| 1. |
- Gunnarsdottir, Anna Gudlaug, et al.
(författare)
-
Snemmkominn árangur opinna ósæðarlokuskipta við ósæðarlokuþrengslum hjá konum á Íslandi
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Laeknabladid. - : Laeknabladid/The Icelandic Medical Journal. - 0023-7213 .- 1670-4959. ; 105:5, s. 215-221
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is the second most common open-heart procedure performed in Iceland. The aim of this study was to analyze the early outcome of AVR among females in Iceland.Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study including 428 patients who underwent surgical AVR due to AS in Iceland from 2002-2013. Information was gathered from medical records, including pre-and postoperative results of echocardiography and complications. Overall survival was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) and logistic regression used to identify predictors of operative mortality. The median follow-up time was 8.8 years (0-16.5 years).Results: Of the 428 patients, 151 were female (35.3%), that were on average 2 years older than men (72.6 ± 9.4 vs. 70.4 ± 9.8 yrs., p=0.020). Preoperative symptoms were similar, but women had significantly higher EurosSCORE II than men (5.2 ± 8.8 vs. 3.2 ± 4.6, p=0.002). Maximal pressure-gradient across the aortic valve was higher for women (74.4 ± 29.3 mmHg vs. 68.0 ± 23.4 mmHg, p=0,013) but postoperative complications, operative mortality (8.6% vs. 4.0%, p=0.068) and 5-year survival (78.6% vs. 83.1%, p=0.245) were comparable for women and men. Logistic regression analysis showed that female gender was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.63-3.77).Conclusions: Females constitute one third of patients that undergo AVR for AS in Iceland. At the time of surgery females are two years older than men and appear to have a more significant aortic stenosis at the time of surgery. However, complication rates, operative mortality and long-term survival were comparable for both genders.
|
|
| 2. |
- Helgason, Dadi, et al.
(författare)
-
Acute Kidney Injury After Acute Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0003-4975 .- 1552-6259. ; 111:4, s. 1292-1298
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) using the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection registry. Methods: Patients who underwent ATAAD surgery at 8 Nordic centers from 2005 to 2014 were analyzed for AKI according to the RIFLE criteria. Patients who died intraoperatively, those who had missing baseline or postoperative serum creatinine, and patients on preoperative renal replacement therapy were excluded. Results: AKI occurred in 382 of 941 patients (40.6%), and postoperative dialysis was required for 105 patients (11.0%). Renal malperfusion was present preoperatively in 42 patients (5.1%), of whom 69.0% developed postoperative AKI. In multivariable analysis patient-related predictors of AKI included age (per 10 years; odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.48), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.51-3.09), renal malperfusion (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.23-9.07), and other malperfusion (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.55-2.86). Perioperative predictors were cardiopulmonary bypass time (per 10 minutes; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07) and red blood cell transfusion (OR per transfused unit, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10). Rates of 30-day mortality were 17.0% in the AKI group compared with 6.6% in the non-AKI group (P < .001). In 30-day survivors AKI was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI; 1.24-2.79). Conclusions: AKI is a common complication after surgery for ATAAD and independently predicts adverse long-term outcome. Of note one-third of patients presenting with renal malperfusion did not develop postoperative AKI, possibly because of restoration of renal blood flow with surgical repair. Mortality risk persists beyond the perioperative period, indicating that close clinical follow-up of these patients is required.
|
|
| 3. |
- Helgason, Dadi, et al.
(författare)
-
Acute Kidney Injury Following Acute Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: The Annals of thoracic surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1552-6259 .- 0003-4975. ; 111:4, s. 1292-1298
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) using the NORCAAD registry.Patients that underwent ATAAD surgery at eight Nordic centers from 2005-2014 were analyzed for AKI according to the RIFLE-criteria. Patients who died intraoperatively, those who had missing baseline or postoperative serum creatinine (SCr), and patients on preoperative RRT, were excluded.AKI occurred in 382/941 (40.6%) patients and postoperative dialysis was required for 105 (11.0%) patients. Renal malperfusion was present preoperatively in 42 (5.1%) patients, of whom 69.0% developed postoperative AKI.In multivariable analysis, patient-related predictors of AKI included age (per 10 years, OR=1.30, 95% CI:1.15-1.48), body mass index>30 kg/m2 (OR=2.16, 95% CI:1.51-3.09), renal malperfusion (OR=4.39, 95% CI:2.23-9.07) and other malperfusion (OR:2.10, 95% CI:1.55-2.86). Perioperative predictors were cardiopulmonary bypass time (per 10 minutes, OR=1.04, 95% CI:1.02-1.07) and red blood cell transfusion (OR=1.08, 95% CI:1.06-1.10). Rates of 30-day mortality were 17.0% in the AKI group compared with 6.6% in the non-AKI group (p<0.001). In 30-day survivors, AKI was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (HR=1.86, 95% CI:1.24-2.79).AKI is a common complication following surgery for ATAAD and independently predicts adverse long-term outcome. Of note, one-third of patients presenting with renal malperfusion did not develop postoperative AKI, possibly due to restoration of renal blood flow with surgical repair. Mortality risk persists beyond the perioperative period, indicating that close clinical follow-up of these patients is required.
|
|
| 4. |
- Johannesdottir, Hera, et al.
(författare)
-
Favourable long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in a nationwide cohort
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 51:6, s. 327-333
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. In a nationwide cohort, we analyzed long-term outcome following coronary artery bypass grafting, using the combined strategy of left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery and saphenous vein as secondary graft to other coronary targets. Methods. 1,507 consecutive patients that underwent myocardial revascularization during 2001-2012 in Iceland. Mean follow-up was 6.8 years. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were depicted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox-regression was used to define risk factors. Relative survival was estimated by comparing overall survival to the survival of Icelanders of the same age and gender. Results. Mean age was 66 years, 83% were males, mean EuroSCOREst was 4.5, and 23% of the procedures were performed off-pump. At 5 years, 19.7% had suffered a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event, 4.5% a stroke, 2.2% myocardial infarction, and 6.2% needed repeat revascularization. Overall 5-year survival was 89.9%, with a relative survival of 0.990. Independent predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were left ventricular ejection fraction 30%, a previous history of percutaneous coronary intervention, chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and old age. The same variables and an earlier year of operation were predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusions. The long-term outcome following myocardial revascularization, using the left internal mammary artery and the great saphenous vein as conduits, is favourable and improving. This is reflected by the 5-year survival of 89.9%, deviating minimally from the survival rate of the general Icelandic population, together with a freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events of 80.3%.
|
|
| 5. |
- Long, Thorir Einarsson, et al.
(författare)
-
Mild Stage 1 post-operative acute kidney injury : association with chronic kidney disease and long-term survival
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical Kidney Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 2048-8505 .- 2048-8513. ; 14:1, s. 237-244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. Mild cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) are identified by a small rise in serum creatinine (SCr) according to the KDIGO AKI definition. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term outcomes of individuals with mild AKI.Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent abdominal, cardiothoracic, vascular or orthopaedic surgery at Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland in 1998-2015. Incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), progression of pre-existing CKD and long-term survival were compared between patients with mild Stage 1 AKI (defined as a rise in SCr of >= 26.5 mu mol/L within 48h post-operatively without reaching 1.5 x baseline SCr within 7 days), and a propensity score-matched control group without AKI stratified by the presence of CKD.Results. Pre- and post-operative SCr values were available for 47333 (42%) surgeries. Of those, 1161 (2.4%) had mild Stage 1 AKI and 2355 (5%) more severe forms of AKI. Mild Stage 1 AKI was associated with both incident CKD and progression of pre-existing CKD (P < 0.001). After exclusion of post-operative deaths within 30 days, mild Stage 1 AKI was not associated with worse 1-year survival in patients with preserved kidney function (94% versus 94%, P = 0.660), and same was true for patients with pre-operative CKD (83% versus 82%, P = 0.870) compared with their matched individuals.Conclusions. Mild Stage 1 AKI is associated with development and progression of CKD, but not with inferior 1-year survival. These findings support the inclusion of a small absolute increase in SCr in the definition of AKI.
|
|
| 6. |
- Long, Thorir E., et al.
(författare)
-
Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury : Focus on Renal Recovery Definitions, Kidney Disease Progression and Survival
- 2019
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Nephrology. - : KARGER. - 0250-8095 .- 1421-9670. ; 49:3, s. 175-185
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to examine different definitions of renal recovery following postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and how these definitions associate with survival and the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent abdominal, cardiothoracic, vascular, or orthopedic surgery at a single university hospital between 1998 and 2015. Recovery of renal function following postoperative AKI was assessed comparing 4 different definitions: serum creatinine (SCr) (i) < 1.1 x baseline, (ii) 1.1-1.25 x baseline, (iii) 1.25-1.5 x baseline, and (iv) > 1.5 x baseline. One-year survival and the development or progression of CKD within 5 years was compared with a propensity score-matched control groups.Results: In total, 2,520 AKI patients were evaluated for renal recovery. Risk of incident and progressive CKD within 5 years was significantly increased if patients did not achieve a reduction in SCr to < 1.5 x baseline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50; 95% CI 1.29-1.75) and if renal recovery was limited to a fall in SCr to 1.25-1.5 x baseline (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.12-1.57) within 30 days. The definition of renal recovery that best predicted survival was a reduction in SCr to < 1.5 x baseline within 30 days. One-year survival of patients whose SCr decreased to < 1.5 x baseline within 30 days was significantly better than that of a propensity score-matched control group that did not achieve renal recovery (85 vs. 71%, p < 0.001).Conclusions: These findings should be considered when a consensus definition of renal recovery after AKI is established.
|
|
| 7. |
- Sigurdsson, Martin, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Association Between Preoperative Opioid and Benzodiazepine Prescription Patterns and Mortality After Noncardiac Surgery
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JAMA Surgery. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2168-6254 .- 2168-6262. ; 154:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ImportanceThe number of patients prescribed long-term opioids and benzodiazepines and complications from their long-term use have increased. Information regarding the perioperative outcomes of patients prescribed these medications before surgery is limited. ObjectiveTo determine whether patients prescribed opioids and/or benzodiazepines within 6 months preoperatively would have greater short- and long-term mortality and increased opioid consumption postoperatively. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective, single-center, population-based cohort study included all patients 18 years or older, undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures at a national hospital in Iceland from December 12, 2005, to December 31, 2015, with follow-up through May 20, 2016. A propensity score-matched control cohort was generated using individuals from the group that received prescriptions for neither medication class within 6 months preoperatively. Data analysis was performed from April 10, 2018, to March 9, 2019. ExposuresPatients who filled prescriptions for opioids only, benzodiazepines only, both opioids and benzodiazepines, or neither medication within 6 months preoperatively. Main Outcomes and MeasuresLong-term survival compared with propensity score-matched controls. Secondary outcomes were 30-day survival and persistent postoperative opioid consumption, defined as a prescription filled more than 3 months postoperatively. ResultsAmong 41170 noncardiac surgical cases in 27787 individuals (16004 women [57.6%]; mean [SD] age, 56.3 [18.8] years), a preoperative prescription for opioids only was filled for 7460 cases (17.7%), benzodiazepines only for 3121 (7.4%), and both for 2633 (6.2%). Patients who filled preoperative prescriptions for either medication class had a greater comorbidity burden compared with patients receiving neither medication class (Elixhauser comorbidity index >0 for 16% of patients filling prescriptions for opioids only, 22% for benzodiazepines only, and 21% for both medications compared with 14% for patients filling neither). There was no difference in 30-day (opioids only: 1.3% vs 1.0%; P=.23; benzodiazepines only: 1.9% vs 1.5%; P=.32) or long-term (opioids only: hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.01-1.24]; P=.03; benzodiazepines only: HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.98-1.26]; P=.11) survival among the patients receiving opioids or benzodiazepines only compared with controls. However, patients prescribed both opioids and benzodiazepines had greater 30-day mortality (3.2% vs 1.8%; P=.004) and a greater hazard of long-term mortality (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.64; P<.001). The rate of persistent postoperative opioid consumption was higher for patients filling prescriptions for opioids only (43%), benzodiazepines only (23%), or both (66%) compared with patients filling neither (12%) (P<.001 for all). Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings suggest that opioid and benzodiazepine prescription fills in the 6 months before surgery are associated with increased short-and long-term mortality and an increased rate of persistent postoperative opioid consumption. These patients should be considered for early referral to preoperative clinic and medication optimization to improve surgical outcomes.
|
|
