
-
Best Practice Physiotherapy for Patients with Low Back Pain in Primary Care : Clinical Outcomes and Explanatory Factors
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Clinical practice guidelines provide general recommendations informing best practice physiotherapy for low back pain (LBP). Despite increased research on LBP, the recommendations have barely changed over the last few decades and the burden of LBP remains. New research strategies have been suggested to further understand the complexity of factors influencing recovery of LBP. Several mechanisms are expected to underpin the benefits of physiotherapy care. How different factors influence and explain treatment outcome in patients in different phases of primary care pathway needs to be better understood for the development of better targeted LBP interventions.The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate if and how best practice physiotherapy primary care for patients with LBP can improve clinical outcome.Methods: The four papers in the thesis are based on two randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating best practice physiotherapy for patients with LBP in different phases of the primary care pathway reflecting the variation of patients’ needs. Two papers investigated pre-surgery physiotherapy compared to being on a waiting-list in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders who are surgical candidates (n = 197). Effects on walking ability and quadriceps femoris strength were evaluated. Associations between the pre-surgery physical factors with 1-year post-surgery physical activity (PA) level were analysed using multiple linear regression. The dose-response relationship was investigated comparing the effects of attending ≤11 treatment sessions with ≥12 treatment sessions. Multiple mediation analyses and conditional process analyses were used to explore physical and psychosocial factors as mediators and patients’ treatment expectations as a moderator of the treatment’s effects on disability, back pain intensity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and self-rated health.Two papers were based on a stepped cluster RCT, where a physiotherapy primary healthcare model for LBP (the BetterBack MoC) was regionally implemented. Patients seeking care for LBP were allocated to either the BetterBack MoC (after implementation) or to routine care (before implementation) (n = 467). In a prospective cohort study within the RCT, the associations between patients’ initial illness perceptions and outcomes in disability, back pain intensity, HRQoL, and self-care enablement (i.e., perceived ability to understand and cope with LBP) after 3 and 12 months were explored using stepwise linear regression. Single mediation analyses were used to test whether a priori hypothesised patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement at 3 months mediated effects in disability and pain at 6 months of care according to the BetterBack MoC compared to routine care. Exploratory mediation analyses were also used to compare guideline-adherent care with non-adherent care. Guideline-adherent care was defined as care that included education and exercise interventions and did not include non-evidence-based interventions, referral to specialist care, or imaging.Results: Small positive effects from pre-surgery physiotherapy were seen in walking ability and quadriceps femoris strength. No clear dose-response relationship could be demonstrated when comparing the effects of ≤11 treatment sessions with ≥12. Pre-surgery physical outcome measures together explained 27.5% of the variation in PA level 1-year post-surgery, mainly explained by the pre-surgery PA level. The effect of the pre-surgery physiotherapy on patients’ PA level partly explained the treatment’s effect on self-rated health. Furthermore, among biopsychosocial factors, self-efficacy related to activities of daily living (ADL) partly explained the effect on all outcomes. PA related fear avoidance beliefs partly explained the effects on pain and self-rated health. Patients’ treatment expectations moderated the effect in all outcomes. High expectations had a positive moderating effect, while expectation of full recovery had a suppressive effect. In patients seeking physiotherapy for LBP, negative initial prognosis and treatment expectations were associated with worse scores in several outcomes at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement did not explain the effects of care after implementing the BetterBack MoC. This was mainly due to the BetterBack MoC not having superior effects over routine care on the hypothesised mediators. Illness perceptions and self-care enablement at 3 months were associated with disability and pain at 6 months. Further, these factors partly explained the effects of guideline-adherent care in disability and pain.Conclusions: Patients’ illness perceptions, self-care enablement, ADL self-efficacy, and PA related fear-avoidance beliefs were supported to be potential factors explaining the effect on clinical outcomes of best practice physiotherapy for LBP in primary care. Patients’ initial expectations regarding the prognosis and treatment may influence prospective outcomes including patients’ self-care enablement. More specifically, pain and disability outcomes of best practice physiotherapy for patients seeking care for LBP may improve by targeting patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement. Patients who are surgical candidates can increase their physical capacity and walking related performance through best practice physiotherapy. In this pre-surgery phase, the treatment should include targeting patients’ ADL self-efficacy, PA related fear-avoidance beliefs, and PA level for improved disability, pain, and HRQoL.
|
|
| 16. |
- Fors, Maria, 1987-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of pre-surgery physiotherapy on walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder : Secondary outcomes of the PREPARE randomised controlled trial
- 2019
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : BioMed Central. - 1471-2474. ; 20:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundDegenerative lumbar spine disorders are common among musculoskeletal disorders. When disabling pain and radiculopathy persists after adequate course of rehabilitation and imaging confirms compressive pathology, surgical decompression is indicated. Prehabilitation aiming to augment functional capacity pre-surgery may improve physical function and activity levels pre and post-surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effect and dose-response of pre-surgery physiotherapy on quadriceps femoris strength and walking ability in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders compared to waiting-list controls and their association with postoperative physical activity level.MethodIn this single blinded, 2-arm randomised controlled trial, 197 patients were consecutively recruited. Inclusion criteria were: MRI confirmed diagnosis and scheduled for surgery due to disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis, ages 25-80 years. Patients were randomised to 9 weeks of pre-surgery physiotherapy or to waiting-list. Patient reported physical activity level, walking ability according to Oswestry Disability Index item 4, walking distance according to the SWESPINE national register and physical outcome measures including the timed ten-meter walk test, maximum voluntary isometric quadriceps femoris muscle strength, patient-rated were collected at baseline and follow-up. Parametric or non-parametric within and between group comparisons as well as multivariate regression was performed.ResultsPatients who received pre-surgery physiotherapy significantly improved in all variables from baseline to follow-up (p < 0.001 – p < 0.05) and in comparison to waiting-list controls (p < 0.001 – p < 0.028). Patients adhering to ≥12 treatment sessions significantly improved in all variables (p < 0.001 – p < 0.032) and those receiving 0-11 treatment session in only normal walking speed (p0.035) but there were no significant differences when comparing dosages. Physical outcome measures after pre-surgery physiotherapy together significantly explain 27.5% of the variation in physical activity level 1 year after surgery with pre-surgery physical activity level having a significant multivariate association.ConclusionPre-surgery physiotherapy increased walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders compared to waiting-list controls. A clear treatment dose-response response relationship was not found. These results implicate that pre-surgery physiotherapy can influence functional capacity before surgical treatment and has moderate associations with maintained postoperative physical activity levels mostly explained by physical activity level pre-surgery.Trial registrationNCT02454400. Trial registration date: August 31st 2015, retrospectively registered.
|
|
| 17. |
- Fors, Maria, 1987-, et al.
(författare)
-
The association between patients' illness perceptions and longitudinal clinical outcome in patients with low back pain
- 2022
-
Ingår i: PAIN Reports. - Philadelphia, PA, United States : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2471-2531. ; 7:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Illness perception is suggested to influence outcome in patients with low back pain (LBP). It is unknown if specific illness perceptions are of more importance for longitudinal outcomes, including development of self-management strategies.Objectives: This study explores whether patients' initial illness perceptions were associated with disability, pain, health-related quality of life, and self-care enablement outcomes in patients with LBP after 3 and 12 months.Methods: Four hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients seeking physiotherapeutic primary care for LBP were eligible to participate in this prospective cohort study, providing data at baseline and after 3 and 12 months (mean age 45 years, 56% women). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore whether patients' illness perceptions at baseline were associated with outcome in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale–LBP (NRS-LBP), EuroQol Five Dimensions, and Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI).Results: Stronger beliefs that the back problem will last a long time at baseline were associated with worse outcome in ODI, NRS-LBP, and PEI at 3 and 12 months and in EuroQol Five Dimensions at 12 months. Negative beliefs regarding treatment's ability to improve LBP were associated with worse outcome in NRS-LBP and PEI at 3 and 12 months and in ODI at 12 months.Conclusions: Illness perceptions regarding prognosis and treatment's ability to improve symptoms were the most prominent perceptions explaining several longitudinal clinical outcomes. These expectations should be addressed in an early stage in the delivery of interventions for LBP. These expectations were also important for patients' development of coping and self-management strategies.
|
|
| 18. |
- Fors, Maria, 1987-, et al.
(författare)
-
What mediates treatment effects in a pre-surgery physiotherapy treatment in surgical candidates with degenerative lumbar spine disorders? : A mediation and conditional process analysis of the PREPARE randomized controlled trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: The Clinical Journal of Pain. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0749-8047 .- 1536-5409. ; 3, s. 168-176
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Treatment guidelines recommend targeting both physical and psychological factors in interventions for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Studying treatment mechanisms gives information on key factors explaining outcome improvement which can refine treatments for future research. This study explores treatment mediators in a physiotherapy treatment on disability, pain intensity and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in surgical candidates with degenerative lumbar spine disorders compared to waiting-list controls. An additional aim was to evaluate patients´ expectation as a moderator of treatment outcome.Methods: Data collected from 197 patients in a single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing 9 weeks of multifaceted physiotherapy to waiting-list were used in this conditional process analysis. Analysis was carried out on group differences for change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and EQ-VAS. The putative moderation role of expectations and mediation role of change in physical variables and psychosocial variables were tested.Results: Change in self-efficacy mediated improvement in all outcomes. Improvement in ODI was also mediated by change in depression, VAS was mediated by change in fear avoidance beliefs and EQ-VAS was mediated by change in activity level and fear avoidance beliefs. Improvements were moderated by patients´ treatment expectations.Discussion: Self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs, physical activity level and patients´ treatment expectations were found to be important factors explaining treatment effects. Self-efficacy was the consistent mediator for effects of the pre-surgical physiotherapy on disability, back pain intensity and HRQoL.
|
|
| 19. |
- Gerdle, Björn, et al.
(författare)
-
The importance of emotional distress, cognitive behavioural factors and pain for life impact at baseline and for outcomes after rehabilitation - a SQRP study of more than 20,000 chronic pain patients
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Pain. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 1877-8860 .- 1877-8879. ; 19:4, s. 693-711
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and aims Although literature concerning chronic pain patients indicates that cognitive behavioural variables, specifically acceptance and fear of movement/(re)injury, are related to life impact, the relative roles of these factors in relation to pain characteristics (e.g. intensity and spreading) and emotional distress are unclear. Moreover, how these variables affect rehabilitation outcomes in different subgroups is insufficiently understood. This study has two aims: (1) to investigate how pain, cognitive behavioural, and emotional distress variables intercorrelate and whether these variables can regress aspects of life impact and (2) to analyse whether these variables can be used to identify clinically meaningful subgroups at baseline and which subgroups benefit most from multimodal rehabilitation programs (MMRP) immediately after and at 12-month follow-up. Methods Pain aspects, background variables, psychological distress, cognitive behavioural variables, and two life impact variables were obtained from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP) for chronic pain patients. These data were analysed mainly using advanced multivariate methods. Results The study includes 22,406 chronic pain patients. Many variables, including acceptance variables, showed important contributions to the variation in clinical presentations and in life impacts. Based on the statistically important variables considering the clinical presentation, three clusters/subgroups of patients were identified at baseline; from the worst clinical situation to the relatively good situation. These clusters showed significant differences in outcomes after participating in MMRP; the subgroup with the worst situation at baseline showed the most significant improvements. Conclusions Pain intensity/severity, emotional distress, acceptance, and life impacts were important for the clinical presentation and were used to identify three clusters with marked differences at baseline (i.e. before MMRP). Life impacts showed complex relationships with acceptance, pain intensity/severity, and emotional distress. The most significant improvements after MMRP were seen in the subgroup with the lowest level of functioning before treatment, indicating that patients with complex problems should be offered MMRP. Implications This study emphasizes the need to adopt a biopsychosocial perspective when assessing patients with chronic pain. Patients with chronic pain referred to specialist clinics are not homogenous in their clinical presentation. Instead we identified three distinct subgroups of patients. The outcomes of MMRP appears to be related to the clinical presentation. Thus, patients with the most severe clinical presentation show the most prominent improvements. However, even though this group of patients improve they still after MMRP show a complex situation and there is thus a need for optimizing the content of MMRP for these patients. The subgroup of patients with a relatively good situation with respect to pain, psychological distress, coping and life impact only showed minor improvements after MMRP. Hence, there is a need to develop other complex interventions for them.
|
|
| 20. |
- Lindbäck, Yvonne, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
Altered somatosensory profile according to quantitative sensory testing in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders scheduled for surgery
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : BIOMED CENTRAL LTD. - 1471-2474. ; 18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Somatosensory profiling in affected and non-affected body regions can strengthen our insight regarding the underlying pain mechanisms, which can be valuable in treatment decision making and to improve outcomes, in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders pre-surgery. The aim was to describe somatosensory profiles in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders, to identify the proportion with altered somatosensory profile, and to analyze demographic characteristics, self-reported function, pain, and health pre- and 3 months post-surgery. Methods: In this prospective cohort study in a Spine Clinic, 105 patients scheduled for surgery for spinal stenosis, disc herniation, degenerative disc disease, or spondylolisthesis were consecutively recruited. Exclusion criteria were; indication for acute surgery or previous surgery at the same spinal level or severe grade of pathology. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and self-reported function, pain, and health was measured pre- and 3 months post-surgery. The somatosensory profile included cold detection threshold, warmth detection threshold, cold pain threshold, heat pain threshold and pressure pain threshold in affected and non-affected body regions. Results: On a group level, the patients somatosensory profiles were within the 95% confidence interval (CI) from normative reference data means. On an individual level, an altered somatosensory profile was defined as having two or more body regions (including a non-affected region) with QST values outside of normal ranges for reference data. The 23 patients (22%) with altered somatosensory profiles, with mostly loss of function, were older (P = 0.031), more often female (P = 0.005), had higher back and leg pain (P = 0.016, 0.020), lower mental health component summary score (SF 36 MCS) (P = 0.004) and larger pain distribution (P = 0.047), compared to others in the cohort. Post-surgery there was a tendency to worse pain, function and health in the group with altered somatosensory profile pre-surgery. Conclusions: On a group level, patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders scheduled for surgery were within normal range for the QST measurements compared to reference values. On an individual level, an altered somatosensory profile outside of normal range in both affected and non-affected body regions occurred in 22% of patients, which may indicate disturbed somatosensory function. Those patients had mostly loss of sensory function and had worse self-reported outcome pre-surgery, compared to the rest of the cohort. Future prospective studies are needed to further examine whether these dimensions can be useful in predicting post-surgery outcome and guide need of additional treatments.
|
|
| 21. |
- Lindbäck, Yvonne, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between pain sensitivity in the hand and outcomes after surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: European spine journal. - : Springer. - 0940-6719 .- 1432-0932. ; 26:10, s. 2581-2588
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To investigate the association between pain sensitivity in the hand pre-surgery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in function, pain and health pre- and post-surgery in patients with disc herniation or spinal stenosis.METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study with 82 patients. Associations between pressure-, cold- and heat pain threshold (PPT, CPT, HPT) in the hand pre-surgery and Oswestry, VAS pain, EQ-5D, HADS, and Self-Efficacy Scale, pre- and three months post-surgery; were investigated with linear regression.RESULTS: Patients with disc herniation more sensitive to pressure pain pre-surgery showed lower function and self-efficacy, and higher anxiety and depression pre-surgery, and lower function, and self-efficacy, and higher pain post-surgery. Results for cold pain were similar. In patients with spinal stenosis few associations with PROs were found and none for HPT and PROs.CONCLUSIONS: Altered pain response in pressure- and cold pain in the hand, as a sign of widespread pain pre-surgery had associations with higher pain, lower function and self-efficacy post-surgery in patients with disc herniation.
|
|
| 22. |
- Lindbäck, Yvonne, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients' experiences of how symptoms are explained and influences on back-related health after pre-surgery physiotherapy : A qualitative study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Musculoskeletal science & practice. - : Elsevier. - 2468-7812. ; 40, s. 34-39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Since the pre-surgery phase is a new setting for physiotherapy, exploring patients' experiences might contribute to new insights for future development of care in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders.OBJECTIVES: To describe patients' experiences of how symptoms are explained, and their experiences of the influences on back-related health after pre-surgery physiotherapy.DESIGN: Explorative qualitative design using semi-structured interviews analysed with content analysis.PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder scheduled for surgery, participated in pre-surgery physiotherapy.FINDINGS: Five categories were identified: Influences on symptoms, physical function and sleep; Influences on coping and well-being; Explanations of back-related symptoms and wanting to be well-informed; Influence on social functioning; The ability of the model of care to influence reassurance and prevention.CONCLUSION: Improvements in back-related health in all the biopsychosocial dimensions emerged. Even those who expressed no symptom improvements, felt better performing exercises than being inactive, and exercises improved their frame of mind, a useful experience in possible low back pain recurrences. Pre-surgery physiotherapy provided reassurance and gave time to reflect on treatments and lifestyle. Despite pre-surgery physiotherapy, back-related symptoms were mainly described in line with a biomedical explanatory model. Those using broader explanations were confident that physiotherapy and self-management could influence their symptoms. Suggesting more emphasis on explanatory models suitable for surgery, pre- and post-surgery physiotherapy and self-management in the professionals' dialogue with patients.
|
|
| 23. |
- Lindbäck, Yvonne, 1967-
(författare)
-
Pre-surgery physiotherapy and pain thresholds in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders
- 2018
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Patients scheduled for spinal surgery often experience long duration of pain, which may influence the pain-regulation system, function and health and have an impact on post-surgery outcome. Prehabilitation potentially augments functional capacity before surgery, which may have beneficial effects after surgery.Aim: The overall aim of the thesis is to study pre-surgery physiotherapy and somatosensory function in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders and to explore the patients’ experiences of pre-surgery physiotherapy.Methods: Somatosensory function was measured with quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pre-surgery physiotherapy was evaluated with patient-reported outcome measures (n = 197). Patients’ experiences of how symptoms are explained and their experiences of the influences on back-related health after pre-surgery physiotherapy were explored.Results: Half of the patients reported back or leg pain for more than 2 years. On a group level, the somatosensory profiles were within the reference range. On an individual level, an altered somatosensory profile was found in 23/105 patients, these were older, more often women, and reported higher pain, larger pain distribution and worse SF-36 MCS (mental health component summary). Patients with disc herniation, more sensitive to pressure pain in the hand presurgery, was associated with poorer function, self-efficacy, anxiety and depression score pre-surgery, worse function, self-efficacy and leg pain 3 months post-surgery and worse health related quality of life, self-efficacy, depression score 1 year postsurgery. The results for sensitivity for cold pain were similar, except that it even was associated with poorer function and pain 1 year post-surgery. The pre-surgery physiotherapy group had less back pain, better function, health, self-efficacy, fear avoidance score, depression score and physical activity level than the waiting-list group after the pre-surgery intervention. The effects were small. Both groups improved significantly after surgery, with no differences between groups, except that the higher physical activity level in the physiotherapy group remained at the 1-year follow-up. Only 58% of the patients reported a minimum of one visit for rehabilitation during the 1 year preceding the decision to undergo surgery. Patients experienced that pre-surgery physiotherapy had influenced symptoms, physical function, coping, well-being and social functioning to various degrees. Pre-surgery physiotherapy was experienced as a tool for reassurance and an opportunity to reflect about treatment and lifestyle. The patients mainly used biomedical explanatory models based on image reports to explain their backrelated symptoms. Both broader and more narrow, as well as lack of explanations of symptoms emerged. Further, wanting and sometimes struggling to be wellinformed about symptoms and interventions were described.Conclusions: Being more sensitive to pressure- and cold pain in the hand, as a sign of widespread pain pre-surgery, was associated with poorer function, pain and health at post-surgery in patients with disc herniation. Pre-surgery physiotherapy decreased pain, fear avoidance, improved health related quality of life; and it decreased the risk of a worsening in psychological well-being before surgery. The improvements were small, and improvements after surgery were similar for both groups. At the 1-year follow-up, the physiotherapy group still had a higher activity level than the waiting list group. The pre-surgery physiotherapy was well tolerated. Patients’ reported experiences also illustrates the influence on function, pain and health. Patients experienced that pre-surgery physiotherapy provided reassurance and gave time to reflect on treatments and lifestyle. Symptoms were mainly described in line with a biomedical explanatory model. Those using a broader explanation were confident that physiotherapy and self-management could influence their back-related symptoms.
|
|
| 24. |
- Lindbäck, Yvonne, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder : a randomized controlled trial
- 2018
-
Ingår i: The spine journal. - : Elsevier. - 1529-9430 .- 1878-1632. ; 18:8, s. 1347-1355
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background ContextSurgery because of disc herniation or spinal stenosis results mostly in large improvement in the short-term, but mild to moderate improvements for pain and disability at long-term follow-up. Prehabilitation has been defined as augmenting functional capacity before surgery, which may have beneficial effect on outcome after surgery.PurposeThe aim was to study if presurgery physiotherapy improves function, pain, and health in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder scheduled for surgery.Study DesignA single-blinded, two-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT).Patient SampleA total of 197 patients were consecutively included at a spine clinic. The inclusion criteria were patients scheduled for surgery because of disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD), 25–80 years of age.Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, fear avoidance, physical activity, and treatment effect.MethodsPatients were randomized to either presurgery physiotherapy or standardized information, with follow-up after the presurgery intervention as well as 3 and 12 months post surgery. The study was funded by regional research funds for US$77,342. No conflict of interest is declared.ResultsThe presurgery physiotherapy group had better ODI, visual analog scale (VAS) back pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), EQ-VAS, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire-Physical Activity (FABQ-PA), Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores and activity level compared with the waiting-list group after the presurgery intervention. The improvements were small, but larger than the study-specific minimal clinical important change (MCIC) in VAS back and leg pain, EQ-5D, and FABQ-PA, and almost in line with MCIC in ODI and Physical Component Summary (PCS) in the physiotherapy group. Post surgery, the only difference between the groups was higher activity level in the physiotherapy group compared with the waiting-list group.ConclusionsPresurgery physiotherapy decreases pain, risk of avoidance behavior, and worsening of psychological well-being, and improves quality of life and physical activity levels before surgery compared with waiting-list controls. These results were maintained only for activity levelspost surgery. Still, presurgery selection, content, dosage of exercises, and importance of being active in a presurgery physiotherapy intervention is of interest to study further to improve long-term outcome.
|
|
| 25. |
- Molander, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
The role of pain in chronic pain patients' perception of health-related quality of life : A cross-sectional SQRP study of 40,000 patients
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Pain. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 1877-8860 .- 1877-8879. ; 18:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Health-related quality of life (Hr-QoL) reflects the burden of a condition on an overarching level. Pain intensity, disability and other factors influence how patients with chronic pain perceive their condition, e.g. Hr-QoL. However, the relative importance of these factors is unclear and there is an ongoing debate as to what importance pain measures have in this group. We investigated the importance of current pain level and mood on aspects of Hr-QoL in patients with chronic pain and investigated whether such relationships are influenced by demographics. Data was obtained from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP), between 2008 and 2016 on patients ≥18 years old who suffered from chronic pain and were referred to participating specialist clinics. Dependent variables were general Hr-QoL [using two scales from European Quality of Life instrument: EQ5D Index and the European Quality of Life instrument health scale (EQ thermometer)] and specific Hr-QoL [from the Short Form Health Survey (SF36) the physical component summary (SF36-PCS) and the mental (psychological) component summary (SF36-MCS)]. Independent variables were sociodemographic variables, pain variables, psychological distress and pain attitudes. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for multivariate correlation analyses of all investigated variables and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Regression (OPLS) for multivariate regressions on health aspects. There was 40,518 patients (72% women). Pain intensity and interference showed the strongest multivariate correlations with EQ5D Index, EQ thermometer and SF36-PCS. Psychological distress variables displayed the strongest multivariate correlations with SF36-MCS. Demographic properties did not significantly influence variations in the investigated Hr-QoL variables. Pain, mood and pain attitudes were significantly correlated with Hr-QoL variables, but these variables cannot explain most of variations in Hr-QoL variables. The results pinpoint that broad assessments (including pain intensity aspects) are needed to capture the clinical presentation of patients with complex chronic pain conditions.
|
|
| 26. |
- Molgaard Nielsen, A, et al.
(författare)
-
The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain : Reliability, Content Validity, Construct Validity and Responsiveness
- 2020
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- BackgroundCurrently, there are no outcome measures assessing the ability of people with non-specific low back pain to self-manage their illness. Inspired by the ‘Patient Enablement Instrument’, we developed the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP). The aim of this study was to describe the development of the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) and investigate content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects.MethodsThe PEI-BP consists of 6 items that are rated on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale. Measurement properties were evaluated using the COSMIN taxonomy and were based on three cohorts from primary care with low back pain: The content validity cohort (N=14) which participated in semi-structured interviews, the GLA:D Back cohort (N=272) and the test-retest cohort (N=37) which both completed self-reported questionnaires. For construct validity and responsiveness, enablement was compared to disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back pain beliefs (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), fear avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire – physical activity), mental health (SF-36), educational level and number of previous episodes of low back pain.ResultsThe PEI-BP was found to have acceptable content validity, construct validity, reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error) and responsiveness. The Smallest Detectable Change was 10.1 points illustrating that a patient would have to change more than 1/6 of the scale range for it to be a true change. A skewed distribution towards the high scores were found at baseline indicating a potentially problematic ceiling effect in the current population.ConclusionsThe PEI-BP can be considered a valid and reliable tool to measure enablement on people seeking care for non-specific LBP. Further testing of the PEI-BP in populations with more severe LBP is recommended.
|
|
| 27. |
- Molgaard Nielsen, A, et al.
(författare)
-
The patient enablement instrument for backpain : reliability, content validity, constructvalidity and responsiveness
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. - : BioMed Central. - 1477-7525. ; 19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundCurrently, there are no outcome measures assessing the ability of people with non-specific low back pain to self-manage their illness. Inspired by the ‘Patient Enablement Instrument’, we developed the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP). The aim of this study was to describe the development of the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) and investigate content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, measurement error, responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects.MethodsThe PEI-BP consists of 6 items that are rated on a 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale. Measurement properties were evaluated using the COSMIN taxonomy and were based on three cohorts from primary care with low back pain: The content validity cohort (N = 14) which participated in semi-structured interviews, the GLA:D® Back cohort (N = 272) and the test–retest cohort (N = 37) which both completed self-reported questionnaires. For construct validity and responsiveness, enablement was compared to disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back pain beliefs (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), fear avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire—physical activity), mental health (SF-36), educational level and number of previous episodes of low back pain.ResultsThe PEI-BP was found to have acceptable content validity, construct validity, reliability (internal consistency, test–retest reliability and measurement error) and responsiveness. The Smallest Detectable Change was 10.1 points illustrating that a patient would have to change more than 1/6 of the scale range for it to be a true change. A skewed distribution towards the high scores were found at baseline indicating a potentially problematic ceiling effect in the current population.ConclusionsThe PEI-BP can be considered a valid and reliable tool to measure enablement on people seeking care for non-specific LBP. Further testing of the PEI-BP in populations with more severe LBP is recommended.
|
|
| 28. |
- Pietilä Holmner, Elisabeth, 1953-, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term outcomes of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care for patients with chronic pain
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - Uppsala : Foundation Rehabilitation Information. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 52:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To investigate the outcomes one year after multimodal rehabilitation programmes in primary care for patients with chronic pain, both as a whole and for men and women separately. A second aim was to identify predictive factors for not being on sickness absence at follow-up after one year.Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study of 234 patients, 34 men and 200 women, age range 18–65 years, who participated in multimodal rehabilitation programmes in primary care in 2 Swedish county councils. Pain, physical and emotional functioning, coping, health-related quality of life, work-related factors, sickness absence (sick leave, sickness compensation/disability pension) were evaluated prior to and one year after multimodal rehabilitation programmes.Results: Patients showed significant improvements at 1-year follow-up for all measures (all p ≤ 0.004) except satisfaction with vocation (p = 0.060). The proportion of patients on sick leave decreased significantly at follow-up (p = 0.027), while there was no significant difference regarding the proportion of patients on sickness compensation/disability pension (p = 0.087). Higher self-rated work ability was associated with not being on sickness absence at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.06, p = 0.005).Conclusion: This study indicates that multimodal rehabilitation programmes in primary care could be beneficial for patients with chronic pain, since the outcomes at 1-year follow-up for pain, physical and emotional functioning, coping, and health-related quality of life were positive. However, the effect sizes were small and thus further development of multimodal rehabilitation programmes is warranted in order to improve the outcomes.
|
|
| 29. |
- Pietilä Holmner, Elisabeth, et al.
(författare)
-
”The acceptance” of living with chronic pain – an ongoing process: A qualitative study of patient experiences of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - : FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 50:1, s. 73-79
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To explore patient experiences of participating in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care. Subjects: Twelve former patients (7 women and 5 men) in multimodal rehabilitation in primary care were interviewed about their experiences of multimodal rehabilitation. Methods: The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Analysis resulted in 4 categories: (i) from discredited towards obtaining redress; (ii) from uncertainty towards knowledge; (iii) from loneliness towards togetherness; and (iv) "acceptance of pain": an ongoing process. The results show that having obtained redress, to obtain knowledge about chronic pain, and to experience fellowship with others with the same condition were helpful in the acceptance process. However, there were patients who found it difficult to reconcile themselves with a life with chronic pain after multimodal rehabilitation. To find what was "wrong" and to have a medical diagnosis and cure were important. Conclusion: Patients in primary care multimodal rehabilitation experience a complex, ongoing process of accepting chronic pain. Four important categories were described. These findings will help others to understand the experience and perspective of patients with chronic pain who engage in multimodal rehabilitation.
|
|
| 30. |
- Sandberg, Klas, 1961-
(författare)
-
Effects of exercise in different phases after stroke
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Stroke is a complex disease that can vary in severity. After a stroke, patients often have long-term disabilities that require major rehabilitation efforts. Evaluation of treatment and methods are important for development of effective rehabilitation after stroke. Various forms of physiotherapy interventions have been tested in different phases after stroke, but there are still questions about timing and forms of exercise. In this work, aerobic exercise with an ergometer cycle and an in-bed cycle were used as models for intervention in subacute and acute phase after stroke. Exercise has been evaluated both after discharge from hospital and in hospital care. Aim: The overall aim of the dissertation was to study the effects of exercise in different phases after stroke of varying severity.Method: Two studies were performed in Swedish stroke units during 2013- 2018. Both studies were randomized controlled trials focusing on the effects of exercise in different phases after stroke. Study A included 56 patients with mild stroke from one hospital. Patients were discharged from the hospital and enrolled to intervention in median 22.5 days after stroke onset. All patients received usual care in a stroke unit according to national guidelines, and the intervention group received additionally aerobic exercise for 1 hour 2 times per week for 12 weeks post-discharge. The session included 2x8 minutes of intense aerobic exercise on an ergometer cycle. In study A, the effects of exercise were evaluated by aerobic exercise, walking distance and hemodynamic responses and compared to usual care.Study B included 52 patients in the acute phase of moderate to severe stroke from two hospitals. Patients were enrolled to intervention 2 days after onset, and all patients received usual care. In addition to usual care, one group received in-bed cycle exercise 20 minutes daily, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. In study B, the effects of exercise were evaluated by walking distance and hemodynamic responses and compared to usual care.Results: Study A showed that intensive aerobic exercise twice weekly for 12 weeks during the subacute phase of mild stroke improved the patient’s aerobic capacity and walking distance after the intervention period. The study also showed that exaggerated blood pressure reactions associated with exercise were common in the subacute phase but not significantly affected by participation in a 12-week exercise period.Study B showed that the addition of in-bed cycle exercise in the acute phase after more severe stroke was not superior to usual care with regards to walking distance after 3 months. From baseline to post-intervention, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly to a similar extent in both groups, but the exercise group seemed to normalize their blood pressure response to exercise to a greater extent than patients in the control group.Conclusion: For patients with mild symptoms, aerobic exercise initiated 3 weeks after stroke onset was beneficial for aerobic capacity and walking distance. In the acute phase after stroke, starting two days after onset, 3 weeks 4 of in-bed cycle exercise was not superior to usual care with regards to walking distance after 3 months. Exercise-related exaggerated blood pressure reactions were common in the subacute phase but not affected by participation in a 12- week exercise period. An effect of the in-bed cycle exercise in the acute phase after stroke seemed to be that patients randomized to the intervention normalized their blood pressure reaction in connection with exercise.
|
|
| 31. |
- Sandberg, Klas, 1961-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of In-Bed Cycle Exercise in Patients With Acute Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. - : Elsevier. - 2590-1095. ; 2:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To investigate the effects of in-bed cycle exercise in addition to usualcare in patients with acute stroke, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 7-42,regarding walking ability, functional outcomes, and inpatient care days.Design: Randomized controlled trial.Setting: Hospital care.Participants: Patients (NZ56) with stroke NIHSS 7-42 were recruited 24-48 hours after strokeonset from 2 stroke units in Sweden.Interventions: Both groups received usual care. The intervention group also received 20 minutes bed cycling 5 days per week with a maximum of 15 sessions.Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was median change in walking ability measuredwith the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcome measures included the median change inmodified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI) for activities of daily living, and inpatient care days.Measurements were performed at baseline, post intervention (3 weeks), and at 3-month follow-up.Results: There was no significant difference in change of walking ability (6MWT) from baseline tofollow-up between the intervention and control groups (median, 105m [interquartile range [IQR,220m] vs 30m [IQR, 118m], respectively, PZ.147, dZ0.401). There were no significant differencesbetween groups regarding mRS, BI, or inpatient care days. Patients with less serious stroke (NIHSS 7-12) seemed to benefit from the intervention.Conclusion: Although this study may have been underpowered, patients with stroke NIHSS 7-42 didnot benefit from in-bed cycle exercise in addition to usual care after acute stroke. A larger study isneeded to confirm our results.
|
|
| 32. |
|
|
| 33. |
- Schröder, Karin, 1966-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness and Quality of Implementing a Best Practice Model of Care for Low Back Pain (BetterBack) Compared with Routine Care in Physiotherapy : A Hybrid Type 2 Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Medicine. - : MDPI. - 2077-0383. ; 10:6, s. 1230-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Low back pain (LBP) occurs in all ages and first-line treatment by physiotherapists is common. The main aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a best practice model of care for LBP (intervention group—BetterBackJ MoC) compared to routine physiotherapy care (control group) regarding longitudinal patient reported outcomes. The BetterBackJ MoC contains clinical guideline recommendations and support tools to facilitate clinician adherence to guidelines. A secondary exploratory aim was to compare patient outcomes based on the fidelity of fulfilling a clinical practice quality index regarding physiotherapist care. A stepped cluster randomized design nested patients with LBP in the three clusters which were allocated to control (n = 203) or intervention (n = 264). Patient reported measures were collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months and analyzed with mixed model regression. The primary outcome was between-group changes from baseline to 3 months for pain intensity and disability. Implementation of the BetterBackJ MoC did not show any between-group differences in the primary outcomes compared with routine care. However, the intervention group showed significantly higher satisfaction at 3 months and clinically meaningful greater improvement in LBP illness perception at 3 months and quality of life at 3 and 6 months but not in patient enablement and global impression of change compared with the control group. Physiotherapists’ care that adhered to all clinical practice quality indices resulted in an improvement of most patient reported outcomes with a clinically meaningful greater improved LBP illness perception at 3 month and quality of life at 3 and 6 months, significantly greater improvement in LBP illness perception, pain and satisfaction at 3 and 6 months and significantly better enablement at all time points as well as better global improvement outcomes at 3 months compared with non-adherent care. This highlights the importance of clinical guideline based primary care for improving patient reported LBP outcomes.
|
|
| 34. |
- Schröder, Karin, 1966-
(författare)
-
Implementing BetterBack – a Best Practice Physiotherapy Healthcare Model for Low Back Pain : Clinician and Patient Evaluation
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Low back pain (LBP) occurs in all ages, and first-line treatment by physiotherapists (PTs) is common. However, national evidence-based LBP clinical guidelines are still lacking in Sweden. To facilitate guideline uptake, we developed and with a multifaceted strategy implemented a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model (BetterBack☺ MoC) with the aim of supporting management of LBP in primary care. The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy and a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model for LBP.Methods: This thesis is based on one methodological study and three experimental trials with PTs and patients with LBP. In Paper I a mixed method design was used to translate, tailor, validate and feasibility-test the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ). This tailored DIBQ Questionnaire (DIBQ-t) was used to evaluate potential barriers/facilitators during the implementation process together with evaluation of PTs’ confidence, attitudes and beliefs in managing LBP. In a stepped cluster randomised controlled trial, PTs and their patients in three clusters were allocated to intervention group (after implementation of BetterBack☺ MoC) or control group (routine physiotherapy care). The proportions of guideline-adherent care were compared between groups (Paper III). This evaluation was based on PTs’ adherence to eight clinical practice recommendations and three clinical practice quality indices (CPQI). The overall CPQI containing the five most prioritised recommendations are: no referral to specialist care; no referral to medical imaging for benign LBP; use of educational interventions; use of exercise interventions; and no use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy. Finally, in Paper IV patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between intervention (after the implementation of BetterBack☺ MoC) and routine care. In Paper IV an additional secondary analysis was performed, comparing PROMs based on whether or not PTs had delivered care that met all five criteria of the overall CPQI or not.Results: A tailored, feasible and valid questionnaire was developed, DIBQ-t to be used for evaluation of the implementation of LBP primary care programmes. After implementation workshop, PTs’ (n = 116) confidence increased, and PTs’ attitudes and beliefs shifted towards a more biopsychosocial orientation. PTs had high expectations of the BetterBack☺ MoC, which decreased after using the MoC. When evaluating received treatment for 500 patients with LBP, a more frequent delivery of guideline-adherent care was seen after implementation (n = 278) compared to routine care (n = 222). The overall CPQI containing the five prioritised recommendations was fulfilled in 59% of all patients in intervention versus 26% in routine care group. Analysis of adherence to specific recommendations showed a significantly improved use of stratification of number of PT visits and patient educational interventions, frequent use of exercise was maintained, and use of non-evidence-based treatment and medical imaging decreased after implementation. The primary outcome, i.e. referral to specialist consultation, was low in both groups, with no between-group differences. After implementation of the BetterBack☺ MoC, no between-group differences in PROMs were seen except for greater satisfaction with LBP care, greater improvement in illness perception and better health-related quality of life, compared with routine care. However, when PTs’ care adhered to all five CPQI criteria, a greater improvement of most patient-reported outcomes was seen compared to patient care that did not adhere to all five CPQI criteria. Conclusions: The implementation of a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model (BetterBack☺ MoC) for LBP improved both clinician and patient outcomes. PTs increased use of guideline-adherent care, confidence and biopsychosocial orientation in managing LBP. Patients reported improved satisfaction, illness perception and health-related quality of life. The implementation did not decrease referral to specialist consultation from an initial low level; nor did it improve patients’ disability and pain more than routine care. However, when guideline-adherent care was fulfilled, most PROMs improved. It is therefore important to highlight the importance of guideline-based primary care for improving patient-reported LBP outcomes.
|
|
| 35. |
- Schröder, Karin, 1966-, et al.
(författare)
-
Improved adherence to clinical guidelines for low back pain after implementation of the BetterBack model of care: A stepped cluster randomized controlled trial within a hybrid type 2 trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0959-3985 .- 1532-5040. ; 39:7, s. 1376-1390
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND The BetterBack model of care (MoC) for low back pain (LBP) was recently developed in Swedish physiotherapy (PT) primary care.OBJECTIVE To evaluate if PTs’ adherence to LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) improves after implementation of the BetterBack MoC (intervention).METHODS This was a stepped, single-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial. Patients nested in the three clusters were allocated to routine care (n = 222) or intervention (n = 278). The primary outcome was referral to specialist consultation. This was among five best practice recommendations divided into an assessment quality index (no referral to specialist consultation and no medical imaging) and a treatment quality index (use of educational interventions; use of exercise interventions; no use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy). For overall adherence, patients had to be treated with all five recommendations fulfilled. Logistic regression was used for between-group comparisons.RESULTS The proportion of patients receiving referral to specialist consultation during the PT treatment period was low in both groups with no between-group differences. However, patients in the intervention group showed significantly higher assessment quality index, treatment quality index and overall adherence compared to routine care. Adherence to the separate recommendations showed improved stratified number of visits, use of exercise was maintained high, patient educational intervention increased and use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy decreased. A reduction of medical imaging during the physiotherapy treatment period was also observed.CONCLUSIONS The adoption of CPGs could be substantially improved by introducing a MoC through PT training and supportive materials.
|
|
| 36. |
- Spångeus, Anna, Bitr Professor, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient Education Improves Pain and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Established Spinal Osteoporosis in Primary Care—A Pilot Study of Short- and Long-Term Effects
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : MDPI. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 20:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Fragility fractures, in particular vertebral fractures, are associated with high morbidity, including chronic pain and reduced health-related quality of life. We aimed to investigate the short- and long-term effects of patient education, including interdisciplinary themes, with or without physical training or mindfulness/medical yoga for patients with established spinal osteoporosis in primary care. Osteoporotic persons aged sixty years or older with one or more vertebral fractures were randomized to theory only, theory and physical exercise, or theory and mindfulness/medical yoga and were scheduled to once a week for ten weeks. Participants were followed up by clinical tests and questionnaires. Twenty-one participants completed the interventions and the one-year follow-up. Adherence to interventions was 90%. Pooled data from all participants showed significant improvements after intervention on pain during the last week and worst pain, and reduced painkiller use (any painkillers at baseline 70% [opioids 25%] vs. post-intervention 52% [opioids 14%]). Significant improvements were seen regarding RAND-36 social function, Qualeffo-41 social function, balance, tandem walking backwards, and theoretical knowledge. These changes were maintained at the 1-year follow-up. Patient group education combined with supervised training seems to have positive effects on pain, and physical function in persons with established spinal osteoporosis. The improved quality of life was maintained at the 1-year follow-up.
|
|
| 37. |
- Tseli, Elena, et al.
(författare)
-
Predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation outcomes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain : protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Systematic Reviews. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2046-4053. ; 6:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a major public health problem. Early prediction for optimal treatment results has received growing attention, but there is presently a lack of evidence regarding what information such proactive management should be based on. This study protocol, therefore, presents our planned systematic review and meta-analysis on important predictive factors for health and work-related outcomes following multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.METHODS: We aim to perform a synthesis of the available evidence together with a meta-analysis of published peer-reviewed original research that includes predictive factors preceding MDR. Included are prospective studies of adults with benign, chronic (> 3 months) musculoskeletal pain diagnoses who have taken part in MDR. In the studies, associations between personal and rehabilitation-based factors and the outcomes of interest are reported. Outcome domains are pain, physical functioning including health-related quality of life, and work ability with follow-ups of 6 months or more. We will use a broad, explorative approach to any presented predictive factors (demographic, symptoms-related, physical, psychosocial, work-related, and MDR-related) and these will be analyzed through (a) narrative synthesis for each outcome domain and (b) if sufficient studies are available, a quantitative synthesis in which variance-weighted pooled proportions will be computed using a random effects model for each outcome domain. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.DISCUSSION: The strength of this systematic review is that it aims for a meta-analysis of prospective cohort or randomized controlled studies by performing an extensive search of multiple databases, using an explorative study approach to predictive factors, rather than building on single predictor impact on the outcome or on predefined hypotheses. In this way, an overview of factors central to MDR outcome can be made and will help strengthen the evidence base and inform a wide readership including health care practitioners and policymakers.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016025339.
|
|
| 38. |
- Wijkman, Magnus, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
The exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in the sub-acute phase after stroke is not affected by aerobic exercise.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. - Hoboken, United States : Le Jacq Communications, Inc.. - 1524-6175 .- 1751-7176. ; 20, s. 56-64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The prevalence of an exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) response is unknown in patients with subacute stroke, and it is not known whether an aerobic exercise program modulates this response. The authors randomized 53 patients (27 women) with subacute stroke to 12 weeks of twice-weekly aerobic exercise (n = 29) or to usual care without scheduled physical exercise (n = 24). At baseline, 66% of the patients exhibited an exaggerated exercise BP response (peak systolic BP ≥210 mm Hg in men and ≥190 mm Hg in women) during a symptom-limited ergometer exercise test. At follow-up, patients who had been randomized to the exercise program achieved higher peak work rate, but peak systolic BP remained unaltered. Among patients with a recent stroke, it was common to have an exaggerated systolic BP response during exercise. This response was not altered by participation in a 12-week program of aerobic exercise.
|
|
| 39. |
- Åhlfeldt, Douglas Anderson, et al.
(författare)
-
Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of and Attitudes towards a Standardized Content Description of Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with Chronic Pain-A Qualitative Study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. - : Journal Issues Limited. - 1661-7827 .- 1660-4601. ; 20:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR) is a recommended treatment for people with chronic pain. An inadequate description of the content of IPR programs makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding their effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions and attitudes of healthcare professionals toward a content description of IPR programs for patients with chronic pain. Individual interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 11) working in IPR teams in Sweden were conducted between February and May 2019. Analysis of the interviews resulted in a theme: interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation is a complex intervention, with three categories: limitations in the description of IPR programs; lack of knowledge about IPR and chronic pain; and facilitating and hindering factors for using the content description of IPR programs. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals perceived that IPR programs could be described through a general content description. A general content description could enhance the quality of IPR programs through a better understanding of their content and a comparison of different IPR programs. Healthcare professionals also expressed the importance of a content description being a guide rather than a steering document.
|
|
| 40. |
- Öberg, Birgitta, 1951-, et al.
(författare)
-
Back pain in primary care : a prospective cohort study of clinical outcome and healthcare consumption
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Advances in Physiotherapy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1403-8196 .- 1651-1948. ; 5:3, s. 98-108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim was to describe the clinical course without active treatment in patients with low back and neck pain visiting primary care. A prospective consecutive study was done with follow-ups weekly for 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12 and 30 months. Main outcome measures were proportion of patients who were free of pain and back-related disability and proportion of patients found to have received additional healthcare at 3-, 6-, 12- and 30-month follow-ups. The physiotherapist predicted additional treatment. Eighty consecutive patients were included. 39 low back pain and 17 neck pain patients underwent 30 months of follow-up. The results on a group level were consistent from about 4 weeks. In the low back pain group, 41% reported no pain and no disability after 30 months, within 3 months 33% and within 30 months 64% had received additional healthcare. In the neck pain group, 12% reported no pain and no disability after 30 months, within 3 months 59% and within 30 months 71% had received additional healthcare. A higher proportion of the patients, predicted with a high probability to seek additional care also reported additional care. It can be expected that half the back pain patients being cared for in primary care will continue to suffer from problems 30 months later. The slope of recovery is most prominent during the first 4 weeks, and a worse outcome is in the neck pain patients. Further healthcare is not equal to self-reported back pain problems at baseline. The 4-week evaluation can be used to predict groups with future healthcare utilization up until 30 months. Further studies including larger cohorts are needed to confirm the results.
|
|
