| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Djavani-Gidlund, Khatereh, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
A comparative study of extra- and intraluminal sigmoid colonic tonometry to detect colonic hypoperfusion after operation for abdominal aortic aneurysm
- 2011
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 42:3, s. 302-308
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: There is no ideal method to monitor colonic perfusion after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim was to evaluate extraluminal sigmoid colon tonometry, comparing with the established intraluminal method. Methods: Eighteen patients were monitored with both methods, 10 after elective and eight after ruptured AAA repair. One tonometric catheter was placed inside the sigmoid colon (intraluminal) and another extraluminally in close contact with the serosa of the sigmoid colon (extraluminal). Intra- and extraluminal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) were measured every 10 min during 48 h postoperatively, 1536 simultaneous measurements. Intraluminal pH (pHi) and extraluminal pH (pHe) were calculated, and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured, every 4 h. Colonic ischaemia was defined as pHi ≤ 7.1. Results: Mean pHi was 7.18 ± 0.11 and mean pHe was 7.28 ± 0.09. With a pHe cut-off value of ≤7.2, the sensitivity and specificity to detect colonic ischaemia were 95% and 95%, respectively. Accuracy was 95% and the positive and negative predictive values 0.80 and 0.99, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 19 and the negative likelihood ratio 0.05. Conclusion: Extraluminal tonometry may serve as a screening test: A pHe-value <7.2 indicates suspected colonic ischaemia, meriting further investigation. It was not able to evaluate the severity of ischaemia.
|
|
| 3. |
- Djavani Gidlund, Khatereh, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- 2011
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 41:6, s. 742-747
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To investigate the frequency of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH)and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) after endovascular repair (EVAR) of rupturedabdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).Methods: This was a prospective clinical study. Patients with endovascular repair of rAAAbetween April 2004 and May 2010 were included. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measuredin the bladder every 4 h. IAH and ACS were defined according to the World Society of theAbdominal Compartment Syndrome consensus document. Early conservative treatments(diuretics, colloids and neuromuscular blockade) were given to patients with IAP > 12 mmHg.Results: Twenty-nine patients, who underwent endovascular repair of a rAAA, had their IAPmonitored. Twenty-five percent of them were in shock at arrival. Postoperatively, 10/29(34%) patients had an IAP > 15 mmHg and six (21%) had an IAP > 20 mmHg. Three (3/29,10%) patients developed ACS that necessitated abdominal decompression in two. Five out ofsix patients with IAP > 20 mmHg presented with preoperative shock. All patients except onewith preoperative shock developed some degree of IAH.Conclusion: IAH and ACS are common and potential serious complications after EVAR for rAAA.Successful outcome depends on early recognition, early conservative treatment to reduce IAHand decompression laparotomy if ACS develops.
|
|
| 4. |
- Djavani Gidlund, Khatereh
(författare)
-
Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Colonic Hypoperfusion after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
- 2011
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Colonic ischaemia (CI), Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are devastating complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. The aims of this thesis were to study the incidence and clinical consequences of IAH/ACS and the association between CI and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) among patients undergoing OR for ruptured AAA (rAAA), to compare extraluminal pHi monitoring, with standard intra-luminal monitoring among patients operated on for AAA, and to study the frequency and clinical consequences of IAH/ACS after endovascular repair (EVAR) for rAAA. The incidence of ACS was 26% in a retrospective study of 27 patients undergoing OR for rAAA. Consensus definitions on IAH/ACS were appropriate for patients after OR for rAAA: 78% (7/9) of patients with IAH grade III or IV developed organ failure and all patients who developed CI had some degree of IAH. Active fluid resuscitation treating hypovolaemia to avoid CI may partly cause IAH. The association between CI and IAP was investigated in a prospective study on 29 patients operated on for rAAA, 86% (25/29) were treated for hypovolaemia and ten (34%) had both IAH and CI. Since monitoring colonic perfusion is very important and there is no ideal method, a new technique, extraluminal colonic tonometry to detect colonic perfusion was compared with standard intraluminal tonometry. Although, this new method was not able to determine the severity of ischaemia it may serve as a screening test. EVAR of rAAA is feasible and patients may benefit from this less invasive procedure. Of 29 patients treated with this technique, 10% developed ACS, and all patients except one with preoperative shock developed some degree of IAH. In conclusion, IAP/ACS is common after both OR and EVAR for rAAA, and is associated with adverse outcome. Monitoring IAP and colonic perfusion with timely intervention may improve outcome.
|
|
| 5. |
- Ersryd, Samuel, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's Choice - Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm : A Nationwide Population Based Study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 52:2, s. 158-165
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective/Background: The understanding of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), and its importance for outcome, has increased over time. The aim was to investigate the incidence and clinical consequences of ACS after open (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR) for ruptured and intact infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA and iAAA, respectively). Methods: In 2008, ACS and decompression laparotomy (DL) were introduced as variables in the Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc), offering an opportunity to study this complication in a prospective, population based design. Operations carried out in the period 2008-13 were analysed. Of 6,612 operations, 1,341 (20.3%) were for rAAA (72.0% OR) and 5,271 (79.7%) for iAAA (41.9% OR). In all, 3,171 (48.0%) were operated on by OR and 3,441 by EVAR. Prophylactic open abdomen (OA) treatment was validated through case records. Cross-matching with the national population registry secured valid mortality data. Results: After rAAA repair, ACS developed in 6.8% after OR versus 6.9% after EVAR (p = 1.0). All major complications were more common after ACS (p<.001). Prophylactic OA was performed in 10.7% of patients after OR. For ACS, DL was performed in 77.3% after OR and 84.6% after EVAR (p=.433). The 30 day mortality rate was 42.4% with ACS and 23.5% without ACS (p <.001); at 1 year it was 50.7% versus 31.8% (p <.001). After iAAA repair, ACS developed in 1.6% of patients after OR versus 0.5% after EVAR (p <.001). Among those with ACS, DL was performed in 68.6% after OR and in 25.0% after EVAR (p=.006). Thirty day mortality was 11.5% with ACS versus 1.8% without it (p <.001); at 1 year it was 27.5% versus 6.3% (p <.001). When ACS developed, renal failure, multiple organ failure, intestinal ischaemia, and prolonged intensive care were much more frequent (p <.001). Morbidity and mortality were similar, regardless of primary surgical technique (OR/EVAR/iAAA/rAAA). Conclusion: ACS and OA were common after treatment for rAAA. ACS is a devastating complication after surgery for rAAA and iAAA, irrespective of operative technique, emphasizing the importance of prevention.
|
|
| 6. |
- Ersryd, Samuel, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's Choice - Abdominal Compartment Syndrome after Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm : Subgroups, Risk Factors, and Outcome
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : W B SAUNDERS CO LTD. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 58:5, s. 671-679
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a serious complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim was to investigate outcome among subgroups and factors associated with outcome, with emphasis on the duration of intra-abdominal hypertension before treatment.Methods: Since 2008, ACS and decompressive laparotomy (DL) after AAA repair are registered prospectively in the Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc). Registry data and case records were reviewed. Subgroups were defined by main pathophysiological finding at DL, timing of DL after AAA repair, and treatment modality.Results: During 2008-2015, 120 of 8765 patients undergoing surgery for infrarenal AAA developed postoperative ACS (1.4%). Eighty-three followed ruptured AAA (rAAA); 45 open surgical repairs (OSR) and 38 endovascular (EVAR), and thirty-seven after intact AAA (iAAA); 30 OSR and seven EVAR. The main pathophysiological findings at DL were bowel ischaemia in 27 (23.3%), post-operative bleeding in 34 (29.3%), and general oedema in 55 (47.4%). DL was performed <24 hours after AAA repair in 56 (48.7%), 24-48 hours in 30 (26.1%), and >48 hours in 29 patients (25.2%). The overall 90 day mortality was 50.0%, neither different depending on main pathophysiological finding, nor on the timing of DL. In multivariable regression analysis, age was a predictor of mortality (p = .017), while duration of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) prior to DL predicted the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (p = .033). DL was performed earlier after EVAR compared with OSR in rAAA (p < .001).Conclusions: Mortality in ACS was high, irrespective of the main pathophysiological finding and timing of DL. The duration of IAH prior to DL predicted the need for RRT. DL was performed earlier after EVAR than after OSR for rAAA, underlining the importance of monitoring IAP after EVAR for rAAA.
|
|
| 7. |
- Ersryd, Samuel, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk Factors for Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm : A Case Control Study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 62:3, s. 400-407
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) increasingly often. Despite rEVAR being a minimally invasive method, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) remains a significant post-operative threat. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for ACS after rEVAR, including aortic morphological features. Methods: The Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc) was assessed for ACS after rEVAR in the period 2008 - 2015. All patients identified were compared with controls (i.e., patients who did not develop ACS after rEVAR), matched by centre and repair date. Case records were reviewed, and radiology images analysed in a core laboratory. Comparisons were performed with respect to physiological and radiological risk factors. Results: The study population consisted of 40 patients with ACS and 68 controls. Pre-operatively, patients with ACS had a lower blood pressure (BP) than controls (median 70 mmHg vs. 97 mmHg; p <.001). Intra-operatively, they had aortic balloon occlusion more often (55.0% vs. 10.3%; p <.001) and received more transfusions than controls (median nine units of packed red blood cells [pRBC] vs. two units; p <.001). Ninety-seven per cent of those who developed ACS had a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, aortic balloon occlusion, or received more than five pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the instructions for use did not differ between patients and controls (57.5% vs. 54.4%; p=.84), and neither did the pre-operative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (57.1% vs. 63.9%; p=.52) nor the number of visible lumbar arteries on pre-operative imaging (2 vs. 4; p=.014). In multivariable logistic regression, the number of intra-operative transfusions were predictive of ACS (p <.001), while pre-operative hypotension (p=.32) and aortic balloon occlusion (p=.018) were not. Conclusion: ACS after rEVAR is mainly associated with physiological factors and is unlikely to develop without the presence of a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, the need for an aortic occlusion balloon, or more than five intraoperative pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the IFU or any other morphological factor were not associated with a risk of ACS.
|
|
| 8. |
- Gavali, Hamid, et al.
(författare)
-
Semi-Conservative Treatment Versus Radical Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 66:3, s. 397-406
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Abdominal aortic graft and endograft infections (AGIs) are rare complications following aortic surgery. Radical surgery (RS) with resection of the infected graft and reconstruction with extra-anatomical bypass or in situ reconstruction is the preferred therapy. For patients unfit for RS, a semi-conservative (SC), graft preserving strategy is possible. This paper aimed to compare survival and infection outcomes between RS and SC treatment for AGI in a nationwide cohort.Methods: Patients with abdominal AGI related surgery in Sweden between January 1995 and May 2017 were identified. The Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria were used for the definition of AGI. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.Results: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with surgically treated abdominal AGI were identified, comprising 43 SC (14 endografts; 53% with a graft enteric fistula [GEF] in total) and 126 RS (26 endografts; 50% with a GEF in total). The SC cohort was older and had a higher frequency of cardiac comorbidities. There was a non-significant trend towards lower Kaplan -Meier estimated five year survival for SC vs. RS (30.2% vs. 48.4%; p = .066). A non-significant trend was identified towards worse Kaplan -Meier estimated five year survival for SC patients with a GEF vs. without a GEF (21.7% vs. 40.1%; p = .097). There were significantly more recurrent graft infections comparing SC with RS (45.4% vs. 19.3%; p < .001). In a Cox regression model adjusting for confounders, there was no difference in five year survival comparing SC vs. RS (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 -1.5).Conclusion: In this national AGI cohort, there was no mortality difference comparing SC and RS for AGI when adjusting for comorbidities. Presence of GEF probably negatively impacts survival outcomes of SC patients. Rates of recurrent infection remain high for SC treated patients.
|
|
| 9. |
- Gavali, Hamid, et al.
(författare)
-
Semi-Conservative Treatment Versus Surgery in Abdominal Aortic Graft and Endograft Infections
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 66:3, s. 397-406
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Abdominal aortic graft and endograft infections (AGIs) are rare complications following aortic surgery. Radical surgery (RS) with resection of the infected graft and reconstruction with extra-anatomical bypass or in situ reconstruction is the preferred therapy. For patients unfit for RS, a semi-conservative (SC), graft-preserving strategy is possible. This paper aimed to compare survival and infection outcomes between RS and SC treatment for AGI in a nationwide cohort.METHODS: Patients with abdominal AGI-related surgery in Sweden between January 1995 and May 2017 were identified. The Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria were used for definition of AGI. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with mortality.RESULTS: A total of 169 patients with surgically treated abdominal AGI were identified, comprising 43 SC [14 endografts; 53% with a graft-enteric fistula (GEF) in total] and 126 RS [26 endografts; 50% with a GEF in total]. The SC cohort was older and had a higher frequency of cardiac comorbidities. There was a non-significant trend towards lower Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year survival for SC versus RS (30.2% vs. 48.4%; p = .066). A non-significant trend was identified towards worse Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year survival for SC patients with a GEF versus without a GEF (21.7% vs. 40.1%; p = .097). There were significantly more recurrent graft infections comparing SC versus RS (45.4% vs. 19.3%; p < .001). In a Cox regression model adjusting for confounders, there was no difference in 5-year survival comparing SC versus RS (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 - 1.5).CONCLUSION: In this national AGI cohort, we could not identify any mortality difference comparing SC versus RS for AGI when adjusting for comorbidities. Presence of GEF likely negatively impacts survival outcomes of SC patients. Rates of recurrent infection remain high for SC-treated patients.
|
|
| 10. |
- Gunnarsson, Kim, et al.
(författare)
-
Endovascular Versus Open Repair as Primary Strategy for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm : A National Population-based Study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 51:1, s. 22-28
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: In randomized trials, no peri-operative survival benefit has been shown for endovascular (EVAR) repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) when compared with open repair. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of primary repair strategy on early and midterm survival in a non-selected population based study.METHODS: The Swedish Vascular Registry was consulted to identify all rAAA repairs performed in Sweden in the period 2008-12. Centers with a primary EVAR strategy (treating > 50% of rAAA with EVAR) were compared with centers with a primary open repair strategy. Peri-operative outcome, midterm survival, and incidence of rAAA repair/100,000 inhabitants aged > 50 years were assessed.RESULTS: In total, 1,304 patients were identified. Three primary EVAR centers (pEVARc) operated on 236 patients (74.6% EVAR). Twenty-six primary open repair centers (pORc) operated 1,068 patients (15.6% EVAR). Patients treated at pEVARc were more often referrals (28.0% vs. 5.3%; p < .01), had a higher rate of respiratory comorbidity (36.5% vs. 21.9%; p < .01), and higher pre-operative systolic blood pressure (84.3 vs. 72.3 mmHg; p < .01). There was no difference in mortality based on primary treatment strategy at 30 days (pEVARc 28.0%, n = 66; pORc 27.4%, n = 296 [p = .87]), 1 year (pEVARc 39.9%, n = 93; pORc 34.7%, n = 366 [p = .19]), or 2 years (42.1%, n = 94; 38.3%, n = 394 [p = .28]), either overall or in subgroups based on age or referral status. Overall, patients treated with EVAR were older (mean age 76.4 vs. 74.0 years; p < .01), and had a lower 30 day mortality (EVAR 21.6%, n = 74; odds ratio 29.6%, n = 288 [p = < .01]). Incidence of rAAA repair was lower in pEVARc regions (6.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.01-7.13) when compared with pORc regions (8.15, 95% CI 7.64-8.66).CONCLUSION: There was no difference in mortality after rAAA repair among centers with a primary EVAR approach when compared with a primary open repair strategy, either peri-operatively or in the midterm. The study supports the early findings of the randomized controlled trials in a national population based setting.
|
|
| 11. |
- Jonsson, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Near Infrared Spectroscopy as a Predictor for Shunt Requirement During Carotid Endarterectomy
- 2017
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 53:6, s. 783-791
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective/Background: Near infrared speCtroscopy (NIRS) continuously monitors regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) in the frontal lobes. This method may be used in patients during carotid endarterectomy to indicate the need for shunting. The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of NIRS in determining the need for selective shunting during CEA. A secondary aim was to compare NIRS with stump pressure.Methods: Between January 2013 and October 2016, 185 patients from two vascular units, undergoing CEA under local anaesthesia were prospectively included. All patients gave informed consent to participate; there were no exclusion criteria. A Foresight® oximeter was used for rSO2 measurement, which was compared with stump pressure. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify optimal cutoff points, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.Results: Twenty patients (10.8%) developed neurological symptoms during clamping. Mean stump pressure was lower in the group that developed neurological symptoms than in the group who did not (34 +/- 19 mmHg vs. 55 +/- 17 mmHg [p < . 01]). Corresponding NIRS results for the decrease in rSO2 on the ipsilateral side was 15 +/- 7% versus 4 +/- 6% (p < .01). Using stump pressure <= 50 mmHg as cutoff value for predicting symptoms, the sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64-95) and specificity 54% (95% CI 46-61). With a relative decrease in NIRS saturation (triangle rSO2) of 9%, sensitivity was 95% (95% CI 76-99), and specificity 81% (95% CI 74-86) to predict ischaemic symptoms during carotid clamping. Neurological deterioration during carotid clamping was detected in one patient with a relative decrease in rSO2 of <9% compared with three patients with a stump pressure >50 mmHg.Conclusion: NIRS allows continuous non-invasive monitoring of cerebral oxygenation during CEA, with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in predicting cerebral ischaemia and the need for shupting, which makes it an attractive alternative to stump pressure.
|
|
| 12. |
- McGreevy, David T., 1988-, et al.
(författare)
-
A 12-year experience of endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in all patients
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Vascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 0741-5214 .- 1097-6809. ; 77:3, s. 741-749
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly performed for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). However, multiple randomized trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit compared with open aortic surgery. During a 12-year period, 100% of patients without a history of aneurysm surgery had undergone EVAR for a rAAA at orebro University Hospital, with no emergent open aortic surgery performed. In the present study, we evaluated the mortality and technical success during this "EVAR-only" period.Methods: A single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted. We identified all patients who had presented to Orebro University Hospital with a rAAA between October 2009 and September 2021. Patients with isolated iliac artery, thoracic, and thoracoabdominal aortic ruptures were not included. Patients who had received previous aortic interventions (open or endovascular) and patients who had received palliative treatment instead of surgical intervention were also excluded. The patient characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data, and mortality rate were investigated.Results: EVAR had been performed in 100 patients. Preoperative hemodynamic instability had been present in 54 patients (54%), and 18 (18%) had undergone aortic balloon occlusion. The aneurysm location was infrarenal in 89 patients (89%). Bifurcated stent grafts had been used in 97 patients (97%), and adjunct endovascular techniques had been used for 27 patients (27%). Of 98 patients, EVAR had been performed with the patient under local anesthesia for 62 patients (63%). Peri-and postoperative complications at 30 days had occurred in 20 of 100 patients (20%) and 22 of 79 patients (28%), respectively. The overall mortality at 30 days was 27% (27 of 100 patients), and the mortality for those with an isolated infrarenal rAAA was 24% (21 of 89 patients). The overall mortality at 1 year was 39% (39 of 100 patients) and for those with an isolated infrarenal rAAA was 37% (33 of 89 patients). The presence of preoperative hemodynamic instability and the use of ABO were statistically significantly and independently associated with increased 30-day mortality on multivariate logistic regression analysis.Conclusions: All 100 patients who had undergone surgery for a rAAA had been treated using EVAR and endovascular adjuncts, with a relatively low mortality rate, thus continuing the "EVAR-only" approach. A low proportion of rAAA patients were considered surgically unsuitable. These findings support the applicability of EVAR for the treatment of all rAAAs at suitable centers.
|
|
| 13. |
- Svensjö, Sverker, et al.
(författare)
-
Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 124:10, s. 1118-1123
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:Screening elderly men with ultrasound is an established method to reduce mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA; Evidence Level 1a). Such programs are being implemented and generally consist of a single scan at 65 years of age. We report the results from screening 65-year-old men for AAA in middle Sweden.METHODS AND RESULTS:All 65-year-old men (n=26,256), identified through the National Population Registry, were invited to an ultrasound examination. An AAA was defined as a maximum infrarenal aortic diameter of ≥30 mm. In total, 22 187 (85%) accepted, and 373 AAAs were detected (1.7%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 1.9). With 127 previously known AAAs (repaired/under surveillance) included, the total prevalence of the disease in the population was 2.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 2.4). Self-reported smoking (odds ratio, 3.4; P<0.001), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 2.0; P<0.001), and hypertension (odds ratio, 1.6; P=0.001) were independently associated with AAA in a multivariate logistic regression model. Thirteen percent of the entire population reported to be current smokers, one third of the frequency reported in the 1980s. The observed low prevalence of AAA was explained mainly by this change in smoking habits.CONCLUSIONS:On the basis of the observed reduced exposure to risk factors, lower-than-expected prevalence of AAA among 65-year-old men, unchanged AAA repair rate, and significantly improved longevity of the elderly population, the current generally agreed-on AAA screening model can be questioned. Important issues to address are the threshold diameter for follow-up, the possible need for rescreening at a higher age, and selective screening among smokers.
|
|
| 14. |
- Sörelius, Karl, et al.
(författare)
-
Open Abdomen Treatment after Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure and Mesh-mediated Fascial Traction
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 45:6, s. 588-594
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES:Open abdomen (OA) treatment is sometimes necessary after surgery for aortic aneurysm (AA), to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). A multicentre study evaluating vacuum-assisted wound closure (100-150 mmHg) and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) was performed.METHODS:All patients treated with OA after AA repair (2006-2009) were prospectively registered at four centres; those treated <5 days were excluded. All surviving patients underwent a 1-year follow-up, including computed tomography (CT) examination.RESULTS:Among 1041 patients treated with open or endovascular repair of AA, 28 (2.9%) had OA treatment with VAWCM; another two had VAWCM after hybrid operations for thoraco-abdominal AA. Eighteen (60%) were operated on for rupture and 12 (40%) electively. Eight had suprarenal or thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. Eight (27%) died within 30 days, none due to OA-related complications. Four died before abdominal closure; primary delayed fascial closure was achieved in all survivors. One-year mortality was 50%. Ten (33%) had bowel ischaemia requiring bowel resection. Late potential OA-related infectious complications occurred in five (17%), all of whom first developed intestinal ischaemia: entero-atmospheric fistulae (two), graft infections (two), aorto-enteric fistula (one). One year follow-up with clinical evaluation and CT showed no signs of graft infection. Incisional hernias occurred in 9 of 15 patients (60%); only three were symptomatic.CONCLUSION:VAWCM provided high fascial closure rate after AA repair and long-term OA treatment. Infectious complications occur after intestinal ischaemia and prolonged OA treatment, and are often fatal. The poor prognosis among patients needing OA after AA surgery may be improved by using VAWCM, permitting earlier closure.
|
|
| 15. |
- Thorbjørnsen, Knut
(författare)
-
Aspects of subaneurysmal aortas in a screening setting
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- With the introduction of screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) more individuals are being identified with a subaneurymal aorta (SAA; diameter 25-29mm). More recent data indicate that these aortas may not be as harmless as previously thought, but there is, however, no general agreement on how SAA should be managed.The aims of this thesis were to study men with screening detected SAA, regarding: (I) prevalence, risk factors and comorbidities; (II), the long-term natural course regarding development to AAA ≥30mm, in particular the progression to AAA ≥55mm, to assess the AAA repair rate, turn down, and mortality rates; (III) the association between aortic morphological baseline factors; (SAA diameter, aortic index related to height and body surface area as well as relative aortic diameter to proximal aorta) and the risk for later progression to AAA ≥55mm; and (IV) describe health utility (HU) values and compare them in men with screened AAA, SAA and in men with normal aortic diameters.There was a marked similarity in the risk factor profile between men with SAA representing 2% of the screening population and men with AAA with smoking as the most important risk factor, with an incremental association between smoking and disease severity. Most SAAs eventually progress to an AAA ≥30mm, of which 30% eventually reach the threshold for AAA-repair within 10 years. A follow-up policy with an ultrasound scan after five years can safe and effectively identify those at risk of developing clinically relevant AAAs, and should be considered for anyone with reasonably good life expectancy. Baseline SAA diameter, aortic size index, and aortic height index were all independently associated with progression to AAA ≥55mm, with aortic size index as the strongest predictor, whereas relative aortic diameter was not. These morphological factors may be considered for stratification of follow-up at initial screening. At baseline screening, HUs were similar between men with AAA, SAA, and normal aortas. Compared to SAAs and controls, lower health utility scores were observed in men with AAA after five years, most likely associated with higher frequency of smoking and comorbidities.
|
|
| 16. |
- Thorbjörnsen, Knut, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's Choice - Long-term Outcome After EndoVAC Hybrid Repair of Infected Vascular Reconstructions
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 51:5, s. 724-732
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective/Background: Vascular graft infection is a serious and challenging complication. In situations when neither traditional radical surgery nor conservative negative pressure wound therapy (VAC) alone, are considered feasible or safe, for example due to bleeding, adverse anatomy, or severe comorbidity, a novel hybrid procedure was developed. The EndoVAC technique consists of (i) relining of the infected reconstruction with a stent graft; (ii) surgical revision (without clamping the reconstruction); and (iii) VAC therapy, to permit granulation and secondary delayed healing, and long-term antibiotic treatment. The aim of the study is to report long-term follow up data of this new treatment modality. Methods: From November 2007 to June 2015, 17 EndoVAC procedures were performed in 16 patients (eight men, aged 16-91 years): six infected carotid patches after carotid endarterectomy, three infected neck deviations, two infected femoro-popliteal bypasses, three infected patches after femoral thrombo-endarterectomy, and two infected vascular accesses. Surveillance was performed routinely every 3-6 months and included clinical examination, hematologic tests, duplex ultrasonography, and imaging techniques, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Results: Primary technical success rate was 100%. Antibiotics were prescribed for a median of 3 months (range 1-20 months). The median duration of VAC treatment was 14 days (range 9-57 days). Complications included early, transient stroke (n = 1), temporary hypoglossal palsy (n = 1), and late, asymptomatic occluded bypasses (n = 2), stent graft thrombosis (n = 1), and moderate carotid stenosis (n = 1). After a median of 5 years (range 1-90 months) of follow up, all patients had healed graft infections with no recurrence was observed. Eight patients died as a result of severe comorbidities, unrelated to the infection or hybrid procedure, 1 month 7 years after treatment. Conclusion: The EndoVAC technique is an alternative, less invasive, option for treatment of infected vascular reconstructions in selected cases, when neither traditional radical surgery, nor conservative simple negative pressure wound therapy are considered feasible or safe. The exact indications for this alternative hybrid treatment need to be established.
|
|
| 17. |
- Thorbjörnsen, Knut, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence and natural history of and risk factors for subaneurysmal aorta among 65-year-old men
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. - : TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. - 0300-9734 .- 2000-1967. ; 124:3, s. 180-186
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of screening-detected subaneurysmal aorta (SAA), i.e. an aortic diameter of 2.5-2.9 cm, its associated risk factors, and natural history among 65-year-old men.Methods: A total of 14,620 men had their abdominal aortas screened with ultrasound and completed a health questionnaire containing information on smoking habits and medical history. They were categorized based on the aortic diameter: normal aorta (n = 14,129), SAA (2.5-2.9 cm; n = 258), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (>= 3.0 cm; n = 233). The SAA-group was rescanned after 5 years. Associated risk factors were analyzed.Results: The SAA-prevalence was 1.9% (95% confidence interval 1.7%-2.1%), with 57.0% (50.7%-63.3%) expanding to >= 3.0 cm within 5 years. Frequency of smoking, coronary artery disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and claudication were significantly higher in those with SAA and AAA compared to those with normal aortic diameter. Current smoking was the strongest risk factor for SAA (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; P < 0.001) and even stronger for AAA (OR 3.6; P < 0.001). Men with SAA expanding to AAA within 5 years presented pronounced similarities to AAA at baseline.Conclusions: Men with SAA and AAA presented marked similarities in the risk factor profile. Smoking was the strongest risk factor with an incremental association with disease severity, and disease progression. This indicates that SAA and AAA may have the same pathophysiological origin and that SAA should be considered as an early stage of aneurysm formation. Further research on the cost-effectiveness and potential benefits of surveillance as well as smoking cessation and secondary cardiovascular prevention in this subgroup is warranted.
|
|
