| 1. |
- Begley, Cecily, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
A systematic review identifying outcomes to measure the effect of oxytocin used in treating delay in labour
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Optimizing childbirth across Europe - an intedisciplinary maternity care conference. 9-10 April 2014, Brussels. Part of COST Action IS0907: Childbirth Cultures, Concerns & Consequences: Creating a dynamic EU framework for Optimal maternity care..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Different outcome measures have been used in studies examining the effects of oxytocin used to treat delay in labour. Comparison of study results is thus difficult, and evidence is inconsistent. Aims of review: To identify outcomes, including salutogenic, positive, health-focussed outcomes, used in systematic reviews and randomised trials designed to measure the effectiveness of oxytocin used to treat delay in labour. This review was supported by the European Commission under COST Action:IS0907. Search and review methodology: A comprehensive search strategy was employed, and eight relevant citation databases were searched up to January 2013. randomised trials, and systematic reviews of randomised trials, that measured effectiveness of oxytocin in treating delay in labour were included. Trials comparing different action lines on partograms or active management of labour were excluded. Two reviewers screened a total of 1918 citations identified and data were extracted independently. no results were to be used, therefore no quality assessment of papers was required. five systematic reviews and 26 randomised trials were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were recorded and frequency distributions calculated. Findings: Primary outcomes used most frequently were caesarean section (n=15, 46%), labour length (n=14, 42%), measurements of uterine activity (n=13, 39%) and mode of vaginal birth (n=9, 27%). maternal satisfaction was identified a priori by only one review and included by four papers as a secondary outcome. no further salutogenic or positive health-focussed outcomes were identified. Conclusions: heterogeneous outcomes were used to measure the effectiveness of oxytocin in treating delay in labour. Additional salutogenic, women-centred and health-focussed outcomes should be included in future randomised trials of oxytocin used as a treatment for delayed labour. An improved focus on salutogenesis in childbirth may result, with potential for increased resilience in women. A core outcome dataset, based on evidence and applicable for evaluating the effects of oxytocin in prolonged labour, should be generated to support future research.
|
|
| 2. |
- Begley, Cecily, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of an intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care: The OptiBIRTH randomised trial (ISRCTN10612254)
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Triennial Congress.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Vaginal birth after a previous caesarean (VBAC) is a safe alternative to repeat caesarean section (CS), is the preferred option of most women and may reduce overall CS rates.1 However, VBAC rates vary; e.g., rates in Germany, Ireland and Italy are considerably lower (29-36%) than those in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland (45-55%). Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to maximise VBAC rates. The OptiBIRTH Project was funded by a European Union Grant: FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-1-HEALTH.2012.3.2-1. Agreement No:305208 Method: A cluster randomised trial was used. A sample size of 12 maternity units was required, each recruiting 120 consenting women, to detect an absolute 15% difference in successful VBACs (increase from 25% in control to 40% in intervention groups), using an ICC of 0.05, with power of >80% and an alpha of 0.05. To allow for loss to follow-up, 15 trial units were randomised across three countries with low VBAC rates (Germany, Ireland and Italy) and the trial commenced April 2014. An evidence-based intervention was introduced in all intervention sites. Control sites had usual care. Interim analysis by an independent Data Monitoring Committee at mid-point permitted continuation. Data were analysed using intention to treat. Key Findings: Recruitment closed October 2015, with the last babies born in December 2015, and data analysis will be completed in April 2016. The primary outcome, comparison of annual VBAC rates for each hospital before and after introduction of the intervention will be presented, and selected secondary outcomes for the recruited women including: mode of birth, perineal trauma, breastfeeding, uterine rupture, wound breakdown, perinatal mortality, Apgar scores, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Discussion: If the OptiBIRTH intervention increases VBAC rates safely, its introduction across Europe could prevent 160,000 unnecessary CSs every year, saving maternity services >€150 million annually and contributing to the normalisation of birth for thousands of women. References: 1 Cunningham et al (2010). National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Vaginal birth after caesarean. Obstet & Gynecol 115(6): 1279-1295. 2 EURO-PERISTAT 2008: CD006066.EURO-PERISTAT Project (2008). European Perinatal Health Report. (www.europeristat.com).
|
|
| 3. |
- Clarke, Mike, et al.
(författare)
-
OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of acomplex intervention to increase vaginalbirth after caesarean section
- 2020
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393 .- 1471-2393.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are lowin many countries.Methods: OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC ratesthrough an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 maternity units with VBAC rates < 35% in Germany, Ireland andItaly. Sites were matched in pairs or triplets based on annual birth numbers and VBAC rate, and randomised, 1:1 or 2:1, intervention versus control, following trial registration. The intervention involved evidence-based education ofclinicians and women with one previous caesarean section (CS), appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review,and joint discussions by women and clinicians. Control sites provided usual care. Primary outcome was annualhospital-level VBAC rates before the trial (2012) versus final year of the trial (2016). Between April 2014 and October2015, 2002 women were recruited (intervention 1195, control 807), with mode-of-birth data available for 1940women.Results: The OptiBIRTH intervention was feasible and safe across hospital settings in three countries. There was nostatistically significant difference in the change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between interventionsites (25.6% in 2012 to 25.1% in 2016) and control sites (18.3 to 22.3%) (odds ratio adjusted for differences betweenintervention and control groups (2012) and for homogeneity in VBAC rates at sites in the countries: 0.87, 95% CI:0.67, 1.14, p = 0.32 based on 5674 women (2012) and 5284 (2016) with outcome data. Among recruited womenwith birth data, 4/1147 perinatal deaths > 24 weeks gestation occurred in the intervention group (0.34%) and 4/782in the control group (0.51%), and two uterine ruptures (one per group), a rate of 1:1000.Conclusions: Changing clinical practice takes time. As elective repeat CS is the most common reason for CS inmultiparous women, interventions that are feasible and safe and that have been shown to lead to decreasingrepeat CS, should be promoted. Continued research to refine the best way of promoting VBAC is essential. Thismay best be done using an implementation science approach that can modify evidence-based interventions inresponse to changing clinical circumstances.Trial registration: The OptiBIRTH trial was registered on 3/4/2013. Trial registration number ISRCTN10612254.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Flenady, Vicki, et al.
(författare)
-
Stillbirths : recall to action in high-income countries.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: The Lancet. - 0140-6736 .- 1474-547X. ; 387:10019, s. 691-702
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Variation in stillbirth rates across high-income countries and large equity gaps within high-income countries persist. If all high-income countries achieved stillbirth rates equal to the best performing countries, 19,439 late gestation (28 weeks or more) stillbirths could have been avoided in 2015. The proportion of unexplained stillbirths is high and can be addressed through improvements in data collection, investigation, and classification, and with a better understanding of causal pathways. Substandard care contributes to 20-30% of all stillbirths and the contribution is even higher for late gestation intrapartum stillbirths. National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-income countries. The need to reduce stigma and fatalism related to stillbirth and to improve bereavement care are also clear, persisting priorities for action. In high-income countries, a woman living under adverse socioeconomic circumstances has twice the risk of having a stillborn child when compared to her more advantaged counterparts. Programmes at community and country level need to improve health in disadvantaged families to address these inequities.
|
|
| 6. |
- Gross, Mechthild M., et al.
(författare)
-
Women's experiences on VBAC: results of a metasynthesis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Optimising Childbirth Across Europe, 9-10 April 2014. Brussels, Belgium..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: More and more women experience a caesarean section with their first, or later, birth. During a subsequent pregnancy they experience a challenging period of decision making on the mode of birth. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant option for a large number of women. Despite lots of quantitative studies on VBAC there is a lack of studies that report the experiences of women. Aim of review: To report the main themes of women’s experiences of VBAC. Search strategy: The following databases were searched: CINAHL, EBSCO, Journals@ OVID, Pubmed, PSYCHINFO, using the keywords VBAC, vaginal birth after caesarean section, qualitative study, experiences, qualitative and women´s experiences in various combinations. Review methodology: In total, 1981 papers were identified; of these, 1959 had to be excluded. From the remaining 22 papers eleven were excluded at this stage, as not focusing on women´s experiences, or only focusing on experiences of CS in relation to VBAC. A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. Main findings: Four final themes became obvious: ‘to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,’ ‘vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,’ ‘vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,’ and ‘own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally’. The papers discussed issues such as the women´s experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC, decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. Conclusion: It became obvious that women may feel as though they are in a fog when preparing for a VBAC. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also about positive aspects of VBAC.
|
|
| 7. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section) : a study from countries with low VBAC rates.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393 .- 1471-2393. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and the most common reason is repeat CS following previous CS. For most women a vaginal birth after a previous CS (VBAC) is a safe option. However, the rate of VBAC differs in an international perspective. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Focus group interviews with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of "OptiBIRTH", an ongoing research project. The study reported here aims to explore the views of clinicians from countries with low VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.METHODS: Focus group interviews were held in Ireland, Italy and Germany. In total 71 clinicians participated in nine focus group interviews. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.RESULTS: The findings are presented in four main categories with several sub-categories: 1) "prameters for VBAC", including the importance of the obstetric history, present obstetric factors, a positive attitude among those who are centrally involved, early follow-up after CS and antenatal classes; 2) "organisational support and resources for women undergoing a VBAC", meaning a successful VBAC requires clinical expertise and resources during labour; 3) "fear as a key inhibitor of successful VBAC", including understanding women's fear of childbirth, clinicians' fear of VBAC and the ways that clinicians' fear can be transferred to women; and 4) "shared decision making - rapport, knowledge and confidence", meaning ensuring consistent, realistic and unbiased information and developing trust within the clinician-woman relationship.CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that increasing the VBAC rate depends on organisational factors, the care offered during pregnancy and childbirth, the decision-making process and the strategies employed to reduce fear in all involved.
|
|
| 8. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
- 2012
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393. ; 12:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is a relevant question for a large number of women due to the internationally rising Caesarean section (CS) rate. There is a great deal of research based on quantitative studies but few qualitative studies about women's experiences. Aim: To integrate qualitative findings and deepen the understanding of women's experiences of VBAC. Method: A metasynthesis based on the interpretative meta ethnography method was conducted. The inclusion criterion was peer-review qualitative articles from different disciplines about women's experiences of VBAC. Eleven articles were checked for quality, and eight articles were included in the synthesis. Results: The included studies were from Australia (four), UK (three), and US (one), and studied women's experience in relation to different aspects of VBAC; decision-making whether to give birth vaginally, the influence of health professionals on decision-making, reason for trying a vaginal birth, experiences when choosing VBAC, experiences of giving birth vaginally, and giving birth with CS when preferring VBAC. The main results are presented with the metaphor groping through the fog; for the women the issue of VBAC is like being in a fog, where decision-making and information from the health care system and professionals, both during pregnancy and the birth, is unclear and contrasting. The results are further presented with four themes: 'to be involved in decision about mode of delivery is difficult but important,' 'vaginal birth has several positive aspects mainly described by women,' 'vaginal birth after CS is a risky project,' and 'own strong responsibility for giving birth vaginally'. Conclusion: In order to promote VBAC, more studies are needed from different maternity settings and countries about women's experiences. Women need evidence-based information not only about the risks involved but also positive aspects of VBAC.
|
|
| 9. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
How can the VBAC rates be improved – according to midwives and obstetricians in six European countries.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Trienníal Congress 18-22 June 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: The most common reason for caesarean section (CS) is repeat CS following previous CS. Vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) rates vary widely in different healthcare settings and countries. Interview studies with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of ‘OptiBIRTH’, a research project funded by EU aiming to increase VBAC rates across Europe through enhanced woman-centred maternity care. Purpose/Objective: To investigate the views of clinicians on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates. Method: Individual interviews and focus group interviews with clinicians in six countries with high and low VBAC rates were conducted during 2012–2013. 115 clinicians participated: 61 midwives and 54 physicians. Five questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language, translated into English, analysed together, and finally categories were validated in each country. Key Findings: According to midwives and obstetricians from countries with high VBAC rates, the important factors for improving the VBAC rate are a common approach, obstetricians’ final decision on the mode of birth, support during birth, and the strengthening of women’s trust in VBAC. Therefore the structure of the maternity care system in the country, cooperation between midwives and obstetricians, and the care offered during pregnancy and birth should be focused. Findings from the low VBAC countries will be presented at the conference and shows similarities in some aspects but also major differences. Discussion: Similarities and differences between factors of importance for improving the VBAC rate are related to both the care structure, and the views and attitudes of midwives and physicians, which has implications for the care of women post CS.
|
|
| 10. |
- Möller, Ann-Beth, et al.
(författare)
-
Are midwives ready to provide quality evidence-based care after pre-service training? Curricula assessment in four countries-Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: PLOS global public health. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 2767-3375. ; 2:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This research sought to map midwifery pre-service training curricula as part of the Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce perinatal morTality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa (ALERT) project conducted in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. We conducted the review in two phases. In the first phase, online interviews were performed with the lead project midwives in all four study countries to get an overview of midwifery care providers' pre-service training courses, registration, and licensing requirements. We performed a mapping review of midwifery care providers' pre-service training curricula from different training institutions in the four study countries during the second phase. Curricula were reviewed and mapped against the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) Essential Competencies framework to assess whether these curricula included the minimum essential training components described in the ICM framework. We identified 10 different professional titles for midwifery care providers. The number of years spent in pre-service training varied from one and a half to four years. Ten pre-service curricula were obtained and the assessment revealed that none of the curricula included all ICM competencies. Main gaps identified in all curricula related to women-centred care, inclusion of women in decision making, provision of care to women with unintended or mistimed pregnancy, fundamental human rights of individuals and evidence-based learning. This review suggests that there are skills, knowledge and behaviour gaps in pre-service training curricula for midwifery care providers when mapped to the ICM Essential Competencies framework. These gaps are similar among the different training courses in participating countries. The review also draws attention to the plethora of professional titles and different pre-service training curricula within countries. Trial registration: PACTR202006793783148-June 17th, 2020.
|
|
| 11. |
- Möller, Ann-Beth, et al.
(författare)
-
Midwifery care providers' childbirth and immediate newborn care competencies: A cross-sectional study in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: PLOS global public health. - 2767-3375. ; 3:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Evidence-based quality care is essential for reducing sub-Saharan Africa's high burden of maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity. Provision of quality care results from interaction between several components of the health system including competent midwifery care providers and the working environment. We assessed midwifery care providers' ability to provide quality intrapartum and newborn care and selected aspects of the working environment as part of the Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce perinatal morTality and morbidity (ALERT) project in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. We used a self-administered questionnaire to assess provider knowledge and their working environment and skills drills simulations to assess skills and behaviours. All midwifery care providers including doctors providing midwifery care in the maternity units were invited to take part in the knowledge assessment and one third of the midwifery care providers who took part in the knowledge assessment were randomly selected and invited to take part in the skills and behaviour simulation assessment. Descriptive statistics of interest were calculated. A total of 302 participants took part in the knowledge assessment and 113 skills drills simulations were conducted. The assessments revealed knowledge gaps in frequency of fetal heart rate monitoring and timing of umbilical cord clamping. Over half of the participants scored poorly on aspects related to routine admission tasks, clinical history-taking and rapid and initial assessment of the newborn, while higher scores were achieved in active management of the third stage of labour. The assessment also identified a lack of involvement of women in clinical decision-making. Inadequate competency level of the midwifery care providers may be due to gaps in pre-service training but possibly related to the structural and operational facility characteristics including continuing professional development. Investment and action on these findings are needed when developing and designing pre-service and in-service training. Trial registration: PACTR202006793783148-June 17th, 2020.
|
|
| 12. |
- Nilsson, Christina, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Women and Birth. - : Elsevier BV. - 1871-5192 .- 1878-1799. ; 30:6, s. 481-490
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Problem and background: Vaginal birth after caesarean section is a safe option for the majority of women. Seeking women´s views can be of help in understanding factors of importance for achieving vaginal birth in countries where the vaginal birth rates after caesarean is low. Aim: To investigate women’s views on important factors to improve the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean in countries where vaginal birth rates after caesarean rates are low. Methods: A qualitative study using content analysis. Data were gathered through focus groups and individual interviews with 51 women, in their native languages, in Germany, Ireland and Italy. The women were asked five questions about vaginal birth after caesarean. Data were translated to English, analysed together and finally validated in each country. Findings: Important factors for the women were that all involved in caring for them were of the same opinion about vaginal birth after caesarean section, thet they experience shared decision-making with clinicians supportive of vaginal birth, receive correct information, are sufficently prepared for a vaginal birth, and experience a culture that supports vaginal birth after caesarean section. Discussion and conclusion: Women’s decision-making about vaginal birth after caesarean in these countries involves a complex, multidimensional interplay of medical, psychological, social, cultural, personal and practical considerations. Further research is needed to explore if the information deficit women report negatively affects their ability to make informed choices, and to understand what matters most to women when making decisions about vaginal birth after caesarean as a mode of birth.
|
|
| 13. |
- Portz, Suniva, et al.
(författare)
-
Midwives and obstetricians’ attitudes towards VBAC: Development and validation of the HCAV-scale
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. - : Elsevier BV. - 1877-5756. ; 27
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To develop a scale that measures attitudes towards vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) among clinicians. Methods: A cross sectional survey among midwives (n = 58) and obstetricians (n = 51). A 23-item “Hannover Clinicians’ Attitudes towards VBAC scale” (HCAV–scale) was developed. Indicators of reliability and validity were assessed, including item-to-total correlation, Cronbach alpha coefficient and factor analysis. Results: The response rate was 35.3% (n = 109). The HCAV–scale showed high construct validity and high internal consistency. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the 23 items was 0.87 (n = 89), indicating good internal consistency of the items. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in factor loadings between 0.34 and 0.70; all 23 items loaded above 0.3 on one factor, providing evidence that the scale can be conceptualized as one dimensional. Conclusions: The HCAV–scale is a reliable and valid tool to assess clinicians’ favourable attitudes towards VBAC. The scale can be used to assess how attitudes of clinicians might contribute to institutional variations in VBAC rates, and has the potential to enhance inter-professional understanding and collaboration around VBAC and quality of care for childbearing people with a previous caesarean.
|
|
| 14. |
- Sinclair, Marlene, et al.
(författare)
-
A systematic literature review of computer-based behavioural change interventions to inform the design of an online VBAC intervention for the OptiBIRTH European randomized trial.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Evidence Based Midwifery. - 1479-4489. ; 15:1, s. 5-13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The aim of this research was o systematically review computer-based, behavior change (BC) interventions during pregnancy and their design components in order to determine their best application within the context of the OptiBIRTH intervention. Design: A systematic literature review was undertaken using the Cochrane collaboration guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Literature searches were conducted in; Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, from database inception to June 2015. Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria was applied to assess the methodological quality of the papers and a taxonomy of BC techniques was used to appraise the interventions. PICO. Participants included healthy pregnant women who were ≥18 years old. The types of intervention used were computer-based interventions designed to facilitate a BC approach in a sample of pregnant women. The comparison was routine antenatal care. The primary outcome included improved health behavior(s), as an indicator of the intention behind the intervention design. Results. A total of 343 papers were identified through database-searching and hand- searching methods; 80 duplicates were removed. From the remaining 263, 244 did not explicitly address the subject under review. Therefore, 19 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; 16 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded at this stage. This resulted in a total of three studies being selected for inclusion in this review (Jackson et al, 2011; Tzilos et al, 2011; Tsoh et al, 2010). The computer-based interventions were designed to bring about BC in relation to alcohol consumption, smoking or diet and exercise during pregnancy. Interventions delivered varied between two types; purely computer-delivered (Tzilos et al. 2011) or a combination of both computer plus face-to-face input (Jackson et al, 2011; Tsoh et al. 2010). Techniques used included motivational interviewing, problem solving cognitive dissonance and goal setting. Types of measurement outcomes varied but were all self-reported behavioral outcomes. Statistically significant improvements in behavioral outcomes were seen in the interventions by Jackson et al (2011) and Tsoh et al (2011), but not in the intervention by Tzilos et al (2011). The GRADE analysis identified that all studies combined lacked blinding and relied on self-reported data increasing risk of bias. Conclusion. This systematic review reports on the best available evidence and theory to design an online component of a complex intervention for use in an RCT to enhance women´s shared decision-making experience about vaginal births after caesarean (VBAC). The review reports the differences between the observed BC approach and that of a decision-making being focused on a more healthy option. As a result, techniques designed to create dissonance are considered appropriate. Shared decision-making, however, is conceptually different, in that the goal is to facilitate a woman in discovering the best direction of travel for her as person. Therefore, the authors argue that it is crucial for healthcare professionals designing complex healthcare interventions (either BC techniques or shared decision-making) to ensure that a person´s self-determination is respected through having access to relevant and understandable information and healthcare professionals who understand a woman´s motivation. However, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions from three studies and there is a requirement for further research.
|
|
| 15. |
- Sinclair, Marlene, et al.
(författare)
-
Assisting women in autonomous decision making about vaginal birth after C section (VBAC): Designing motivational Apps in OptiBIRTH cluster randomised trial (ISRCTN10612254
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Triennial Congress 18-22 June 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Optibirth is a funded FP7 research programme using a cluster randomised trial in Ireland, Germany and Italy, with 15 clusters of 94 women per cluster. The aim of OptiBIRTH is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention aimed at increased VBAC rates through enhanced women-centred care1 .The intervention consisted of motivationally enhanced, evidence-based, educational information for women and clinicians for use in face to face and online modes. Purpose/Objective: This paper reports the design process associated with creating three interrelated mobile apps, as part of a complex intervention, to enable women with a previous caesarean section to decide autonomously between a repeat caesarean section and a vaginal birth. The emphasis has been on using technology creatively and effectively maximizing optimality bearing in mind the needs of the new “Z” generation. Method: Focus groups were undertaken across six European countries to illicit women’s need for information about caesarean section and VBAC. Motivational theory underpinned the development of subsequent e-learning materials to enhance woman-led-decision-making. Ethical approval was obtained from Trinity College University, Dublin. Following analysis of focus group data, consultation with experts and exploration of technological solutions, three electronic applications were designed. Following three iterations, the Apps were reviewed for content, motivational design and functionality by Irish, German and Italian midwifery experts and translated into German and Italian. Key Findings: The following interrelated Apps were designed to provide women and health professionals with rapid access to women’s perceptions of their previous birth experience and their current decision-making-in-progress: “My birth story” uses a wordle to communicate past birth experience “My birth thoughts” enables women to communicate their current decision making “My Birth plan” generates a personalised birth plan Discussion: Discussion will focus on challenges facing midwives including, embedding the Apps into a motivationally-designed portal, staff support and training, timeline, cultural differences and translation issues
|
|
| 16. |
- Smith, Valerie, et al.
(författare)
-
Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome set (SIPCOS)
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BMC Medical Research Methodology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2288. ; 17:61
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Maternity intrapartum care research and clinical care more often focus on outcomes that minimise or prevent adverse health rather than on what constitutes positive health and wellbeing (salutogenesis). This was highlighted recently in a systematic review of reviews of intrapartum reported outcomes where only 8% of 1648 individual outcomes, from 102 systematic reviews, were agreed as being salutogenically-focused. Added to this is variation in the outcomes measured in individual studies rendering it very difficult for researchers to synthesise, fully, the evidence from studies on a particular topic. One of the suggested ways to address this is to develop and apply an agreed standardised set of outcomes, known as a ‘core outcome set’ (COS). In this paper we present a protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum COS (SIPCOS) for use in maternity care research and a SIPCOS for measuring in daily intrapartum clinical care. Methods: The study proposes three phases in developing the final SIPCOSs. Phase one, which is complete, involved the conduct of a systematic review of reviews to identify a preliminary list of salutogenically-focused outcomes that had previously been reported in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions. Sixteen unique salutogenically-focused outcome categories were identified. Phase two will involve prioritising these outcomes, from the perspective of key stakeholders (users of maternity services, clinicians and researchers) by asking them to rate the importance of each outcome for inclusion in the SIPCOSs. A final consensus meeting (phase three) will be held, bringing international stakeholders together to review the preliminary SIPCOSs resulting from the survey and to agree and finalise the final SIPCOSs for use in future maternity care research and daily clinical care. Discussion: The expectation in developing the SIPCOSs is that they will be collected and reported in all future studies evaluating intrapartum interventions and measured/recorded in future intrapartum clinical care, as routine, alongside other outcomes also deemed important in the context of the study or clinical scenario. Using the SIPCOSs in this way, will promote and encourage standardised measurements of positive health outcomes in maternity care, into the future.
|
|
